Government of Canada Workplace 2.0 Fit-up Standards

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Government of Canada Workplace 2.0 Fit-up Standards Section A: General-purpose Office Space Justification Based on Security When the recommended option is based on security, the justification submitted by the client department or agency must include: • Reference to text within a third party Threat and Risk Assessment, Security Design Brief or Security Site Brief that specifically supports the request. If these documents are not available, they must be developed before the business case is submitted; • In the case of project-specific requests, if there is sufficient reason for not developing any of the above-noted documents, a letter from the Departmental Security Officer must be provided and include, where appropriate: �� a statement of the security requirement necessitating the non-compliant fit-up; �� an explanation as to why zoning is not an acceptable alternative; �� the security classification of the information being handled i.e., Confidential, Secret, Top Secret, Protected A, B, or C; and �� legal liabilities. Information on Government of Canada security requirements including approaches to physical security and the selection and design of facilities can be found in the Government Security Policy, and in the Operational Security Standard on Physical Security. A-18 April 2012
Government of Canada Workplace 2.0 Fit-up Standards Section A: General-purpose Office Space A2.5 Criteria for Evaluating Requests for Non-compliance The Accommodation Standards Committee uses the following criteria to evaluate requests for exemption to the Workplace 2.0 Fit-up Standards. 1. Is the request a program requirement? 2. Is the request due to a health and safety issue? 3. Have alternate solutions been appropriately considered? 4. Is the request in the best economic interest of the Crown and taxpayer? 5. Does the request demonstrate sound judgment and common sense? 6. Does the request have an impact on the achievement of accommodation savings? A-19 April 2012
Page 3: Government of Canada Workplace 2.0
Page 6 and 7: Government of Canada Workplace 2.0
Page 78 and 79:
Government of Canada Workplace 2.0
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135:
Page 139 and 140:
Section B: Guidelines for Ministeri
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 167:
Section C: Quasi-judicial Office Sp
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 189:
Section D: Call/Contact Centres Apr
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
show all

Government of Canada Workplace 2.0 Fit-up Standards

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?