Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2-2. Grazing Capacity in Acres per AUY Before and After Brush Control by Brush Type-Density Category Heavy Cedar Heavy Mesquite Brush Type-Density Category & Brush control State Heavy Mixed Brush Moderate Cedar A2-9 Moderate Mesquite Moderate Mixed Brush Heavy Post Oak/ Shinnery Oak/Elm Moderate Post Oak/ Shinnery Oak/Elm Watershed Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Lake Arrowhead 28 22 - - - - - - 26 22 - - - - - - Lake Brownwood 40 25 20 15 35 20 37 25 18 15 29 20 30 20 29 20 Fort Phantom Hill 45 25 20 15 35 20 18 15 37 25 29 20 - - - - Palo Pinto 45 25 25 18 35 20 37 25 21 18 29 20 40 20 27 20
Table 2-3. NPV Report - Lake Brownwood Watershed, Heavy Mesquite Year Animal Units Total Increase in Sales Total Added Investment A2-10 Increased Variable Costs Addition al Revenu es Cash Flow Annual NPV Accumulate d NPV 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 53.3 1292 2100 417 1000 -225 -212 -212 2 57.1 3015 2800 973 1000 242 215 3 3 61.5 4737 2800 1529 1000 1408 1182 1185 4 66.7 6890 5000 2224 1000 666 528 1713 5 66.7 6890 0 2224 1000 5666 4234 5947 6 66.7 6890 0 2224 1000 5666 3995 9942 7 66.7 6890 0 2224 1000 5666 3768 13710 8 66.7 6890 0 2224 1000 5666 3555 17265 9 66.7 6890 0 2224 1000 5666 3354 20619 Salvage Value 12700 7517 28136
Page 1 and 2:
Lake Brownwood Watershed Brush Cont
Page 3 and 4: LAKE BROWNWOOD WATERSHED Brush Cont
Page 5 and 6: LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 3-1 Gen
Page 7 and 8: 1.0 INTRODUCTION In 1985, the Texas
Page 9 and 10: 3.0 HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION The follo
Page 11 and 12: The western and southern portions o
Page 13 and 14: µ Blackland Prairies Rolling Plain
Page 15 and 16: Early travelers knew the location o
Page 17 and 18: Some of the native grasses that con
Page 19 and 20: Figure 3-5 2000 Watershed Vegetatio
Page 21 and 22: The gauge at Brownwood has the long
Page 23 and 24: Figure 3-6 Geologic Map of the Stud
Page 25 and 26: Artificial discharge of groundwater
Page 27 and 28: 4.0 REFERENCES Allred, B.W. 1956. M
Page 29 and 30: APPENDIX 1 BRUSH / WATER YIELD FEAS
Page 31 and 32: land use, weather, management, and
Page 33 and 34: Water Ponds, reservoirs, and large
Page 35 and 36: Hydrologic Response Units (HRU). Th
Page 37 and 38: Brush Removal Simulations All water
Page 39 and 40: LITERATURE CITED Arnold, J.G., P.M.
Page 41 and 42: A1-13 Lake Arrowhead Lake Fort Phan
Page 43 and 44: Lake Inflow Increase (acre-feet/yr)
Page 45 and 46: (2002), and TAES (2000). Points are
Page 47 and 48: Objectives This Chapter reports the
Page 49 and 50: competition for light, water and nu
Page 51 and 52: several reasons why this will not l
Page 53: Table 2-1. Cost of Water Yield Brus
Page 57 and 58: Table 2-5. Cost of Added Water From
Page 59 and 60: METHODS Land Use/Land Cover The lan
Page 61 and 62: Ponds and Reservoirs Surface runoff
Page 63 and 64: of increased water yield were expec
Page 65 and 66: Table 3-2. Subbasin data, Lake Brow
Page 67 and 68: Figure 3-2. Climate and stream gage
Page 69 and 70: Storage (Ac-Ft) 14,000 12,000 10,00
Page 71 and 72: Figure 3-5. Measured and predicted
Page 73 and 74: Figure 3-7. Cumulative monthly meas
Page 75 and 76: Figure 3-9. Cumulative monthly meas
Page 77 and 78: Figure 3-11. Predicted cumulative s
Page 79 and 80: APPENDIX 4 LAKE BROWNWOOD WATERSHED
Page 81 and 82: COST OF ADDITIONAL WATER The total
Page 83 and 84: Table 4-1. Cost of Water Yield Brus
Page 85 and 86: Table 4-2. Grazing Capacity With an
Page 87 and 88: Table 4-4. Landowner/State Cost-Sha
Page 89: 38 910322.94 612035792.59 1878.27 1
show all

Lake Brownwood Watershed - Texas State Soil and Water ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?