Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12:
Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manmade CO2
• ->>cont 10 Crisis Idea: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming idea ignores:
• p-Other man/noman made element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this
phenomena is not even Western science consensus, only main media/gov’t(except
US since 2017 in west, but many non western nations actually passively not agreeing)
/NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is
opposite of media claims(science consensus but still media level debate exists):
• i-IPCC founding charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing
climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scientists are forced into or tricked into
signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporting
IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P
Reiter+), v-Hurts career to disagree with media/NGO's view regardless of actual
scientific consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Verdier+), vi-Education content altered to
make sense of increasingly contradictory theory(Joh Ball+).
• From pure data tracking/academic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when
"crisis prediction" science-policy was formulated is still being adhered as correct can
be safely stated either some kind of large well coordinated corruption, hoax, fraud, or
beyond normal collective incompetency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data
altering to keep funding/job security/public reputation etc is much more "practical
way to do science" than sticking to pure science,
398