2021_Book_TextbookOfPatientSafetyAndClin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
17 Patient Safety in Internal Medicine<br />
remaining 20% during transcription and verification<br />
(12%) or pharmacy dispensing (11%) [42].<br />
Any type of error can result from different proximal<br />
causes and a single proximal cause can lead<br />
to a variety of errors. For example, lack of drug<br />
knowledge can cause wrong choice, dose, frequency,<br />
route, or technique of administration.<br />
Wrong dose can result from lack of drug or<br />
patient knowledge, slip or memory lapses, transcription<br />
errors, and so on. Behind proximal<br />
causes there are latent causes or system failures.<br />
Leape et al. counted 16 different system failures,<br />
but the first seven have in common an impaired<br />
access to information and accounted for 78% of<br />
all MEs, whereas work and staff assignment have<br />
been associated to a broad range of errors such as<br />
slips, dose- and identity-checking, breakdown of<br />
allergy barriers [41].<br />
Frequency of MEs/ADEs in IM has been<br />
poorly investigated. An 8-month prospective,<br />
cross-sectional study found that 89% of the<br />
patients experienced at least one ME during hospitalization,<br />
with a mean of 2.6 errors per patient<br />
or 0.2 errors per ordered medication. More than<br />
70% of MEs happened during prescription. The<br />
most prevalent prescription MEs were inappropriate<br />
drug selection, prescription of unauthorized<br />
drugs or for untreated indications. The most<br />
involved drugs were cardiovascular agents followed<br />
by antibiotics, vitamins, minerals, and<br />
electrolytes [43].<br />
MEs are more frequent and severe in the socalled<br />
high-risk situations due to high-risk<br />
patients and/or providers, medications, or settings.<br />
High-risk patients are younger or older,<br />
multi-morbid or chronic patients (with liver and/<br />
or renal impairment), on polypharmacy [44–47].<br />
High-risk providers are younger or not expert<br />
providers [48, 49]. High-risk systems are hospitals<br />
delivering acute care (e.g. error rates are<br />
likely higher for drugs administered intravenously<br />
compared with other routes [50]) and<br />
high-risk medications are the so-called high-alert<br />
medications (HAMs) and look-alike, sound-alike<br />
medications (LASA). HAMs have a heightened<br />
risk of causing significant patient harm when<br />
used erroneously. They include drugs with a low<br />
therapeutic index and drugs at a high risk of harm<br />
225<br />
when administered by the wrong route or at<br />
wrong dosage or when other system errors occur.<br />
The acronym A-PINCH serves as a reminder of<br />
them, it stays for Anti-infective, Potassium and<br />
other electrolytes, Insulin, Narcotics and other<br />
analgesics, Chemotherapeutic agents, Heparin<br />
and other anticoagulants. LASA are drugs with<br />
similar names or boxes [50].<br />
Although there is no standard definition, polypharmacy<br />
is generally defined as the concurrent<br />
use of five or more medications [51], over-thecounter<br />
and complementary medicines included.<br />
It increases MEs because it reduces compliance<br />
and favors timing and/or dosing errors, duplications,<br />
or omissions. Drug–drug and drug–disease<br />
interactions, instead, increase ADEs [51]. It is<br />
particularly risky in IM as it cares for polypathological<br />
patients, even if internists could be<br />
more aware and cautious, as supposed by a<br />
French study [52].<br />
Care transition is a key moment of care for<br />
several reasons, medication safety included. It<br />
occurs when a patient moves to, or returns from,<br />
home, hospital, residential care setting or simply<br />
outpatient clinics, general practitioners’ office or<br />
consultation. In care transition unintentional<br />
(changes not supported by clinical reason) and/or<br />
undocumented (motivated but not documented<br />
changes) medication discrepancies can occur<br />
[53]. They are MEs that can lead to ADEs. A<br />
mean of 1.72 unintentional discrepancies per<br />
patient have been reported at hospital admission<br />
(0.16 per patient potentially harmful) and 2.05<br />
per patient (0.3 potentially harmful) at discharge<br />
from hospital [54].<br />
Causes of MEs are numerous, so multiple<br />
simultaneous interventions are needed to reduce<br />
their rate and impact [36]. In recent years, information<br />
technology has been established as a cornerstone<br />
for MEs reduction. Recent meta-analysis<br />
highlighted that in hospital computerized physician’s<br />
order entry is associated with a greater than<br />
50% decline in pADEs [55], and the use of barcode<br />
assisted medication administration substantially<br />
reduced the rate of MEs and pADEs [56].<br />
Medication reconciliation (MR) is recommended<br />
to avoid unintentional discrepancies<br />
between patients’ medications across transitions