02.04.2013 Views

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBALA 4<br />

OBALA 3<br />

60 000 DWT<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7<br />

WATERFRONT 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

OBALA 2<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

OBALA 1<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

OBALA 0<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO Shunting group 3 - designed<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

(OF TARGET CONTENT)<br />

PLOCE CONTAINER TERMINAL<br />

(QUAY 7) FAZE I.<br />

STUDIJA UTJECAJA NA OKOLIŠ<br />

( CILJANOG SADRŽAJA)<br />

KONTEJNERSKI TERMINAL PLOCE<br />

(OBALA 7) I. ETAPA<br />

RN 03-033<br />

IZVEDENO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO Shunting group - completed<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO Shunting group 2 - completed


CONSTRUCTOR: PLOCE PORT AUTHORITY<br />

20324 PLOCE<br />

Trg kralja Tomislava 21<br />

AUTHOR OF THE SUTDY: RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

51000 RIJEKA<br />

Moše Albaharija 10a<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

OF TARGET CONTENT<br />

CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE<br />

IN THE PLOCE PORT<br />

PRODUCTION MANAGER: Aleksandar Markovic, B.Sc.C.E.<br />

PROJECT REFERENCE NUMBER: Rn 03-033<br />

DIRECTOR: Ratimir Šarar, B.Sc.C.E.<br />

RIJEKA , July 2004


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

AUTHORS AND ASSOCIATES<br />

WATER PROTECTION: Mr.sc.Višnja Hinic, B.Sc.nav.arch.<br />

SEA:<br />

1. Sea Hydrodinamics pr<strong>of</strong>. dr. Vladimir Androcec, B.Sc. nav. arch.<br />

2. Sea Flora and Fauna Dr. Andrej Jaklin, B.Sc.biol.<br />

GEOTECHNICS: dr. Cedomir Benac, B.Sc.geol.<br />

PRELIMINARY DESING PRISTANIŠTA: Aleksandar Markovic, B.Sc.C.E.<br />

PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF<br />

INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

1. Roads: Branimir Pliskovac, B.Sc.C.E.<br />

2. Railways: Aleksandar Markovic, B.Sc.C.E.<br />

3. Water supply and sewage: Raoul Valcic, B.Sc.C.E.<br />

4. Electrical installations: Željko Matic, B.Sc.el.<br />

SPATIAL PLANNING<br />

DOCUMENTS: Sanka Vrdoljak, B.Sc.arch.<br />

GRAPHICS: Dijana Jurišic, B.Sc.C.E.<br />

LANGUAGE EDITING: pr<strong>of</strong>. Slavica Dundovic<br />

PHOTOGRAPHY: Ranko Dokmanovic, Rijeka<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

<strong>PAGE</strong><br />

FRONT COVER 1 - 2<br />

AUTHORS 1 - 1<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 - 7<br />

A. DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION AND<br />

LOCATION<br />

A.1. PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF CONTAINER TERMINAL<br />

PLOCE<br />

1 - 8<br />

A.1.1. Intervention type for national significance 3<br />

A.1.2. Reasons and objectives <strong>of</strong> investments connected to<br />

Economic and spatial development 5<br />

A.1.3. General data on technological characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

Container terminal 6<br />

Attachments:<br />

Figure 1. Location <strong>of</strong> planned project 1:50 000<br />

Figure 2.Technological layout – final state 1:2500<br />

Figure 3.Technology – typical cross section 1:500<br />

A.2. DATA FROM PHYSICAL PLANNING DOCUMENT<br />

A.2.1. Strategy and program <strong>of</strong> physical planning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia 2<br />

A.2.2. The Dubrovacko-neretvanska county spatial plan 9<br />

A.2.3. Changes and additions to spatial plan <strong>of</strong><br />

the Kardeljevo municipality to year 2000 15<br />

A.2.4. Changes and additions to master plan<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo 19<br />

Attachments:<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

1 - 20<br />

Figure 1.Excerpt from the STRATEGY AND PROGRAM OF PHYSICAL PLANNING OF THE REPUBLIC<br />

OF CROATIA<br />

Figure 2. Excerpt from PHYSICAL PLAN OF THE DUBROVACKO- NERETVANSKA COUNTY<br />

Figure 3. Key to Use and Assignment <strong>of</strong> Land<br />

Figure 4. Physical plan <strong>of</strong> Municipality <strong>of</strong> Ploce –Assignment <strong>of</strong> land use in 2000.g.<br />

Figure 5. Master Plan <strong>of</strong> Ploce-Plan assignment <strong>of</strong> land use


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

A.3. DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION SURROUNDINGS AND<br />

INTERVENTION IMPACT AREA 1 - 63<br />

A.3.1. Location <strong>of</strong> the planned intervention 2<br />

A.3.2. Spatial and functional units and assignment <strong>of</strong><br />

land in the Ploce town area 3<br />

A.3.3. Port industrial complex 6<br />

A.3.4. Analysis <strong>of</strong> natural conditions 9<br />

A.3.5. Assesment <strong>of</strong> the present site capacity 51<br />

Attachments:<br />

Figure 1: Panoramic view <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

Figure 2: Aerial view at the <strong>port</strong> area<br />

Figure 3:View at the <strong>port</strong><br />

Figure 4: Town <strong>port</strong><br />

Figure 5: Development plan for the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

Figure 6. Port area - terminals<br />

Figure 7: Wind rose<br />

Figure 8: Wind<br />

Figure 9: Frequency <strong>of</strong> different directions (%) in the climatologic periods 7 a.m., 2 p.m. and 9. p.m. (a)<br />

and total (b).<br />

Figure 10: Mean annual wind force by directions in the climatologic periods 7 a.m, 2 p.m. and 9 p.m. (a)<br />

and total (b) in m/s<br />

Figure 11: Mean annual number <strong>of</strong> days with strong and stormy wind<br />

Figure 12: Annual range <strong>of</strong> the mean wind force<br />

Figure 13: Seasonal and annual frequencies <strong>of</strong> wind force classes (5). The wind force is given in Beaufort.<br />

Figure 14 Mean annual values <strong>of</strong> the sea level height in relation to the mareographic zero in Ploce<br />

in the period from March 2002 - March 2003<br />

Figure 15 Values <strong>of</strong> sea level height in Ploce recorded during occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> standing waves.<br />

Figure 16 Basic directions <strong>of</strong> surface currents in winter and spring season in the Neretva channel<br />

Scale 1 : 80 000<br />

Figure 17 Permanent surface currents in the zone <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river mouth scale 1 : 40 000<br />

Figure 18 Currents at 5 m depth in the zone <strong>of</strong> the Neretva mouth scale 1 : 40 000<br />

Figure 19 . Mooring place for the Ploce Port<br />

Figure 20 . Wave height for basin between quay 5 and 7<br />

Figure 21. Mean monthly values <strong>of</strong> meteorological elements and occurrences<br />

Figure 22. MEAN DATES OF TEMPERATURE THRESHOLDS AND DURATION OF<br />

TEMPERATURE ABOVE 0°, 5°, 10°, 15° and 20° (in days)<br />

Figure 23 Mean annual air temperature rate, Ploce<br />

Figure 24 Mean annual rate <strong>of</strong> cloud and average number <strong>of</strong> cloudy and clear days<br />

Figure 25 Mean annual rate <strong>of</strong> relative humidity (%) and precipitation (mm)<br />

Figure 26 Annual rate <strong>of</strong> mean and minimum monthly air humidity (%) and average number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

with relative humidity >80% at 14.00 hrs and >30% in all three times <strong>of</strong> measurements<br />

Figure 27 Mean annual rate <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> days with precipitation and thunder<br />

Figure 28 Mean annual number <strong>of</strong> days with certain quantity <strong>of</strong> precipitation<br />

Figure 29. Planned intervention area in the Ploce Port, view <strong>of</strong> coast<br />

Figure 30. Planned intervention area in the Ploce Port, view <strong>of</strong> sea<br />

Figure 31. Map <strong>of</strong> area with transects PL-01 and PL-02.<br />

Figure 32. Small depth <strong>of</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect PL-01.<br />

Figure 33. Transect PL-01 area above sea, buoy marking the end <strong>of</strong> transect.<br />

Figure 34. Short coast <strong>of</strong> sandy silt.<br />

Figure 35: Description <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile PL-01<br />

Figure 36. Zoostera noltii sea grass; depth 0,8 m.<br />

Figure 37. Numerous holes in the sediment; depth 0,5 m.<br />

Figure 38. Marine fanworms Sabella spalanzanii; depth 6,8 m.<br />

Figure 39. Terrigenous silt without visible benthonic organisms; depth 9,9 m.<br />

Figure 40. Beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect PL-02.<br />

Figure 41 Transect PL-02.<br />

Figure 42 .End <strong>of</strong> transect PL-02.<br />

Figure 43 .Coastal s<strong>of</strong>t mud<br />

Figure 44. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the bottom <strong>of</strong> the transect PL-02, with established bottom type and bottom<br />

living communities.<br />

Figure 45. Sandy mud on the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect, numerous holes visible; depth 2 m.<br />

Figure 46. Terrigenous mud without visible benthonic organisms; depth 13,5 m.<br />

Figure 47. Bare surface abundant with holes and mounts <strong>of</strong> unknown origin; depth 14 m.<br />

Figure. 48. Stations for sediment examination<br />

Figure 49. Results <strong>of</strong> examination <strong>of</strong> sediment in the area <strong>of</strong> the Ploce <strong>port</strong><br />

Figure 50. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the spatial ambient <strong>of</strong> the Planned Intervention 1:5000<br />

Slika 51. Present state 1:2000<br />

Slika 52. Container terminal - orto foto 1:5000<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

A.4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1-14<br />

A4.1. Function <strong>of</strong> planned project 2<br />

A4.2. Spatial needs <strong>of</strong> planned project 2<br />

A4.3. Construction <strong>of</strong> structure/facility 4<br />

Attachments:<br />

Figure 1. Por <strong>of</strong> Ploce layout plan – functional assembly 1.2000<br />

Figure 2. Purpose <strong>of</strong> area and terms <strong>of</strong> construction 1:2000<br />

Figure 3. Traffic infrastructure 1:2000<br />

Figure 4. Water supply and drainage layout 1:2000<br />

Figure 5. Electrical installation layout - VN and NN distribution 1:2000<br />

A.5. EVALUATION OF COSTS FOR REALIZATION OF<br />

PLANNED INTERVENTION 1-2<br />

A.6. RELATION BETWEEN CONTRACTOR AND<br />

GENERAL PUBLIC 1-2<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

B. OPERATION ACCEPTABILITY EVALUATION<br />

B.1. IDENTIFICATION AND OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE OPERATION DURING ITS<br />

PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND UTILIZATION PHASE,<br />

INCLUDING ECOLOGICAL DISASTER AND RISK OF ITS<br />

OCCURRENCE 2-4<br />

B.1.1. Overview <strong>of</strong> potential environmental impacts<br />

during the construction phase 3<br />

B.2. OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS<br />

DURING THE UTILIZATION PHASE 1-17<br />

B.2.1. Potential micro-climatic condition change 2<br />

B.2.2. Potential impacts on natural terrestrial and<br />

sea ecosystems 2<br />

B.2.3. Potential changes with regards to utilization 5<br />

B.2.4. Potential changes <strong>of</strong> air or sea water quality,<br />

changes caused by noise, in normal conditions<br />

and in case <strong>of</strong> ecological emergency 6<br />

B.2.5. Potential environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the operation<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> ecological emergency with occurrence<br />

risk assessment 16<br />

B.3. THE MOST SUITABLE OPTION PROPOSAL<br />

WITH CLARIFICATION 1-3<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

C. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND<br />

MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN<br />

C.1. PROPOSAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

DURING THE PHASE OF PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND<br />

EXPLOITATION 1 - 20<br />

C.1.1. Proposed environmental protective<br />

Measures during the phase <strong>of</strong> preparation 3<br />

C.1.2. Proposed environmental protective<br />

Measures during the phase <strong>of</strong> construction 8<br />

C.1.3. Proposed environmental protective<br />

Measures during the phase <strong>of</strong> exploitation 10<br />

Attachments:<br />

Figure 1. Submarine excavation<br />

C.2. PROPOSAL OF MEASURES FOR PREVENTION AND MITIGATION<br />

OF POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF ECOLOGICAL DISASTERS<br />

1 - 2<br />

C.3. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 1 - 3<br />

C.3.1. Sea 2<br />

C.3.2. Traffic Impact 3<br />

C.3.3. Waste 3<br />

Attachments:<br />

Figure 1. Position <strong>of</strong> control measuring points for environemantal state monitoring<br />

C.4. ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION POLICY OF THE INTERVENTION<br />

HOLDER 1 - 3<br />

C.5. PRESENTATION OF THE PLANNED MODE OF COOPERATION OF<br />

INTERVENTION HOLDER WITH THE PUBLIC 1 - 2<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

D. STUDY CONCLUSION<br />

D.1. EXPLANATION OF MOST SUITABLE PROJECT<br />

ALTERNATIVE 1-4<br />

D.2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DURING<br />

PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF PROJECT,<br />

INCLUDING ALSO ECOLOGICAL INCIDENT AND<br />

RISK OF ITS OCCURRENCE 1-5<br />

D.3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES, DURING<br />

PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF PROJECT,<br />

INCLUDING ALSO ECOLOGICAL INCIDENT AND RISK<br />

OF ITS OCCURRENCE 1-7<br />

Attachments:<br />

Figure 1. Submarine excavation<br />

D.4. ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING PROGRAMME 1-3<br />

Attachments:<br />

Figure 1. Position <strong>of</strong> control measuring points for environemantal state monitoring<br />

F. INFORMATION SOURCES 1-6<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

A. DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION<br />

AND LOCATION<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

A.1. PUROSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF CONTAINER<br />

TERMINAL PLOCE<br />

A.1.1. KIND OF INTERVENTION OF IMPORTANCE FOR THE<br />

STATE<br />

A.1.2. REASONS AND OBJECTIVES OF INVESTMENT<br />

CONNECTED TO THE ECONOMIC AND SPATIAL<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

A.1.3. BASIC DATA ON THE TECHNOLOGICAL SPECIFICS<br />

OF THE CONTAINER TERMINAL<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

A.1. PURPOSE OF UNDERTAKING INTERVENTION<br />

A.1.1. KIND OF INTERVENTION OF IMPORTANCE FOR THE STATE<br />

Today, the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is a <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> state significance open to home and<br />

international public traffic, and mainly designated for cargo traffic.<br />

The Dubrovacko-neretvanska County Spatial Plan defined that the Port<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ploce is a <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> special (international) economic interest for the<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia.<br />

LAW REGULATIONS<br />

In accordance with the Law on maritime estate and sea <strong>port</strong>s (Official<br />

Gazette158/03), a <strong>port</strong> is defined as a sea <strong>port</strong>, i.e. marine and land space<br />

directly connected with the sea with wharves and non built shores,<br />

breakwaters, equipment, plants and other structures designated for landing,<br />

anchoring and protection <strong>of</strong> ships, yachts and boats, loading and unloading <strong>of</strong><br />

passengers and goods, storage and other handling <strong>of</strong> goods, production,<br />

enrichment and finishing <strong>of</strong> goods and other economic activities, which are in<br />

economic, traffic or technological interrelation with these activities.<br />

Port area <strong>of</strong> a <strong>port</strong> is the sea <strong>port</strong> area consisting <strong>of</strong> one or more sea and land<br />

spaces (<strong>port</strong> basin) used for <strong>port</strong> activities operations and under<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> a <strong>port</strong> <strong>authority</strong>, i.e. concessionaire representative, and the<br />

<strong>port</strong> area boundary-line are the boundary <strong>of</strong> the maritime estate.<br />

According to the purpose they are used for, <strong>port</strong>s are divided to:<br />

- <strong>port</strong>s open to public traffic<br />

- <strong>port</strong>s for special designation<br />

Port open to public traffic is a sea <strong>port</strong> which, under equal terms, can be<br />

used by every physical and legal entity in accordance with its designation and<br />

within the limits <strong>of</strong> available capacities.<br />

Ports open for public traffic can be: <strong>port</strong>s open to international traffic and <strong>port</strong>s<br />

open to home traffic, in accordance with the Maritime Code.<br />

The <strong>port</strong> can consist <strong>of</strong> one or more basins.<br />

According to size and significance for the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia, the <strong>port</strong>s open<br />

to public traffic are divided to:<br />

• Ports <strong>of</strong> special (international) economic interest for the Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Croatia<br />

• Ports <strong>of</strong> county significance<br />

• Port <strong>of</strong> local significance<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

In accordance with “Ordinance on the criteria for ranking <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s open to<br />

public traffic” (NN 31/96) the criteria for classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s open to public<br />

traffic under <strong>port</strong>s <strong>of</strong> special (international) economic interest for the Republic<br />

<strong>of</strong> Croatia are:<br />

• average traffic exceeding 3,000,000 tons <strong>of</strong> cargo per year, with 10%<br />

share <strong>of</strong> transit traffic in the structure <strong>of</strong> the total traffic between 1985<br />

and 1990, or average traffic <strong>of</strong> passengers exceeding 500,000<br />

passengers per year with 10% <strong>of</strong> passengers in international traffic<br />

between 1985 and 1990 for a <strong>port</strong> operating for passenger traffic only;<br />

• railway and road connections with inland, i.e. connection to air<strong>port</strong>s;<br />

• installed <strong>port</strong> capacities for traffic <strong>of</strong> 5,000,000 tons <strong>of</strong> cargo per year<br />

in accordance with the cargo structure against main goods groups, and<br />

developed shoreline and piers for anchorage <strong>of</strong> ships length over 130<br />

m and draught 6 m.<br />

• no less than five regular ship lines per month or minimum three<br />

international lines per year for <strong>port</strong> operating for passenger traffic only.<br />

In accordance with “Ordinance on ranking <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce” (Official<br />

Gazette no. 37/96):<br />

• According to size and significance the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce has been<br />

ranked under a <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> special (international) economic<br />

im<strong>port</strong>ance for the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia.<br />

• Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is a <strong>port</strong> open to international public traffic.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

A.1.2. REASONS AND OBJECTIVES OF INVESTMENT CONNECTED TO<br />

ECONOMIC AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

In 2002 the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce reloaded about 10.000 TEU. There is a regular<br />

weekly feeder line to the <strong>port</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Malta and Gioia Tauto in Italy. The shipping<br />

company is Lošinjska plovidba - brodarstvo d.d. The ship UPA can trans<strong>port</strong><br />

226 TEU. This year an additional ship RAPOCA <strong>of</strong> the same shipping<br />

company has been introduced to the same line twice a week.<br />

With the aim to obtain a thorough insight, as well as scientific and expert<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the possibilities and needs <strong>of</strong> sea <strong>port</strong>s several scientific<br />

institutions and foreign companies have been engaged, which have also<br />

prepared the development studies for the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, and in which the<br />

segment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> containerization has also been considered:<br />

• Economic and technical study <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Rijeka and Ploce,<br />

S<strong>of</strong>remer - Apis, 1997. (financed by the Works Bank);<br />

• Study on the multimodal traffic corridor Ploce-Sarajevo (financed by<br />

TDA, USA Government Agency),<br />

• Forecast <strong>of</strong> traffic <strong>of</strong> these goods has been given also by the one and<br />

only operator in the <strong>port</strong> area – the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

The first study was used as landmark document for elaboration <strong>of</strong> the Traffic<br />

Development Strategy <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia, which related to <strong>port</strong>s, and a<br />

Sea Ports Development Plan for the period <strong>of</strong> 10 years has been prepared but<br />

not yet passed. The quantities <strong>of</strong> containers to be trans<strong>port</strong>ed through the Port<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ploce according to this plan should be:<br />

YEAR 1989 1995 1999 2000 2005 2010<br />

TEU 2,500 250 1,800 3,000 32,000 71,000<br />

The decision to initiate preparations for this investment has been influenced<br />

by the planned traffic forecasts and by the fact that the existing container<br />

traffic handling is even now a problem for the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

There are no onshore surfaces for container storage, the surfaces have not<br />

been designed to withstand heavy loads <strong>of</strong> the equipment required for such<br />

handling, the bearing capacity <strong>of</strong> operative shoreline for installation <strong>of</strong> special<br />

equipment for container transshipment are questionable and re<strong>port</strong>ed several<br />

times already. To conclude with, the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce does not possess<br />

equipment suitable for reloading <strong>of</strong> container unit by LO-LO technology.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> all these reasons, a clear goal was set out:<br />

The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce should be equipped for container traffic by construction <strong>of</strong> a<br />

container terminal, capacity 100 000 TEU per year.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

A.1.3 BASIC DATA ON TECHNOLOGICAL SPECIFICS<br />

A.1.3.1. EXISTING STATUS ON THE LOCATION<br />

Micro location <strong>of</strong> the container terminal has been proposed based on the<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the local geography, suitable access from the sea and protected<br />

basin docks 5 and 7 against adverse meteorological, hydrographical effects,<br />

suitable access from inland-road/railway, adjacent required municipal<br />

infrastructure, enough space for extension <strong>of</strong> the terminal. Since impact on<br />

environment is not significant, the location is a buffer-zone against the city<br />

between the existing built volumes and pollutants which will be farther on. The<br />

bulk cargo terminals located opposite <strong>of</strong> the dock no.5.To the North is limited<br />

by the future waterline – dock 7, to the East by the existing runaway <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Air<strong>port</strong> Ploce, which is located in the area <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river valley, and in<br />

accordance with the Dubrovacko-Neretvanska County Spatial Plan, to the<br />

South by the future railway tracks routs and to the West by the shore line. The<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> this land plot is about 210.000 m². For half <strong>of</strong> this surface on which<br />

the container terminal will be built the Location Permit will be obtained. The<br />

remaining surface will be kept for expansion <strong>of</strong> the terminal what we do not<br />

foresee to be in so near future.<br />

A.1.3.2. DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION ON SHORES AND STORAGE SPACE<br />

