26.02.2013 Views

I'm not your - Critic

I'm not your - Critic

I'm not your - Critic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I<br />

tried, oh how I tried, to get up on my high horse and write<br />

about the marriage amendment bill that will shortly be coming<br />

before Parliament, which will of course allow gay and lesbian<br />

couples to marry.<br />

But I just couldn’t get passionate about it. Not only is it highly likely<br />

that the bill will pass, it’s blindingly obvious to anyone born this<br />

side of 1945 that a legally mandated institution like marriage needs<br />

to be open to any two people that want to enter into it, regardless<br />

of how their bits fit together.<br />

Personally, I’d prefer if the government got out of the marriage<br />

business entirely, and just provided a basic civil contract that people<br />

could sign, divvying up their property if they decide to split. But<br />

that’s just me.<br />

Generally there are two arguments against gay marriage, and neither of them is very<br />

good. The first says that you are undermining the family unit, and that it is unfair<br />

on any children that would be raised by said couple. Sure, ideally there would be a<br />

man and a woman raising a kid. But hetero marriage has a terrible track record of<br />

providing committed and loving relation-<br />

“I can<strong>not</strong> for the life of me understand why<br />

ships as the basis for raising kids. Anyone<br />

with half a brain would say that a loving gay any intelligent person would fight for the<br />

marriage is a better place for a kid than a right to enter into an establishment as<br />

divorced and acrimonious hetero one.<br />

fucked up as marriage.”<br />

The second, slightly stronger argument is that religious establishments, churches<br />

for example, shouldn’t be forced to marry people that do <strong>not</strong> share their religious<br />

views. And if a religion forbids homosexuality, then fine, of course they shouldn’t<br />

be forced to marry a homosexual couple. However, it is the government who makes<br />

the rules about marriage, <strong>not</strong> churches. Legally gays should be allowed to marry.<br />

Churches should make their own internal decisions. No, you won’t have the right to<br />

marry in that beautiful church that you love if the parish that the church belongs to<br />

doesn’t agree with gay marriage, but it’s their church, tough shit.<br />

Honestly, it surprised me how excited people got when the news came out (see what<br />

I did there) that a gay marriage bill would be put before Parliament. I can<strong>not</strong> for the<br />

life of me understand why any intelligent person would fight for the right to enter<br />

into an establishment as fucked up as marriage. I get the desire to have exactly the<br />

same rights as everyone else, but still, it is honestly beyond me. But it sure as hell<br />

isn’t up to breeders like me to decide what rights queers should have. You tell me<br />

what you want, and I’m more than happy to help you get it.<br />

Hey, look at that. Wrote the whole thing about gay marriage after all.<br />

- Joe Stockman<br />

critic.co.nz<br />

GAAAY<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!