20.03.2013 Views

British Empire.

British Empire.

British Empire.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

j 43 THE KING.<br />

juft and constitutional remarks of a late writer, who will be no<br />

iefs the admiration of future ages than he was the wonder and<br />

delight of that which he instructed and adorned.<br />

«« Unquestionably," fays Mr. Burke, « there was at the revolution,<br />

in the perfon of king William, a fmall and a temporary<br />

deviation from the Strict order of a regular hereditary fucceflion<br />

; but it is agaiult all gemiiue principles of jurisprudence<br />

to draw a principle from a law made in a fpecial cafe, and regarding<br />

an individual perfon. Privilegium non trauftt in exan-plttm.<br />

If ever there was a time favourable for ellablifhing the<br />

principle, that a king of popular choice was the only legal king,<br />

without all doubt it was at the revolution. Its not being done<br />

at that time is a proof that the nation was of opinion it ought<br />

not to be done at any time. There is no perfon fo completely<br />

ignorant of our hiftory, as not to know, that the majority in<br />

parliament of both parties were fo little difpofed to any thing<br />

refembling that principle, that at firlt they were determined to<br />

place the vacant crown, not on the head of the prince of<br />

Orange, but on that of his wife Mary, daughter of king Jarnes,<br />

the cldcft born of the ifiue of that king, which they acknowledged<br />

as undoubtedly his. It would be to repeat a very trite<br />

Story, to reca' to yor.r memory a" thofe circumstances which<br />

demonstrated that their accepting king William was not properly<br />

a choice; but to r.!I thofe who did not with, in effect, to<br />

rccal king Jar iec. or to d Ji'ge their country in blood, and again<br />

to bring tlici; religion, L\- s, and liberties into the peril they<br />

had juft efc;r.v*:!, it was an act: of licceffity, in the ftricfteit<br />

moral Senie h: which ::ecef"ty can be taken.<br />

" In the v.ry act, in whlchj for a time, and in a Single cafe,<br />

parliament d -'arced from the ittic!: order of inheritance, in<br />

favour of a prltcc, who, though r.-.>t next, was, however, verv<br />

near in the -lite of fuccefiion, it 'a curious to obferve how lord<br />

Somtrs, who drew the bill called the Declaration of Rights,<br />

has comported himfelf on that delicate occalion. It is curious<br />

to obferve w th what address this temporary Solution of continuity<br />

is kept from the eve ; v/hilit all that could be found in<br />

this act of 1 cceility to countenance the idea ot an hereditary<br />

fuccefiion is brought forward and foltcrcd, and made the molt<br />

of by this greet man, and by the legislature who followed him.<br />

Quitting the dry, imperative ftvle of an act of parliament, he<br />

makes the lords and commons fall to a pious, legislative ejaculation,<br />

and declare that they confidcr it " as a marvellous providence<br />

and merciful goodnefs of God to this nation, to preserve<br />

their Said majeflies' royal perfons, molt happily to reign<br />

over us on the throne of their ancestors, for which, from the<br />

bottom

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!