01.03.2013 Views

31420-12-1 SAWRIDGE, Indian vs. ROLAND, Twinn et al

31420-12-1 SAWRIDGE, Indian vs. ROLAND, Twinn et al

31420-12-1 SAWRIDGE, Indian vs. ROLAND, Twinn et al

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F43<br />

1Proceedings taken in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Law Courts, Edmonton, Alberta<br />

2<br />

3April 5, 20<strong>12</strong> Afternoon Session<br />

4<br />

5The Honourable Court of Queen’s Bench<br />

6Justice Thomas of Alberta<br />

7<br />

8J.L. Hutchison For the Office of the Public Trustee<br />

9M.S. Por<strong>et</strong>ti For the Trustees of the 1985 Sawridge Trust<br />

10 D.C.E Bonora For the Sawridge Trustees<br />

11 E.H. Molstad, Q.C. For the Sawridge First Nation<br />

<strong>12</strong> E.J. Kindrake For the Minister of Aborigin<strong>al</strong> Affairs in<br />

13 Northern Development<br />

14 A. Meads Court Clerk<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17 Discussion<br />

18<br />

19 THE COURT: Afternoon.<br />

20<br />

21 MR. MOLSTAD: Afternoon, My Lord.<br />

22<br />

23 MS. HUTCHISON: Good afternoon, My Lord.<br />

24<br />

25 Submissions by Ms. Molstad<br />

26<br />

27 MR. MOLSTAD: I will be brief, My Lord; and one of the reasons<br />

28 why Ican be brief is that, on beh<strong>al</strong>f of the Sawridge First Nation, we concur and adopt<br />

29 the written submissions made by counsel on beh<strong>al</strong>f of the Sawridge trustees except for<br />

30 one matter which I will address in my submissions.<br />

31<br />

32 The position of the Sawridge First Nation is fairly clear and simple. We submit that the<br />

33 questioning proposed by the Public Trustee in relation to Sawridge membership will not<br />

34 assist in d<strong>et</strong>ermining any issue that is raised in the main motion and certainly will not<br />

35 significantly help d<strong>et</strong>ermine any issues.<br />

36<br />

37 We submit further that even if the Public Trustee, which we submit we haven’t seen, were<br />

38 to frame this motion by s<strong>et</strong>ting out specific questions that <strong>al</strong>l of the gener<strong>al</strong> areas that the<br />

39 Public Trustee has described wh<strong>et</strong>her you propose to go, in our submission, on a fishing<br />

40 trip are irrelevant and would provide no assistance to the Court.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!