21.02.2013 Views

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

FfW Bulgarian report (English language) - Fit for Work Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4<br />

Recommendations<br />

<strong>for</strong> government<br />

Conclusions and recommendations<br />

66<br />

• Encourage self-management. Try to ensure that the patient can adopt strategies to<br />

manage aspects of their own condition, especially if they are staying in or returning to<br />

work. A feeling of empowerment and control will help their mood and ensure that they<br />

can keep on top of important aspects of their incapacity while at work. Collaborate with<br />

patient support groups, which may often provide advice on job retention or return to<br />

work. Consider using specialist psychological support to help patients deal with their<br />

symptoms.<br />

Encourage the focus on the capacity rather than the incapacity of disabled people. Review the<br />

labour codes to ensure that they do not discourage employers from hiring disabled people.<br />

Equally, the welfare system may discourage partially disabled individuals from retaining active<br />

employment status and incentives should be introduced to ensure that those who are able and<br />

willing to work could return to the labour market.<br />

• Consider replacing the current system of sickness certificates with a UK-style ‘<strong>Fit</strong> Note’<br />

(sample presented in Appendix 2) which encourages GPs to indicate what a worker is<br />

still capable of per<strong>for</strong>ming. Focusing on the capacity of the employee would help other<br />

health care professionals and employers to plan return to work interventions and to<br />

make appropriate adjustments to job demands and/or working time.<br />

• Consider a more standardised, joined up approach to recording data about the<br />

prevalence of MSDs, economic costs and societal burden so that data is comparable<br />

across government departments. Prioritise reducing the costs of MSDs <strong>for</strong> individuals<br />

and their families, employers and the labour market. The government should consider<br />

a national plan <strong>for</strong> people with MSDs – driven <strong>for</strong>ward by a National Clinical Director<br />

<strong>for</strong> MSDs – which monitors the improvement in diagnosis and access to appropriate<br />

therapy and vocational rehabilitation in Bulgaria, reducing the societal and economic<br />

burden of MSDs.<br />

• Acknowledge the psychological effects of physical illness that if remain untackled can<br />

perpetuate MSDs. Increase access to psychological support <strong>for</strong> people with MSDs to<br />

enable them to manage the psychological impact of their condition. Occupational health<br />

services that raise awareness of the impact of workplace factors on employee health<br />

need to be equipped with appropriate legislation to pursue the necessary changes in<br />

organisations.<br />

• Expand the definitions of MSDs in the current classification of occupational diseases<br />

beyond their current narrow focus, <strong>for</strong>mally acknowledging that many MSDs and other<br />

chronic conditions (such as rheumatic diseases) are not caused by work, but may<br />

inhibit participation at work.<br />

<strong>Fit</strong> For <strong>Work</strong>?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!