02.04.2013 Views

SACRAMENTS OF THE INCARNATE WORD - ETD - University of ...

SACRAMENTS OF THE INCARNATE WORD - ETD - University of ...

SACRAMENTS OF THE INCARNATE WORD - ETD - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sacraments related to these). 57 How exactly might or does the Word <strong>of</strong> God serve as a<br />

decisive precedent for all texts, and “the sacred text” (as Jordan says) in particular? And,<br />

if Aquinas presumed this to be the case, where—in the Summa, for instance—does he<br />

speak about it, and how significant is the point for a proper understanding <strong>of</strong> his larger<br />

achievement?<br />

Joseph Wawrykow’s essay on “Wisdom in the Christology <strong>of</strong> Thomas Aquinas”<br />

charts a useful course for the address <strong>of</strong> such questions, building on Jordan, but “not at<br />

the expense <strong>of</strong> the ideas that Thomas expresses about the Word who becomes<br />

incarnate.” 58 For our purposes, three preliminary lessons may be culled from<br />

Wawrykow’s essay. First, Wawrykow notes Thomas’s systematic and orderly handling <strong>of</strong><br />

the Word in the Summa: that the discussion <strong>of</strong> the redemptive Word in the tertia pars<br />

builds upon the treatment <strong>of</strong> the creative Word in the prima. The Word, as “the eternal<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> God, ... stands as the exemplar (likeness) <strong>of</strong> all creatures,” and so is fittingly<br />

the incarnated actor who should, by the power <strong>of</strong> the Father, initiate the “second<br />

57 The only focused handling <strong>of</strong> sacraments that I have found in Jordan’s work is his brief study <strong>of</strong><br />

sacramental causality in ST III 60-65 in “Philosophy in a Summa <strong>of</strong> Theology,” Rewritten Theology, pp.<br />

163-68, in service <strong>of</strong> the formal point that Thomas “converts philosophy into theology” (p. 168). I know <strong>of</strong><br />

no treatment <strong>of</strong> God as Trinity or <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ in Jordan’s writings on Aquinas (or Augustine).<br />

58 Wawrykow, “Wisdom in the Christology <strong>of</strong> Thomas Aquinas,” p. 175. Wawrykow does not in<br />

his essay criticize Jordan; I am drawing the contrastive point for my own purposes. Wawrykow adverts<br />

positively to Jordan’s work by citing two <strong>of</strong> his essays in the first footnote, in evidence <strong>of</strong> the claim that<br />

“readers <strong>of</strong> Aquinas are increasingly... more attentive to the ways in which what might be called Thomas’s<br />

literary decisions have shaped and promoted his thought” (p. 175). The essays are “The Alleged<br />

Aristotelianism <strong>of</strong> Thomas Aquinas” (1992) and “The Competition <strong>of</strong> Authoritative Languages and<br />

Aquinas’s Theological Rhetoric” (1994), both <strong>of</strong> which appear in revised form in Rewritten Theology, as<br />

chs. 4 and 2, respectively.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!