You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a Sport?<br />
go AHeAD cAllUM, Be A DIcK ABoUt It.<br />
So here goes. First, I would like to say that this is a<br />
completely thankless task. This debate will never be<br />
decided, and no amount of emotive vitriol or ascerbic<br />
wit will bring us any closer. They only thing we can hope for<br />
is to be dragged entertainingly off-topic by some interesting<br />
thoughts and avoid getting bogged down in semantics. Still, I<br />
fear that that the atrocious avenues of vitriol and semantics<br />
are exactly where Callum will take you, mainly because this<br />
topic lends itself to fuck-all else.<br />
I am sure Callum will instantly set about tearing down anyone<br />
and everyone’s moderate and sensible <strong>not</strong>ions of what a sport is<br />
in scurrilous fashion. I can hear his self-righteous pomp now: “I<br />
don’t care what you say Gus, javelin is <strong>not</strong> a sport (voice a little<br />
higher pitched now), it’s just <strong>not</strong> (even higher now), I mean, I<br />
don’t know how anyone can think that javelin is a sport, what<br />
you’re thinking of is a hobby (and finally, at a pre-pubescent<br />
crescendo), I don’t care what anyone says, I’m <strong>not</strong> going to let<br />
those hippies win, rah rah rah, tax the poor, rah rah rah.”<br />
While Callum’s theory is sure to be polarising, like a child he<br />
sees only in black and white, while I understand the more<br />
sophisticated concept of a “grey area”. Skills are <strong>not</strong> divided<br />
simply into “open” and “closed” activities. They are spread<br />
along a continuum, and most have elements of both (I don’t<br />
have time to explain what closed and open skills are, this isn’t<br />
Sixth Form PE).<br />
In my opinion, an activity can consist mostly of closed skills, but<br />
By Gus GaWn<br />
sports editor | gus gawn | gus.gawn@critic.co.nz<br />
as soon as it tips even slightly off the impossibly high pedestal of<br />
a “purely closed skill” then it is eligible to become a sport. Take<br />
Javelin as an example. In essence, it is a closed skill. But then<br />
introduce external factors such as the pressure of competition,<br />
the environment of the stadium, and the fact a winner will be<br />
crowned, and you’ve got <strong>your</strong>self enough grey area to rebuff<br />
the black-and-white “closed skills can’t be sports” argument.<br />
I’m <strong>not</strong> saying that all closed skills are sports, but that an event<br />
appearing “closed” at first glance is <strong>not</strong> enough to banish it from<br />
the sporting pantheon forever.<br />
For me, a sport only has to clear three hurdles to make the<br />
grade. Is it organised (<strong>not</strong> spontaneous)? Is it competitive (a<br />
contest)? Is it physical (the primary means of success is through<br />
the superior execution of a physical skill)? If yes to all three, then<br />
you’ve got <strong>your</strong>self a sport my friend. Come on up here with<br />
the rest of us. Now, the physical part is important. The other<br />
two criteria are pretty easy to meet, but the physical element<br />
really decides the issue. Is the main activity involved in the<br />
sport powered by the participant’s own body? If so, then yeah,<br />
you’ve got <strong>your</strong>self a sport. Football? A sport. Javelin? A sport.<br />
Darts? Sure, why <strong>not</strong>. Video games? Nah.<br />
So I’m sure Callum has had a great old time tearing down all<br />
the things he thought you thought you knew about what a<br />
sport is. I have tried <strong>not</strong> to get bogged down in semantics and<br />
lexicology – we all know that’s boring as shit. It’s the reason<br />
legal trials don’t attract massive audiences. You know what do<br />
attract massive audiences? Sports. Now go watch the Olympics.<br />
sPorts<br />
13