23.10.2016 Views

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

Kas Tālāk Aukstas Kodolsintēzes? .. Super Efektīvs Strāvas Ģeneratori Sacenšas par Cilveku Uzmanība(Kopsavilkumu Latviešu) / What's Next Cold Fusion? Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Energy Cleantech with Scientific, Economical & political impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Outrageous claims : <strong>Energy</strong>-Tech Lobby & ZPE -1 Intro<br />

• Claims related to <strong>Energy</strong> tech and Geopoli5cs <strong>in</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g p407-485, even though<br />

by frequent <strong>in</strong>ter-valida5on, have higher mis-<strong>in</strong>fo mix likelihood: They are o@en<br />

related to Space ac5vity, Propulsion, Surveillance, Geo-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Material<br />

science/Electronics /Nanotechnology, cross<strong>in</strong>g over <strong>with</strong> M<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>fluence &<br />

Military applicable technologies, many of which appear to be classified:<br />

WARNING- presented data seem<strong>in</strong>gly stands valid a@er cross exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g differs<br />

significantly from ma<strong>in</strong>stream western media described uniform state of affairs..<br />

• Readers/<strong>par</strong>;cipators are encouraged to either skip en;re Outrageous Claims<br />

segment which ends at p485, or reassess given <strong>in</strong>fo by own detailed<br />

<strong>in</strong>ves;ga;on, especially on what “prevail<strong>in</strong>g balanced common sense” brands as<br />

controversial "conspiracy theory”. Even if data happened to be confirmed<br />

accurate, it should be considered as unconven5onal, non-exclusive <strong>in</strong>terpreta5on<br />

of facts because<br />

• 1-The data would o@en con5nue to fundamentally contradict/upset rest of<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream narra5ve of societal & scien5fic construct,<br />

• 2-ignor<strong>in</strong>g some evidence s5ll makes it possible to s5ck <strong>with</strong> many of ma<strong>in</strong>stream<br />

narra5ves. Or consider this as experimental truth because of its disrup5veness if<br />

prac5cally applied to policy or social movement: -->>cont:<br />

407

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!