09.03.2013 Views

gold standard local stakeholder consultation report - MyClimate

gold standard local stakeholder consultation report - MyClimate

gold standard local stakeholder consultation report - MyClimate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report<br />

SECTION E. DISCUSSION ON SUSTAINABILITY MONITORING PLAN<br />

[See Toolkit 2.4.3 and 2.6.1]<br />

Discuss <strong>stakeholder</strong>s’ ideas on monitoring sustainable development indicators. Do people<br />

have ideas on how this could be done in a cost effective way? Are there ways in which<br />

<strong>stakeholder</strong>s can participate in monitoring?<br />

The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s considered successful monitoring of the indicators to be based on an elaborate<br />

plan that should be initiated by the <strong>stakeholder</strong>s and coordinated by the implementing organization<br />

but with great input and chance for participation for the community.<br />

The participants developed the following acronym ‘FORRIC’ (Fair, Open and Transparent, Relevant,<br />

Responsive, Inclusive and Credible) to be guiding line for their participation.<br />

1. Fair<br />

The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s considered the need for a fair and non partial exercise that included all members<br />

of society without special preference for any religion, region, clan or any other preference, unless as<br />

may be warranted by prevailing and agreed upon special cases. The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s who included the<br />

administration and <strong>local</strong> political leadership offered an extended platform for enhancing fairness by<br />

ensuring that all groups are brought on board. The project implementers should avoid bias.<br />

2. Open and transparent<br />

The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s attached success to depend on how open and transparent the exercise is and how<br />

the community will perceive it to be. The two elements were distinctly separated. The first one taking<br />

the measures that will be taken to achieve transparency and openness, the following was agreed<br />

upon; 1. All steps should be explained and understood 2. All activities should be well publicized and<br />

documented.<br />

To ensure the public perception is positive it was agreed that the public should be great chance to<br />

publicize the project and participate as well as awareness creation in all forums and sectors.<br />

3. Relevant<br />

It was discussed that all activities, steps and forums should be focus on the main issue. It was<br />

observed that the public and the implementing agency Tembea have a role to play in maintaining<br />

the project on focus. It was stated that to achieve this all through the project duration <strong>stakeholder</strong>s<br />

need to focus on issues that matter. It was observed that as the process goes on clear indicators will<br />

be designed to <strong>report</strong> on achievement.<br />

4. Responsive<br />

The <strong>stakeholder</strong>s held the view that it will be important to observe and evaluate how the inputs and<br />

requirements of the <strong>stakeholder</strong>s were received, discussed, decided upon, and mainstreamed and<br />

feedback.<br />

Gold Standard Passport version 2.1 July 2009<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!