22.03.2013 Views

Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RESULTS<br />

Model Calibration<br />

The results of reservoir storage calibrations are shown on Figures 3-4 <strong>and</strong> 3-5. Measured <strong>and</strong><br />

predicted mean monthly volumes were within 4.9% (Hords Creek Reservoir) <strong>and</strong> 3.5% (<strong>Lake</strong><br />

<strong>Brownwood</strong>). The calculated difference between measured <strong>and</strong> predicted values expressed as a<br />

residual of the means squared is the root mean square error (RMSE). One way to gage the<br />

accuracy of the calibration is to divide the RMSE by the mean measured monthly value. The lower<br />

the result of this calculation, the more precise the comparison. The RSME/actual storage values<br />

were very low (0.3 <strong>and</strong> 0.1 respectively, for Hords Creek <strong>and</strong> <strong>Brownwood</strong>) which indicate that the<br />

model did a good job simulating actual storage volumes.<br />

The results of calibration are shown for the stream gages on Figures 3-6 through 3-9. The<br />

calibration period for each stream gage varied but all fell within the range from 1960 through 1990.<br />

Comparisons of measured flow versus predicted flow (cumulative average monthly flow) yielded<br />

the following differences: 24.7% (08141500; 1960-1990), 3.5% (08142000; 1960 - 1970),<br />

0.2%(08140800; 1965 - 1980), <strong>and</strong> 6.1% (08140700; 1968 - 1979). The RSME/actual flow<br />

values for different calibration points in the watershed are as follows: 3.3 (08141500), 1.6<br />

(08142000), 2.2 (08140800), <strong>and</strong> 0.5 (08140700). The calibration for stream gage 08141500<br />

(immediately downstream of Hords Creek reservoir) showed the poorest agreement for measured<br />

<strong>and</strong> predicted flow <strong>and</strong> RMSE. This particular calibration was considered acceptable only because<br />

it fell closely between two other calibration points (08140100 <strong>and</strong> 08142000) that demonstrated a<br />

good correlation.<br />

Brush Removal Simulation<br />

Average annual evapo-transpiration (ET) was 21.57 inches for the brush condition (calibration)<br />

<strong>and</strong> 19.05 inches for the no-brush condition. This represented 81% <strong>and</strong> 72% of precipitation<br />

for the brush <strong>and</strong> no-brush conditions, respectively.<br />

Figures 3-10 through 3-12 shows the cumulative monthly total flow to <strong>Lake</strong> Clyde, <strong>Lake</strong><br />

Coleman, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Brownwood</strong> for the brush <strong>and</strong> no-brush conditions from 1960 through<br />

1999.<br />

The total subbasin area, area of brush treated, fraction of subbasin treated, water yield increase<br />

per acre of brush treated, <strong>and</strong> total water yield increase for each subbasin are shown in Table<br />

3-2. The amount of annual increase varied among the subbasins <strong>and</strong> ranged from 82,525<br />

gallons per acre of brush removed per year in subbasin number 38, to 195,281 gallons per acre<br />

in subbasin number 48. The large increase in water yield for the subbasin containing <strong>Lake</strong><br />

<strong>Brownwood</strong> (subbasin 48) was most likely due to the presence of predominantly muck soils<br />

(high runoff potential) associated with water bodies <strong>and</strong> heavy brush. Variations in the amount<br />

A3-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!