21.03.2013 Views

Conservation Plan 3 Significance.pdf - National Maritime Museum

Conservation Plan 3 Significance.pdf - National Maritime Museum

Conservation Plan 3 Significance.pdf - National Maritime Museum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cutty Sark <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> vol. 3: <strong>Significance</strong><br />

2.3. The Career of Cutty Sark<br />

Building of Cutty Sark<br />

1868—1869<br />

14 of 107<br />

The above table illustrates the relative sizes of clippers and their<br />

‘successors’, the four-masted barques. The voyages times are indicative<br />

that clippers were significantly faster, but it is notoriously difficult to<br />

compare individual voyages and it should not be interpreted as an<br />

attempt at a ‘league table’.<br />

It is worth noting that Cutty Sark carried 32,000 ft 2 of canvas. Relative<br />

to her size, this was a greater sail area than carried by any other clipper.<br />

Cutty Sark was commissioned by London-based ship owner John ‘Jock’<br />

Willis, son of the founder of J. Willis & Son.<br />

Willis already had three ships in the China tea trade but none were true<br />

clippers.<br />

It is believed that Willis commissioned Cutty Sark specifically to compete<br />

with Thermopylae (launched 1868 by Walter Hood of Aberdeen), the<br />

fastest ship of the day.<br />

Cutty Sark was designed and built by Messrs. Scott & Linton of<br />

Dumbarton, who had submitted the lowest tender.<br />

Scott & Linton built one other clipper — Inverishie — but not for the<br />

tea trade. This vessel was lost in the early 1870s. Hercules Linton, who<br />

is specifically credited with Cutty Sark’s design, had been apprenticed<br />

to Halls of Aberdeen, pioneers in the development of the clipper.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!