c - IARIA Journals
c - IARIA Journals
c - IARIA Journals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements, vol 5 no 3 & 4, year 2012, http://www.iariajournals.org/systems_and_measurements/<br />
the electronic bottleneck. In spite of the fast overload of the<br />
passive channel at ONUs, the use of the proposed enhanced<br />
t‒ routing architecture, allows the COs to remain<br />
congestion free. In consequence, the introduction of optically<br />
bypassed channels leads to congestion avoidance, thus the<br />
network can more efficiently support different traffic<br />
requirements while reducing the power consumption.<br />
In a future proof optical access scenario, each CO must<br />
manage much more than 64 ONUs. However, the t‒λ routing<br />
architecture cannot meet this requirement because it presents<br />
a limitation in the number of ONUs managed by the CO.<br />
The t‒λ frame is composed by the same number of<br />
wavelengths as ONUs connected to the CO. Because of the<br />
time division multiplexing, in average each ONU experience<br />
a transmission rate<br />
. The architecture was<br />
proposed to introduce the optical bypass of only one passive<br />
channel per CO [19]. In consequence, for each ONU the<br />
optical bypassed traffic experience in average a transmission<br />
rate of<br />
, while the rest of the traffic experience in<br />
average a transmission rate of . Therefore, as<br />
the number of ONUs ( ) increases, the average transmission<br />
rate of the passive channel perceived by each ONU<br />
decreases. In the case of a CO with 128 ONUs the average<br />
transmission rate of the passive channel perceived by each<br />
ONU will be<br />
In such scenario, the<br />
performance of the t‒λ routing architecture will be very poor,<br />
because there will be one or just few channels associated<br />
with the major destination (up to 80% of offered load<br />
destined to major destination) increasing the bottleneck at the<br />
passive channel.<br />
Hybrid Wavelength Division Multiplexing-Passive<br />
Optical Networks (XDM‒WDM‒PON) seems to be the<br />
solution to tackle the requirements for optical access<br />
networks of the future. The introduction of optical bypass<br />
(on‒the‒fly routed) channels based on the nonuniform access<br />
traffic distribution to achieve a transparent, low latency and<br />
low power consumption Metro‒Access interface could<br />
represent an interesting useful approach to consider in<br />
XDM‒WDM‒PON architectures. Based on our simulation<br />
results, we propose to combine the best of the t‒λ routing<br />
architecture and XDM‒WDM‒PON. A more effective<br />
combination could be by means of hybrid OFDM<br />
‒WDM‒PON or OCDM‒WDM‒PON, in substitution of the<br />
time division multiplexing. Such hybrid WDM‒PON must<br />
be able to provide transparent ONU‒CO connections and<br />
transparent Metro‒Access optical bypass routed paths<br />
(releasing electronic bottleneck) without restrictions to<br />
increase the number of ONUs per CO.<br />
It would be convenient to conduct some additional<br />
experiments introducing inelastic and elastic traffic<br />
differentiation. Using traffic differentiation can assure that<br />
only inelastic traffic will be sent by the optical bypassed<br />
channels, whereas elastic traffic could be sent through<br />
electronically routed channels.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />
This work has been supported by the Applied Networks<br />
and Telematics Group at Simon Bolivar University<br />
(GRETA‒USB), Venezuela, and the Metro Access and Short<br />
Range Systems Group at Technical University of Denmark,<br />
Denmark.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] R. Alvizu, M. Huerta, R. Gonzales, R. Martinez, L. Rodríguez,<br />