Warf length 260 m is to form the line <strong>of</strong> the future dock 7 with water landing<br />

area depth <strong>of</strong> 13.5 m, in which root the RO-RO ramp is to be built. In the<br />

reloading zone the equipment is to be placed with technical characteristics<br />

enabling transshipment <strong>of</strong> the container ships <strong>of</strong> the third generation. The<br />

surface provided for construction <strong>of</strong> terminal is to be about 100,000 m². It is<br />

provided to include the zone for reloading ships and railway cars, the zone for<br />

storage, service zone and surfaces needed for the main infrastructure (roads,<br />

power supply , telecommunications), and is to include RO-RO space also.<br />

The design provides also construction <strong>of</strong> all infrastructure structures/facilities<br />

outside the terminal land plot necessary for its operation as one technological<br />

unit.<br />

The Location Permit has been applied for the final construction stage which<br />

includes RO-RO ramp also, and construction in phase should be made<br />

possible.<br />

RAILWAY TRACKS<br />

In order to get an insight into the status <strong>of</strong> railway infrastructure in the Port <strong>of</strong><br />

Ploce as well as the marshalling tracks in the cargo railway station adjacent to<br />

the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, used as sup<strong>port</strong>ing structure to the <strong>port</strong> capacities, in 1988<br />

a Study on track capacities in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce and railway station Ploce<br />

(Institute for Traffic, Sarajevo, November 1988) was prepared. The conclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study was that at construction <strong>of</strong> new railway capacities it will be<br />

necessary to undertake reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the connection <strong>of</strong> the existing <strong>port</strong><br />

capacities to the cargo station Ploce.<br />

As shown in this study at construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal it is necessary,<br />

besides the railway tracks on the terminal itself, construct marshalling groups<br />

III and IV. The first mentioned for the needs <strong>of</strong> the timber transit terminal and<br />

waterfront tracks <strong>of</strong> the future container terminal, and the second for the<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> the mainly container terminal. In addition, it is necessary to<br />

undertake reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the existing connection and connection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

connection track to the cargo station Ploce (about 600 m).<br />

ROADS<br />

The Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce has provided for construction <strong>of</strong> the main<br />

<strong>port</strong> road 15.0 m wide, which goes to the main gate <strong>of</strong> the container terminal.<br />

For the main <strong>port</strong> road the Main Design has been prepared. So far about 350<br />

m <strong>of</strong> mentioned road has been built, while for the remaining about 580 m<br />

earth works are carried out. The Consultant will renew this documentation and<br />

design the road connections <strong>of</strong> this road to the traffic infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

container terminal.<br />

POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM<br />

Feeding <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is from 10kV network from TS 35/10 kV Vranjak,<br />

which is located adjacent to the <strong>port</strong> fence. The energy is supplied through<br />

two cable lines type PP 41 A 3 x 150 mm² to switching yard 10 (20) kV <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce an from there to separate transformer substations within the <strong>port</strong><br />

area.<br />

For the future container terminal there is a 10 kV cable, which route goes<br />

along the edge <strong>of</strong> the future terminal. Although this cable is in function and<br />

can serve for supply <strong>of</strong> the future terminal, it is obsolete and in future could be<br />

unsafe for the good quality feeding. Therefore, being aware <strong>of</strong> the need <strong>of</strong> the<br />

future <strong>port</strong> capacities for electric energy and water, the Port Authority has<br />

order elaboration <strong>of</strong> Main Design, Construction <strong>of</strong> public utilities system along<br />

the main <strong>port</strong> road with connection <strong>of</strong> the power supply cable Switch yard - TS<br />

Vranjak. The goal <strong>of</strong> this design is sizing and construction <strong>of</strong> an infrastructure<br />

corridor by which this new part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> will be supplied with the necessary<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> water and electric energy and creating a ring <strong>of</strong> 10 kV lines within<br />

the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce space. The public utilities system is to be built along the<br />

main <strong>port</strong> road to South, and all utilities are provided to be placed into a<br />

reinforced concrete channel.<br />

The connection <strong>of</strong> the container terminal to new cable 10/20 kV cable is to be<br />

also at the edge <strong>of</strong> the container terminal. In this case the existing cable 10 kV<br />

network is provided as reserve to the new network.<br />

TELEPHONE AND FIRE ALARM<br />

The existing primary telephone and fire alarm networks within the <strong>port</strong> area<br />

have been reconstructed in the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>. The ducts, cable<br />

manholes, new cable switch boards were installed, PEHD pipes laid, fire<br />

alarm cables, type JB- Y(ST)Y and telephone cables, type TK 59 were pulled<br />

through, with capacity to satisfy the existing and future needs. The<br />

reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the western part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> is planned and will be completed<br />

during 2004.<br />

From the telephone, i.e. fire alarm stations, there is a built cable duct network<br />

leading to the HPT post <strong>of</strong>fice in which the PEHD pipes have been laid.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 8<br />

For the needs <strong>of</strong> the container terminal in the part <strong>of</strong> telephone and fire alarm<br />

system and connection to the main fire alarm station, i.e. telephone station, it<br />

will be necessary to build a cable ducts network from the cable manhole KZ<br />

1.1 in the direction <strong>of</strong> the future container terminal space.<br />

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM<br />

The main feeding <strong>port</strong> water supply system is built <strong>of</strong> steel pipes Ø 200 mm<br />

and laid underground, along the eastern edge <strong>of</strong> the road in the direction <strong>of</strong><br />

«Energopetrol» and passes along the edge <strong>of</strong> the future container terminal. Its<br />

capacity is 33.6 l/s, and pressure 5.5-6.0 bar.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


A1. PURPOSE OF PROJECT<br />

CONSTRUCTION UNDERTAKING<br />

LOCATION OF PLANNED PROJECT<br />

A1. SVRHA PODUZIMANJA<br />

IZGRADNJE ZAHVATA<br />

LOKACIJA PLANIRANOG ZAHVATA<br />

PROJECT SCALE (MJ) 1:50000<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA )<br />

PORT AREA (LUCKO PODRUCJE)


60 000 DWT<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

m o r e<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

TS-15<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

gps<br />

z<br />

vatrogasci<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

2179/2<br />

(4559/80)<br />

z<br />

z<br />

garaza<br />

ts<br />

I<br />

z<br />

z<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

z<br />

ts<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

A1. PURPOSE OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION<br />

UNDERTAKING<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

TECHNOLOGICAL LAYOUT - FINAL STATE<br />

A1. SVRHA PODUZIMANJA I IZGRADNJE ZAHVATA<br />

SITUACIJA TEHNOLOGIJE - KONACNO STANJE<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA)<br />

LINE OF EXISTING WATERFRONT (LINIJA POSTOJECE OBALE)<br />

LINE OF NEW WATERFRONT (LINIJA NOVE OBALE)<br />

EXISTING RAILWAYS (POSTOJECE ŽELJEZNICE)<br />

DESIGNED RAILWAYS (PROJEKTIRANE ŽELJEZNICE)<br />

EXISTING ROADS (POSTOJECE CESTE)<br />

DESIGNED ROADS (PROJEKTIRANE CESTE)<br />

FENCE (OGRADA)<br />

EXISTING STRUCTURES (POSTOJECI OBJEKTI)<br />

SEA (MORE)<br />

STORAGE AREAS (POVRŠINE ZA SKLADIŠTA)<br />

CONTAINER DISPOSAL AREAS (POVRŠINE ZA ODLAGANJE KONTEJNERA)<br />

GREEN AREAS (ZELENE POVRŠINE)<br />

GROUND (TEREN)<br />

STRUCTURES (OBJEKTI)<br />

SL. 2


A1. PURPOSE OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION<br />

UNDERTAKING<br />

TECHNOLOGY - TYPICAL CROSS<br />

A1. SVRHA PODUZIMANJA I IZGRADNJE ZAHVATA<br />

TEHNOLOGIJA-KARAKTERISTOCNI POPRECNI<br />

PRESJECI<br />

SECTIONS SCALE (MJ) 1:500<br />

SL. 3


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

A.2. DATA FROM PHYSICAL PLANNING DOCUMENT<br />

A.2.1. STRATEGY AND PROGRAMME OF PHYSICAL PLANNING OF THE<br />

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA<br />

A.2.2. THE DUBROVACKO-NERETVANSKA COUNTY SPATIAL PLAN<br />

A.2.3. CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO SPATIAL PLAN OF THE<br />

KARDELJEVO MUNICIPALITY TO YEAR 2000<br />

A.2.4. CHAGES AND ADDITIONS TO MASTER PLAN OF KARDELJEVO<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

For the intended intervention and analyzed space, considering the<br />

international im<strong>port</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>, all currently valid physical planning<br />

documents <strong>of</strong> this area have been analyzed, as well as those that will be<br />

passed in near future.<br />

They are:<br />

• STRATEGY AND PROGRAMME OF PHYSICAL PLANNING OF THE<br />

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA<br />

• DUBROVACKO-NERETVANSKA COUNTY SPATIAL PLAN<br />

• CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO SPATIAL PLAN OF MUNICIPALITY<br />

OF KARDELJEVO UNTIL YEAR 2000<br />

• CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO MASTER PLAN OF KARDELJEVO<br />

A.2.1. STRATEGY AND PROGRAMME OF PHYSICAL PLANNING OF THE<br />

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA<br />

(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Physical Planning, Construction and Housing, Institute for<br />

Spatial Planning, 1999, Official Gazette no. 50/99)<br />

The physical planning strategy <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia has ranked the Port<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ploce among the seven biggest sea <strong>port</strong>s on the Croatian coast.<br />

The Strategy has defined the spatial development and planning trends and<br />

main development terms <strong>of</strong> reference for infrastructure systems. For the<br />

maritime traffic, as part <strong>of</strong> the infrastructure, i.e. traffic system, we can read<br />

the following assessment <strong>of</strong> the present status (section 4.4.1.2., page 115.):<br />

«The specific <strong>of</strong> the Croatian spatial territory is the very long and well indented<br />

coast that throughout history has been the natural base for development <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>port</strong>s in many places what was acceptable at that time considering the level <strong>of</strong><br />

technique and technology. During the last fifty years due to the world<br />

economy development trends a phenomenon has arisen that some <strong>port</strong>s have<br />

been promoted into carriers <strong>of</strong> connection. In result <strong>of</strong> such policy seven big<br />

<strong>port</strong>s have been built on the Croatian coast (Rijeka, Pula, Zadar, Šibenik,<br />

Split, Ploce and Dubrovnik), with length <strong>of</strong> built operative shores 17,736 m,<br />

covering space about 700 ha, and reloaded cargo volume 14,891.000 tons for<br />

1995. This is a considerate decrease in comparison to traffic volumes before<br />

the Homeland War. Before the Homeland War began the operative shores<br />

built volumes and the superstructure was satisfactory with positive<br />

development trends».<br />

In the section Spatial-development and planning directives we can read<br />

the following guidelines (section 4.4.1.4., page 120.):<br />

«Revitalization <strong>of</strong> the maritime traffic in Croatia, considering the well indented<br />

coast and its length, is a necessity for Croatia and the neighboring countries<br />

both on home and international level. The further development <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s and<br />

marine connections should be based on the needs <strong>of</strong> the state (meaning<br />

connections with other countries), and at home level on needs <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

regions, especially islands, and economic activities <strong>of</strong> the country (ecological<br />

sustainable economy).<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

The modern technology in trans<strong>port</strong>ation, transshipment and <strong>port</strong> handling is<br />

developing in such direction that <strong>port</strong>s become more and more specialized for<br />

specific designations and specific kinds <strong>of</strong> cargos. The first degree <strong>of</strong><br />

specialization begins with unitized cargo from <strong>port</strong> to <strong>port</strong> and ends with<br />

automatic monitoring <strong>of</strong> cargo from the consigner to the consignee with all<br />

activities and changes <strong>of</strong> traffic branches. In this segment the Croatian <strong>port</strong>s,<br />

as well as the whole Croatian traffic system, are not at all at an enviable level<br />

and would require urgent and overall modernization in accordance with<br />

available resources, which would rendered them equipped to respond to<br />

possibilities that are generally known and applied in the developed world.<br />

The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce should predominately develop for the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

neighboring Bosnia and Herzegovina, but also for broader home and<br />

international hinterland.<br />

GOALS AND TRENDS OF MARITIME TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT:<br />

• revalorization the traffic value <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic Sea and proper evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the exceptional geo-traffic advantages <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic traffic route,<br />

which would open the Croatian spatial territory to main traffic flows<br />

thus improving the Croatian costal and ferry navigation,<br />

• reorganization and upgrading <strong>of</strong> the Croatian <strong>port</strong>s technology base,<br />

providing better links with the world/inland and continent and promote<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the Croatian <strong>port</strong>s for realization <strong>of</strong> different economic activities<br />

thus attracting, as much as possible, traffic flows (goods) from Eastern<br />

Europe (in all Croatian <strong>port</strong>s, and in particular to Rijeka and Ploce.<br />

Request for new space is relevant for three <strong>port</strong>s only: Rijeka, Split<br />

and Ploce,<br />

• improvement <strong>of</strong> following new techniques and technologies in maritime<br />

traffic (application <strong>of</strong> containers, unitized cargo, and other).<br />

Considering the above, validate and incorporate into the spatial plans <strong>of</strong><br />

lower-rank the requirements and conditions relating to space for the requested<br />

extensions and modernization. It is equally im<strong>port</strong>ant that the planning <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s<br />

at local level is harmonized with the General Development Plans <strong>of</strong> the costal<br />

region/islands.<br />

This physical planning document has defined that in reconstructions or<br />

constructions <strong>of</strong> new structures the highest technological, economic and<br />

ecological criteria should be applied, and emphasized that physical planning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the maritime traffic must be prepared in compliance with regulations <strong>of</strong><br />

relevant laws, in particular those regulating <strong>port</strong>s as part <strong>of</strong> the maritime<br />

estate.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

In the «Programme <strong>of</strong> Physical Planning <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia» we<br />

can read in section 3.1.3. Martine traffic goals and guidelines for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the maritime traffic:<br />

(3-6)<br />

(3-7)<br />

In the new circumstances <strong>of</strong> social and economic development in<br />

Croatia, the development <strong>of</strong> the maritime traffic should be based on<br />

the advantages <strong>of</strong> Croatia, with particular emphasis on improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

connections between islands, and systematic approach in the following<br />

segments:<br />

Physical planning <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s should be planned at the level <strong>of</strong> needs <strong>of</strong><br />

the economy and traffic as a whole, and establish the spatial<br />

requirements for necessary extensions and modernization.<br />

The maritime traffic physical planning should comply with all<br />

regulations <strong>of</strong> relevant laws, and in particular those regulating <strong>port</strong>s as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the maritime estate. At reconstruction or construction <strong>of</strong> new<br />

projects/structures, all interventions should be undertaken in<br />

compliance with the highest technological, economic and ecological<br />

criteria, and include investigation <strong>of</strong> the interrelations <strong>of</strong> traffic corridors<br />

road-railway-sea in the narrow costal space/islands.<br />

Priorities in elaboration <strong>of</strong> documents are:<br />

• strategic development plan <strong>of</strong> all <strong>port</strong>s<br />

• general development plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> systems <strong>of</strong> Rijeka and<br />

Ploce<br />

The connection <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s with the inland traffic structure should be<br />

improved.<br />

While developing the broader maritime infrastructure priority should be given<br />

to improvement <strong>of</strong> technical and technological characteristics <strong>of</strong> marine<br />

vessels and accompanying <strong>port</strong> services.<br />

In the section 4.4. Maritime estate we can read:<br />

In further development Croatia should adopt a more appropriate and<br />

systematic approach when using the advantages <strong>of</strong> its position on the<br />

Mediterranean with distinctive orientation to tourism and maritime economy.<br />

(4-13)<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> the maritime orientation <strong>of</strong> the country should be<br />

based in particular on:<br />

• maritime traffic and shipping industry,<br />

• <strong>port</strong> economy (including joint economic activities and free<br />

zones) …<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

The economic interests and programmes should be prepared in such<br />

way to incorporate broader influences and especially those related to<br />

development <strong>of</strong> costal settlements in relation to lithologization<br />

processes and influences <strong>of</strong> other activities, and include environmental<br />

impacts as well as account for the fact that good quality environment is<br />

considered as the main advantage and specifics <strong>of</strong> the Croatian<br />

maritime economy.<br />

This objective can be achieved through systematic determination <strong>of</strong><br />

the maritime estate boundaries, allowable maritime space pressures<br />

(land and home waters), and criteria for location <strong>of</strong> economic activities.<br />

Special im<strong>port</strong>ance should be given to valorization and preservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sea water quality and the costal region on a larger scale.<br />

In the section 5.1. Environmental protection, among other things, we read:<br />

(5-1)<br />

(5-2)<br />

(5-3)<br />

Croatia should improve the present quality <strong>of</strong> the environment, and in<br />

further development remove causes <strong>of</strong> pollution and make efforts to<br />

coordinate future development with the efforts to achieve better quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> living. It is <strong>of</strong> special im<strong>port</strong>ance that the environmental protection is<br />

implemented per sectors- departments based on laws and regulations<br />

and in accordance with the Strategy on Environmental Protection,<br />

systematic preventive measures against adverse impacts and<br />

incentive procedures aimed at preservation and improvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment.<br />

Croatia will enforce the signed bilateral agreements and conventions at<br />

all levels, especially those on sustainable development, biological<br />

diversity and human settlements, and in the framework <strong>of</strong><br />

management <strong>of</strong> the larger spatial units belonging to the European<br />

systems (Adriatic Sea, Danube basin) and implement a system <strong>of</strong><br />

protection <strong>of</strong> generally recognized values.<br />

Due to specifics <strong>of</strong> the Croatian spatial territory and past development<br />

trends the following aspects should be emphasized:<br />

• on the global level it is im<strong>port</strong>ant to establish an integral<br />

approach to management <strong>of</strong> larger units, and special<br />

emphasize should be given, among other things, to the Adriatic<br />

Sea.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> the environmental protection principles in spatial<br />

planning is based on modern principles and standards <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental protection and the quality <strong>of</strong> the environment should be<br />

the main criterion in spatial planning.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

(5-4)<br />

More efficient spatial planning would require proper clarification <strong>of</strong><br />

the actual circumstances:<br />

• spatial pressures and past hazards, or the degree <strong>of</strong> the<br />

preserved quality <strong>of</strong> specific space and acceptable<br />

(sustainable) spatial capacity,<br />

• status, drawbacks and requirements relating needs in technical<br />

infrastructure,<br />

• natural and created values to be protected by application <strong>of</strong><br />

special categories <strong>of</strong> protection as well as physical planning<br />

measures in connection with use <strong>of</strong> space,<br />

• regulations, agreements and conventions applying to specific<br />

area and determined kind <strong>of</strong> space -resource.<br />

The development context is marked by circumstances present in the<br />

body <strong>of</strong> undergoing social changes, by old technologies, incomplete<br />

physical planning systems and unbalanced development, aspirations<br />

for fast development, therefore special attention should be paid when<br />

choosing development programs; obsolete and hazardous<br />

technologies that represent a treat to space should be disregarded, as<br />

well as irrational exploitation <strong>of</strong> resources and space that can bring<br />

short term benefits, but in the long run can cause damage to space<br />

and environment, should not be allowed.<br />

Therefore it is necessary to:<br />

• enforce measures for remediation <strong>of</strong> endangered parts <strong>of</strong><br />

space and environment within the framework <strong>of</strong> departments<br />

activities and engagement <strong>of</strong> all entities involved in space use,<br />

in particular those systems causing considerable environmental<br />

loads, like industry and mining, energetic industry, traffic,<br />

intensive farming, water management,<br />

• investigate and correct the former spatial-planning and<br />

development projections, considering mainly declamatory<br />

postulations <strong>of</strong> environmental protection, unbalanced and<br />

unreal past development trends <strong>of</strong> all development indexes,<br />

with side effects <strong>of</strong> adverse space loads, and define criteria for<br />

space use in accordance with guidelines <strong>of</strong> sustainable and<br />

balanced development that will account for the specifics and<br />

sensitiveness (vulnerability) <strong>of</strong> the spatial structure,<br />

• increase investments in infrastructure and qualitative changes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the existing economy systems (removal <strong>of</strong> unclean and<br />

obsolete technologies), and when defining new locations and<br />

routs consider all key elements <strong>of</strong> environment and space<br />

through application <strong>of</strong> an interdisciplinary approach,<br />

• establish mechanisms <strong>of</strong> information and decision making<br />

based on reliability and verification <strong>of</strong> data, and promote cooperation<br />

and consensus <strong>of</strong> all relevant entities and local<br />

communities,<br />

• prevent possible and actual pollutions in-situ (in the framework<br />

<strong>of</strong> technologies and functional units), establish economic and<br />

legal instruments <strong>of</strong> incentives and penalties and recognize<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

(5-5)<br />

conflicts and solve them primarily through prevention and<br />

incentive measures.<br />

During elaboration and implementation <strong>of</strong> the Strategy guidelines and<br />

department programmes at the level <strong>of</strong> significant interventions<br />

(national programmes, programmes <strong>of</strong> complex infrastructureeconomy<br />

systems and other), environmental protection must be<br />

considered as the basic principle and goal to be realized through<br />

application <strong>of</strong> systematic measures at both state and local levels.<br />

Key action fields are the areas <strong>of</strong> economy concentration, exploitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural resources, and conflict <strong>of</strong> interests in use <strong>of</strong> urban space,<br />

especially in cities, with priorities:<br />

Energetic and industry: priority in updating and introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

modern technologies that will lower and even eliminate the adverse<br />

trends, and in further development, care in selection <strong>of</strong> locations and<br />

technologies, and implementation <strong>of</strong> all measures already in the<br />

preliminary phase <strong>of</strong> planning to secure best possible location and<br />

operation within the allowable environmental pressures.<br />

Infrastructure and municipal activities: modernization <strong>of</strong><br />

infrastructure networks - solution <strong>of</strong> traffic problems in cities and other.<br />

