21.02.2013 Views

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. <strong>Work</strong> and MSDs in Bulgaria<br />

3.1<br />

An unclear<br />

picture<br />

18<br />

This section sets out what we know about the impact of MSDs on people of working age in<br />

Bulgaria. It uses data, research and interview evidence from <strong>Bulgarian</strong> sources where this is<br />

available, and paints a picture of the challenges faced by both current and future <strong>Bulgarian</strong><br />

workers, their families, their employers and, ultimately, state agencies. It looks at four main<br />

issues:<br />

1. The inadequacy of the data on MSDs in Bulgaria and the consequences of this;<br />

2. The impact that MSDs have on people’s ability to work;<br />

3. The impact that work can have on MSDs;<br />

4. The wider economic and social impact of MSDs in Bulgaria.<br />

We begin by looking at data quality.<br />

While there are a few major public bodies holding data on work-related MSDs in Bulgaria<br />

(<strong>for</strong> example, the National Centre of Health In<strong>for</strong>mation, the National Centre of Public Health<br />

Protection, the National Statistical Institute and the National Social Security Institute),<br />

Gladicheva and Chengelova (2007) suggest that these sources are under-resourced, potentially<br />

affecting the quality of available data. The lack of communication between those agencies is<br />

also evident from the inconsistencies between data indicators available from those sources.<br />

Despite the processing of data collection being in place, lack of resourcing and unavailability of<br />

regular publications hinders the understanding of the impact of work-related MSDs in Bulgaria.<br />

Figure 3.1 on the next page presents the growth of the number of patients discharged from<br />

<strong>Bulgarian</strong> hospitals after undergoing treatment <strong>for</strong> MSDs.<br />

This method of data collection provides only a narrow view of prevalence of MSDs in Bulgaria.<br />

Because the prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases is estimated based on the numbers of<br />

patients discharged from hospital with a particular diagnosis, this method does not take account<br />

of those people with MSDs who were not hospitalised or of outpatients. Likewise it neglects<br />

measuring the costs of MSDs beyond direct costs of treatments, <strong>for</strong> example, the rates of<br />

unemployment and disability associated with MSDs.<br />

It is particularly difficult to gain insight into the prevalence of conditions not included in the<br />

occupational diseases list. For example, in the case of rheumatoid arthritis we have had to go<br />

to sources external to Bulgaria to gain a picture of the prevalence of this disease. The same is<br />

true <strong>for</strong> Ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Within Bulgaria the prevalence of these conditions is either<br />

un<strong>report</strong>ed, or – at best – is estimated based on membership figures in patient organisations.<br />

<strong>Fit</strong> For <strong>Work</strong>?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!