VISION: Road Transport in Europe 2025 - FEHRL
VISION: Road Transport in Europe 2025 - FEHRL
VISION: Road Transport in Europe 2025 - FEHRL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
60<br />
Path to implementation<br />
Whilst a functionally suitable network is a pre-requisite under all five scenarios, the degree of functionality<br />
would vary considerably. There would be little improvement under the Do-Noth<strong>in</strong>g scenario and current<br />
practice would cont<strong>in</strong>ue with any changes be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>troduced slowly.<br />
In the Government-Led scenario road function would be differentiated by the traffic management and<br />
restra<strong>in</strong>t. Fast construction techniques might be <strong>in</strong>troduced through <strong>in</strong>centives if it could be demonstrated<br />
that there were wider benefits.<br />
By contrast the Market-Led scenario would be driven by more specific (and parochial) cost benefit arguments<br />
driven by the returns on <strong>in</strong>vestment. Improvements <strong>in</strong> service would be provided for those who were prepared<br />
to pay. <strong>Road</strong>s that could be constructed quickly would provide quicker returns than those by more<br />
conventional methods.<br />
The Susta<strong>in</strong>able-Society scenario would place more emphasis on the environmental issues; greater use of a<br />
holistic approach to provide a network that caused m<strong>in</strong>imum damage to the environment.<br />
In the Ideal-World scenario there would be: substantial flexibility and <strong>in</strong>tegration of the physical assets;<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated transport corridors; the <strong>in</strong>tegration between land-use and transport be<strong>in</strong>g well understood and<br />
planned for; and development plann<strong>in</strong>g.