Landscape: implementation <strong>of</strong> protection measures <strong>of</strong> natural and<br />

cultural heritage and preservation <strong>of</strong> the cultural and natural features <strong>of</strong><br />

landscape as a whole.<br />

At the state and local levels it is necessary to establish such<br />

instruments <strong>of</strong> taxation policy and financial measures that will treat the<br />

ecological component as an expenditure item, but payment should not<br />

give right to pollution.<br />

At the local level as well as within framework <strong>of</strong> competences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental management entities, it is necessary to implement<br />

urgent and pragmatic measures that do not require complex<br />

procedures and projects or major funds, but are relating to behavior<br />

and order in space and concern organization and function <strong>of</strong> all<br />

mentioned entities.<br />

CONCLUSION:<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is in<br />

accordance with the spatial planning principles <strong>of</strong> the Strategy and<br />

Programme <strong>of</strong> Physical Planning <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 8<br />

Picture 1 .Excerpt from the STRATEGY AND PROGRAMME OF PHYSICAL PLANNIN OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 9<br />

A.2.2. SPATIAL PLAN OF DUBROVACKO-NERETVANSKA COUNTY (PPDNŽ)<br />

(County Institute <strong>of</strong> Physical Planning, Dubrovnik)<br />

The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, as <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> special (international) im<strong>port</strong>ance for the<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia, represents one <strong>of</strong> the relevant development and traffic<br />

components in the Dubrovacko-Neretvanska County. Therefore, a more<br />

detailed excerpt from the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> Dubrovacko-Neretvanska County<br />

(PPDNŽ) is presented for the needs <strong>of</strong> this Study.<br />

Excerpt form the County Spatial Plan (PPDNŽ):<br />

1. PREMISIS<br />

1.1. CHARACTERISTICS OF SPACE, DEVELOPMENT AND<br />

RESOURCES<br />

Maritime traffic system<br />

On the territory <strong>of</strong> the Dubrovacko-Neretvanska County there are, according<br />

to the Ordinance on ranking <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s open to public traffic in Dubrovacko-<br />

Neretvanska County (Official Gazette no. 96/96), two <strong>port</strong>s <strong>of</strong> special<br />

(international) im<strong>port</strong>ance for the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia:<br />

• the Port <strong>of</strong> Gruž - passenger <strong>port</strong><br />

• the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce has not been damaged during the Homeland War, but<br />

because <strong>of</strong> war and aggression on the Bosnia and Herzegovina territory the<br />

<strong>port</strong> operations were reduced to minimum, with the exception <strong>of</strong> humanitarian<br />

aid shipments and equipment shipments for the United Nation peace task<br />

forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina.<br />

The total length <strong>of</strong> the operative shore <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is 1.618 m, water<br />

depth between 6 and 12 meters. The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce now operates with the<br />

following terminals:<br />

• general cargo terminal<br />

• bulk cargo terminal<br />

• liquid cargo terminal<br />

• spike cargo terminal<br />

• timber transit terminal<br />

• alumina and petrol coke terminal<br />

1.2. OBLIGATORY TERMS OF REFERENCE FROM STARTEGY AND<br />

PROGRAMME OF PHYSICAL PLANNING OF THE REPUBLIC OF<br />

CROATIA<br />

Maritime traffic<br />

In the new social and economic conditions in Croatia, the development <strong>of</strong><br />

maritime traffic should be based on the comparative advantages <strong>of</strong> Croatia,<br />

with special emphasis given to improvement <strong>of</strong> connections between islands,<br />

and based on the systematic approach in the following segments:<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 10<br />

• renovation, reconstruction and refurbishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>s<br />

• physical planning <strong>of</strong> maritime traffic<br />

• construction and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the existing piers for express ship<br />

lines.<br />

Priorities in elaboration <strong>of</strong> documents:<br />

• development strategy plan <strong>of</strong> all <strong>port</strong>s<br />

• general development plan for the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce system<br />

2. GOALS OF SPATIAL AND PHYSICAL PLANNING<br />

2.1. DETERMINATION OF SPATIAL AND ECONOMIC STRUCTURE<br />

Main point <strong>of</strong> reference (factors) <strong>of</strong> economic development<br />

Since infrastructure is the precondition for more advanced economic<br />

development, it is essential to solve the problem <strong>of</strong> traffic isolation <strong>of</strong> this area.<br />

It is also possible to reverse the negative trends in maritime trade by<br />

introducing smaller specialized cargo liners and RO-RO ships to Italy and<br />

other countries on the Mediterranean.<br />

The <strong>port</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Ploce and Dubrovnik have good development prospective on<br />

long term basis considering the im<strong>port</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> shipping, road and <strong>port</strong> traffic.<br />

2.2. DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

Maritime traffic<br />

Revitalization <strong>of</strong> the maritime traffic in Croatia due to very indented and long<br />

coastal line, is a necessity for Croatia both on the international and home<br />

level. The future development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>s and maritime connections should<br />

be based on the needs <strong>of</strong> Croatia, and at home level on needs <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

regions, in the first place islands, and economic activities <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce should be developed predominately for the needs <strong>of</strong> Bosnia<br />

and Herzegovina, but also for broader national and international hinterland.<br />

The main goals and development trends <strong>of</strong> maritime traffic are:<br />

• revalorization <strong>of</strong> the traffic value <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic Sea and proper<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the exceptional geo-traffic advantages <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic<br />

traffic route,<br />

• reorganization and technological updating <strong>of</strong> the Croatian <strong>port</strong>s,<br />

together with improvement <strong>of</strong> their connections with the world/inland<br />

and continent.<br />

• following <strong>of</strong> the latest technical and technological trends in maritime<br />

traffic,<br />

• improve legislation to enable new capital investments into <strong>port</strong>s and<br />

the whole sector <strong>of</strong> maritime traffic.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 11<br />

3. PHYSICAL PLANNING<br />

Potentials <strong>of</strong> the future economic development <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

The economic development <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Ploce projections foresee fast<br />

growth in the fields <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture, development <strong>of</strong> smaller production plants in the fields <strong>of</strong> traffic and<br />

trans<strong>port</strong> (<strong>port</strong> activities) in accordance with the new geo-political<br />

circumstances, development <strong>of</strong> trades and crafts, catering business and<br />

tourism as auxiliary activities.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> activity – traffic and trans<strong>port</strong> activities as the<br />

main carrier <strong>of</strong> development in this region, will depend partly on the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

the Bosnia and Herzegovina economy and partly on recently established geopolitical<br />

and development strategy circumstances on the longitudinal routs-<br />

through orientation to particular kind <strong>of</strong> cargo, necessary for the economy <strong>of</strong><br />

the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia.<br />

3.1. DEVELOPMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS<br />

3.1.1. MARITIME TRAFFIC SYSTEM<br />

Planned status 2015.<br />

• Ports <strong>of</strong> special (international) economic im<strong>port</strong>ance for the Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Croatia<br />

• The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce should now, after restoration <strong>of</strong> peace and<br />

normalization <strong>of</strong> relations on the territory <strong>of</strong> the Bosnia and<br />

Herzegovina, regain its former position within the system <strong>of</strong> Croatian<br />

cargo <strong>port</strong>s and this part <strong>of</strong> Europe. The fact that <strong>port</strong> capacities have<br />

remained undamaged will considerably speed up and facilitate return<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce to the pre-war status regarding both reloaded<br />

cargo volumes and traffic volumes. Within the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce area it is<br />

planned to construct a new bulk cargo terminal, new container<br />

terminal, and new liquid cargo terminal and issue a concession for the<br />

liquefied oil gas. All these planned interventions objective is significant<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the existing infrastructure and superstructure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>port</strong>, which should become the main cargo <strong>port</strong> for the territory <strong>of</strong><br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina and for the north east area <strong>of</strong> Croatia and<br />

part <strong>of</strong> Middle Europe. It has to be pointed out that part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

operative shore in Metkovic is an integral part <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

system.<br />

II. PROVISIONS FOR REALIZAITON<br />

139. On the territory <strong>of</strong> the County, the maritime traffic system<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> the existing <strong>port</strong>s:<br />

• Port <strong>of</strong> special (international) im<strong>port</strong>ance<br />

o Port <strong>of</strong> Gruž-passenger <strong>port</strong> (the City <strong>of</strong> Dubrovnik)<br />

o Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce (the City <strong>of</strong> Ploce)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 12<br />

CONCLUSION:<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is in<br />

accordance with the spatial and planned premises <strong>of</strong> the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong><br />

the Dubrovacko- Neretvanska County – final proposal <strong>of</strong> the plan.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 13<br />

Picture 2. Excerpt from SPATIAL PLAN OF DUBROVACKO-NERETVANSKA COUNTY<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 14<br />

Picture 3. Key for reading signs USE AND DESIGNATION O F SPACE<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 15<br />

A.2.3. CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO THE SPATIAL PLAN OF MUNICIPALITY<br />

OF KARDELJEVO 2000.<br />

(Zoning Institute <strong>of</strong> Dalmatian Region, Split, 1987.)<br />

The changes and additions to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />

Kardeljevo have been prepared with the objective to harmonize the Spatial<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo from 1981 to the defined goals and<br />

assignments <strong>of</strong> the socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />

Kardeljevo, which have arisen due to law regulations, changes <strong>of</strong><br />

development trends, as well as due to departures from the planned premises<br />

and space designations.<br />

The changes and additions to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />

Kardeljevo have been prepared and passed with the goal to <strong>of</strong>fer to the social<br />

entities that decide about the future development <strong>of</strong> the municipality, the<br />

optimal concept <strong>of</strong> organization and physical planning <strong>of</strong> space.<br />

The Spatial Plan as per its nature is a development plan defining the main<br />

components <strong>of</strong> development and giving a comprehensive insight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economic and spatial elements <strong>of</strong> development.<br />

With the objective to define the needs for space in 2000, the economic and<br />

social trends between 1981 and 1985 have been analyzed with the aim to<br />

check the premises defined in the earlier Plan. For the Port o Ploce, the<br />

analysis has shown the following results:<br />

Between 1981 and 1985 the Work organization »The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce» had<br />

shown growth in total revenues by 6 time, and 3.2 % yearly increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> employees. The realized accumulation income has also been<br />

considerate.<br />

The prospective <strong>of</strong> the further development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> have been assigned as<br />

significant due to the interests <strong>of</strong> a boarder development area. In addition, the<br />

Federal Executive Council also passed an «Ordinance on approval to<br />

establish custom zone in Kardeljevo», what would increase the business<br />

operations and needs for additional space (about 290 ha <strong>of</strong> new surfaces).<br />

In the planning section <strong>of</strong> the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo<br />

(Section IV. TRAFFIC PLAN) we can read the following:<br />

• The long term development <strong>of</strong> the traffic system <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Municipality <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo has been made on the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development strategy trends <strong>of</strong> the more immediate and<br />

boarder socio-political community, where the development <strong>of</strong><br />

traffic has a major functional role in development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong><br />

activities, industry, agriculture and tourism.<br />

• The traffic network, structures/facilities and their connection<br />

into a system provides for a higher degree <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

municipality space with its boarder surrounding, and has been<br />

based on built structures/facilities and routs and plans,<br />

investigation and projects.<br />

• The Plan has defined the traffic corridors that have to be kept<br />

for construction and extension <strong>of</strong> the traffic networks and<br />

structures in the long term perspective. It is assumed that the<br />

realization <strong>of</strong> the separate parts <strong>of</strong> the network will follow after<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 16<br />

Maritime traffic<br />

2000. The realization schedule <strong>of</strong> particular interventions in<br />

solving the traffic system will be in accordance with the<br />

economic possibilities and medium-term development plans.<br />

• The Port in Kardeljevo has been defined as the main maritime <strong>port</strong> for<br />

international and home traffic.<br />

• The biggest part <strong>of</strong> the traffic the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce will be realized to<br />

satisfy needs <strong>of</strong> the gravitation area. The <strong>port</strong> has excellent<br />

prospective (possibilities) to increase traffic and foreign trade<br />

exchange (forming <strong>of</strong> custom zone) and development <strong>of</strong> other<br />

economic activities connected with the <strong>port</strong>. With the objective to<br />

increase the <strong>port</strong> traffic volumes it will be necessary to continue<br />

construction and extension <strong>of</strong> the operative shores and construction <strong>of</strong><br />

modern storage space, modernization <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> machinery and<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> favorable technical and spatial conditions for maximally<br />

efficient good handling <strong>of</strong> goods. In the town <strong>of</strong> Rogotin on the Neretva<br />

River a smaller cargo operative shore will be built.<br />

IX. PROVISIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES AND ADDITIONS<br />

INTO SPATIAL PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KARDELJEVO<br />

• The Spatial Plan has defined the Port <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo as the main<br />

maritime <strong>port</strong> for international and home traffic.<br />

• The Spatial Plan has provided for surface for the extension <strong>of</strong> the Port<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ploce covering 410 ha in order to render possible further<br />

development <strong>of</strong> traffic volumes and foreign trade exchange, forming <strong>of</strong><br />

a freight-trans<strong>port</strong>ation center and development <strong>of</strong> other economic<br />

activities connected to the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

• The Plan provides for construction and extension <strong>of</strong> the operative<br />

shores, construction <strong>of</strong> the modern storage space, i.e. creation <strong>of</strong><br />

favorable technical and spatial conditions for maximally efficient<br />

handling <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />

• The Spatial Plan defines the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the protected costal zone<br />

for the sea shore, .....<br />

• Construction along the sea shore is implemented based on the<br />

detailed zoning plan.<br />

• The sea shore and shore waters shall not be occupied, nor is any<br />

construction allowed in opposition to the spatial plan designation.<br />

• Spatial Plan has defined especially endangered parts <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

environment::<br />

• The River Neretva<br />

• Costal sea waters from the mouth <strong>of</strong> the river Neretva to the bay <strong>of</strong><br />

Mala Pošta<br />

• Industrial and <strong>port</strong> operative zones<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 17<br />

...........<br />

CONSCLUSION:<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is in<br />

accordance with the spatial-planning premises <strong>of</strong> the Changes and<br />

Additions to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo from 1987.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


SL. 4


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 19<br />

A.2.4. CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO MASTER PLAN OF KARDELJEVO<br />

(Zoning Institute <strong>of</strong> Dalmatian Region, Split, 1987.)<br />

The changes and additions to the Master Plan <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo had been made<br />

at the same time with Changes and Additions to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Municipality <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo and passed in 1987.<br />

It should be mentioned that the Master Plan <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Ploce has been in<br />

force from 1973 and that many new law have been passed since, as well as<br />

regulations that regulate the field <strong>of</strong> spatial planning, that changes have<br />

occurred in use <strong>of</strong> surfaces and that all mentioned required to revaluate the<br />

spatial and planning premises with the objective to harmonize with the Spatial<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo.<br />

With consideration that these two Physical Planning documents (Spatial Plan<br />

and Master Plan) have been harmonized, the planned development within the<br />

city area is in accordance with the defined goals and assignments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo, arisen<br />

changes in legislation, changes <strong>of</strong> development trends, and also due to<br />

departures from planned premises and designations <strong>of</strong> space.<br />

However, in the Master Plan, space is better divided between the one<br />

foreseen for construction and other surfaces. In the graphical part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Master Plan (Picture 7. Excerpt from the Master Plan, Space designation<br />

Plan) the surface for the <strong>port</strong>-industrial complex have been determined (<strong>port</strong>operative<br />

zone), while in the textual part <strong>of</strong> the Master Plan the contents within<br />

this complex (zone) have been defined.<br />

Therefore, in the Master Plan <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo (point 3.1.5. Port-industrial<br />

complex) we can read the following:<br />

• The <strong>port</strong>-industrial complex and other industrial zones will be used for<br />

realization <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> the freight-trans<strong>port</strong>ation terminal<br />

Kardeljevo.<br />

• The <strong>port</strong>-industrial zone in the part between the city and the channel<br />

Vlaška is covering the surface <strong>of</strong> 211.5 ha. According to present<br />

knowledge, within this zone, besides the <strong>port</strong>-reloading function and<br />

the goods storage function, it is planned to enrich transit goods. Part <strong>of</strong><br />

the custom zone will be realized with the boundaries <strong>of</strong> this zone, and<br />

part in the industrial zones (along the channel Vlaška). Within the <strong>port</strong>industrial<br />

zone it is generally foreseen to locate contents described in<br />

detail in PROVISIONS FOR MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION.<br />

• The future extensions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>-industrial zone are planned over the<br />

channel Vlaška covering surface <strong>of</strong> 165.2 ha. By extension <strong>of</strong> the zone<br />

the channel Vlaška will be regulated and used as operative shore<br />

(both sides),<br />

• The Plan also defined the main communication lines by which the<br />

connection between the <strong>port</strong> and the city and with the boarder<br />

surrounding is to be realized, as well as the main network <strong>of</strong> the<br />

industrial and railway tracks.<br />

• The regulation <strong>of</strong> the operative shore in plan is general only, and final<br />

solution will be regulated by the detailed zoning plan. The terminal for<br />

special cargo will be left within the <strong>port</strong> zone until the realization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 20<br />

new zone in the area <strong>of</strong> «Dracevac». Relocation <strong>of</strong> the terminal to the<br />

new zone is to be completed until 1990.<br />

VIII. PROVISIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES AND<br />

ADDITIONS OF THE MASTER PLAN OF KARDELJEVO<br />

In the Master Plan the goods-trans<strong>port</strong>ation center has been defined, the<br />

terminal will be realized in the <strong>port</strong> and industrial zones.<br />

In the Master Plan the space <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>-industrial zone generally designated<br />

for construction have been defined as:<br />

• general cargo terminal, food products, timber, terminal, bulk cargo,<br />

liquid cargo, livestock, grain (spike cargo) and container and RO-RO<br />

terminal<br />

• warehouses<br />

• custom zone contents<br />

• business-administration building with parking lot<br />

• hydro-meteorological station<br />

• main entrance space with central parking lot<br />

• traffic and public utilities structures/facilities, green belts, construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> operative shores and similar.<br />

The Master Plan defined the main communication lines networks for<br />

connection between the <strong>port</strong> and the city and the boarder area, the main<br />

network <strong>of</strong> the industrial and railway tracks, and the general regulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shoreline. In the detailed zoning plan it is necessary to define in detail the<br />

traffic and municipal utilities solutions <strong>of</strong> this zone, regulation <strong>of</strong> the operative<br />

shore and achieve their harmonization with the technological and operational<br />

processes.<br />

The Master Plan has defined that future extensions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>-industrial zone<br />

will be undertaken on space over the channel Vlaška, together with the<br />

regulation <strong>of</strong> the channel Vlaška and refurbishment/construction <strong>of</strong> operative<br />

shores.<br />

The Maser Plan has also defined the zones <strong>of</strong> other industrial activities and<br />

along the channel Vlaška, in function <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>-industrial complex, and<br />

smaller service-storage zones in the Town <strong>of</strong> Rogotin.<br />

The Maser Plan has defined the Port <strong>of</strong> Kardeljevo as the main maritime <strong>port</strong><br />

for international and home traffic.<br />

CONCLUSION:<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is in<br />

accordance with the spatial-planning premises <strong>of</strong> the changes and<br />

additions to the Master Plan <strong>of</strong> the Kardeljevo from 1987.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


SL. 5


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

A.3. ENVIRONMENT AND IMPACT AREA OF THE SITE<br />

DESCRIPTION<br />

A.3.1. LOCATION OF THE SITE<br />

A.3.2. SPATIALY FUNCTIONAL UNITS AND DESIGNATION OF<br />

PLOTS IN THE TOWN OF PLOCE AREA<br />

A.3.3. INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX OF THE PORT<br />

A.3.4. ANALYSIS OF NATURAL CONDITIONS<br />

A.3.5. ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING SITE CAPACITY<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

A.3.1. LOCATION OF THE SITE<br />

The Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is situated in the southern part <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic coast in the<br />

natural harbour to the northeast <strong>of</strong> the Neretva Estuary. Its clearly defined and<br />

large gravitation area includes the north-eastern part <strong>of</strong> Croatia, part <strong>of</strong> Serbia<br />

and Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, part <strong>of</strong> Austria, Hungary, the<br />

Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Romania and Poland. The navigation<br />

corridor Bosanski Šamac – Vukovar and the Pan European road corridor Vc<br />

Budapest – Osijek – Sarajevo – Ploce will enhance the im<strong>port</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ploce Port for the combined road trans<strong>port</strong> among the Danube countries. The<br />

central Adriatic navigation corridor, the natural continuation <strong>of</strong> the Vc corridor<br />

will connect the Italian southern regions with the Central and East European<br />

countries in the most efficient way.<br />

The long-term development program passed by the Parliament should create<br />

conditions for the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce to provide high quality services to all users.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal is therefore a priority project in the<br />

forthcoming investment cycle.<br />

The primary trans<strong>port</strong> corridors connecting the industrialized countries are<br />

containerised. There is at the same time a growing tendency in both<br />

developed and developing countries to containerise the traditional routes. Port<br />

Authorities in the developing countries must therefore consider<br />

containerisation <strong>of</strong> both their own <strong>port</strong>s and the <strong>port</strong>s within their gravitation<br />

area as well as forecast changes that such a development would entail for the<br />

<strong>port</strong> planning, organisation and implementation.<br />

Figure 1: Panoramic view <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

A.3.2. SPATIALY FUNCTIONAL UNITS AND DESIGNATION OF PLOTS IN<br />

THE TOWN OF PLOCE AREA<br />

Numerous limiting factors in the near and remote townscape have affected the<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> individual plots. Thus, it is possible to identify the following three<br />

global zones in the Town <strong>of</strong> Ploce, which are divided as to the characteristic<br />

designation:<br />

• Working zones in the area <strong>of</strong> the Neretva Delta<br />

• Residential zone on the lime-stone hills<br />

• Tourist and recreational zone in the area <strong>of</strong> the Bacinska lakes<br />

