REFERENCES Adams, F. C., Graff, D. S., & Richstone, D. O. 2001, ApJ, 551, L31 Bacon, R., Emsellem, E., Combes, F., Cop<strong>in</strong>, Y., Monnet, G., & Mart<strong>in</strong>, P. 2001, AA, 371, 409 Balcells, M., Morganti, R., Oosterloo, T., Perez-Fournon, I., & Gonzales-Serrano, J. I. 1995, A&A, 302, 665 Barth, A. J., Filippenko, A. V., & Moran, E. C. 1999, ApJ, 525 Barth, A. J., Sarzi, M. R., Rix, H.-W., Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., & Sargent, W. L. W. 2001, ApJ, 555, 39 Baum, S. A., Zirbel, E. L., & O’Dea, C. P. 1995, ApJ, 451, 88 Beckman, J. E. 2001, <strong>in</strong> ASP Conference Series, Vol. 249, The Central Kiloparsec of Starbursts <strong>and</strong> AGN: The La Palma Connection, ed. J. H. Knapen, J. E. Beckman, I. Shlosman, & T. J. Mahoney (San Francisco, CA: The Astronomical Society of the Pacific), 11 B<strong>in</strong>ney, J., & Merrifield, M. 1998, Galactic Astronomy (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton, NJ: Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton University Press) Biretta, J. A., ed. 1996, WFPC2 Instrument H<strong>and</strong>boov, 4th edn. (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Biretta, J. A., Sparks, W. B., & Macchetto, F. 1999, ApJ, 520, 621 Bower, G. A., Green, R. F., Bender, R., Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Richstone, D. O., Danks, A., Gull, T., Hutch<strong>in</strong>gs, J., Joseph, C., Kaiser, M. E., Weistrop, D., Woodgate, B., Nelson, C., & Malumuth, E. M. 2001, ApJ, 550, 75 284
Bower, G. A., Green, R. F., Danks, A., Gull, T., Heap, S., Hutch<strong>in</strong>gs, J., Joseph, C., Kaiser, M. E., Kimble, R., Kraemer, S., Weistrop, D., Woodgate, B., L<strong>in</strong>dler, D., Hill, R. S., Malumuth, E. M., Baum, S., Sarajed<strong>in</strong>i, V., Heckman, T. M., Wilson, A. S., & Richstone, D. O. 1998, ApJ, 492, L111 Bridle, A. H. 1984, AJ, 89, 979 Bridle, A. H., & Perley, R. A. 1984, ARA&A, 22, 319 Brown, T., Davies, J., Diaz-Miller, R., Downes, R., Dressel, L., Espey, B., Goudfrooij, P., Hodge, P., Kim Quijano, J., Kriss, J., Leitherer, C., Michell, G., Mobasher, B., Potter, M., Proffitt, C., Sahu, K., Stys, D., Valenti, J., & Walborn, N. 2002, <strong>in</strong> HST STIS Data H<strong>and</strong>book, 4th edn., ed. B. Mobasher (Baltimore, MD: STScI) Burke, B. F., & Graham-Smith, F. 1997, <strong>Radio</strong> Astronomy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press) Capetti, A., de Ruiter, H. R., Fanti, R., Morganti, R., Parma, P., & Ulrich, M.-H. 2000, A&A, 362, 871 Cappellari, M., Verolme, E. K., van der Marel, R. P., Verdoes Kleijn, G. A., Ill<strong>in</strong>gworth, G. D., Franx, M., Carollo, C. M., & de Zeeuw, P. T. 2002, ApJ, 578, 787 Chakrabarty, D., & Saha, P. 2001, AJ, 122, 232 Condon, J. J., & Broderick, J. J. 1988, AJ, 96, 30 Cretton, N., & van den Bosch, F. 1999, ApJ, 514, 704 Davies, R. L., Burste<strong>in</strong>, D., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Lynden-Bell, D.; Terlevich, R. J., & Wegner, G. 1987, ApJS, 64, 581 de Koff, S., Best, P., Baum, S. A., Sparks, W., Röttger<strong>in</strong>g, H., Miley, G., Golombek, D., Macchetto, F., & Martel, A. 2000, ApJS, 129, 33 di Matteo, T., Quatarert, E., Alln, S. W., Narayan, R., & Fabian, A. C. 2000, MN- RAS, 311, 507 Di Nella, H., Garcia, A., Garnier, R., & Paturel, G. 1995, A& AS, 113, 151 Doptia, M. A., Koratkar, A. P., Allen, M. G., Tsvetanov, Z. I., Ford, H. C., Bicknell, G. V., & Sutherl<strong>and</strong>, R. S. 1997, ApJ, 490, 202 285
- Page 1 and 2:
Gas Disks and Supermassive Black Ho
- Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Gas Disks and Supermassive
- Page 5 and 6:
Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Radio
- Page 7 and 8:
4.2.3 Stellar luminosity densities
- Page 9 and 10:
List of Tables 1.1 Properties of va
- Page 11 and 12:
5.1 Weighted mean kinematic paramet
- Page 13 and 14:
2.12 Optical continuum image of the
- Page 15 and 16:
4.14 Data-Model residuals with vary
- Page 17 and 18:
Acknowledgments First I would like,
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1 Introduction The relation
- Page 21 and 22:
1.1 Radio galaxies A radio galaxy c
- Page 23 and 24:
