10.01.2015 Views

kvartalsvis orientering 2 2009 - Søfartsstyrelsen

kvartalsvis orientering 2 2009 - Søfartsstyrelsen

kvartalsvis orientering 2 2009 - Søfartsstyrelsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kvartalsvis Orientering 2/<strong>2009</strong><br />

Quaterly Information 2/<strong>2009</strong><br />

The job of checking the breathing apparatus compressor involved connection of<br />

equipment of very distinct pressure class.<br />

The chief officer had not realized that the job was connected with a substantial risk, as<br />

he did not know that the equipment to be connected was of distinct pressure class.<br />

It is the opinion of the Division for Investigation of Maritime Accidents that the lacking<br />

existence of a risk assessment for the job in connection with the yearly check of the<br />

breathing apparatus compressor has been a contributing factor to the accident.<br />

Initiatives<br />

After the accident the ship owner issued a “Safety Flash” to vessels with similar equipment<br />

where it is recommended:<br />

• To avoid using the above mentioned test equipment unless a pressure reduction<br />

valve is used.<br />

• Alternatively to fill a SCBA (Self Contained Breathing Apparatus) bottle and test<br />

the air quality directly from the bottle.<br />

• To make out a risk assessment, if not already done.<br />

Additionally the ship owner stressed that according to the company’s ”Personal Protection<br />

Equipment Guidelines” safety goggles should be worn during work with high pressure<br />

equipment.<br />

The ship owner recommends the shore organisation:<br />

• To update procedure GSMS ID 0459 with a description of how to use the air<br />

test equipment.<br />

• To update procedure GSMS ID 7610 to reflect the lessons learnt from this accident.<br />

Recommendations<br />

The Division for Investigation of Maritime Accidents believes that more substantial aspects<br />

in the prevention of similar accident could be treated.<br />

The Division for Investigation of Maritime Accidents recommends the ship owner:<br />

• To reconsider the recommendation in the “Safety Flash” regarding connection<br />

of air test equipment directly to the SCBA bottle.<br />

• To evaluate relevant procedures and job descriptions, where the amount of external<br />

references is considered with concern to possible simplification.<br />

• To consider how it can be ensured that crew members will receive sufficient instructions,<br />

when they are engaged with job tasks outside their normal educational<br />

wise competences and qualifications.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!