31420-12-1 SAWRIDGE, Indian vs. ROLAND, Twinn et al
31420-12-1 SAWRIDGE, Indian vs. ROLAND, Twinn et al
31420-12-1 SAWRIDGE, Indian vs. ROLAND, Twinn et al
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
F65<br />
1<br />
2MR. PORETTI: -- your attention the schedule, and the most<br />
3 recent procedur<strong>al</strong> order is dated February 24; and that was the procedur<strong>al</strong> order that did<br />
4 s<strong>et</strong> down the date of the main application for June 26 and 27. It <strong>al</strong>so had deadlines for<br />
5 the filing of briefs for this application, and it’s actu<strong>al</strong>ly the previous order -- yes, it’s<br />
6 the -- there was a previous order of February 16th that de<strong>al</strong>t with some dates that I wish<br />
7<br />
8<br />
tobring to your attention.<br />
9 The first is any questioning on affidavits filed in respect of the main application is to be<br />
10 done by April 30th. I’m going to be me<strong>et</strong>ing with my friend Ms. Hutchison after today’s<br />
11 application. We’ve got some dates. It looks like we’re into May <strong>al</strong>ready to try to do that,<br />
<strong>12</strong> but just to inform you that that’s out there. Obviously, we await your decision in respect<br />
13 of <strong>al</strong>l the issues before you today before we’re going to be able to proceed to any<br />
14<br />
15<br />
questioning.<br />
16 And from there -- well, the other dates de<strong>al</strong> with when the leg<strong>al</strong> arguments are to be filed:<br />
17 May 29th by the applicants, June 14th by any other person, and then any replies by the<br />
18 applicant on June 22nd; and then the -- two days have been s<strong>et</strong> aside in the subsequent<br />
19<br />
20<br />
order of June 26th and 27th.<br />
21<br />
22<br />
So Ijust thought I would --<br />
23 THE COURT:<br />
24<br />
Mm-hm.<br />
25 MR. PORETTI:<br />
26<br />
-- bring that to your attention --<br />
27 THE COURT:<br />
28<br />
Thanks.<br />
29 MR. PORETTI:<br />
30<br />
-- Sir. Thank you.<br />
31 THE COURT: Thanks. Well, l<strong>et</strong> me say this just so the<br />
32 counsel involved know this matter just seems to have, you know, quite appropriately<br />
33 f<strong>al</strong>len into the commerci<strong>al</strong> list, if I can c<strong>al</strong>l it that. The next time I am on duty doing<br />
34 commerci<strong>al</strong> is the week of May 22nd, so I think what we could do is if we g<strong>et</strong> re<strong>al</strong>ly out<br />
35 of line on the tim<strong>et</strong>able that is approved by order, perhaps you could bring it back some<br />
36 day that week and we will sort it out and see if we can hold on to those dates at the end<br />
37<br />
38<br />
of June, okay?<br />
39 MR. PORETTI:<br />
40<br />
Thank you, Sir.<br />
41 THE COURT: I mean, I do not want to interfere with
Change language