Money laundering through money remittance ... - Council of Europe
Money laundering through money remittance ... - Council of Europe
Money laundering through money remittance ... - Council of Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2010 - <strong>Money</strong> Laundering <strong>through</strong> <strong>Money</strong> Remittance and Currency Exchange Providers<br />
53. In the countries that apply the registering system <strong>of</strong> <strong>money</strong> remitters/currency exchanges,<br />
usually the authority responsible for keeping the register also supervises the entities.<br />
54. Typical sanctions applied to an unregistered /unlicensed <strong>money</strong> <strong>remittance</strong> providers are<br />
fines and/or imprisonment. 19 Maximum levels <strong>of</strong> fines imposed vary from EUR 5 000 in Bulgaria to<br />
unlimited amounts in the UK.<br />
55. Most responding countries indicated that existing sanctioning regime was considered to be<br />
effective in deterring the illegal MR providers. In the United States, for example, there are federal and<br />
state sanctions for operating a <strong>money</strong> remitter or currency exchange that fails to become licensed or<br />
registered. For example, knowingly operating a <strong>money</strong> <strong>remittance</strong> business without a proper state<br />
license/registration and federal registration is subject to a fine <strong>of</strong> up to USD 5 000 a day and<br />
imprisonment for up to five years. Furthermore, an unlicensed or unregistered MR/CE service<br />
providers may be subject to civil and criminal penalties for violations <strong>of</strong> the Bank Secrecy Act. In<br />
contrast, in Denmark, the current system is considered to be relatively ineffective because it takes a<br />
long time for law enforcements to investigate and prosecute persons in the case <strong>of</strong> unregistered<br />
activities. However, Danish AML supervisors in close co-operation with the State Prosecutor have<br />
decided to intensify the sanctions in cases <strong>of</strong> non-compliance.<br />
56. In Mexico, the Tax Administration Service, a decentralised entity <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />
and Public Credit) is in charge <strong>of</strong> the supervision <strong>of</strong> <strong>money</strong> remitters (transmisores de dinero) and<br />
currency exchange centres (centros cambiarios) regarding the AML/CFT preventive measures in<br />
Mexico. With regards to supervision, in the case <strong>of</strong> casas de cambio, these are by decree <strong>of</strong> law<br />
supervised by the National Banking and Securities Commission (CNBV).<br />
57. Although there is no agency that supervises CE service providers in Japan, such businesses<br />
must report the volume and number <strong>of</strong> transactions to the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance when they exceed a<br />
certain volume.<br />
18 See Annex 3, Table 4.<br />
19 See Annex 3, Table 5.<br />
20 - © 2010 MONEYVAL and FATF/OECD