The central town spaces are to be found in the inner-town, at the junction <strong>of</strong><br />

the delta and the residential zones. All relevant public spaces that shape the<br />

urban character <strong>of</strong> the town are also here and serve as the orientation point in<br />

the urban structure <strong>of</strong> the town.<br />

Almost all working activities take place in remote, large, industrial zones,<br />

which ensure both the continuance <strong>of</strong> technological processes and the proper<br />

traffic connections.<br />

Figure 2:Aerial view at the <strong>port</strong> area<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

Figure 3:View at the <strong>port</strong><br />

Figure 4: Town harbour<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

The areas that are not built up but are designated for parks and other green<br />

zones affect the physical planning considerably.<br />

The town is encircled by large water bodies (sea and lakes), which are<br />

partially categorized as protected areas.<br />

The cargo <strong>port</strong> Ploce in the harbour basin Ploce is located to the south <strong>of</strong> the<br />

residential part <strong>of</strong> the town, in the remote cargo operating zone adjacent to<br />

which is the industrial zone.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

A.3.3. INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX OF THE PORT<br />

The cargo terminal Ploce is situated within the industrial complex <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong><br />

with industrial facilities.<br />

The industrial zone <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>, occupying a <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the town and the Vlaška<br />

Channel, covers the area <strong>of</strong> 211.5 ha. The zone includes:<br />

• Terminal for general cargo, food, wood, bulk cargo, liquid<br />

cargo, livestock, cereals (loose cargo) as well as the container<br />

and RO-RO terminal<br />

• Indoor warehouses<br />

• Customs facilities<br />

• Administration building with the car parking<br />

• Hydro-meteorological station<br />

• Main entrance are and the central car parking<br />

• Traffic and utility facility, green buffer zone, operation quays,<br />

etc.<br />

According to projections the industrial zone would extend across the Vlaška<br />

channel and cover the area surface <strong>of</strong> 165.2ha. Due to such an extension the<br />

Vlaška channel would be regulated and used as an operation quay (from both<br />

sides).<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

Figure 5: Development plan for the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 8<br />

OTHER INDUSTRIES<br />

The industrial zones with the total surface <strong>of</strong> 94.7ha include the zone <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>port</strong> and other industries along the Vlaška Channel as well as the smaller<br />

service-storage area in Rogotin.<br />

The major part <strong>of</strong> the industrial zone along the Vlaška Channel is designated<br />

for industrial activities related to the development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>’s industrial<br />

complex (customs zone).<br />

Figure 6: Port terminals<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 9<br />

A.3.4. ANALYSIS OF NATURAL CONDITIONS<br />

A.3.4.1. GENERAL DATA ON METEOROLOGICAL, MAREO-GEOGRAPHIC AND<br />

CLIMATIC CONDITIONS<br />

This chapter presents the available data relating to the general climatic sea<br />

and air conditions that may be relevant for the assessment <strong>of</strong> interrelations<br />

between the terminal and the environment. Knowing these elements and<br />

taking into consideration the expected climatic conditions in a particular<br />

month, season or year is crucial for continuous and coordinated construction<br />

works and for the technological operating <strong>of</strong> the terminal during its life cycle.<br />

A.3.4.1.1. Meteorological wind data<br />

According to the hydro-meteorological division <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic Sea in<br />

quadrants in which the wind data are statistically processed, the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

is in the 13 th quadrant. For a twenty-year period (1957 – 1976) in (1) days the<br />

probability (‰) <strong>of</strong> wind occurrence from all directions is as follows:<br />

529,4 235,3<br />

(1-3 Bf), (4-5 Bf)<br />

58,8 19,6<br />

(6-7 Bf), (= 8 Bf)<br />

The above table confirms that the area <strong>of</strong> the Ploce Port annually registers ca.<br />

16% <strong>of</strong> calm and ca. 2% <strong>of</strong> strong winds and hurricane = 8 Bf.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 10<br />

Figure 7: Wind rose<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 11<br />

Figure 7 shows the wind rose for the Ploce Port area, based on the same<br />

data. It is obvious from it that the strongest winds blow from the SE direction.<br />

Another relevant source (2) provides the wind statistics in the period between<br />

1949 and 1976, based on measurements by the meteorological station<br />

Opuzen, some 8.5 km to the east <strong>of</strong> the site. Figure 8 shows these<br />

measurement data classified by months and directions.<br />

Figure 8:WIND<br />

MEAN FREQUENCY (‰) AND FORCE (BEAUFORT)<br />

MEAN NUMBER OF DAYS WITH STRONG (6. B) AND STORMY (8. B) WIND<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

OPUZEN<br />

N NE E SE S SW W NW ‡ ‡<br />

Month Fr Fo Fr Fo Fr Fo Fr Fo Fr Fo Fr Fo Fr Fo Fr Fo C 6.B 8.B<br />

1 97 2.8 84 2.6 101 2.4 560 2.5 112 2.5 13 2.7 9 2.2 24 2.8 0.8 0.1<br />

2 195 3.5 124 3.2 112 2.9 392 2.7 90 3.0 33 2.6 47 3.0 7 3.5 1.1 0.1<br />

3 113 3.7 82 3,1 127 2.8 338 3.0 79 3.1 73 2.7 175 2.7 13 2.3 1.3 0.1<br />

4 71 4.1 71 3.6 98 3.0 363 3.0 80 3.9 91 2.9 204 2.9 22 2.5 1.5 0.1<br />

5 33 4.0 49 3.8 66 2.5 332 2.6 64 3.8 95 2.3 324 2.8 37 2.0 0.5 0.1<br />

6 97 3.5 33 3.4 55 3.0 360 3.0 75 2.9 51 3.1 358 2.9 7 3.3 4 0.1<br />

7 95 3.5 49 3.2 70 2.8 312 2.8 35 3.2 56 2.6 368 2.8 15 2.5 0.2<br />

8 86 3.1 6 3.5 60 2.8 301 2.7 41 3.0 66 2.5 431 2.8 9 2.3 0.2<br />

9 112 3.6 70 3.8 62 3.0 336 2.8 53 3.0 79 2.8 280 2.8 5 3.0 3 0.5<br />

10 135 3.5 84 3.5 78 3.0 443 2.9 58 3.6 56 2.7 129 2.5 17 2.8 0.7<br />

11 97 3.7 55 2.5 120 2.7 519 2.9 97 2.8 35 2.9 66 2.0 11 2.9 0.9<br />

12 99 3.5 79 2.9 101 2.7 670 2.7 22 3.0 4 3.0 19 2.7 6 3.5 0.9 0.2<br />

P 99 3.7 65 3.5 88 2.9 410 2.8 67 3.3 54 2.9 201 2.6 14 2.9 1 8.7 0.7<br />

It is interesting to notice, also here, that the predominant frequency is from the<br />

southeast throughout each month and in particular in the wintertime. Strong<br />

winds blow the whole year through (2,3%) and in particular in the winter and<br />

spring months, while stormy winds and hurricanes blow in winter and in<br />

spring, though less than 1%).<br />

The detailed data come from the weather station Ploce that is positioned 2 m<br />

above the sea level, at 43 o 2’ N and 17 o 25’ E, which is less than 1 km to the<br />

south <strong>of</strong> the site. The data used here (3) refer to a 16-year period (1978-1994)<br />

and are based on three daily climatologic periods (7 a.m., 2 p.m. and 9 p.m.)<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> getting a complete account <strong>of</strong> the wind regime for the<br />

Ploce Port area, probabilities <strong>of</strong> simultaneous occurrences <strong>of</strong> both wind<br />

direction and wind force in the three climatologic periods between 1978 and<br />

1994 have been analysed. Figures 9, 10 and 11 detail the summarized data.<br />

Figure 9 shows the wind rose for each period (a) and for all <strong>of</strong> them together<br />

(b). The frequencies are expressed in percentages for each wind direction.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 12<br />

Figure 9: Frequency <strong>of</strong> different directions (%) in the climatologic periods<br />

7 a.m., 2 p.m. and 9. p.m. (a) and total (b).<br />

Figure 10: Mean annual wind force by directions in the climatologic periods 7<br />

a.m, 2 p.m. and 9 p.m. (a) and total (b) in m/s<br />

Figure 10 shows the distribution by the mean wind force for each direction,<br />

converted into m/s.<br />

Figure 11 details the mean annual number <strong>of</strong> days with strong and stormy<br />

winds, for a period <strong>of</strong> 17 years.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

b)<br />

a)


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 13<br />

Figure 11: Mean annual number <strong>of</strong> days with strong Figure 12: Annual range <strong>of</strong> the mean and stormy<br />

winds wind force<br />

Figures 9 – 11 detail the key indicators <strong>of</strong> the wind regime: a very<br />

characteristic shape <strong>of</strong> the wind rose with the most frequent winds from the<br />

northern quadrant (N-E), in particular in the morning and evening hours, while<br />

during the day the predominant directions are from the west and southwest. A<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> the study area is that the winds are strongest at 2 p.m., while<br />

the frequency <strong>of</strong> the calm is ca. 14%. In addition, the strongest wind is not the<br />

most forceful one since the most forceful winds are associated with the flows<br />

from the southeast (SE). Such a distribution <strong>of</strong> wind directions and speed is<br />

based on the general circulation and flows in the study area, as well as on the<br />

orographic effects (the windward sides are to the west, southwest and<br />

northeast). In average less than 1 day with stormy wind per year can be<br />

expected, while strong winds can be expected to blow ca. four days in the<br />

winter and spring months. The widest range <strong>of</strong> strong wind days occurs in<br />

December and in the observed 17-year period it comes to 10 days, though it<br />

may not occur at all. Stormy winds occur most frequently in February but also<br />

their ranges are widest in December: they can be expected to occur up to 4<br />

days per month, while in February the maximum recorded value is 3 days.<br />

Figure 12, showing the mean wind force regardless <strong>of</strong> the direction, details the<br />

winter and spring maximum wind force values.<br />

Since the wind regime is contingent on the position <strong>of</strong> the Sun in relation to<br />

the Earth, the wind roses differ by seasons. Seasonal and annual wind roses<br />

are shown on Figure 7.<br />

Both seasonal and annual wind force distributions are presented on Figure 13.<br />

It shows that except for winter the increased frequency <strong>of</strong> stronger winds is<br />

connected to the 2 p.m. period in all seasons. Namely, due to less radiation<br />

from the Sun, winds are less contingent on the day scheme. Almost a uniform<br />

distribution by the periods is characteristic for the wintertime <strong>of</strong> the year, while<br />

the summer months record the most diverse division.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 14<br />

Figure 13: Seasonal and annual frequencies <strong>of</strong> wind force classes (5). The wind force is given<br />

in Beaufort.<br />

Conclusion<br />

For this statement, the most interesting winds are the strongest winds, which<br />

may cause problems related to the <strong>port</strong> facilities’ operational functions. Most<br />

sensitive are the mobile <strong>port</strong>al crane (100 tons) and the container bridge, for<br />

which the operational criterion comes to the wind peak <strong>of</strong> 5 Bf (36 km/h or 10<br />

m/s). The data show that such winds (= 6 Bf), making the loading activities<br />

impossible, blow ca 30 days or 8,2% per year.<br />

All the equipment should be dimensioned for at least two-second gusts <strong>of</strong> ca<br />

11 Bf (108 km/h or 30 m/s), which are possible by a long-term distribution if<br />

the maximum hourly wind speed comes to 8/9 Bf (72 km/h or 20 m/s).<br />

According to the observed periods, the maximum speed <strong>of</strong> 8/9 Bf (20 m/s) can<br />

be understood as the speed <strong>of</strong> the return period <strong>of</strong> 20 years. For a 100-year<br />

return period, according to the Gumbel distribution scale, the maximum speed<br />

will amount to ca. 23 m/s, which corresponds to 9/10 Bf.<br />

Theoretically speaking, the winds that may generate surface waves, which<br />

may impact the site, blow from the south-southwest. Based on the<br />

aforementioned data, they can be 5/6 Bf (10 m/s) strong in a twenty-year<br />

return period, i.e. a limit <strong>of</strong> 6/7 Bf (14 m/s) is accepted as the speed per hour.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 15<br />

A.3.4.1.2 Mareographic data (dynamics <strong>of</strong> water masses, waves, tides, submarine<br />

springs)<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> the sea dynamics interesting for mutual impact <strong>of</strong> the project and sea<br />

movements are certainly tides and sea currents. They will, therefore, be<br />

described here on the basis <strong>of</strong> existing data.<br />

Tides<br />

The dynamics <strong>of</strong> exchange <strong>of</strong> sea levels has the character <strong>of</strong> semidiurnal<br />

period predominantly on a greater part <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic and consequently in the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the location under consideration.<br />

The theory <strong>of</strong> sea tides in the Adriatic shows that the distribution <strong>of</strong> theoretical<br />

amplitudes <strong>of</strong> longitudinal oscillations coincides with the observation in the<br />

case when assumed that the stimulus for oscillation comes from the Ionian<br />

Sea. On the other hand, the determination <strong>of</strong> mentioned values does not<br />

agree with empirical values, if these are derived under the condition that the<br />

Adriatic water mass is stimulated to oscillation only by the direct gravitational<br />

action <strong>of</strong> the moon and the sun. It can be concluded from this that the tides in<br />

the Adriatic sea are not independent.<br />

Almost completely regular flow <strong>of</strong> the tides is disturbed by fluctuations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Adriatic level which is the consequence <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> atmosphere, from air<br />

pressure variations and wind action. Increase <strong>of</strong> the air pressure and northerly<br />

winds (bora/north-easter, sjevernjak/north wind) lower the water level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sea in the northern part by 40 cm, while the air pressure drop and southerly<br />

winds (jugo, oštro) which are the consequence <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean<br />

depressions (cyclones), increase the water level by 70 cm. Jugo blows<br />

towards the closed part <strong>of</strong> the basin for several days with the constant<br />

strength and accumulates water in the north Adriatic where, in the period <strong>of</strong><br />

high water, the coastal areas can be flooded (very high water level in Trieste<br />

and Venice). On the other hand, very low water levels are linked with high air<br />

pressure which is the consequence <strong>of</strong> anticyclone over the central Europe.<br />

Fluctuations <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic water level which is reduced to the action <strong>of</strong><br />

mentioned atmospheric factors, consists primarily in slow rising and falling <strong>of</strong><br />

its mean level. It is very irregular and slightly disrupts the amplitude <strong>of</strong> sea tide<br />

oscillations. In addition to that, free oscillations (standing waves) occur, with<br />

periods smaller than 1 minute and up to a period <strong>of</strong> several hours, which can<br />

sometimes significantly disrupt the rate <strong>of</strong> sea tides. These are the standing<br />

waves in numerous bays and channels, whose water mass is prompted to<br />

oscillation by impulses <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> the atmosphere or <strong>of</strong> the open sea.<br />

Since their periods depend on dimensions and relief <strong>of</strong> the basin bed, these<br />

oscillations too are the characteristic <strong>of</strong> sea delevelling in a particular area. To<br />

date explorations were made <strong>of</strong> seiches in the bay <strong>of</strong> Trieste, Bakar and<br />

Kaštela and the free oscillation <strong>of</strong> the entire Adriatic basin, whose period<br />

amounts to about 23 hours.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 16<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> the data under (5) information is obtained for the area <strong>of</strong> Ploèe<br />

with regard to geodetic zero (Trieste) that:<br />

Mean sea level SRM = +0.32 m<br />

SNNžR = +0.12 m (hydrographic zero)<br />

Extr.NžR10 = -0.22 m<br />

Extr.NžR100 = -0.32 m<br />

A SVVšR = + 0.35 m<br />

Extr.VR10 = +1.00 m<br />

Extr.VR100 = +1.10 m<br />

According to this long-term forecast we can see, a piece <strong>of</strong> information<br />

interesting for us, that in the ten-year return period the possible amplitude is<br />

about 1.22 m while in the hundred-year return period the maximum possible<br />

oscillation <strong>of</strong> the level is 1.42 m which should be taken into consideration in<br />

designing the <strong>port</strong> quay.<br />

The latest investigations <strong>of</strong> sea level fluctuations in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe are<br />

shown in the study <strong>of</strong> the Croatian Hydrographic Institute (4). On the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

measurements conducted continuously from March 2002 to March 2003,<br />

calculations were made <strong>of</strong> the values <strong>of</strong> the sea mean level (SRM) and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hydrographic zero (HN) in the area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe, and these were<br />

compared with the geodetic zero (GN) and mareographic zero (MN)<br />

(mareograph measures the height <strong>of</strong> the sea level in relation to the<br />

mareographic zero). The relationships are as follows:<br />

SRM - HN = 24.5 cm SRM - MN = 121.1 cm<br />

SRM - GN = 42.2 cm HN - MN = 96.6 cm<br />

HN - GN = 17.7 cm GN - MN = 78.9 cm<br />

With regard to shortness <strong>of</strong> measured period a survey <strong>of</strong> relationships <strong>of</strong><br />

SRM, HN and GN in Split based on 19-year measurements is given too.<br />

Namely, because <strong>of</strong> astronomic parametres which influence the tidal<br />

fluctuations <strong>of</strong> the sea level, it is exactly this time period that is necessary for<br />

an accurate definition <strong>of</strong> the hydrographic zero. Therefore:<br />

SRM - HN = 20.2 cm<br />

SRM - GN = 30.7 cm<br />

HN - GN = 10.5 cm<br />

Consequently, the difference between SRM and HN in Split is slightly smaller<br />

than in Ploèe which is the consequence <strong>of</strong> semi-diurnal components which<br />

have higher amplitudes in Ploèe than in Split. Furthermore, in the investigated<br />

period the mean sea water level in Split is by about 10 cm higher than in the<br />

several-year period and this relationship is also valid in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe<br />

aquatorium. It is therefore to be assumed that the values <strong>of</strong> HN and SRM in<br />

Ploèe in the investigated one-year period are about 10cm higher than in the<br />

19-year period, which has to be taken into consideration during planning <strong>of</strong><br />

activities over a longer time period.<br />

The graphic presentation <strong>of</strong> daily sea level values is shown in fig. 9<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


HEIGHT OF SEA LEVEL (m)<br />

HEIGHT OF SEA LEVEL (m)<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 17<br />

Figure 14. Mean annual values <strong>of</strong> the sea level height in relation to the mareographic zero in<br />

Ploèe in the period from March 2002 - March 2003<br />

Here we can see consistency with previously mentioned source, having taken<br />

into consideration the extrapolation for a long-term period<br />

Figure 15. Values <strong>of</strong> sea level height in Ploèe recorded during occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> standing waves.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 18<br />

What figure 15 distinctly shows are measured fluctuations <strong>of</strong> sea levels at the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> standing waves in the period <strong>of</strong> three days which is the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the topography <strong>of</strong> the entire bay <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe and<br />

unhomogeneous activities <strong>of</strong> atmospheric pressure disturbances. According to<br />

this it can be estimated that the period <strong>of</strong> standing waves in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe<br />

is about thirty minutes, which is far above own frequencies <strong>of</strong> all motions <strong>of</strong><br />

any vessels which will move or be berthed to the quay (7) and there is no<br />

danger <strong>of</strong> resonant effects.<br />

Sea currents<br />

Sea currents, along with the changes in sea level or as their consequence,<br />

are an im<strong>port</strong>ant cause <strong>of</strong> sea dynamics which causes cleaning, bringing or<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> pollutants on one side and the spatial sea<br />

change which affects flora and fauna <strong>of</strong> a particular aquatorium, on the other<br />

side.<br />

The investor has provided data based on measurements <strong>of</strong> Hydrographic<br />

Institute about basic directions <strong>of</strong> sea currents in the aquatorium between the<br />

Pelješac peninsula and the mainland, consequently in the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong><br />

the project for Quay 7 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe.<br />

Figure 16 shows the basic directions <strong>of</strong> surface currents in the Neretva<br />

channel during winter and spring. They are qualitative for the whole year,<br />

because it is evident that the surface currents in the wider neighbourhood <strong>of</strong><br />

the project are under the impact <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river confluence. More detailed<br />

and quantified these surface currents are shown in the sea aquatorium in front<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project in figure 17 where it can be seen that surface currents in the<br />

immediate neighbourhood <strong>of</strong> the project are significant and amount to about<br />

25 cm/s (about 0.9 km/h). This can be attributed to the circulation from the<br />

Neretva, Vlaška channel and the bay <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe itself.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 19<br />

Figure 16 Basic directions <strong>of</strong> surface currents in winter and spring season in the Neretva channel<br />

Scale 1 : 80 000<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 20<br />

Figure 17 Permanent surface currents in the zone <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river mouth<br />

scale 1 : 40 000<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

Speed <strong>of</strong> currents (cm/s)<br />

SPRING SEASON<br />

WINTER SEASON


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 21<br />

Figure 18 Currents at 5 m depth in the zone <strong>of</strong> the Neretva mouth<br />

scale 1 : 40 000<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

WINTER SEASON<br />

SPRING SEASON<br />

KEY:<br />

FLOOD TIDE CURRENT (cm/s)<br />

EBB TIDE CURRENT (cm/s)


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 22<br />

In order to get a better insight into the deep-sea spatial circulation, the figure 18 shows<br />

currents at 5 m depth, separately for flood tide and ebb tide. In the very location <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project, ebb and tide currents alternate and amount to about 8 to 10 cm/s (about 0.35 km/h).<br />