This thesis focuses on a sample of
- Page 25 and 26:
et al., 2000; Tomita et al., 2000;
- Page 27 and 28:
larger than the generally expected
- Page 29 and 30:
most reliable is, of course, by the
- Page 31 and 32:
galaxies were obtained with the Fai
- Page 33 and 34:
• What connections can be found b
- Page 35 and 36:
Table 1.2. Reliable black hole mass
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 1.2 An example of a FR-I (le
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 1.4 From Martel et al. (2000
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 1.6 The famous cartoon by Ph
- Page 43 and 44:
M BH (M Sun) 10 10 10 9 10 8 10 7 1
- Page 45 and 46:
dish flux density measurements at 1
- Page 47 and 48:
2.2.1 Radio properties Radio observ
- Page 49 and 50:
scribed by Verdoes Kleijn et al. (1
- Page 51 and 52:
Table 2.2. Multiwavelength Fluxes o
- Page 53 and 54:
0.5" Figure 2.1 Optical continuum i
- Page 55 and 56:
0.5" Figure 2.3 Optical continuum i
- Page 57 and 58:
0.5" Figure 2.5 Optical continuum i
- Page 59 and 60:
0.5" Figure 2.7 Optical continuum i
- Page 61 and 62:
0.5" Figure 2.9 Optical continuum i
- Page 63 and 64:
0.5" Figure 2.11 Optical continuum
- Page 65 and 66:
0.5" Figure 2.13 Optical continuum
- Page 67 and 68:
0.5" Figure 2.15 Optical continuum
- Page 69 and 70:
0.5" Figure 2.17 Optical continuum
- Page 71 and 72:
0.5" Figure 2.19 Optical continuum
- Page 73 and 74:
0.5" Figure 2.21 Optical continuum
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 3 STIS spectroscopy of the
- Page 77 and 78:
spectra in a future paper. We inclu
- Page 79 and 80:
3.2.1 Data Reduction We used the st
- Page 81 and 82:
λvac − λair λair = 6.4328 × 1
- Page 83 and 84:
line flux of the Hα line and colum
- Page 85 and 86:
3.3.3 Quantifying error sources The
- Page 87 and 88:
and velocity dispersions (dominated
- Page 89 and 90:
slits were aligned to a mean of the
- Page 91 and 92:
windows. The central kinematic and
- Page 93 and 94:
(slit one) than the central positio
- Page 95 and 96:
(see key in Figure 3.1 for an expla
- Page 97 and 98:
the gas exhibits a regular rotation
- Page 99 and 100:
show the relationship between the t
- Page 101 and 102:
3.5.2 Flux ratios and ionization In
- Page 103 and 104:
them to the samples of LINERS by Ho
- Page 105 and 106:
lines. 5. Flux-unconstrained Broad
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 3.1. HST-STIS G750M observing
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 3.3. Position angles of vario
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 3.5. NGC 193: Measured Parame
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 3.7. NGC 383: Measured Parame
- Page 115 and 116:
Table 3.9. NGC 741: Measured Parame
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 3.11. NGC 2329: Measured Para
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 3.13. NGC 3801: Measured Para
- Page 121 and 122:
Table 3.15. UGC 7115: Measured Para
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 3.17. NGC 4335: Measured Para
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 3.19. NGC 4486: Measured Para
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 3.21. NGC 5141: Measured Para
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 3.23. NGC 7052: Measured Para
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 3.25. NGC 7626: Measured Para
- Page 133 and 134:
Table 3.27. Presence of a Nuclear B
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 3.29. Fits to the central pix
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 3.31. Comparison of broad lin
- Page 139 and 140:
(a) (b) (i) (ii) (c) (i) (ii) (iii)
- Page 141 and 142:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 143 and 144:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 145 and 146:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 147 and 148:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 149 and 150:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 151 and 152:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 153 and 154:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 155 and 156:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 157 and 158:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 159 and 160:
