26.03.2013 Views

Conference Resolutions - Centre for Conveyancing Practice

Conference Resolutions - Centre for Conveyancing Practice

Conference Resolutions - Centre for Conveyancing Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Resolution The whole of the property must be made subject to the conditions of the will -<br />

(RCR27/2006).<br />

Paragraph 5.4 Supporting documents <strong>for</strong> estate transfers due to inheritance<br />

Proof of intestacy<br />

Question Can a death notice be accepted, amongst other things, as proof of intestacy?<br />

Resolution<br />

1 A death notice may be accepted as proof of death but not as proof of<br />

intestacy or proof of descendants and ascendants.<br />

2 For proof of heirs, including illegitimate children (children born out of wedlock),<br />

an affidavit of next-of-kin must be called <strong>for</strong>. 20<br />

Question Given the fact that a death notice cannot be accepted as proof of intestacy (that<br />

a person died without leaving a valid will), what proof should be required?<br />

Resolution<br />

1 Proof, in the <strong>for</strong>m of an affidavit from the executor / representative, must be<br />

insisted upon.<br />

2 However, in the case of a transfer by endorsement in terms of section 45 of the<br />

Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937 a regulation 49(1)(g) certificate from the<br />

Master will be acceptable - (RCR3/2007).<br />

Affidavit of next-of-kin as proof of heirs<br />

Question In RCR7/1997 it was resolved that <strong>for</strong> proof of any further heirs, (including<br />

children born out of wedlock) an affidavit of next-of-kin must be called <strong>for</strong>. Does<br />

this mean that an affidavit of next-of-kin must be called <strong>for</strong> in all cases where the<br />

testator nominates his/her children as heirs without identifying them as well as<br />

children born out of wedlock?<br />

Resolution Yes. RCR7/1997 is confirmed. In all cases mentioned above, an<br />

affidavit of next-of-kin must be lodged - (RCR11/2005).<br />

Question The Master only requires that an affidavit of next-of-kin be filed in cases where<br />

the deceased did not leave a valid will. There are cases where wills bequeath<br />

property to “my child or children”. How should these children be proved?<br />

RCR5/2007 provides that an affidavit of next-of-kin must be called <strong>for</strong> to prove<br />

heirs (intestate or testate). What if there is no affidavit of next-of-kin filed at the<br />

Master? Can the liquidation and distribution account be accepted as proof?<br />

Resolution No, the liquidation and distribution account is not acceptable. An affidavit of<br />

next-of-kin must be lodged - (RCR9/2008).<br />

RCR 9 of 2008: Proof of unnamed testate heirs<br />

Question What is the position if an affidavit of next-of-kin is not filed with the Master and<br />

the Master does not want to accept a new next-of-kin affidavit? Can the original<br />

next-of-kin affidavit be accepted and will this not be in contravention of regulation<br />

50 of the Deeds Registries Act?<br />

20 In RCR7/1997 <strong>Conference</strong> resolved that a death notice can be accepted, amongst other things, as proof of<br />

intestacy. In RCR28/2006 <strong>Conference</strong> resolved that a death notice cannot be accepted as proof of intestacy. In<br />

RCR5/2007 the latter resolution, 28/2006 was confirmed and RCR29/1996 and RCR7/1997 were withdrawn.<br />

February 2012 Self-Study Deeds Course<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!