With the estimate in the first approximation through the continuity equation and considering<br />

two-beat mean sea tide for the volume <strong>of</strong> the Ploèe Port aquatorium, we arrive at these<br />

speeds exactly as the maximum ones in the channel near the cape G.Višnjica, at mean<br />

oscillations <strong>of</strong> the sea. This leads to the conclusion that the currents in the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong><br />

this project are under the distinct impact <strong>of</strong> ebb and tide and have regular periodic alternating<br />

flow. The Crna rijeka river confluence in the aquatorium <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe which is<br />

minimum in the summer season was not taken into consideration here.<br />

As far as the execution <strong>of</strong> the project and its impact on the sea current is concerned, it is<br />

necessary to conclude immediately that this impact practically does not exist or if it exists<br />

then it is positive.<br />

Namely, the project is executed laterally, by preserving the existing coastline and deepening<br />

the basin, thus enabling better spatial circulation and eddying motion around the vertical<br />

edges <strong>of</strong> the basin.<br />

Besides, with the execution and maintenance <strong>of</strong> an appropriate access waterway <strong>of</strong> the<br />

constant depth, hydrodynamic resistances to current will be reduced, which will contribute to<br />

the safety <strong>of</strong> the waterway.<br />

Sea waves<br />

Surface sea waves, as oscillatory periodic occurrences <strong>of</strong> sea fluctuation are divided into<br />

short and long waves.<br />

Among long waves, which by their definition are those with period <strong>of</strong> more than about thirty<br />

seconds, the sea tides and atmospheric (baric) waves were processed because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

passage <strong>of</strong> front or gusts <strong>of</strong> wind.<br />

With a simple calculation for the own frequency <strong>of</strong> semiopen rectangular basin, it can be<br />

seen that the first tone has a period <strong>of</strong> about 160 seconds. Therefore, there is the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> resonant effect <strong>of</strong> long waves <strong>of</strong> mentioned period, but according to above mentioned<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> seiches, which could cause this resonance effect, they have a much<br />

greater period (about 30 minutes).<br />

As the own periods <strong>of</strong> ship movements which will be berthed in this <strong>port</strong> basin are also<br />

significantly lower, for rolling motion between 25 and 35 seconds, for pitching motion<br />

between 10 to 15 seconds and for heaving motion about 10 seconds, these long waves<br />

cannot cause resonance effects neither <strong>of</strong> the basin or <strong>of</strong> the ship, significant for safety resp.<br />

operational level.<br />

The short waves which are wind-related can have an effect if they should penetrate the basin<br />

in which they are also analyzed.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 23<br />

Wind waves which can affect the project <strong>of</strong> Quay 7 are those from the sector <strong>of</strong> exposure S<br />

to SW. Since it was analyzed earlier that the winds from this direction can have an hourly<br />

strength in twenty-year return peak period 7 Bf (17 m/s) for the direction SW and ( Bf (20<br />

m/s) for S which is a strict criterion for impact <strong>of</strong> waves on the <strong>port</strong>, then through known<br />

diagram for wave forecast for shorter windward sides (Groen-Dorrenstein) we obtain the<br />

following wave elements, for the position in the deep sea in front <strong>of</strong> the entrance to the<br />

waterway (near cape Višnjica):<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 24<br />

Slika 19 . Windward sides for <strong>port</strong> pf Ploce<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 25<br />

Slika 20 . Wave height for harbour basin between Quay 5 and Quay7<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 26<br />

Direction Wind speed<br />

m/s<br />

Windward<br />

side<br />

F (km)<br />

Significant<br />

wave height<br />

H1/3(m)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

Period<br />

T(s)<br />

Length<br />

L(m)<br />

S 10.00 8.5 1.60 3.5 19.1<br />

SW 17.00 9.0 1.40 3.4 18.0<br />

This shows that these deepwater waves start their transformation because <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

the bed at a depth <strong>of</strong> about 9 m, i.e. in front <strong>of</strong> cape Višnjica, at the entrance to the waterway.<br />

Since the waterway has about 150m in width and 15m in depth, with about 700m in length,<br />

and in the SSW direction, according to presented bathymetry, all waves are outside this<br />

direction, and from the critical sector with refraction and diffraction on the shore and in<br />

shallow waters around the way they dissipate and cannot in any way reach the <strong>port</strong> basin <strong>of</strong><br />

the quay 7, which means that they cannot affect its safety.<br />

Waves from the direction SSW itself, and along the channel whose wave height can by<br />

interpolation be determined as Hs = 1.5 m, especially behind the cape G.Višnjica, have<br />

smaller height because <strong>of</strong> lateral energy dissipation by sudden refraction and diffraction. It<br />

can be seen and established that the reduction <strong>of</strong> wave height only considering the principle<br />

<strong>of</strong> energy preservation equation in diverging channel in the ratio<br />

B1<br />

H2 = -------- . H1<br />

√ B2<br />

where H1 and B1 is the height <strong>of</strong> waves and width <strong>of</strong> wave front before wave deformation and<br />

H2 and B2 on some position in the direction <strong>of</strong> the wave beam/ ray.<br />

In this way in the line <strong>of</strong> Quay 7 and the island <strong>of</strong> Gubavac we come to the reduction <strong>of</strong> wave<br />

height from Hs = 1.5 m to Hs = 1.0 m. In that line there comes the diffraction <strong>of</strong> this wave and<br />

the diffraction lines, based on the standard diagram, are the diffractions around an acute<br />

angle shown in enclosed layout. From this analysis, it can be seen in the first approximation<br />

that the aquatorium <strong>of</strong> Quay 7 and the berth itself are well protected from all waves from the<br />

critical sector S - SW.<br />

Direct waves are possible from the direction W and they can be caused by maximum wind up<br />

to 6 Bf (about 14 m/s). With regard to the windward side which is short and amounts to about<br />

0.9 km at the end <strong>of</strong> the basin, according to mentioned diagram Groen-Dorrenstein we get<br />

considerable height <strong>of</strong> waves Hs = 0.4 m which has no effect on <strong>port</strong> operational level since it<br />

lies within the permitted criteria (6), (7).<br />

This analysis shows that the Quay 7 itself, for which the Environmental impact study is being<br />

prepared, is very well protected from wind waves and its complete safety and operational<br />

level with regard to this parameter.<br />

A.3.4.1.3. Climatic data<br />

In order to get a more complete insight into other climatic parameters on an immediate and<br />

wider project area, here are given measured data for the weather station Ploèe for the period


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 27<br />

from 1978 - 1994 (Attachments 15 - 20) and the neighbouring station Opuzen for the period<br />

from 1949 - 1976 (Figure 14).<br />

It is clear how the data for these two stations coincide well also in different time periods, and<br />

they are therefore briefly commented upon here.<br />

Month<br />

TEMPERATURE<br />

mean monthly<br />

mean daily<br />

amplitude<br />

absolute maximum<br />

Absolute minimum<br />

Absolute mean<br />

amplitude<br />

Mean monthly total<br />

cloudiness in 10/10<br />

REL./MOIST<br />

URE<br />

Mean monthly<br />

rel.moisture in %<br />

1 7.4 7.2 17.7 -8.6 26.3 5.7 70 17 155 283 91<br />

2 7.3 7.9 20.8 -7.3 28.1 5.3 67 22 139 298 96<br />

Abs.min in %<br />

PRECIPITATION NUMBER OF DAYS<br />

Monthly sum<br />

Absolute month<br />

Absolute daily<br />

maximum<br />

With precipitation<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

With precipitation<br />

Sa padavinama<br />

cloudy<br />

sunny<br />

cold<br />

warm<br />

hot<br />

With warm night<br />

With snow<br />

With hail<br />

With thunder<br />

With fog<br />

S snježnim<br />

pokrivacem<br />

11.<br />

5<br />

10.1 5.6 13.3 6.2 4.1 1.4 0.4 2.2 0.1 0.5<br />

10.<br />

5<br />

9.9 4.5 11.2 6.3 3.8 1.3 0.8 1.9 0.5 0.7<br />

3 10.6 8.7 23.6 -4.4 28.0 4.9 70 8 88 183 55 9.9 9.0 3.2 10.0 9.1 2.7 0.8 0.2 1.8 0.3 0.4<br />

4 14.3 9.3 28.5 1.9 27.2 5.1 67 7 95 178 74 9.8 8.1 2.6 9.3 8.8 0.5 0.1 3.2 0.3<br />

5 18.9 9.9 32.2 3.7 28.5 4.2 67 19 59 93 73 7.2 6.6 1.9 6.8 8.4 8.1 0.8 0.6 0.1 4.0 0.6<br />

6 22.3 10.3 34.4 10.1 24.3 3.4 61 18 66 233 77 6.5 5.2 2.1 3.8 10.1 20.4 5.6 1-9 0.1 4.2 0.2<br />

7 25.1 11.4 37.3 11.6 25.7 2.4 62 16 38 205 64 4.2 2.8 0.7 1.7 16.3 29.2 16.0 8.7 3.6<br />

8 25.2 11.7 38.5 10.8 27.7 2.3 60 11 53 119 86 4.7 3.4 1.6 2.5 17.0 29.5 18.0 7.5 2.6 0-1<br />

9 21.5 11.4 34.7 3.4 31.3 3.3 66 15 93 234 112 6.6 5.9 2.8 4.5 12.5 16.7 4.2 0.7 0.2 2.6 0.4<br />

10 16.4 10.7 32.1 -2.0 34-1 4.1 71 5 128 325 76 8.7 7.9 4.1 7.5 11.2 2.4 0.3 3.0 0.3<br />

11 12.8 8.7 23.1 -4.4 27.5 5.5 75 16 189 250 151<br />

12 9.1 7.5 20.3 -5.2 25.5 5.8 73 14 185 472 155<br />

15.9 9.5 38.5 -8.6 47-7 4.3 68 5 1288 1429 155<br />

CLIMATIC CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Figure 21 Mean monthly values <strong>of</strong> meteorological elements and occurrences<br />

OPUZEN<br />

0° 5° 10° 15° 20°<br />

1.I - 31.XII 1.I - 31.XII 9.III-9.XI 18.IV-27.X 26.V-25.IX<br />

365 365 276 193 123 (days)<br />

17-<br />

1<br />

11.5 4.7 11.7 5.2 0.3 0.1 3.5 0.5<br />

13-<br />

7<br />

11.9 5.8 13.5 6.7 2.1 0.1 0.3 2.8 0.2 0.1<br />

10<br />

6.0<br />

92.3 39.6 95.8 117.8 13.0 106.8 44.6 19.4 3.6 2.6 35.4 3.5 1.7<br />

Figure 22 MEAN DATES OF TEMPERATURE THRESHOLDS AND DURATION OF TEMPERATURE ABOVE 0°,<br />

5°, 10°, 15° and 20° (in days)<br />

Air temperature<br />

Air temperature by itself is not <strong>of</strong> special interest for the analysis <strong>of</strong> the possible impact <strong>of</strong><br />

some object on the environment. However, it is useful to have available the data about the<br />

temperature and the range within which it is found. Figure 23 shows an annual temperature<br />

rate: mean monthly temperature, absolute maximum and absolute minimum.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 28<br />

Cloud, precipitation and relative air humidity<br />

Cloud is the total amount <strong>of</strong> clouds which at a given moment covers the celestial dome. This<br />

is an im<strong>port</strong>ant meteorological element on which it depends how much energy <strong>of</strong> the sun will<br />

reach the ground and how much will the ground cool at night by irradiation. It is therefore<br />

im<strong>port</strong>ant for the power balance between the ground and the atmosphere. Cloud amount is<br />

determined virtually and expresses the pro<strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the sky covered by cloud.<br />

Figure 23 Mean annual air temperature rate, Ploèe<br />

months<br />

Mean annual cloud in the area <strong>of</strong> Ploèe amounts to 4.3 tenths (from 1.9 tenths in August to<br />

5.5 tenths in March and April). The total number <strong>of</strong> cloudy days (cloud above eight tenths) is<br />

about 80 on average, which makes about 22% annually, while the number <strong>of</strong> clear days<br />

(cloud under two tenths) is as much as about 38% annually, which is also expected<br />

considering the location <strong>of</strong> Ploèe.<br />

Along with the air temperature, cloud and precipitation gives an im<strong>port</strong>ant piece <strong>of</strong><br />

information about the climate. Annual rate <strong>of</strong> cloud and annual rate <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> clear<br />

(cloud ≤ 2/10) and cloudy (cloud ≥ 8/10) days are shown in figure 24, while figure 25 shows<br />

mean annual rate <strong>of</strong> the quantity <strong>of</strong> precipitation and humidity.<br />

Relative air humidity represents the degree <strong>of</strong> air saturation with water vapour and it depends<br />

on air temperature. Mean annual rate <strong>of</strong> relative humidity is shown in figure 25, which also<br />

gives the mean annual rate <strong>of</strong> precipitation. On average it amounts to about 63% for the<br />

whole year, and the deficit in moisture is highest in summer months.<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> mean and minimum monthly air humidity as well as the number <strong>of</strong> days with<br />

relative humidity >80 % at 14.00 hours and >30 % in one <strong>of</strong> the three daytime<br />

measurements, is shown in figure 26. This overview clearly shows that the maximum<br />

humidity in mean day measurement (14.00 hours) is expected right in summer months (July,<br />

August) when air temperatures are also highest, i.e, when evaporation from big water areas<br />

is high. At the same time, annual daily humidity, as well as the number <strong>of</strong> days with moisture<br />

< 30 % is at the lowest in these months.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 29<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> days with cloud<br />

>8 and 8/10<br />

Cloud 80 at 14.00 hrs<br />

Figure 26 Annual rate <strong>of</strong> mean and minimum monthly air humidity (%) and average number <strong>of</strong> days with<br />

relative humidity >80% at 14.00 hrs and >30% in all three times <strong>of</strong> measurements<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

Cloud<br />

in tenths


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 30<br />

Mean annual rates <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> days with precipitation and thunder are shown in figure<br />

27. It can be observed that there are two maximums <strong>of</strong> precipitation annually, in spring<br />

months (March, April) and autumn (October, November, December). On average it amounts<br />

to about 100 days a year, whereby the greatest number is <strong>of</strong> days with precipitation between<br />

0.5 and 1 litre per square metre. The number <strong>of</strong> days with certain quantity <strong>of</strong> precipitation<br />

(ranging from 0.1 to 50 mm) is shown in figure 28. The total annual quantity <strong>of</strong> precipitation is<br />

about 1080 mm on average.<br />

Precipitation is the parameter which is measured once a day at 7 a.m. Consequently, the<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> precipitation refers to the total precipitation which is registered in the period <strong>of</strong> 24<br />

hours. In about 10% <strong>of</strong> cases it is above 20 litres per square metre, while about 3 days a<br />

year can be expected to have very heavy precipitation with about 50 l/m 2 and more.<br />

Days<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

Thunder<br />

Precipitation<br />

months<br />

Figure 27 Mean annual rate <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> days with precipitation and thunder<br />

Figure 28 Mean annual number <strong>of</strong> days with certain quantity <strong>of</strong> precipitation<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> days


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 31<br />

Since the number <strong>of</strong> cold days, with fog, snow and hail is very small, it can be said that the<br />

container terminal in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploèe (quay 7) has very good climatic characteristics for<br />

operation and in that sense no problems related to operational level and safety should be<br />

expected.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 32<br />

A.3.4.2. SEA FLORA AND FAOUNA<br />

A.3.4.2.1. Explored area and work method<br />

A.3.4.2.2. Results<br />

The inspection <strong>of</strong> living communities <strong>of</strong> the sea bottom along two transects<br />

was performed in the area <strong>of</strong> the planned container terminal Ploce. The first<br />

transect is in the area where the extension foreseen by the design could affect<br />

the environment and the second one in the area <strong>of</strong> an unlikely possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

impact by extension. (Fig. 29,30.). The first transect (PL-01) is located on the<br />

internal side <strong>of</strong> the cove, opposite to the existing operative Quay 5. The<br />

second transect (PL-02) is placed outside the area <strong>of</strong> the extension planned in<br />

this phase, almost at the very west end <strong>of</strong> the quay (Fig. 31.).<br />

During this field biocenologic research on the transects, a standard method <strong>of</strong><br />

direct observation and sampling was applied using autonomous diving<br />

equipment (SCUBA), and records taken in situ are completed with pictures<br />

(Jaklin i Travizi, 1999). Biological material was preserved in the 70% alcohol<br />

and 4% neutralized formalin. An average number <strong>of</strong> samples was visually<br />

evaluated in degrees <strong>of</strong> abundance: R = rare samples, + = species is<br />

frequent, C = species is very frequent, CC = species prevails in number. In<br />

addition to these identification marks, a number <strong>of</strong> individual specimens was<br />

recorded.<br />

With the purpose <strong>of</strong> biological environmental impact study assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

container terminal extension in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, it was performed a<br />

biocenologic analysis <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna at the bottom with the intention <strong>of</strong><br />

valorising bottom communities. The biocenologic analysis <strong>of</strong> sea bottom was<br />

performed on the basis <strong>of</strong> Braun-Blanquet (1921) fitocenologic method and<br />

the terminology used is nomenclature by Pér?sa and Picarda (1964),<br />

Gamulin-Bride (1967), Pér?sa and Gamulin-Bride (1973), and Bellan-<br />

Santinija & associates (1994), which is gerally used for similar researches in<br />

the Mediterranean and the Adriatic sea.<br />

While making preparations for field work, not a single study was found which<br />

refers to the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce. Since there is no previous biocenologic data<br />

concerning this area, the comparison <strong>of</strong> recent and historical data was not<br />

possible. Therefore this research can be considered as a preliminary<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the current zero state.<br />

Transect PL-01<br />

Due to shallowness and s<strong>of</strong>t sediment, the transect is withdrawn some 15<br />

meters from the coastal line to the right edge <strong>of</strong> the hall (viewed from the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> cross-section) on Quay 5 in the direction 345° (Fig. 32.). GPS<br />

position at the pr<strong>of</strong>ile end is 43° 02,681' N and 17° 25,690' E. Total transect<br />

length along the bottom is 182 meters (Fig. 33.).<br />

The beginning <strong>of</strong> transect consists <strong>of</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> terrigenous mud and the<br />

finest river sand that looks like silt earth. The bottom is slightly slanted (Fig.<br />

34.). After somewhat steeper transition part follows the inclination where<br />

gradually decreases the <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> sand and the bottom continues gradually to<br />

descent in depth. Sediment is pure s<strong>of</strong>t sticky mud and the greatest depth <strong>of</strong><br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 33<br />

13.9 m is recorded at the very end <strong>of</strong> the transect. In spite <strong>of</strong> a sunny day and<br />

relatively small depth, the visibility <strong>of</strong> the greatest part <strong>of</strong> transect was about<br />

0.5 m. Along last fifty meters, the visibility more or less equaled zero!<br />

Cross-section description (Fig. 35.):<br />

The beginning <strong>of</strong> transect PL-01 covers infra-littoral part <strong>of</strong> sandy mud to the<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> 1.4 m. By subsequent exploration <strong>of</strong> transect surroundings, it was<br />

recorded that the tidal movements zone almost does not exist, so that neither<br />

flora nor fauna species are recorded. In the infra-littoral part, at depth <strong>of</strong> 0.7<br />

and 1.0 m, a small “meadow” <strong>of</strong> Zoostera noltii sea grass is developed which<br />

is the only plant species recorded in the entire transect (Fig. 36.). With regard<br />

to animal species, numerous species <strong>of</strong> snails (Cerithium vulgatum i<br />

Nassarius sp.) as well as the hermit crabs (Paguridea indet.) in sub-fossil<br />

houses <strong>of</strong> these snails are registered. Numerous small holes in sediment most<br />

probably originated from the crabs Thalassinidea indet. but it was not possible<br />

to determine for sure by the used work method (Fig. 37.).<br />

Between the 14th and 30th meter <strong>of</strong> transect, the depth relatively suddenly<br />

increases from 1.4 to 7.9 m. Portion <strong>of</strong> sand decreases more and more in the<br />

sediment content, the bottom is almost naked, and judging by small hole<br />

density in sediment, the number <strong>of</strong> crabs in sediment decreases as well. The<br />

oases <strong>of</strong> hard base make some discarded cable in depth <strong>of</strong> 6.8 m, which is<br />

colonized by a thick community <strong>of</strong> filtering organisms. The most frequent<br />

organisms are white sea squirts (Styela plicata), marine fanworms (Sabella<br />

spalanzanii) and tube worms (Serpula vermicularis), and colonies <strong>of</strong> bryozoas<br />

(Schizobranchiella sanguinea) - (Fig. 38.).<br />

From the depth <strong>of</strong> 8.6 m, the bottom is naked and sediment consists <strong>of</strong> sticky<br />

terrigenous mud. The increase <strong>of</strong> depth is almost hardly noticeable, so that<br />

the greatest recorded depth is 13.9 m at the very end <strong>of</strong> transect. It should be<br />

emphasized that the visibility along the last 50 meters equalled zero, so that<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> macro-organisms could not be determined with certainty.<br />

However, according to the description, terrigenous mud is the most frequent<br />

sediment (Fig. 39.).<br />

By this preliminary review, only 1 plant and 10 animal macrobenthic species<br />

have been recorded on the transect PL-01 area (Fig. A; Table I, II).<br />

Considering this more than modest number <strong>of</strong> species, it is hard to talk about<br />

the prominent bottom biocenosis. The finding <strong>of</strong> Zoostera noltii sea grass<br />

indicates the muddy sands biocenosis <strong>of</strong> protected coasts <strong>of</strong> the shallowest<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the transect. The remaining explored bottom part contains a very poor<br />

terrigenous mud community. Real population could be evaluated only by using<br />

a grab and by studying possible infauna sediments. Anyway, great<br />

sedimentation <strong>of</strong> the smallest fractions <strong>of</strong> suspended materials resulting from<br />

intensive river inflows is obvious. The only hard based enclave is <strong>of</strong><br />

antropogenic origin (discarded rope or cable) and is colonized by numerous<br />

sciaphilic filtering organisms (filtrators). Their density also indicates a strong<br />

and constant inflow <strong>of</strong> organic substances in suspension.<br />

Fish fauna has not been specially examined and only two species (dragonet<br />

Serranus hepatus and mullet -Mullus sp.) are recorded along the transect. Not<br />

a single species that would be interesting for fishing has been noticed.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 34<br />

Transect PL-02<br />

Due to shallowness and s<strong>of</strong>t sediment, the transect is withdrawn some 20<br />

meters from the coastal line to the red <strong>port</strong> light on the opposite coast in the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> 330° (Fig. 40.). The GPS position at the beginning <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile is 43°<br />

