01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - United States Department of Labor

Printing - FECA-PT2 - United States Department of Labor

Printing - FECA-PT2 - United States Department of Labor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a. Signatures. The CE must review claim forms and certified documents to<br />

ensure that original signatures are present. Original signatures <strong>of</strong> those persons<br />

who certify the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the information enable the Office to hold them<br />

accountable for any misinformation furnished. When claims forms, claimant<br />

statements, form medical reports such as CA-20, and witness statements are<br />

received without original signatures, they should be copied and returned for proper<br />

signature. It is not usually necessary to copy both the face and reverse <strong>of</strong> a form.<br />

The original form should not be returned.<br />

Signatures should be reviewed to ensure that they have not been altered. If the<br />

signature has been amended or if it appears to be different from other specimens in<br />

file, the CE should determine whether the signature is genuine by contacting the<br />

person who ostensibly signed the form. If the signature is invalid, the matter should<br />

be brought to the attention <strong>of</strong> the OIG.<br />

b. Alteration <strong>of</strong> Documents. Alteration <strong>of</strong> forms is most likely on Forms CA-7<br />

and CA-8 and on medical forms such as CA-20, reporting dates <strong>of</strong> disability, leave or<br />

pay information, etc. It may only be necessary to check with the person who<br />

prepared the form to ascertain whether the alteration was made by a third party. If<br />

it appears that information submitted by the agency or physician has been altered by<br />

a claimant in an attempt to significantly misrepresent the facts, the case should be<br />

submitted to the OIG (see paragraph 4).<br />

c. Inconsistent Information. The CE should review Form CA-1032 and other<br />

forms to ensure that birth dates <strong>of</strong> children and earnings information are consistent<br />

from one report to the next. If discrepancies are found which do not appear to<br />

accidental, the CE should develop the record to determine the facts. If a discrepancy<br />

can be satisfactorily resolved by letter or telephone call, and overpayment has not<br />

resulted, the CE should document the file with the correct information, but not alter<br />

the erroneous form or document. If preliminary exploration indicates a pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

deception, and the exact facts cannot be established with certainty, an investigation<br />

may be required. For example, if there are inconsistent reports <strong>of</strong> earnings and<br />

employment over a long period during which compensation has been paid for total<br />

disability, investigative help should be requested to establish the earnings record for<br />

that period.<br />

d. Other Factors. The CE should be alert to any information which indicates that<br />

an improper claim was filed or that a questionable activity, either within or outside<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fice, has occurred. The best protections against fraud and abuse are careful<br />

and attentive case monitoring and intelligent reading <strong>of</strong> documents. Maintaining<br />

current call-ups on all open cases, corresponding with the attending physician,<br />

checking the <strong>of</strong>ficial superior's allegations concerning the claim, and reviewing<br />

compensation and medical history against approved payments will prevent fraud in<br />

the compensation system.<br />

2-0402-3 Payments<br />

3. Payments.<br />

a. Unexplained discrepancies between the Office's payments and the actual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!