Intensity (erg s −1 cm −2 Å
- Page 161 and 162:
Difference in mean velocity on each
- Page 163 and 164:
Mean velocity dispersion (km s -1 )
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 4 Modeling gas in gravitati
- Page 167 and 168:
4.2 Thin disk models with and witho
- Page 169 and 170:
gas disks were computed by making a
- Page 171 and 172:
intensity contours are aligned conc
- Page 173 and 174:
4.2.4 Dynamical models As discussed
- Page 175 and 176:
are described in Appendix A of van
- Page 177 and 178:
models integrating using 150 by 150
- Page 179 and 180:
models. Pronounced differences can
- Page 181 and 182:
NGC 383: This S0 galaxy has a nucle
- Page 183 and 184:
at an offset of 80 km s −1 , equi
- Page 185 and 186:
gas velocities are very well settle
- Page 187 and 188:
NGC 5141: This S0 galaxy has a nucl
- Page 189 and 190:
e compatible with a ∼ 9 × 10 8 M
- Page 191 and 192:
hole masses for these galaxies. The
- Page 193 and 194:
numerical approaches they made the
- Page 195 and 196:
In the positive offset slit of NGC
- Page 197 and 198:
4.5 Conclusions In this chapter we
- Page 199 and 200:
low statistical significance) possi
- Page 201 and 202:
Table 4.2. STIS PSF Parameters. Gau
- Page 203 and 204:
Table 4.4. Mass to light ratio (Υ)
- Page 205 and 206:
Table 4.6. Black hole signatures in
- Page 207 and 208:
weighted 600 500 400 300 200 100 =
- Page 209 and 210:
weighted 600 500 400 300 200 100 =
- Page 211 and 212:
weighted 500 400 300 200 100 = 0. k
- Page 213 and 214:
weighted 500 400 300 200 100 = 37.
- Page 215 and 216:
weighted 500 400 300 200 100 = 50.
- Page 217 and 218:
weighted 600 500 400 300 200 100 =
- Page 219 and 220:
weighted 500 400 300 200 100 = -50.
- Page 221 and 222:
weighted 800 600 400 200 = 280. km
- Page 223 and 224:
weighted 500 400 300 200 100 = -47.
- Page 225 and 226:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) 400
- Page 227 and 228:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 229 and 230:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 231 and 232:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 233 and 234:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 235 and 236:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 237 and 238:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) 300
- Page 239 and 240:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 241 and 242:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 243 and 244:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 245 and 246:
Gas Radial Velocity (km s -1 ) Gas
- Page 247 and 248:
v r (km s −1 ) 5000 4800 4600 440
- Page 249 and 250:
v r (km s −1 ) 4700 4600 4500 440
- Page 251 and 252: M BH (M Sun) 10 10 10 9 10 8 10 7 1
- Page 253 and 254: We showed that the mean dispersions
- Page 255 and 256: within 100 pc of the nucleus: � N
- Page 257 and 258: as face on disks are approached; th
- Page 259 and 260: the inclination of the dust disk. O
- Page 261 and 262: where we observe smaller and larger
- Page 263 and 264: on scales of 1/8 the Effective radi
- Page 265 and 266: may have some connections with the
- Page 267 and 268: is well correlated with σc (correl
- Page 269 and 270: e primarily driven by the central e
- Page 271 and 272: organized rotation. This supports t
- Page 273 and 274: Table 5.1. Weighted mean kinematic
- Page 275 and 276: Table 5.3. Correlations between kin
- Page 277 and 278: σ100 (km s -1 −−− ) 500 400
- Page 279 and 280: −−− 2 2 σ100 / ∆100 100.00
- Page 281 and 282: ε 100 (km s -1 ) 250 200 150 100 5
- Page 283 and 284: ∆ 100 (km s -1 ) 500 400 300 200
- Page 285 and 286: ε 100 (km s -1 ) 250 200 150 100 5
- Page 287 and 288: V-Band I-Band VLA Peak VLBA Peak 10
- Page 289 and 290: 42 41 40 39 38 M87 nuclear SED 37 8
- Page 291 and 292: ased on the gas kinematics? • How
- Page 293 and 294: emaining galaxies may be of particu
- Page 295 and 296: in nearby galaxies, and is being us
- Page 297 and 298: of the features observed in the vel
- Page 299 and 300: From the work presented in this dis
- Page 301: Comparing samples of active and qui
- Page 305 and 306: Herrnstein, J. R., Moran, J. M., Gr
- Page 307 and 308: Quataert, E., & Narayan, R. 2001, A