02,629' N and 17° 25,436' E. Total transect length along the bottom is 190<br />

meters (Fig. 41,42.).<br />

The beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect makes the mixture <strong>of</strong> terrigenous mud and the<br />

finest river sand with some black particles (coal dust?) while the bottom slowly<br />

descends into depth. After extremely steep transitional part in which sand<br />

<strong>port</strong>ion diminishes more and more, the bottom continues very slowly to<br />

descend into the depth. Sediment is pure, s<strong>of</strong>t, sticky mud and the greatest<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> 14.1 m is recorded at the very end <strong>of</strong> the transect. The visibility in the<br />

greatest part <strong>of</strong> transect is approximately 0.5 m.<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> cross-section (Fig. 44.):<br />

The beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect PL-02 covers the infralitoral part <strong>of</strong> sandy mud<br />

in depth from 0.6 to 2.4 m (Fig. 45.). Tufts <strong>of</strong> Zoostera noltii sea grass (the<br />

only plant species recorded in the entire transect) are recorded in depth <strong>of</strong><br />

about 1 m. With regard to animal species, numerous species <strong>of</strong> snails<br />

(Cerithium vulgatum, Nassarius sp.) as well as hermit crabs (Paguridea indet.)<br />

in sub-fossil houses <strong>of</strong> these snails are recorded. Numerous small holes in<br />

sediment originate most probably from the crabs Thalassinidea indet. The<br />

oases <strong>of</strong> hard base make some discarded cable at depth <strong>of</strong> 2.4 m which is<br />

colonized by a thick community <strong>of</strong> filtering organisms. The most frequent<br />

organisms are white sea squirts (Styela plicata), marine fanworms (Sabella<br />

spalanzanii) and European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis), as well as the bryozoas<br />

(Schizobranchiella sanguinea)<br />

Between the 20th and 40th meter <strong>of</strong> transect, the depth suddenly increases<br />

from 2.4 to 10.1 m. Even at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the slope the sand disappears<br />

and remains only terrigenous mud. The bottom is completely naked and<br />

deserted at least in the field <strong>of</strong> sight. After a prominent slope, the inclination<br />

decreases very fast so that the depth in the second part <strong>of</strong> the transect varies<br />

from 13.5 to 14.3 m the most. The sediment surface made <strong>of</strong> terragenous<br />

mud is furrowed, full <strong>of</strong> holes and hillocks <strong>of</strong> unknown origin. Any<br />

macrobentonic organism is noticed (Fig. 46,47.).<br />

By this preliminary review, only 1 plant and 10 animal macrobenthic species<br />

were recorded on the transect PL-02 area (Fig. B; Table I, II). Considering<br />

such a small number <strong>of</strong> species, it is hard to define certain bottom biocenosis.<br />

The finding <strong>of</strong> Zoostera noltii sea grass indicates the biocenosis <strong>of</strong> muddy<br />

sands <strong>of</strong> protected coasts <strong>of</strong> the shallowest part <strong>of</strong> the transect, but compact<br />

settlement has not been recorded. Individual sea grass shoots indicate the<br />

last remnants <strong>of</strong> once developed settlement or to the initial phase <strong>of</strong><br />

colonization. The remaining part <strong>of</strong> researched bottom should be a very poor<br />

terrigenous mud community. Real population could be evaluated only by using<br />

a grab and by studying possible infauna sediments. Anyway, great<br />

sedimentation <strong>of</strong> the smallest fractions <strong>of</strong> suspended materials resulting from<br />

intensive river inflows is obvious. The only hard based enclave is <strong>of</strong><br />

antropogenic origin (discarded rope or cable) and is colonized by numerous<br />

sciaphilic filtrating organisms. Their density also confirms a strong and<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 35<br />

constant inflow <strong>of</strong> suspended substances with a very rich organic component.<br />

Fish fauna has not been specially examined and no species have been<br />

recorded along the transect.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 36<br />

A.3.4.2.3. Attachmetns<br />

Figure A.: Field records related to transect PL-01, with estimated abundance <strong>of</strong> species<br />

recorded by depth and distance from the initial transect.<br />

* field records: first number indicates the distance from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transect (along the bottom) and the number in the bracket the depth, both<br />

expressed in meters.<br />

Transect PL-01, 13.09.2003., 10:30, AJ<br />

- GPS position (at the end <strong>of</strong> cross-section): N 43° 02,681'<br />

E 17° 25,690'<br />

- transect drawn from the coast toward the right hall edge (viewing from the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> cross-section) on Quay 5; transect direction from the end toward<br />

the beginning: 165°<br />

- length along the bottom: 182 meters<br />

- photographs CCXXXVIII: 01-07 and M32: 20-end, M33: 01-02<br />

10(0,6): mixed terrigenous mud and the finest river sand (like flint earth), black<br />

particles are frequent (coal dust?); small meadow (1 m) <strong>of</strong> Zoostera<br />

noltii sea grass, snails Cerithium vulgatum +, Nassarius sp. +, hermit<br />

crab Paguridea indet. +, small holes in sendiment CC (probably crabs<br />

Thalasssinidea indet.)<br />

12(1,1): terrigenous mud and some smaller quantity <strong>of</strong> the finest sand<br />

14(1,4): small holes in sediment CC<br />

16(2,1): snails Cerithium vulgatum 1, houses Nassarius sp. +, small mullet<br />

Mullus sp. 1, small holes in sediment C<br />

18(2,8): terrigenous mud with some sand; small holes in sediment +<br />

20(3,6): s<strong>of</strong>t mud with fresh terrigenous layer<br />

30(6,5): /<br />

36(6,8): rope or iron (wire cable) bellow cross-section, approx. 1 m above the<br />

bottom); dragonet Serranus hepatus 1, marine fanworm Sabella<br />

spalanzanii +, tube worm Serpula vermicularis +, bryozoa<br />

Schizobranchiella sanguinea +, sea squirt Styela plicata C<br />

40(7,9):/<br />

50(8,6): s<strong>of</strong>t mud, visibility < 0,5 m<br />

60(9,3): /<br />

70(9,6): /<br />

80(9,7): gray s<strong>of</strong>t mud with a thin layer <strong>of</strong> brown terrigenous deposit on the top<br />

90(9,9): /<br />

100(10,6): /<br />

110(11,4): /<br />

120(12,3): /<br />

130(12,5): sample <strong>of</strong> sediment to be analyzed in Rijeka PLS 01<br />

140(12,7): /<br />

150(12,5): very s<strong>of</strong>t mud, visibility almost 0<br />

192(13,9): obscure and very dark, visibility 0, s<strong>of</strong>t terrigenous mud<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 37<br />

Figure B.: Field record related to transect PL-02, with estimated abundance <strong>of</strong> species<br />

recorded by depths and distance from the beginning <strong>of</strong> transect.<br />

* field records: first number indicates the distance from the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

transect (along the bottom) and number in the bracket indicates the depth,<br />

both expressed in meters.<br />

Transect PL-02, 13.09.2003., 12:51, AJ<br />

- GPS position (at the beginning <strong>of</strong> cross-section): N 43° 02,629'<br />

E 17° 25,436'<br />

- transect from coast in the direction <strong>of</strong> red <strong>port</strong> light on the opposite coast,<br />

transect direction from the end toward the beginning approximately 150°<br />

- length along the bottom 190 meters<br />

- photographs CCXXXVIII: 08-22 and M33: 03-12<br />

10(0,6): mixed terrigenous mud and the finest river sand (like flint earth), black<br />

particles are frequent (coal dust?); small holes in sediment CC<br />

(probably crabs Thalasssinidea indet.)<br />

12(0,8): /<br />

14(0,9): crabs Paguridea indet. C in houses <strong>of</strong> snails Cerithium vulgatum i<br />

Nassarius sp., rare tufts <strong>of</strong> Zoostera noltii sea grass<br />

16(1,1): /<br />

18(1,8): /<br />

20(2,4): mud and the fines sand; Myxicola infundibulum 1, crabs Paguridea<br />

indet. in houses <strong>of</strong> snails Cerithium vulgatum +; discarded wire ropes:<br />

marine moluscus Murex sp., marine fanworm Sabella spalanzanii +,<br />

European flat oyster Ostrea edulis +, sea squirt Styela plicata +,<br />

bryozoa Schizobranchiella sanguinea +<br />

30(7,1): /<br />

40(10,1): /<br />

50(10,7): /<br />

60(10,9): visibility 0<br />

70(11,1): no more small holes in sediment<br />

80(11,2): sticky terrigenous mud with a thin brown layer on the surface, the<br />

bottom is furrowed, full <strong>of</strong> holes and hillocks, visibility ~ 0,5 m<br />

90(12,4): /<br />

between 90 and 100 distance <strong>of</strong> 1,5 m<br />

100(13,9): /<br />

110(13,9): /<br />

120(13,8): s<strong>of</strong>t mud, visibility < 0,5 m<br />

130(13,7): /<br />

140(13,5): /<br />

150(14,3): /<br />

160(13,9): /<br />

170(14,1): /<br />

180(14,1): /<br />

190(14,0): /<br />

200(13,9): sticky, s<strong>of</strong>t terragenouns mud; dark, visibility < 0,5 m;<br />

sediment sample to be analyzed in Rijeka PLS 02<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 38<br />

Table I. List <strong>of</strong> recorded macrobethonic species on the researched area<br />

Transect PL - 01 PL - 02<br />

ANGIOSPERMAE<br />

Zoostera noltii + +<br />

MOLLUSCA<br />

Cerithium vulgatum + +<br />

Murex sp. +<br />

Nassarius sp. + +<br />

Ostrea edulis +<br />

POLYCHAETA<br />

Myxicola infundibulum +<br />

Sabella spallanzani + +<br />

Serpula vermicularis +<br />

CRUSTACEA<br />

Paguridea indet. + +<br />

Thalassinidea indet + +<br />

BRYOZOA<br />

Schizobranciella sanguinea +<br />

+<br />

TUNICATA<br />

Styela plicata + +<br />

PISCES<br />

Mullus sp. +<br />

Serranus hepatus +<br />

Table II. Number <strong>of</strong> recorded macrobenthonic species by transect and total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> species on the researched area<br />

PL - 01 PL - 02 ?<br />

MACROALGAE 0 0 0<br />

SEAGRASSES 1 1 1<br />

MACROANIMALS 10 10 13<br />

TOTAL 11 11 14<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 39<br />

Figure 29. Planned intervention area in the Ploce Port, view <strong>of</strong> coast<br />

Figure 30. Planned intervention area in the Ploce Port, view <strong>of</strong> sea<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 40<br />

Figure 31. Map <strong>of</strong> area with transects PL-01 and PL-02.<br />

Figure 32. Small depth <strong>of</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect PL-01<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 41<br />

Figure 33. Transect PL-01 area above sea, buoy marking the end <strong>of</strong> transect.<br />

Figure 34. Short coast <strong>of</strong> sandy silt.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 42<br />

Figure 35: Description <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile PL-01<br />

Figure 36. Zoostera noltii sea grass; depth 0,8 m.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 43<br />

Figure 37. Numerous holes in the sediment; depth 0,5 m.<br />

Figure 38. Marine fanworms Sabella spalanzanii; depth 6,8 m.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 44<br />

Figure 39. Terrigenous silt without visible benthonic organisms; depth 9,9 m.<br />

Figure 40. Beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect PL-02.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 45<br />

Figure 41 Transect PL-02.<br />

Figure 42 .End <strong>of</strong> transect PL-02.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 46<br />

Figure 43 .Coastal s<strong>of</strong>t mud<br />

Figure 44. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the bottom <strong>of</strong> the transect PL-02, with established bottom type and bottom<br />

living communities.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 47<br />

Figure 45. Sandy mud on the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transect, numerous holes visible; depth 2 m.<br />

Figure 46. Terrigenous mud without visible benthonic organisms; depth 13,5 m.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 48<br />

Figure 47. Bare surface abundant with holes and mounts <strong>of</strong> unknown origin; depth 14 m.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 49<br />

A.3.4.3. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOCATION<br />

A.3.4.3.1. ENGINEERING – GEOLOGICAL BASIS<br />

The main rock on the processed area is made by the sedimentary rock <strong>of</strong><br />

karst type <strong>of</strong> Jurrasic and Cretaceous age. Due to the emphasized tangential<br />

movements during the paleogenetic and tectonic period, there has come to<br />

compression <strong>of</strong> rock masses. The consequence <strong>of</strong> these movements was<br />

folding <strong>of</strong> Cretaceous and palogenetic rocks and creation <strong>of</strong> reverse structures<br />

and covers. After the change <strong>of</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> regional stress in the younger,<br />

neotectonic period, the earlier created structures were distrubed. The rock<br />

mass was completely deformed and weathered, and karstificated for tens <strong>of</strong><br />

meters below the present sea level.<br />

The main rock on the Ploce Port area is completely covered in the alluvium<br />

from the delta <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river and in marine sediments as well as in<br />

embankment. The sediments <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river delta were sedimented on<br />

the paleorelief, formed in karst rocks, which are visible on the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surrounding elevations. According to the data known so far, the thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

the layer (alluvium and marine sediments) is increasing towards the south and<br />

sout-west. On the location <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>, the thickness <strong>of</strong> alluvium from upper<br />

pleistocenic and holocenic age above the main rock ranges from 70 to 125 m.<br />

Alluvium <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river delta is sedimented in pronounced<br />

morphodynamic conditions where, besides the river flow, the late pleistocenic<br />

and holocenic erection <strong>of</strong> the Adriatc sea level had a significant influence.<br />

Since the sedimentation environments rapidly changed as well, whether<br />

horizontally or vertically, the sediments are <strong>of</strong> various grain size content.<br />

Some belong to the marine, some to brackish, and the third to the fresh water<br />

type. There is also a pronounced vertical and horizontal exchange <strong>of</strong> grain<br />

size content, so drilling revealed sediments <strong>of</strong> sand and dust, organic mud,<br />

clay and gravel.<br />

Current state <strong>of</strong> relief on land and sea bed is a consequence <strong>of</strong> erection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Adriatic sea level, alluvium from the river Neretva delta during the upper<br />

pleistocene and holocene, as well as embankment <strong>of</strong> the sea bed during the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

A.3.4.3.2. HIDROGEOLOGICAL INFORMATION<br />

The river Neretva delta area is under the influence <strong>of</strong> the river Neretva flow as<br />

well as <strong>of</strong> sea tides. The same is applicable to the underground water level<br />

within the sediment body <strong>of</strong> the delta. In the <strong>port</strong> area three levels <strong>of</strong><br />

underground waters were established. The first or the upper level is found in<br />

surface sands. The channel flow is open, i.e. it is the freatic type <strong>of</strong> aquifer.<br />

The second and third channel flow, located lower, are found in gravel lenses.<br />

The lowest gravel level is connected with deep karst water-carrier.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 50<br />

A.3.4.3.3. SEISMIC CHARACTERISTICS<br />

The river delta territory is seismically active. It is shown ba the density <strong>of</strong><br />

earthquake epicenters, their frequency as well as the magnitude size <strong>of</strong><br />

seismic impacts. The cause <strong>of</strong> elevated seismic activity is the the Adriatic slab<br />

slipping under the Dinarides, i.e. under the High Karst zone. The contact<br />

between those zones is characterized by seicmically very active Biokovodubrovacka<br />

fracture zone, stretching through the river Neretva delta as well.<br />

In the last 50 years, in 1942. and 1961. this area was struck by earthquakes <strong>of</strong><br />

7 to 8 0 magnitute on the MCS scale, causing greater material damage on<br />

buildings.<br />

According to the valid data, the basic seismic intensity on the river Neretva<br />

delta is <strong>of</strong> 8 0 <strong>of</strong> the MCS scale. The expected intensities with 63% probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> occurrence are: 6 0 MSK-64 for the 50 year return period, 7 0 MSK-64 for<br />

100 and 200 year return period and 8 0 MSK-64 for 500 year return period.<br />

According to the ground seismic stability analyses in the river Neretva delta<br />

zone since 1986, the maximum magnitude can be M = 6.1, while the basic<br />

seismicity degree Imax = 9.15 <strong>of</strong> MCS scale. The same analyses have shown<br />

the psosibility <strong>of</strong> liquefaction in the mud and sand sediments <strong>of</strong> the delta.<br />

A.3.4.3.4. GEOMECHANICAL INFORMATION<br />

According to the information from the geotechnical study by the IGH, the<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Geotechnics, the area where the Ploce Port is located lies on the<br />

wide delta <strong>of</strong> the river Neretva. Therefore, this territory is formed mainly <strong>of</strong><br />

sediment formations from the Quarternary age which in form <strong>of</strong> thick<br />

formations are accumulated over the karst paleorelief. On the area foreseen<br />

for container terminal and Quay 7 construction, the thickness <strong>of</strong> Quarternary<br />

formations exceeds 100 m. sediment formations are <strong>of</strong> very different grain<br />

size content and are <strong>of</strong>ten intermixed. According to the research studies<br />

performed in 1989, for the phase I <strong>of</strong> the container terminal construction in the<br />

Quay 7 background, the following types <strong>of</strong> ground were established:<br />

From elevation 0 to elevation –20 mud and sand material<br />

From elevation –20 to elevation –35 clayley materials<br />

From elevation –35 to elevation –42 sand<br />

From elevation –42 to elevation –52 gravel<br />

These research studies were elaborated in the text: Study on Engineering<br />

Geological and Geotechnical Ground Characteristics and Requirements for<br />

the Object Funding for the First Phase <strong>of</strong> Container Terminal in the «Ploce<br />

Port» in Kardeljevo, Institute for Geotechnics and Funding <strong>of</strong> the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Civil Engineering in Sarajevo, Reference number D-1815, Sarajevo, I/1990<br />

(cited from the quote in the Geotechnical Study <strong>of</strong> the IGH, project number<br />

Rn-03-033-04-IR-03).<br />

According to these information, the ground where the container terminal shall<br />

be built is <strong>of</strong> extremely low carrying capacity and is subject to subsidence. In<br />

the geotechnical study for the preliminary design, the terms <strong>of</strong> construction<br />

and ground consolidation with gravel piles were determined, in order that<br />

foreseen loads from the container terminal could be taken over.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 51<br />

A.3.5. EXISTING LOCATION LOAD ASSESSMENT<br />

A.3.5.1. AIR<br />

On the <strong>port</strong> territory <strong>of</strong> the Ploce Port there are no larger stationary, point air<br />

pollution sources. In several smaller boiler rooms designed for business<br />

premise heating, gas or light special liquid fuel is used, and the volume <strong>of</strong><br />

pollutants emmitted into the air are negligible.<br />

Reloading devices are categorized into diffusive air pollution sources, i.e.<br />

there is no specific discharge where the values <strong>of</strong> the emmission <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pollutants could be controlled, but the whole reloading device is an open<br />

source <strong>of</strong> air pollution, there is no exact data <strong>of</strong> the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

emmission <strong>of</strong> particles from the Ploce Port area.<br />

Regulation on limit air emmission value <strong>of</strong> polluting substances (OG 140/97)<br />

sets out limit values <strong>of</strong> emmission only for stationary sources, while diffusive<br />

sources and trans<strong>port</strong>ation means are not included.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 52<br />

A.3.5.2. THE SEA QUALITY<br />

A.3.5.2.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE LARGER AREA OF THE PROJECT<br />

Ploce is situated west from the Neretva estuary, where the Neretva flat delta<br />

touches the hilly karst areas. The <strong>port</strong>, as the principal economic branch has<br />

been developed at Ploce, situated at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />

communication way along the Neretva valley. The nearest surroundings <strong>of</strong><br />

Ploce <strong>of</strong>fer great possibilities for development <strong>of</strong> tourist activities (the<br />

Bacinska lakes), and the Neretva estuary is very favourable for mariculture<br />

development. The Nature Park (ichtyological and ornithological reserve) is<br />

situated at the south-east side <strong>of</strong> the channel Vlaška–more.<br />

The town and the <strong>port</strong> Ploce occupy the east part <strong>of</strong> the Ploce bay. The<br />

densest urbanized part <strong>of</strong> the town and the <strong>port</strong> zone are situated between the<br />

Crna River and the channel Vlaška – more.<br />

Systematic researches <strong>of</strong> the coastal sea quality in the Neretvanski channel<br />

have been carried out for many years within the Project Vir – Konavle. The<br />

researches have been made by the Oceanography and Pisciculture Institute<br />

from Split for the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Hrvatske Vode («Croatian Waters») from<br />

Zagreb, Department for water and sea waters protection from pollution and<br />

contamination. The sea quality state is presented based on the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

researches undertaken in the year 2002.<br />

The researches include the area from Gradac to the Malo More and the<br />

Prapratno cove. Figure 48. presents the sea research stations in the specified<br />

area. Station P1 is located in front <strong>of</strong> the Ploce town <strong>port</strong>. The investigation<br />

included climatological features <strong>of</strong> the area, physical and chemical properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sea water, biological properties and characteristic pollutants.<br />

The Neretva channel is characterized by variable hydrographic properties<br />

(temperature, salinity, density) conditioned by an interaction with the<br />

atmosphere, the influence <strong>of</strong> fresh waters, first <strong>of</strong> all those from the river<br />

Neretva, as well as by exchange <strong>of</strong> water with other parts <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic<br />

(Table 1). Influence <strong>of</strong> fresh water inflow is reflected in variations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surface salinity, between 32.28 – 34.53 psu. The lowest salinities are<br />

registered in April, then in July, while in December minimum values were a bit<br />

higher. In warmer season a vertical temperature stratification is noticed, where<br />

thermo cline is pronounced, contrary to almost homogeneously mixed strata in<br />

colder part <strong>of</strong> the year (December - April).<br />

In the Neretvanski channel, influence <strong>of</strong> the gradient incoming stream <strong>of</strong><br />

north-west direction is registered. The sea streaming in front <strong>of</strong> Ploce is under<br />

considerable influence <strong>of</strong> the river Neretva flow, whose estuary is situated<br />

south from the town. The river Neretva flow accelerates the sea streaming<br />

along the shore in north-west direction, so we can suppose that this fact is<br />

favourable for taking <strong>of</strong>f the town and the <strong>port</strong> pollution from the Neretvanski<br />

channel. The same favourable effect is achieved by mixing <strong>of</strong> water with<br />

seawater <strong>of</strong> the Hvarski and Bracki Channel.<br />

The limpidity ranges between 7 and 25 m. The lowest and very uniform<br />

limpidity is registered at the station P1 that is under most expressed influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> sweet waters: 7 – 9 m. A higher limpidity and its larger ranges are recorded<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 53<br />

at station P4 situated in front <strong>of</strong> the Prapatno bay on the Pelješac Peninsula,<br />

i.e. at the outer side <strong>of</strong> the Neretvanski Channel: 14 – 25 m.<br />

