21.02.2013 Views

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Interventions<br />

4.1<br />

The case<br />

<strong>for</strong> early<br />

intervention<br />

42<br />

The impact of MSDs, as we have seen, can be significant to the people living with them,<br />

to employers and to society as a whole. Their impact on the work<strong>for</strong>ce has recently started<br />

to receive greater recognition. Whilst it is widely acknowledged that early intervention is an<br />

essential part of addressing the onset of MSDs and absence caused by these conditions, there<br />

is still some way to go be<strong>for</strong>e people with MSDs are given the best support possible to remain<br />

in work or return to work. Long waiting times <strong>for</strong> care, certain employer’s lack of capacity to deal<br />

with sickness, lack of employee awareness about conditions and their management, and mixed<br />

messages on the effectiveness of various methods of workplace interventions or return to work<br />

programmes are all barriers to making good and healthy work a reality <strong>for</strong> those with MSDs.<br />

Improved health has been shown to have positive effect on overall economic growth. This<br />

section looks at the kinds of interventions which are most likely to help workers with MSDs to<br />

stay in work, to return to work, to remain productive, to derive health benefits from work and to<br />

continue to make a contribution to society. In addition, Appendix 3 provides a wide number of<br />

indicators that may help to identify both enablers and barriers to early intervention in Bulgaria<br />

and to compare Bulgaria to countries with similar or different labour market, welfare and health<br />

care systems.<br />

Ensuring that workers who have MSDs get access to the appropriate treatment and support<br />

as quickly as possible must be a top priority <strong>for</strong> employers and health care professionals.<br />

Epidemiological studies of employees whose absence is caused by low back pain have shown<br />

that the longer the sick leave, the more difficult it is to get the employee to return to work and<br />

the higher the economic cost (Frank, Sinclair, Hogg-Johnson, Shannon, Bombardier et al. 1998;<br />

Meijer, Sluiter, Heyma, Sadiraj, and Frings-Dresen, 2006). Sick leave has also been shown to<br />

have a negative psychological impact on employees (Meijer, Sluiter, and Frings-Dresen, 2005).<br />

Early intervention is there<strong>for</strong>e crucial to individual recovery and self-management, and may<br />

contribute to reducing the number of working days lost and reduced productivity caused by<br />

MSDs (although the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of specific return to work programmes is<br />

inconclusive).<br />

It is also in an employer’s best interests to act early if they are to minimise the costs to the<br />

health of employees and to their business through absence. Based on a review of the available<br />

evidence Breen, Langworthy and Bagust (2005) recommend that employees and employers<br />

should discuss and adjust work within the first week. If employees have concerns about their<br />

condition they should consult a health care professional and, following referral or diagnosis,<br />

advice and planned action, a review should be conducted within four weeks.<br />

<strong>Fit</strong> For <strong>Work</strong>?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!