Referat Bernhard Klingen

Konfliktlinien und -dimensionen in internationalen GremienClashes in the Assembly 205 12
FIGURE 6. Structure of conflict in the UNGA (1994–96)
Abbildung 3: Konfliktlinien in der VN-Generalversammlung 1994–96
other extreme a counterhegemonic voting bloc of countries that challenge U.S. hegemony.
The countries on the ‘‘non-Western’’ pole are not the prototypical representatives
of the countries that were seeking to establish a new international economic
−→ Interpretation der Konfliktlinien für die Periode 1994–96:
order in the 1970s and 1980s. They are states that challenge principles of political
liberalism and the dominance of the United States. This finding therefore supports
the• counterhegemonic große Stabilität bloc der hypothesis Positionen rather entlang than theder structuralist ersten Konfliktdimension hypothesis that im
North-South conflict has superseded East-West conflict.
The finding could also be seen as evidence for the hypothesis that regime type
Vergleich zur Periode 1991–93 (Korrelationskoeffizient r = 0, 96)
matters, since most countries on the ‘‘non-Western’’ pole are nondemocracies. The
substantive meaning of the continuum that underlies the voting behavior of states can
be• further erneut evaluated geringe by constructing Bedeutungmultivariate der zweiten testsKonfliktdimension; that relate different possible zudem niedrige
Stabilität der Positionen entlang dieser
determinants of state behavior to their position on this continuum. I will develop
(Korrelationskoeffizient
r = 0, 57)
@xyserv3/disk3/CLS_jrnl/GRP_inor/JOB_inor54-2/DIV_105k01
rich