April July September December<br />

Temperature, º C 14.18 – 17.06 16.16 – 26.20 17.44 – 23.43 13.7 – 17.21<br />

Salinity, psu 32.28 – 38.57 34.93 – 38.93 34.53 – 38.69 36.72 – 38.51<br />

Density (s t) kg/m 3 23.41 – 28.81 22.98 – 28.70 23.93 – 28.39 27.42 – 28.18<br />

Table 1. Ranges <strong>of</strong> main hydrographical parameters in the Neretvanski Channel (3 stations) during the year 2002:<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> dissolved nutritious salts, i.e. salts <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus<br />

and silicon are a precondition for primary production <strong>of</strong> organic matter.<br />

However, their excessive amount (brought by rivers or by waste waters) may<br />

cause eutrophication <strong>of</strong> a certain area, with unfavourable impact on the sea<br />

ecosystem and on aesthetical properties <strong>of</strong> the sea water.<br />

The sea <strong>of</strong> the Neretvanski Channel in the year 2002, as well as in the<br />

preceding years, can be classified as an area <strong>of</strong> low concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

nutritious salts. The sea, in the area influenced by the Neretva river (stations<br />

P1, P2 and P3) contains higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> salts <strong>of</strong> inorganic nitrogen<br />

and orthosilicate in relation to the outer side <strong>of</strong> the Channel (station P4), while<br />

values are opposite for orthophosphate. The only exception is the station P1,<br />

situated in front <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>port</strong> in Ploce, where the surface layer is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

enriched by orthophosphate.<br />

In the whole investigated area, water column saturation by oxygen was<br />

appropriate; it ranged within narrow limits. On the station in front <strong>of</strong> the Ploce<br />

town <strong>port</strong> (P 1) vertical pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> saturation by oxygen shows a uniform<br />

distribution by depth, without enrichment in the surface layer or reduction in<br />

the bottom layer.<br />

Trophic (nutritional) degree <strong>of</strong> an area is very well reflected through the height<br />

<strong>of</strong> primary production <strong>of</strong> organic matter (the first step in transformation <strong>of</strong><br />

inorganic material into a living organic matter). Each disturbance <strong>of</strong> the sea<br />

ecosystem balance is first reflected at the first step <strong>of</strong> the food chain, so that,<br />

by following the primary production, an appropriate insight into the integral<br />

state <strong>of</strong> the sea ecosystem can be obtained. The primary production has been<br />

examined by determination <strong>of</strong> biomass (chlorophyll a) and the phytoplankton<br />

community structure.<br />

In the area <strong>of</strong> Ploce, the overall situation can be considered very favourable,<br />

as chlorophyll concentrations (amount <strong>of</strong> biomass) range between values<br />

characteristics for channel waters and open waters <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic. Qualitative<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the phytoplankton community is marked by predominance <strong>of</strong><br />

diatomaceaes, although in summer period din<strong>of</strong>lagellates were pro<strong>port</strong>ionally<br />

well represented too. In this area no im<strong>port</strong>ant water bloom was noticed in the<br />

year 2002.<br />

Contamination by faecal waters was examined by determining bacteria<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> the faecal pollution. The sea at the station P1, in front <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ploce <strong>port</strong>, was only lightly polluted, i.e. it satisfied the criterion imposed for<br />

the sea intended for bathe and recreation.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 54<br />

Investigation <strong>of</strong> heavy metals shows that contents <strong>of</strong> cadmium, lead, copper<br />

and zinc in the sea sediment at the area in front <strong>of</strong> the Ploce <strong>port</strong> is higher<br />

than the values found in the sediment at the reference station (Vis – Stoncica)<br />

(Table 2). Concentration <strong>of</strong> cadmium is above the level <strong>of</strong> «probable natural<br />

contents» <strong>of</strong> this heavy metal in sea sediments in the greater area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Central Adriatic, which indicates a certain influence <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollution (waste waters in the town <strong>port</strong>).<br />

Station Wsm (Cd)*10 6 Wsm (Pb)*10 6 Wsm (Cu)*10 6 Wsm (Zn)*10 6<br />

PLOCE 0.303 25,7 19.2 106.3<br />

STONCICA 0.124 16.1 8.46 54,9<br />

Table 2. Average values <strong>of</strong> mass share <strong>of</strong> Cd, Pb, Cu and Zn in surface sediments in the area <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

and Stoncica in the year 2002. The <strong>port</strong>ions refer to dry sediments (Wsm (CD)*10 6<br />

Chlorinated hydrocarbons (chlorinated insecticides and polychlorinated<br />

biphenyl) were examined in shells Mytilus galloprovincialis. Concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

these organic pollutants are considerably lower in the area <strong>of</strong> Ploce in relation<br />

to average values <strong>of</strong> chlorinated hydrocarbons for the Mediterranean area.<br />

A.3.5.2.2. RESTRICTED AREA OF THE PROJECT<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> a container terminal in the <strong>port</strong> Ploce is planned within the<br />

Ploce <strong>port</strong> area, west from the bulk freight shore. On the south-east, along the<br />

canal Vlaška – more, a petroleum terminal is situated, as well as storehouses<br />

for foodstuffs, soja oil and etc.<br />

There were no systematic researches <strong>of</strong> sea quality in the restricted site <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Project. Sea limpidity between the bulk freight ramp and the area planned for<br />

container terminal construction is reduced, and bigger waste floating matter<br />

was noticed as well. Having in mind that, in addition to the activities in the<br />

<strong>port</strong>, untreated waste waters <strong>of</strong> town Ploce are emptied into the sea by a<br />

coastal outlet, it is to be expected that the area <strong>of</strong> the Project has been<br />

considerably degraded.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> the present Study, sediment was examined in the Project<br />

area on two stations: PLS 01 and PLS 02, as shown on Fig. 49.<br />

Sediment sampling took place in September 2003.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 55<br />

PLS-02<br />

Fig. 48. Stations for sediment examination<br />

Sediment was analysed by the Public Health Institute <strong>of</strong> the County<br />

Primorsko-Goranska. The examination included detection <strong>of</strong> heavy metals<br />

(cadmium, chrome, lead, copper, zinc, nickel, vanadium) and <strong>of</strong> organic,<br />

steady, hazardous matter: polychlorinated biphenyl and polycyclic aromatic<br />

hydrocarbons. The results are shown in the Table 3.<br />

Polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons, µg/kg S.T.<br />

Sample marking PLS 01 PLS 02<br />

Phenanthrene 29 11<br />

Anthracene 4 1<br />

Fluorantrene 77 30<br />

Pyrene 57 20<br />

Benzo (a) anthracene + chrysene? 39 7<br />

Benzo(b)fluoranthene + benzo(k) fluoranthene 19 8<br />

Benzo(a)Pyrene 22 16<br />

Indo(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 29 7<br />

? PAU 276 100<br />

Heavy metals, mg/kg S.T.<br />

Pb 18.3 20.9<br />

Cd 0.26 0.24<br />

Cr 27.2 30.5<br />

Ni 36.6 45.1<br />

V 39.5 48.3<br />

Zn 112 104<br />

Polychlorinated biphenyl, ug/kgM.T.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 56<br />

Sediment in the station PLS 01 is a bit more loaded with polycyclic aromatic<br />

hydrocarbons than sediment in station PLS 02. Levels <strong>of</strong> polycyclic aromatic<br />

hydrocarbons in both stations are low and characteristic for low loaded areas.<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> polychlorinated biphenyl has not been detected.<br />

There is no considerable difference in concentration <strong>of</strong> examined heavy metals<br />

between the stations.<br />

Established concentrations are at the level <strong>of</strong> those found in sediment in the<br />

station situated in front <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> Ploce (examinations carried out within the<br />

Project Vir- Konavle). Concentrations <strong>of</strong> heavy metals are characteristic for<br />

areas under lower anthropogenic influence.<br />

On the investigated area the <strong>port</strong> basin has been recently deepened. When<br />

excavating the sediment, the surface layer was removed so that these<br />

investigations probably do not reflect the real situation <strong>of</strong> local sea water<br />

loading by these matters.<br />

Sanitary quality <strong>of</strong> the sea is being examined at Bacina and on the municipal<br />

beach close to the <strong>port</strong> Ploce. On both beaches microbiological pollution <strong>of</strong><br />

faecal origin was detected. The beach close to the town <strong>port</strong> had been<br />

proclaimed unsuitable for bathe and recreation as early as 1999. but in spite<br />

<strong>of</strong> this, people keep bathing there. The pollution is the result <strong>of</strong> inappropriate<br />

drainage <strong>of</strong> waste water in the area <strong>of</strong> Ploce, where untreated waste waters<br />

are let into the sea close to the shore. Such a situation may have negative<br />

consequences for human health.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/1<br />

A.3.5.2.2.1. SUPPLEMENT - WORLD BANK<br />

The revision <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment for Container terminal<br />

at the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce made by the World Bank has asked for to supplement the<br />

Assessment in the part referring to problems relating to deepening <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong><br />

maritime zone on the area planned for terminal construction (between 5 th and<br />

7 th pier). It has been asked for to supplement the Assessment as follows:<br />

1. To estimate maximal content <strong>of</strong> contaminants based on results obtained<br />

from analysis <strong>of</strong> excavated sediment;<br />

2. To discuss about dredging technology and water volume estimate to be<br />

removed together with excavated sediment and to be drained into the sea via<br />

proposed storage reservoir. The time necessary to carry out dredging works<br />

has to be estimated too and an optimal period for their carrying out has to be<br />

defined;<br />

3. To discuss about possible contaminant leaching from excavated masses<br />

when depositing them on soil;<br />

4. To classify sediment on spot <strong>of</strong> planned intervention in view <strong>of</strong> its disposal:<br />

deposit in sea or deposit on land for the purpose <strong>of</strong> embankments <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong><br />

quays;<br />

5. To show on map the area on which dredging shall take place and location<br />

where excavated material shall be deposited. Storage reservoir –coagulation<br />

tank for water to be drained from excavated material has to be shown on the<br />

same map.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> outlined problems the target <strong>of</strong> this study has been:<br />

• To estimate maximal content <strong>of</strong> contaminants based on results<br />

obtained from analysis <strong>of</strong> excavated sediment,<br />

• To estimate possibility for contaminant leaching from excavated<br />

masses when depositing them on soil;<br />

• To classify material anticipated to be excavated in view <strong>of</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

its disposal: deposit in sea or deposit on land for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

embankments <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> quays.<br />

Work Method<br />

Within the development framework <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment<br />

for Container terminal at Ploce (Rijekaprojekt d.o.o. Rijeka, 2004), in the year<br />

2003 the sediment surface layer (0 to 5 cm depth) has been examined on two<br />

stations PLS 01 and PLS 02 on the area <strong>of</strong> planned intervention, shown on<br />

the Fig. 1. The diver took a sample <strong>of</strong> the sediment by means <strong>of</strong><br />

polyethylene container. The sediment analysis included determination <strong>of</strong><br />

heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, V and Zn) and organic contaminant: polycyclic<br />

aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB).<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> better assessment <strong>of</strong> sediment characteristics and<br />

contaminant content, a sample <strong>of</strong> sediment has been taken on the previous<br />

stations (PLS01 and PLS02) once again. By this occasion, the diver took the<br />

sample by corer : on the station PLS01 up to depth <strong>of</strong> 60 cm and on the<br />

station PLS02 up to depth <strong>of</strong> 40 cm.<br />

Physical and chemical properties has determined done by the<br />

HIDRO.LAB.d.o.o Rijeka on following samples:<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/2<br />

Sample Mark Sampling Station Analyzed Layer<br />

Sample 1 st PLS01 0 – 10 cm depth<br />

Sample 2 nd PLS01 50 - 60 cm depth<br />

Sample 3 rd PLS02 0 -10 cm depth<br />

Sample 4 th PLS02 30 - 40 cm depth<br />

The analysis included following determinations:<br />

• Physical parameters: grain size distribution, content <strong>of</strong> solid<br />

substances/water and <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> combustibles<br />

• Chemical parameters: heavy metals (cooper, zinc, cadmium,<br />

chromium, nickel, lead and mercury), total and mineral oils, polycyclic<br />

aromatic hydrocarbon and polychlorinated biphenyls<br />

The leaching test has been carried out on the most critical samples in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminant content. The leaching test has been carried out according to the<br />

standard EN 12457 for granulated waste and sludge. Examined material has<br />

been mixed with water in pro<strong>port</strong>ion 1: 10. Following parameters has been<br />

determined in water <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the sediment containing desorbed, dispersed<br />

and dissolved substances from the sample <strong>of</strong> examined material: pH,<br />

electrical conductivity, total organic carbon (TOC), total phenols, metals:<br />

cooper, zinc, cadmium, chromium, nickel, lead and mercury. These indicators<br />

have been selected with respect to characteristics <strong>of</strong> untreated sediment,<br />

estimated possibility for contaminant leaching (e.g. polycyclic aromatic<br />

hydrocarbons has not been examined as they tend to be bound to particles,<br />

but phenols as good water-soluble substances and as such easily leached<br />

from sediment have been examined).<br />

Sediment Characteristics and Estimate <strong>of</strong> Contaminant Leaching<br />

Sediment Analysis<br />

Analysis results <strong>of</strong> grain size distribution are given in the Table0 and figure 1.<br />

Sample mark mm 4.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.250 0.125 0.063<br />

PLSO1, 0-10 cm<br />

PLS01, 50 -60 cm<br />

PLS02, 0-10cm<br />

PLS02, 30- 40 cm<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

<<br />

0.063 TOTAL<br />

dry wt (%) 0,14 0,86 1,71 2,30 2,18 2,81 12,59 77,41 100,00<br />

dry wt (%) 0,00 0,17 0,25 0,00 1,24 3,60 14,34 80,39 100,00<br />

dry wt (%) 2,57 3,98 6,07 4,93 3,53 5,06 16,52 57,34 100,00<br />

dry wt (%) 0,79 1,03 1,19 3,24 0,00 3,07 10,69 79,98 100,00<br />

Table 0. Grain size distribution at the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/3<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

PLS01, 0-10cm PLS01, 50-60<br />

cm<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

PLS02, 0-10<br />

cm<br />

Šljunak Pijesak Silt+glina<br />

gravel sand Silt+clay<br />

Fig. 1. Portion <strong>of</strong> basic sediment fractions from the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

PLS02, 50-60<br />

cm<br />

The sample taken at the station PLS01 is <strong>of</strong> uniform grain size distribution.<br />

Prevailing sediment fraction (from 77 to 80%) is composed <strong>of</strong> particles smaller<br />

than 0.063 mm. Portion <strong>of</strong> particles between 1.00 and 0.063 mm amounts to<br />

19 and 21 %, and <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> particles bigger than 2 mm 1.00 and 0.17 %.<br />

Sediment type on surface <strong>of</strong> this station is sandy silt and in the lower layer silt<br />

and clay.<br />

Grain size distribution <strong>of</strong> the sample taken on the station PLS02 is something<br />

different in upper and lower layer. Upper layer is sandy silt with gravel <strong>port</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6.55 %, sand 36.1 % and 57.34 % silt + clay. Silt and clay are in the lower<br />

layer and <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> individual fractions is as follows: gravel 1.83 %, sand<br />

18.9% and silt+ clay 79.9 %.<br />

Testing results <strong>of</strong> content <strong>of</strong> dry weight, fixed residue, heavy metals and<br />

organic contaminants have been shown in the Table 1.<br />

Parameter Sample Mark<br />

PLS01 PLS01 PLS02 PLS02<br />

0–10 cm 50-60 cm 0-10 cm 30-40 cm<br />

Dry weight, % 58,6 73,7 70,9 71,7<br />

Fixes residue, % 44,5 61,6 60,6 63,4<br />

Cooper, mg/kg dray substance<br />

(S.T.)<br />

34,1 24,7 33,9 27,0<br />

Zinc, mg/kg S.T. 157 72,7 82,6 81,3<br />

Cadmium, mg/kg S.T. 0,47


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/4<br />

Dry weight content (S.T.) in analyzed samples varies from 58.6 to 73.7 %. In<br />

addition to the sample <strong>of</strong> sediment surface layer PLS01, it is a matter also <strong>of</strong><br />

material with high <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> solid substance. Portion <strong>of</strong> combustible<br />

substances (rough estimate for content <strong>of</strong> solid substancess) is the highest in<br />

the sample PLS01 0-10 cm (24.1 %) and the lowest in the sample PLS02 30-<br />

40 cm (11.6 %).<br />

Differences at heavy metal concentrations in single samples are not big. The<br />

biggest difference has been determined at zinc and chromium concentrations.<br />

Zinc concentration varies from 72.7 to 157 mg/kg S.T.<br />

The sediment surface layer at the station PLS01 is considerably loaded with<br />

this metal in respect to other samples. This is probably the result <strong>of</strong> discharge<br />

<strong>of</strong> untreated sewage being as a rule loaded with zinc into the maritime zone<br />

between the pier 5 th and 7 th .<br />

Chromium concentration ranges from 14.1 to 34.7 mg/kg S.T. Vertical and<br />

horizontal distribution <strong>of</strong> this metal is something different then the zinc<br />

distribution. The lowest value has been obtained in the surface layer PLS02<br />

and the highest in the layer from 30 to 40 cm on the same station.<br />

Nickel concentrations range from 30.7 to 43.4 mg/kg S.T. The distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

this metal is very similar to the distribution <strong>of</strong> chromium. The surface layer on<br />

the station PLS01 contains a higher concentration then the layer being at 50 –<br />

60 cm depth. On the station PLS02 the situation is inverse.<br />

Mercury concentration ranges from 0.83 to 1.00 mg/kg S.T.<br />

The sediment surface layer on both stations is more loaded with total and<br />

mineral oils then the deeper sediment layers. The concentrations range from<br />

28.3 to 52.0 respectively from 5.7 to 9.7 mg/kg S.T.<br />

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are widespread sea environment<br />

contaminants. They originate mainly from combustion process or pouring out<br />

petroleum products. The sediment surface layer is as well when oils are in<br />

question more loaded on both stations being an expected phenomenon. The<br />

values obtained by this examination (20.6 do 34.9 µg/kg S.T.) are something<br />

lower then the values obtained by examination in the year 2003 (104 – 112<br />

µg/kg S.T.).<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> polychlorinated biphenyls has not been identified in any sample<br />

as well as in the year 2003. Use <strong>of</strong> these organochlorine compounds as well<br />

as transformer and condenser oils and specially their use in open systems i.e.<br />

lubrication oils, colors etc. is forbidden therefore such finding has been<br />

obtained.<br />

Comparing the results <strong>of</strong> these examinations with results <strong>of</strong> examination<br />

performed in the year 2003 it could be said that concentration levels <strong>of</strong><br />

examined metals are practically the same at both examinations. It has to be<br />

noted that mercury examination has been not performed in the year 2003.<br />

Sediment Pollution Estimate<br />

Sediment Contamination Estimate Based on Comparison with Reference<br />

Values for the Adriatic Area<br />

Attention to problems related to quality evaluation <strong>of</strong> sediment developed<br />

through <strong>port</strong> maintenance and its disposal has been paid in Croatia only in<br />

recent time. Oceanographic institutes are in charge for examination <strong>of</strong> sea<br />

sediment contamination in Croatia (Adriatic East Coast) within the Adriatic<br />

Systematic Contamination Research Project (Project Jadran, Vir Konavle,<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/5<br />

MED POL). The sediment surface layer from 0 to 5 cm depth is mainly<br />

examined Content <strong>of</strong> heavy metals is examining in most cases. Data on<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> organic contaminant are relatively poor and they refer to<br />

polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sediment provided for removal takes place only within the<br />

Environmental Impact Assessments for construction <strong>of</strong> new structures.<br />

Croatia has not both standards and specific guidelines for evaluation <strong>of</strong> sea<br />

sediment contamination. The comparison with concentration established on<br />

reference stations in the Adriatic Sea or in the Mediterranean is applying for<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> sea sediment contamination. The Table 2 shows results <strong>of</strong><br />

heavy metal examination on area <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic being not directly affected by<br />

pollution source and may be used as reference concentrations.<br />

North Adriatic Middle Adriatic<br />

Cooper, mg/kg S.T. 20-22 8-23<br />

Zinc, mg/kg S.T. 105-130 54-100<br />

Cadmium, mg/kg S.T. 0,140-0,350 0,230-0,260<br />

Chromium, mg/kg S.T. 23-58<br />

Nickel, mg/kg S.T. 38-170<br />

Lead, mg/kg S.T. 25 - 50 16-27<br />

Mercury, mg/kg S.T. 0,24-0,60 0,037-0,042<br />

Table 2: Concentration <strong>of</strong> Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb and Hg in sediments <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic Sea<br />

By comparing the concentration <strong>of</strong> metals examined in the sediment at the<br />

Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce having concentrations characteristic for the Adriatic area, it can<br />

be concluded that the established concentrations <strong>of</strong> lead, chromium and<br />

nickel are on level <strong>of</strong> reference concentrations. Concentration <strong>of</strong> cooper, zinc<br />

and cadmium are a little bit higher, so the sediment poorly polluted with these<br />

metals can be taken into consideration. Only the mercury concentrations are<br />

higher then the concentrations characteristic for the Adriatic.<br />

The concentration <strong>of</strong> PAH sum in the sediment <strong>of</strong> clear Mediterranean areas<br />

ranges from 3 to 60 µg/kg S.T. The concentrations established in the<br />

sediment <strong>of</strong> Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce are on this level.<br />

Sediment researches on mineral oils performed on the Italian side <strong>of</strong> the North<br />

