09.03.2013 Views

gold standard local stakeholder consultation report - MyClimate

gold standard local stakeholder consultation report - MyClimate

gold standard local stakeholder consultation report - MyClimate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report<br />

the blind exercise with <strong>stakeholder</strong>s. Explain how both were consolidated.<br />

The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s’ blind exercise expressed the same or more positive scoring as the one given by own<br />

sustainable development matrix. The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s’ take on the same were generally positive and they<br />

proceeded further to provide measures to improve the outcomes or benefits of the project. The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s<br />

identified no negative scores.<br />

Stakeholders’ comments on the different indicators are assessed under section C.3. iii Assessment of all<br />

Comments.<br />

Difference in scores<br />

Stakeholders scored 5 sustainable indicators positive, which were scored neutral in the project developer’s<br />

sustainable development matrix. This is true for indicators, which certainly will be positively influenced by the<br />

project activity, however more in an indirect way (e.g. water quantity/quality, biodiversity, etc.) through the<br />

reduction of tree cutting and of firewood consumption. Since it will be difficult to attribute and monitor the<br />

project’s contribution to the improvement of these indicators, the scores are kept neutral. The indicator “quality<br />

of employment” was scored neutral in the own sustainability matrix, but was scored positive in the blind<br />

sustainable development matrix. Stakeholders pointed out that the opportunity for trainings would definitely<br />

have a positive influence on the quality of employment. This indicator was therefore changed to positive in the<br />

consolidated matrix.<br />

Indicator Stakeholder Own Consolidated Reasons<br />

score score score<br />

Air quality + + + Same view<br />

+ 0 0 It was afterward agreed that monitoring<br />

Water quality and<br />

water quality and quantity may be hard,<br />

quantity<br />

equally hard to identify what caused the<br />

outcome.<br />

+ 0 0 It was agreed that it may be hard to<br />

Soil condition<br />

measure and attribute changes in this<br />

indicator to this project<br />

0 0 0 It was agreed that it may be hard to<br />

Other pollutants<br />

measure and attribute changes in this<br />

indicator to this project<br />

+ 0 0 It was agreed that it may be hard to<br />

Biodiversity<br />

measure and attribute changes in this<br />

indicator to this project<br />

Quality<br />

employment<br />

of<br />

+ 0 + Stakeholder’s view was considered and<br />

score was changed in the consolidated<br />

matrix<br />

Livelihood of the<br />

poor<br />

+ + + Same view<br />

Access to + + + Same view<br />

Gold Standard Passport version 2.1 July 2009<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!