19.02.2013 Views

Allocation of four community radio broadcasting licences for ... - ACMA

Allocation of four community radio broadcasting licences for ... - ACMA

Allocation of four community radio broadcasting licences for ... - ACMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

- evidence that the applicant is appropriately structured to facilitate the access<br />

and participation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>community</strong> represented by it;<br />

- evidence <strong>of</strong> the extent to which the applicant currently meets the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>community</strong> interest identified in the application;<br />

- evidence <strong>of</strong> the extent to which the applicant will meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>community</strong> interest identified in the application in the future.<br />

In relation to the meaning <strong>of</strong> 'future needs', the ABA has taken into account s91 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Act, which deals with the circumstances in which the ABA must renew<br />

<strong>community</strong> <strong>broadcasting</strong> <strong>licences</strong>. Section 91 provides:<br />

(1) Subject to subsection (2), if the ABA receives an application [<strong>for</strong> renewal <strong>of</strong> a<br />

licence] under section 90, the ABA must, by notice in writing given to the licensee,<br />

renew the licence <strong>for</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years.<br />

(2) The ABA must refuse to renew a <strong>community</strong> <strong>broadcasting</strong> licence if the ABA<br />

decides the subsection 83(2) [the suitability provisions] applies to the licensee.<br />

(3) The ABA is not required to conduct an investigation or a hearing into whether a<br />

licence should be renewed.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> s91 is that the ABA must renew <strong>community</strong> <strong>broadcasting</strong> <strong>licences</strong><br />

except in the circumstances set out in s91. The ABA notes that pursuant to clause<br />

9(2) <strong>of</strong> Part 5 <strong>of</strong> Schedule 2 <strong>of</strong> the Act, it is a condition <strong>of</strong> a <strong>community</strong> <strong>broadcasting</strong><br />

licence that:<br />

(b) the licensee will continue to represent the <strong>community</strong> interest that it represented at<br />

the time the licence was allocated;<br />

(c) the licensee will encourage members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>community</strong> that it serves to participate<br />

in:<br />

(i) the operations <strong>of</strong> the licensee in providing the service;<br />

(ii) the selection and provision <strong>of</strong> programs under the licence …<br />

Nevertheless, the ABA has considered the extent to which applicants are likely to<br />

meet the perceived needs <strong>of</strong> the communities that they claim to represent <strong>for</strong> period<br />

beyond the five year terms <strong>of</strong> the <strong>licences</strong>.<br />

Section 84(2)(d): capacity <strong>of</strong> the applicant to provide the proposed service<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e allocating a licence, the ABA must also be satisfied that an applicant has the<br />

capacity to provide the proposed service. It will become clear in the assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the applicants that there were a number <strong>of</strong> applicants who could demonstrate that<br />

their particular <strong>community</strong> interest was not well served, or indeed was not served at<br />

all by existing broadcasters, but they did not have the requisite capacity to provide<br />

their proposed service.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!