27.03.2013 Views

Money laundering through money remittance ... - Council of Europe

Money laundering through money remittance ... - Council of Europe

Money laundering through money remittance ... - Council of Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Money</strong> Laundering <strong>through</strong> <strong>Money</strong> Remittance and Currency Exchange Providers - 2010 <br />

CHAPTER I –OVERVIEW OF MONEY REMITTANCE & CURRENCY EXCHANGE<br />

SECTORS<br />

1.1 General<br />

21. The globalisation <strong>of</strong> the financial sector and the vast development <strong>of</strong> information<br />

technologies has contributed to a considerable increase in the volume <strong>of</strong> the activity carried out by the<br />

MR/CE sectors during the past two decades. In the US for example, the estimated value <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

services provided by the <strong>money</strong> service business industry, which includes MR/CE activity, 9 was<br />

approximately USD 200 billion annually in 1997; however, by 2005 the industry had grown to<br />

approximately USD 284 to USD 305 billion (FinCEN 2005). Unfortunately there are no similar<br />

figures available for the equivalent sector in other parts <strong>of</strong> the world; therefore it is impossible to<br />

estimate the size <strong>of</strong> the MR/CE industry globally.<br />

1.2 The <strong>money</strong> <strong>remittance</strong> sector in MONEYVAL/FATF member States<br />

22. The World Bank estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>money</strong> <strong>remittance</strong> (MR) worldwide is 443.5 billion USD for<br />

2008 and 420.1 (estimated) for 2009. Not all countries are able to determine the total volume <strong>of</strong><br />

incoming and outgoing MR activity. It is therefore difficult to provide an indication <strong>of</strong> the proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> global MR that MONEYVAL/FATF countries represent. Nevertheless certain jurisdictions are able<br />

to provide reliable estimates <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> MR activity, and these are included in Table 1 below.<br />

From this information, countries can be divided into two groups:<br />

Senders, i.e,. countries where the amount <strong>of</strong> outgoing <strong>money</strong> transfers are remarkably<br />

higher than incoming.<br />

Receivers, i.e., countries where the amount <strong>of</strong> incoming <strong>money</strong> transfers are remarkably<br />

higher than outgoing.<br />

23. At <strong>Europe</strong>an level, the first group mostly includes primarily the “old” EU member states<br />

(Germany, Greece, Italy, and Spain), along with Croatia, Cyprus, Malta, and Monaco; while in the<br />

second group southeastern <strong>Europe</strong>an countries and former Soviet republics (Armenia, Bulgaria,<br />

Georgia, “the former Yugoslav Republic <strong>of</strong> Macedonia” and Ukraine) predominate.<br />

Country<br />

Table 1. Volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>money</strong> <strong>remittance</strong>s sent and received<br />

in selected MONEYVAL/FATF member States<br />

(2006-2008, million EUR)<br />

Sent Received<br />

2006 2007 2008 2006 2007 2008<br />

Armenia 615.6 787.7 722.0 971.0 1 353.7 1 433.5<br />

Bulgaria NA 11.1 8.6 NA 94.7 73.5<br />

Cyprus 190.5 212.1 227.3 17.0 37.1 29.8<br />

9 See paragraph 10 above for an explanation <strong>of</strong> the difference between MSBs and MR/CE service providers<br />

as the terms are used in this report.<br />

© 2011 MONEYVAL and FATF/OECD - 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!