31420-12-1 SAWRIDGE, Indian vs. ROLAND, Twinn et al

F40
1 The second issue, I think, though, is what about these others that may be out there, these
2 others that may have pending applications or that their parents may have pending
3 applications? And our submission is that simply that’s -- that is simply not before the
4 Court. Any concern that any individual may have in relation to a pending application,
5 they have -- there’s a process in place that they can address that. And whether it’s an
6 application that’s been out there for 20 years or 2 months, that’s up to the individual to
7
8
pursue. And the Sawridge Trustees have absolutely no jurisdiction over that.
9
10
SoIthink, sir, those are all of my submissions, unless you had any further questions.
11 THE COURT: No. Isee, you know, you were following along
12
13
in your brief, and it was well amplified, so thanks. I’m okay.
14 MR. PORETTI:
15
Thank you.
16 MR. MOLSTAD:
17
Do you want to continue, My Lord, or --
18 THE COURT: Well, I just wondered how long you thought
19
20
you’d be, Mr. Molstad.
21 MR. MOLSTAD: Well, I don’t think I’ll be very long, but I
22
23
expect that my friend will have some reply.
24 THE COURT: All right. Well, look, we’ll take a break.
25 We’ve got all afternoon. So we’ll take a break. But it may -- I’ve got a phone call, a
26 conference call, about quarter to 2. So I might be a little late getting back to the
27
28
courtroom depending on how long that matter takes to resolve.
29
30
31
So why don’t I just say we’ll come back at 2:15. All right.
32 PROCEEDINGS ADJOURNED UNTIL 2:15 PM
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41