23.10.2016 Views

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Outrageous Claims:<br />

ZPE-Resonance Type WEAPON TECH 7<br />

• -->>cont ■3 WEAPON RELATED:<br />

Controversy regard<strong>in</strong>g claims of Gov't suppress<strong>in</strong>g tech, Its black projects, or Use of<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d related tech, false flag op & pseudo-operation domestically:<br />

• There are ideas of western gov'ts be<strong>in</strong>g directly <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> "conspiracy" of false flag<br />

operation, black projects or covert tech suppressions etc, but this is unlikely to be<br />

accurate: Those operations usually don't officially exist. Also officials' behaviours, far<br />

beyond co<strong>in</strong>cidental cooperation & well timed orchestration of unrelated <strong>in</strong>stitutions,<br />

NGOs, Media etc before-dur<strong>in</strong>g-after events suggest most of those <strong>in</strong>volved are<br />

unknow<strong>in</strong>gly(com<strong>par</strong>tmentalization) or coerced <strong>in</strong>to do<strong>in</strong>g so. Plus witnesses usually<br />

claim they are strongly discouraged from <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g/testify<strong>in</strong>g. So exaggerated<br />

comments like "100% <strong>in</strong>side job"(but this does apply to events like mortgage security<br />

fraud & public funded pay out <strong>in</strong> 2008 where tens of thousonds were clearly aware of<br />

assist this to happen) or "so-and-so organization/ethnic/religious groups are<br />

responsible for all operations" often seem to be used to prevent(<strong>in</strong>stead of clarify<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

from identify<strong>in</strong>g real groups directly <strong>in</strong>volved, or hide a bulk <strong>par</strong>t of groups <strong>in</strong>volved -<br />

if so, is this simply all <strong>in</strong>fight<strong>in</strong>g amongst researchers?, or <strong>par</strong>tly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by black<br />

op cooperators?<br />

• Hence if various data is cross-exam<strong>in</strong>ed, likely more accurate to speculate those<br />

networked events are run by small com<strong>par</strong>tmentalized privatized syndicates<br />

<strong>in</strong>filtrated <strong>in</strong> key positions of wide range of Western <strong>in</strong>stitutions - public & private. 485

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!