22.03.2013 Views

Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mesquite in the <strong>Lake</strong> Pala Pinto <strong><strong>Water</strong>shed</strong> to $37.20 per acre for control of heavy Shinnery Oak<br />

in the <strong>Lake</strong> Pala Pinto <strong><strong>Water</strong>shed</strong>.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Cost Share<br />

If ranchers are not to benefit from the state’s portion of the control cost, they must invest in the<br />

implementation of the brush control program an amount equal to their total net benefits. The total<br />

benefits that are expected to accrue to the rancher from implementation of a brush control program<br />

are equal to the maximum amount that a profit maximizing rancher could be expected to spend on a<br />

brush control program (for a specific brush density category).<br />

Using this logic, the state cost share is estimated as the difference between the present value of the<br />

total cost per acre of the control program <strong>and</strong> the present value of the rancher participation.<br />

Present values of the state cost share per acre of brush controlled are also shown in Table 4. The<br />

<strong>State</strong>’s cost share ranges from a low of $42.53 for control of moderate mesquite in the Fort<br />

Phantom Hill <strong><strong>Water</strong>shed</strong> to $131.61 for control of heavy cedar in the <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Brownwood</strong><br />

<strong><strong>Water</strong>shed</strong>.<br />

The costs to the state include only the cost for the state’s cost share for brush control. Costs that<br />

are not accounted for, but which must be incurred, include costs for administering the program.<br />

Under current law, this task will be the responsibility of the <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />

Conservation Board.<br />

COSTS OF ADDED WATER<br />

The total cost of additional water is determined by dividing the total state cost share if all eligible<br />

acreage were enrolled in the program by the total added water estimated to result from the brush<br />

control program over the assumed ten-year life of the program. The brush control program water<br />

yields <strong>and</strong> the estimated acreage by brush type-density category by sub-basin were supplied by the<br />

Blackl<strong>and</strong>s Research Center, <strong>Texas</strong> Agricultural Experiment Station in Temple, <strong>Texas</strong> (see<br />

Appendix 1). The total state cost share for each sub-basin is estimated by multiplying the per acre<br />

state cost share for each brush type-density category by the eligible acreage in each category for<br />

the sub-basin. The cost of added water resulting from the control of the eligible brush in each subbasin<br />

is then determined by dividing the total state cost share by the added water yield (adjusted for<br />

the delay in time of availability over the 10-year period using a 6% discount rate). Table 5<br />

provides a detailed example for the <strong>Lake</strong> Arrowhead <strong><strong>Water</strong>shed</strong>. The cost of added water from<br />

brush control for the <strong>Lake</strong> Arrowhead <strong><strong>Water</strong>shed</strong> is estimated to average $14.90 per acre-foot for<br />

the entire watershed. Sub-basin cost per added acre-foot within the watershed range from $6.84<br />

to $26.38.<br />

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Total state costs <strong>and</strong> total possible added water discussed above are based on the assumption that<br />

100% of the eligible acres in each type-density category would enroll in the program. There are<br />

A2-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!