23.10.2016 Views

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What Are Harmonious Free <strong>Energy</strong> Intro Scenarios?<br />

• Four possible ideas are presented here, and 4 th scenario is analyzed <strong>in</strong> depth:<br />

1- Gradual cost reduction(eg: Coal->Thorium—> “Free energy” Thermonuclear<br />

<strong>Fusion</strong>), 2- Gradual INFRA cost reduction & tech exclusivity WITHIN Free <strong>Energy</strong>;<br />

Start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>with</strong> most expensive & exclusive(eg: <strong>Fusion</strong>)->Less(LENR)->Even<br />

less(<strong>in</strong>ventor tech), 3- In future to allow "free energy device" trad<strong>in</strong>g at Amazon<br />

or ma<strong>in</strong>stream Western governmental trad<strong>in</strong>g web sites; Currently sold at subma<strong>in</strong>stream<br />

web sites(eg Alibaba,+);<br />

• 4-“Co-existence tech model α”: Both low cost & old tech thrive <strong>with</strong> full<br />

endorsement by “trusted authorities”(eg; Free Skype vs Charged phone call)<br />

• Recent “free energy” treatment by ma<strong>in</strong>stream is a repeat of “Co-existence<br />

tech model β ”: obfuscate or completely ignore alternative disruptive <strong>in</strong>vention<br />

when complete cover-up is no longer plausible :i.e “Give a small pie” to<br />

disruptive tech while secur<strong>in</strong>g no further expansion by at least ma<strong>in</strong>stream data<br />

authority orchestration; ”As long as western ma<strong>in</strong>stream <strong>in</strong>ter-references as<br />

real, controversial, or "go unreported", majority believes anyth<strong>in</strong>g” or obliged to<br />

act as if so": Ignore/discredit “free tech” while allow<strong>in</strong>g commercialization<br />

avoids “conversion rush” of ma<strong>in</strong>stream crowd, assist<strong>in</strong>g formulation of<br />

adoption ceil<strong>in</strong>g or gradual transition: Promote debate on theoretical level <strong>with</strong><br />

an agreement “no <strong>in</strong>vestment should take place until theoretical or designated<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional approval comes because it will waste money”, or entirely avoid the<br />

debate as if such th<strong>in</strong>g doesn't exist. - i.e. no development; ->>cont: 336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!