and I. Tafur, "On-the-Fly Routing and Traffic Self-Aggregation<br />
Towards Metro-Access Integration," in INFOCOMP 2011, The<br />
First International Conference on Advanced Communications<br />
and Computation, Barcelona, Spain, 2011.<br />
[2] Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology,<br />
2010-2015. http://www.cisco.com . 12.12.2011.<br />
[3] A. Di Giglio, et al., "STRONGEST: Challenges for network<br />
architectures," in Future Network and Mobile Summit, 2010,<br />
2010, pp. 1-8.<br />
[4] J. i. Kani, "Enabling Technologies for Future Scalable and<br />
Flexible WDM-PON and WDM/TDM-PON Systems," IEEE J.<br />
Sel. Topics Quantum Electron., vol. 16, pp. 1290-1297, 2010.<br />
[5] P. E. Green, "Fiber to the home: the next big broadband thing,"<br />
IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 42, pp. 100-106, 2004.<br />
[6] L. G. Kazovsky, W.-T. Shaw, D. Gutierrez, N. Cheng, and S.-W.<br />
Wong, "Next-Generation Optical Access Networks," J. Lightw.<br />
Technol., vol. 25, pp. 3428-3442, 2007.<br />
[7] X. Shilin, Z. Zhao, B. Meihua, Z. Min, and C. He, "Evolution<br />
scenarios for passive optical access networks," in International<br />
Conference on Information Communications and Signal<br />
Processing (ICICS) 2011 8th, 2011, pp. 1-5.<br />
[8] E. Wong, "Next-Generation Broadband Access Networks and<br />
Technologies," J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 30, pp. 597-608, 2012.<br />
[9] Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) Council website.<br />
http://www.ftthcouncil.org/. 12.12.2012.<br />
[10] K. Prince, et al., "GigaWaMNext-Generation WDM-PON<br />
Enabling Gigabit Per-User Data Bandwidth," J. Lightw.<br />
Technol., vol. 30, pp. 1444-1454, 2012.<br />
[11] K. Grobe and J. P. Elbers, "PON in adolescence: from TDMA to<br />
WDM-PON," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 46, pp. 26-34, 2008.<br />
[12] C. Gee-Kung, et al., "Key Technologies of WDM-PON for<br />
Future Converged Optical Broadband Access Networks<br />
[Invited]," IEEE J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 1, pp. C35-C50,<br />
2009.<br />
[13] Z. Luying, C. Xiaofei, Y. Yong-Kee, and N. Lek heng, "Hybrid<br />
WDM-TDM PON architectures and DWBA algorithms," in<br />
Communications and Networking in China (CHINACOM), 2010<br />
5th International ICST Conference on, 2010, pp. 1-6.<br />
[14] P. Ossieur, et al., "A 135-km 8192-Split Carrier Distributed<br />
DWDM-TDMA PON With 2 x 32 x 10 Gb/s Capacity," J.<br />
Lightw. Technol., vol. 29, pp. 463-474, 2011.<br />
[15] P. Ossieur, et al., "Demonstration of a 32 x 512 Split, 100 km<br />
Reach, 2x 32 x 10 Gb/s Hybrid DWDM-TDMA PON Using<br />
Tunable External Cavity Lasers in the ONUs," J. Lightw.<br />
Technol., vol. 29, pp. 3705-3718, 2011.<br />
[16] N. Cvijetic, "OFDM for Next-Generation Optical Access<br />
Networks," J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 30, pp. 384-398, 2012.<br />
[17] K. Fouli and M. Maier, "OCDMA and Optical Coding:<br />
Principles, Applications, and Challenges [Topics in Optical<br />
Communications]," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 45, pp. 27-34,<br />
2007.<br />
[18] J. i. Kani, et al., "Next-generation PON-part I: Technology<br />
roadmap and general requirements," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.<br />
47, pp. 43-49, 2009.<br />
[19] M. Wieckowski, A. V. Osadchiy, J. P. Turkiewicz, and I. T.<br />
Monroy, "Performance assessment of flexible time-wavelength<br />
routing for a self-aggregating transparent Metro-access<br />
interface," in 35th European Conference on Optical<br />
Communication (ECOC) 2009, pp. 1-2.<br />
2012, © Copyright by authors, Published under agreement with <strong>IARIA</strong> - www.iaria.org<br />
152