19.01.2021 Views

2021_Book_TextbookOfPatientSafetyAndClin

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

17 Patient Safety in Internal Medicine<br />

remaining 20% during transcription and verification<br />

(12%) or pharmacy dispensing (11%) [42].<br />

Any type of error can result from different proximal<br />

causes and a single proximal cause can lead<br />

to a variety of errors. For example, lack of drug<br />

knowledge can cause wrong choice, dose, frequency,<br />

route, or technique of administration.<br />

Wrong dose can result from lack of drug or<br />

patient knowledge, slip or memory lapses, transcription<br />

errors, and so on. Behind proximal<br />

causes there are latent causes or system failures.<br />

Leape et al. counted 16 different system failures,<br />

but the first seven have in common an impaired<br />

access to information and accounted for 78% of<br />

all MEs, whereas work and staff assignment have<br />

been associated to a broad range of errors such as<br />

slips, dose- and identity-checking, breakdown of<br />

allergy barriers [41].<br />

Frequency of MEs/ADEs in IM has been<br />

poorly investigated. An 8-month prospective,<br />

cross-sectional study found that 89% of the<br />

patients experienced at least one ME during hospitalization,<br />

with a mean of 2.6 errors per patient<br />

or 0.2 errors per ordered medication. More than<br />

70% of MEs happened during prescription. The<br />

most prevalent prescription MEs were inappropriate<br />

drug selection, prescription of unauthorized<br />

drugs or for untreated indications. The most<br />

involved drugs were cardiovascular agents followed<br />

by antibiotics, vitamins, minerals, and<br />

electrolytes [43].<br />

MEs are more frequent and severe in the socalled<br />

high-risk situations due to high-risk<br />

patients and/or providers, medications, or settings.<br />

High-risk patients are younger or older,<br />

multi-morbid or chronic patients (with liver and/<br />

or renal impairment), on polypharmacy [44–47].<br />

High-risk providers are younger or not expert<br />

providers [48, 49]. High-risk systems are hospitals<br />

delivering acute care (e.g. error rates are<br />

likely higher for drugs administered intravenously<br />

compared with other routes [50]) and<br />

high-risk medications are the so-called high-alert<br />

medications (HAMs) and look-alike, sound-alike<br />

medications (LASA). HAMs have a heightened<br />

risk of causing significant patient harm when<br />

used erroneously. They include drugs with a low<br />

therapeutic index and drugs at a high risk of harm<br />

225<br />

when administered by the wrong route or at<br />

wrong dosage or when other system errors occur.<br />

The acronym A-PINCH serves as a reminder of<br />

them, it stays for Anti-infective, Potassium and<br />

other electrolytes, Insulin, Narcotics and other<br />

analgesics, Chemotherapeutic agents, Heparin<br />

and other anticoagulants. LASA are drugs with<br />

similar names or boxes [50].<br />

Although there is no standard definition, polypharmacy<br />

is generally defined as the concurrent<br />

use of five or more medications [51], over-thecounter<br />

and complementary medicines included.<br />

It increases MEs because it reduces compliance<br />

and favors timing and/or dosing errors, duplications,<br />

or omissions. Drug–drug and drug–disease<br />

interactions, instead, increase ADEs [51]. It is<br />

particularly risky in IM as it cares for polypathological<br />

patients, even if internists could be<br />

more aware and cautious, as supposed by a<br />

French study [52].<br />

Care transition is a key moment of care for<br />

several reasons, medication safety included. It<br />

occurs when a patient moves to, or returns from,<br />

home, hospital, residential care setting or simply<br />

outpatient clinics, general practitioners’ office or<br />

consultation. In care transition unintentional<br />

(changes not supported by clinical reason) and/or<br />

undocumented (motivated but not documented<br />

changes) medication discrepancies can occur<br />

[53]. They are MEs that can lead to ADEs. A<br />

mean of 1.72 unintentional discrepancies per<br />

patient have been reported at hospital admission<br />

(0.16 per patient potentially harmful) and 2.05<br />

per patient (0.3 potentially harmful) at discharge<br />

from hospital [54].<br />

Causes of MEs are numerous, so multiple<br />

simultaneous interventions are needed to reduce<br />

their rate and impact [36]. In recent years, information<br />

technology has been established as a cornerstone<br />

for MEs reduction. Recent meta-analysis<br />

highlighted that in hospital computerized physician’s<br />

order entry is associated with a greater than<br />

50% decline in pADEs [55], and the use of barcode<br />

assisted medication administration substantially<br />

reduced the rate of MEs and pADEs [56].<br />

Medication reconciliation (MR) is recommended<br />

to avoid unintentional discrepancies<br />

between patients’ medications across transitions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!