Adriatic Sea show that their concentrations in sediment are declining from the<br />

cost towards the high seas with values from 32.3 to 7.2 mg/kg (GEA Project -<br />

Snamprogetti, 2000). The authors consider that these values are within limits<br />

for areas with a low pollution rate. All values <strong>of</strong> mineral oils in the sediment <strong>of</strong><br />

the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce are below 10 mg/kg resulting that this sediment is not loaded<br />

with new contaminants.<br />

Sediment classification according standards <strong>of</strong> some European<br />

Countries<br />

There is a different approach to sea sediment pollution estimate being<br />

excavated to maintain <strong>port</strong>s, shipways and likely in the world. The<br />

comparison with contaminant concentration in sediments on the area being<br />

under no pollution effect (reference or background concentrations) is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

used for estimate. The approach review towards environmental quality<br />

standards for sediments in ICES (International Council for the Exploration <strong>of</strong><br />

the Sea) Members Countries is given in the Table 2. It is noticeable that many<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/6<br />

<strong>of</strong> countries do not have required standards for sediment pollution estimate. In<br />

such cases, the government authorities use <strong>of</strong>ten the recommended values<br />

based on reference concentrations. However, some ICES members (Norway,<br />

Sweden and the Netherlands) regulated the sediment classification, which<br />

may be based on concentration <strong>of</strong> single contaminant (Table 3).<br />

Country Legislation Notes<br />

Belgium x Data compared against OSPAR BC<br />

Denmark x Locally derived BCs from reference sediment (mainly for metals)<br />

Finland x<br />

France x Data compared against OSPAR BRC and locally derived BCs<br />

Irland x<br />

Canada ? ISQG and PEL approach from field data demonstrating<br />

associations between chemistry and biological effects.<br />

Netherlands yes Two-class system (NEC and MPC) based on equilibrium<br />

partitioning or ecotoxicological data.<br />

Norway yes Five class system. Data compared against local, surface<br />

sediment concentrations.<br />

Germany x<br />

Portugal x Data compared against OSPAR BC.<br />

Spain x Data compared with international (e.g. USEPA) and locally<br />

derived BCs<br />

Sweden yes Five-class system.. BCs derived from cored sediments<br />

UK<br />

(England<br />

and Wales)<br />

x Data compared against OSPAR BRC: locally derived BCs in<br />

preparation<br />

Table 3: Summary <strong>of</strong> Environmental Quality Standards for sediments in International<br />

Council for the Exploration <strong>of</strong> the Sea (ICES) Members Countries<br />

x= standards not currently covered by legislation BRC=<br />

Background/reference concentration<br />

ISQA = Interim sediment quality guidelines PEL= Probable<br />

effects level<br />

USEPA= United States Environmental Protection Agency BC = background<br />

concentration<br />

NEC= No effect concentration MPC = Maximum<br />

Permissible Concentration<br />

Norwegian and Swedish standards predict five-class sediment classification.<br />

Sediment classification standards in Norway are given in the Table 4.<br />

Contaminant Unit Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5<br />

(good) (moderate) (poor) (bad)<br />

(very bad)<br />

Cooper mg/kg < 35 35 - 150 150 - 700 700 - 1500 > 1500<br />

Zinc mg/kg < 150 150 - 650 650 - 3000 3000- 10000 > 10000<br />

Cadmium mg/kg 10<br />

Chromium mg/kg < 70 70 - 300 300 - 1500 1500 - 5000 > 5000<br />

Nickel mg/kg 1500<br />

Lead mg/kg 1500<br />

Mercury mg/kg 5<br />

Total PAH µg/kg 20000<br />

PCB µg/kg < 5 5-25 25-100 100-300 >300<br />

Table 4: Sediment classification with respect to pollution grade in Norway, in < 2mm fraction,<br />

dry weight<br />

By comparing the defined maximum values <strong>of</strong> single contaminant in sediment<br />

to be dredged at the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce with limit values in Norwegian standards<br />

the implication is as follows:<br />

- cooper, chromium, PAH and PCB meet limit values for the 1 st class<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/7<br />

Contamina<br />

nt Class<br />

- zinc, cadmium, lead and nickel meet limit values for the 2 nd class with<br />

observation that the set concentrations are just a little bit higher then<br />

the limit values for the 1 st class<br />

- mercury exceeds the limit value for the 2 nd class by more then 50%.<br />

The World Bank’s counselor for funding construction <strong>of</strong> the Container terminal<br />

at Ploce suggested to classify sediments in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce according to<br />

criteria being considered on the EU level (not accepted yet) and being<br />

something more restrictive than the Norwegian standards. According to<br />

theses documents, sediments shall be classified in four classes depending on<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, Cr, Hg and oil products (total oil):<br />

- Class 1 (pure sediment) – maximum one parameter exceeds 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

the limit value for the class 1<br />

- Class 2 (poorly contaminated) – two or more parameters exceed 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the limit values for the class 1:<br />

- Class 3 (contaminated) – two or more parameters exceed 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

limit values for the class 2<br />

- Class 4 (very contaminated) - two or more parameters exceed 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

the limit values for the class 3.<br />

Limit values <strong>of</strong> mentioned parameters are given in the Table 5.<br />

Type <strong>of</strong><br />

sediment<br />

Concentration <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Substances mg/kg, dry weight<br />

OP Cu Pb Zn Ni Cd Cr Hg<br />

I Sand


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/8<br />

Cu, mg/kg S.T.<br />

Pb, mg/kg S.T.<br />

Zn, mg/kg S.T.<br />

Ni, mg/kg S.T.<br />

Cd, mg/kg S.T.<br />

Cr, mg/kg S.T.<br />

Hg, mg/kg S.T.<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

1,2<br />

1<br />

0,8<br />

0,6<br />

0,4<br />

0,2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1,4<br />

1,2<br />

1<br />

0,8<br />

0,6<br />

0,4<br />

0,2<br />

0<br />

PLOCE N I. N II. EU I. EU II.<br />

PLOCE N I. N II. EU I. EU II.<br />

PLOCE N I. N II. EU I. EU II.<br />

PLOCE N I. N II. EU I. EU II. EU III.<br />

PLOCE N I. N II. EU I. EU II.<br />

PLOCE N I. N II. EU I. EU II.<br />

PLOCE N I. N II. EU I. EU II. EU III.<br />

Fig. 2. Maximum set concentrations in sediment <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, limit values for single class<br />

within standard applied in Norway and criterion being under EU consideration<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/9<br />

By comparing the set maximum values <strong>of</strong> single contaminants in sediment<br />

provided for dredging in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce under EU criteria, being still under<br />

consideration, the implication is as follows:<br />

- Only cadmium concentration meet the class 1<br />

- Total oil, cooper, zinc, lead, chromium and nickel concentrations meet<br />

the limit values for the class 2<br />

- Mercury concentration exceeds the limit value for the class 2 by more<br />

then 50%<br />

The same proposal defines the limit values for PCB and PAH just for the class<br />

3: for PCB this is 0.03 mg/kg dry weight and for PAH 1.0 mg/kg dry weight.<br />

We have already mentioned that there is no evidence <strong>of</strong> PCB presence in<br />

examined sediments (detection limit 0.25 µg/kg). For this parameter the PAH<br />

concentration are lower then the limit values by two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude.<br />

Maximum metal concentration set in sediment <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce and limit<br />

values <strong>of</strong> single contaminant and sediment class according to the Norwegian<br />

standard and criterion being under EU consideration are given parallel in<br />

order to have an easy reference to the shown on the Fig. 2.<br />

It can be concluded that sediment in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce can be classified<br />

in the class 2, i.e. poorly contaminated sediments. In addition, the<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> concentration examined hazardous substances with<br />

reference concentrations for the Adriatic area indicates to poorly<br />

contaminated sediment.<br />

Sediments <strong>of</strong> such characteristics may be deposit in the sea on specifically<br />

determined territorial sea area outside <strong>of</strong> the coastal zone, i.e. on depth<br />

deeper then 30 m.<br />

Estimate <strong>of</strong> Contaminant from Sediment<br />

It is planned to use dredged material to embank quays. In respect to dredging<br />

technology with which sediment when extracting shall be mixed with specific<br />

water amount (app. 40 % sediment and app. 60 % water) water shall be<br />

leached from material deposited in land. For this reason, the leaching test for<br />

contaminants from sediment has been carried out. The surface sediment layer<br />

PLS01, proved as the most contaminated has been selected for testing. The<br />

leaching test has been carried out according to the standard EN 12457 for<br />

granulated waste and sludge. Tested material has been mixed with water in<br />

pro<strong>port</strong>ion 1: 10. Following parameters has been determined in water <strong>port</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sediment containing desorbed, dispersed and dissolved substances<br />

from the sample <strong>of</strong> tested material: pH, electrical conductivity, phenols, and<br />

metals: Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, Cr and Hg.<br />

The table 6 shows the testing results. In addition, the same Table shows limit<br />

values for waste eluates that may, according to the Regulations on Waste<br />

Treatment Conditions (Official Gazette No. 123/1997 and 112/2001), be<br />

deposited in landfills and limit values for hazardous substances that may,<br />

according to Regulations on Limit Values <strong>of</strong> Indicators <strong>of</strong> Hazardous and<br />

Other Substances in Waste Water (Official Gazette 40/1999 and 6/2001), be<br />

discharged into the sea.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/10<br />

Parameter Unit Analysis<br />

Result<br />

GVO for filling<br />

in landfill <strong>of</strong> the<br />

2 nd category<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

GVV for discharging<br />

<strong>of</strong> industrial waste<br />

water into the sea<br />

pH 7.35 5.5 - 13 6.0-8.5<br />

Electrical<br />

conductivity<br />

mS/cm 3.570


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/11<br />

Sedimentation time<br />

PLS01 volume <strong>of</strong><br />

extracted water (mL)<br />

PLS02 volume <strong>of</strong><br />

extracted water (mL)<br />

10 min. 20 min. 30 min. 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours 24 hours<br />

220 310 330 370 410 450 540<br />

110 180 250 300 330 370 450<br />

Table 7. Sedimentation dynamics <strong>of</strong> sediment mixture from the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce and the sea<br />

(40 % sediment and 60% water)<br />

Different velocity <strong>of</strong> sedimentation <strong>of</strong> individual sediment layers is noticeable<br />

being caused by their different grain size distribution. Upon 24 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

sedimentation, the extracted liquid in sediment sample PLS01 amounts to 90<br />

% <strong>of</strong> added water volume and in the PLS02 75 %. Extracted water was almost<br />

clear. Concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended substances in extracted water amounts for<br />

the sample PLS01 = 7.3 mg/L and for the sample PLS02 = 8.0 mg/L<br />

representing low values. Namely, according to the Regulation on Limit Values<br />

for Indicators <strong>of</strong> Hazardous and other Substances in Waste Waters (Official<br />

Gazette 40/1999 and 6/2001) the maximum permissible concentration for<br />

discharge into waters <strong>of</strong> 2 nd category (the most sensitive recipients in which<br />

discharge <strong>of</strong> waste waters is allowed) is 35 mg/L. Our opinion is that with<br />

retention <strong>of</strong> dredged material in settling basins for a period <strong>of</strong> 24 hours the<br />

possible adverse effects <strong>of</strong> its disposal to the sea and sea ecosystem quality<br />

can be reduce largely.<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY AND USED DATA<br />

1. Littoral Sea Quality Control, Project Vir – Konavle 2002, Oceanography<br />

and Fishery Institute, March, 2003, p. 187.<br />

2. Monitoring Programme <strong>of</strong> the Eastern Adriatic Coastal Area. Re<strong>port</strong> for<br />

1983. 1992., Institut za istraživanje mora Rovinj 1993., p. 100-111, 128-<br />

143<br />

3. P. Garrignes et al.: Distribution and Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Aromatic<br />

Compounds in Coastal Mediterranean Ecosystems. MAP Technical<br />

Re<strong>port</strong>s Series No 59, UNEP, Athens p. 211-212<br />

4. Marine Habitat Committee, ICES CM 2003/E:04. Ref. ACME: Re<strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the Working Group on marine Sediments in Relation to Pollution,<br />

Tromso, Norway 2003.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:57<br />

A.3.5.2.3. EXISTING POLLUTION SOURCES IN THE PROJECT AREA<br />

In the area <strong>of</strong> the Project the main pollution sources are sewage waters and<br />

activities in the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

SEWAGE WATERS<br />

Waste waters from the main sewer <strong>of</strong> the town Ploce sewage system are let<br />

without treatment into the sea, by coastal outlet situated beside the bulk<br />

freight ramp base. According to investigations carried out by the Public Health<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> the County Splitsko – Dalmatinska in 2002, properties <strong>of</strong> these<br />

waters were as follows: pH 6.61 – 8,46, suspended matter 18 – 142 mg/L,<br />

KPK 63 - 300 mg/L, BPK5 22 - 260 mg/L, ammonium 14 - 115 mg/L,<br />

faecal coliforma 2E +08 - 3 E + 10. It is evident that these are characteristic<br />

sewage waters containing im<strong>port</strong>ant amount <strong>of</strong> suspended matter, dissolved<br />

organic matter and nutritious salts, as well as micro-organisms <strong>of</strong> which many<br />

represent potential hazard for human health. Such loading rates, along with<br />

low sea streams are the main factors influencing sedimentation <strong>of</strong> suspended<br />

matter and the increase <strong>of</strong> nutritious matter amount within the <strong>port</strong><br />

aquatorium, which, in conditions <strong>of</strong> increased temperature and proper<br />

illumination <strong>of</strong> the water column, may lead to an accelerated overgrowing or a<br />

mass development <strong>of</strong> algae. In some parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> total disappearance <strong>of</strong><br />

oxygen may occur, as well as development <strong>of</strong> anaerobic process <strong>of</strong><br />

decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic matter, whose final products have a very unpleasant<br />

odour and unfavourable biological impact.<br />

THE PLOCE PORT<br />

In the Ploce <strong>port</strong>, basic <strong>port</strong> activities take place: mooring <strong>of</strong> vessels,<br />

transhipment <strong>of</strong> goods from ships to open and closed storages, and reloading<br />

to trans<strong>port</strong> means ship - railway – lorries. In this <strong>port</strong> transhipment <strong>of</strong> general,<br />

mass bulk freight and liquid freight is carried out.<br />

Sea pollution in <strong>port</strong>s is mainly the consequence <strong>of</strong> sea pollution from ships,<br />

and load handling, its loading, unloading, reloading and storage. The greatest<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> pollution is the consequence <strong>of</strong> unexpected occurrences –<br />

incidents. In regular working conditions the pollution degree depends on the<br />

method <strong>of</strong> handling and storing, on handling area layout and its drainage<br />

system. The <strong>port</strong> equipment and its maintenance also represent a danger for<br />

sea pollution due to contamination <strong>of</strong> handling surfaces by oil, and due to<br />

waste waters and other waste from garages and workshops for the equipment<br />

maintenance<br />

According to data furnished by the Ploce Harbour Master's Office, in several<br />

preceding years there was no sea pollution from ships.<br />

According to data furnished by the Marine Service <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> Ploce, in May<br />

2002 contamination by oil in the <strong>port</strong> aqatorium by the Shore No. 5 was<br />

registered. The pollution was <strong>of</strong> minor extent.<br />

The storage and handling areas <strong>of</strong> the bulk freight terminal (coal) dispose <strong>of</strong> a<br />

system for precipitation water collection; before its letting into the sea the<br />

rainwater is treated in sedimentation chambers – fat separators. Quality <strong>of</strong><br />

these waters was not examined.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:58<br />

No treatment system existsd for oiled waste waters <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> equipment<br />

maintenance facilities. These waters are let by a precipitation canal into the<br />

channel Vlaška - more. There are no data on quality <strong>of</strong> these waters.<br />

The <strong>port</strong> has no specific place for washing and cleaning <strong>of</strong> lorries and<br />

wagons, and there is no drainage system for soiled waters and their<br />

treatment.<br />

A part <strong>of</strong> faecal waste waters <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> structures (zone around Shores 0, 1,<br />

2, 3 and 5) is connected to the main municipal sewage that ends by the Shore<br />

No. 5, while a minor part is resolved individually, by septic tanks.<br />

The petroleum terminal <strong>of</strong> Energopetrol represents a high potential hazard for<br />

sea pollution by petroleum in case <strong>of</strong> an incident. Waste waters from its tank<br />

vanes are let into the channel Vlaška – more after treatment on oil separator<br />

(capacity 300 m 3 ). According to data furnished by the Public Health Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

county Splitsko – Dalmatinska, these waters are considerably loaded by<br />

organic matter whose concentration highly varies (in 2002 chemical<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> oxygen ranged from 30 to 800 mg/L). It is interesting to<br />

mention that total fat and mineral oil loading <strong>of</strong> these waste waters was<br />

relatively low (total fat 3.1 mg/L, mineral oils =.56 mg/L) and not pro<strong>port</strong>ional<br />

to the organic matter load.<br />

At the very location <strong>of</strong> the intervention, waste consisting mostly <strong>of</strong> timber,<br />

sturdy waste iron and rubber can be detected.<br />

A.3.5.2.4. CONCLUSION<br />

Basic hydrographical sea conditions in the Neretvanski Channel and the sea<br />

in front <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>port</strong> Ploce, are under great influence <strong>of</strong> the Neretva river.<br />

Although under considerable influence <strong>of</strong> sweet water, the sea in this area<br />

may be classified as having low concentration <strong>of</strong> nutritious salts and a good<br />

and uniform distribution <strong>of</strong> oxygen saturation. Only in the segment in front <strong>of</strong><br />

the town <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, the surface sea layer is <strong>of</strong>ten enriched by<br />

orthophosphate.<br />

In the area <strong>of</strong> Ploce, in relation to bio-production properties <strong>of</strong> the sea, a<br />

general situation may be considered as very favourable. In the station in front<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Ploce <strong>port</strong>, microbiological pollution <strong>of</strong> faecal origin is low.<br />

Exploring <strong>of</strong> heavy metals shows that content <strong>of</strong> cadmium, lead, copper and<br />

zinc in the sea sediment in front <strong>of</strong> the Ploce <strong>port</strong> is higher than the values<br />

established in sediment at the reference station (Vis). Concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

cadmium is above the level <strong>of</strong> the « probable natural contents» <strong>of</strong> this heavy<br />

metal in sea sediment in the greater area <strong>of</strong> the central Adriatic, which<br />

indicates a certain influence <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic sources <strong>of</strong> pollution (waste<br />

waters, the town <strong>port</strong>).<br />

Concentrations <strong>of</strong> organic pollutants – chlorinated hydrocarbons in shells<br />

Mytilus galloprovincialis are considerably lower in the area <strong>of</strong> Ploce in relation<br />

to average values <strong>of</strong> chlorinated hydrocarbons for the Mediterranean basin.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:59<br />

Municipal sewage waters contain different kinds <strong>of</strong> heavy metals, high amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> suspended and dissolved organic matter and nutritious salts. These loads<br />

as well as less intensive streaming within the <strong>port</strong> aquatorium are the main<br />

factors influencing the limpidity reduction, sedimentation <strong>of</strong> suspended matter<br />

and increase <strong>of</strong> nutritious matter amount within the <strong>port</strong> aquatorium, which, in<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> increased temperature and a proper illumination <strong>of</strong> water column<br />

may lead to an accelerated overgrowing or a mass development <strong>of</strong> algae.<br />

These processes may have unfavourable impact on the sea ecosystem as<br />

well as on aesthetic properties <strong>of</strong> sea water.<br />

The <strong>port</strong> itself may load the <strong>port</strong> aquatorium by its activities, the freight<br />

tranloading from ships.<br />

Emptying <strong>of</strong> untreated waste water from the equipment maintenance facilities<br />

is a considerable source <strong>of</strong> sea pollution.<br />

Concentration <strong>of</strong> heavy metals (cadmium, lead, copper, zinc, vanadium and<br />

nickel) and polycyclic hydrocarbons in sediment <strong>of</strong> the Ploce <strong>port</strong> are<br />

characteristic for areas under a very low anthropogenic influence.<br />

Polychlorinated biphenyls have been not detected. Sediment load with heavy<br />

metals is quite possible result <strong>of</strong> discharge <strong>of</strong> untreated sewage into the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:60<br />

A.3.5.3 TRAFFIC INFLUENCE<br />

The problem <strong>of</strong> traffic is one <strong>of</strong> the essential factors in functioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong><br />

technologies. This is equally pointed out for both external and internal traffic in<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> basin Ploce. If the traffic possibilities <strong>of</strong> installed capacities in<br />

the Ploce <strong>port</strong> are put in relation with factor <strong>of</strong> traffic capacities <strong>of</strong> the external<br />

road traffic, one becomes aware <strong>of</strong> the problem <strong>of</strong> access roads to the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

Namely, even in the present form, prior to the container terminal construction,<br />

the <strong>port</strong> basin has a considerably greater installed capacity than the<br />

permeability <strong>of</strong> external road communications.<br />

It is therefore necessary, even inevitable, to start with modernization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>port</strong> capacities, and, even more necessary, with modernization and increase<br />

<strong>of</strong> permeability <strong>of</strong> communication ways, in particular those that connect the<br />

<strong>port</strong> capacities with the state primary road network. This will then enable a<br />

better and a more rapid traffic flow from the town, without disturbance, if<br />

possible.<br />

Consequently, the interference <strong>of</strong> lorry traffic into the traffic flow <strong>of</strong> the city<br />

vehicles is strikingly negative in the sense <strong>of</strong> environmental impact, whether<br />

considering the traffic safety, the environment pollution or occupying <strong>of</strong> a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the communication capacity. According to the actual situation, the lorry<br />

route from the <strong>port</strong> facilities to the city area is realized, in the existing<br />

organization, through the city streets. Increased needs <strong>of</strong> the city traffic,<br />

pedestrian traffic, passenger cars, interfere to a large extent with the lorry<br />

traffic. In fact, such a situation on roads leading to the <strong>port</strong> or from it is the<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> the greatest pollution in every way.<br />

By this intervention - the container terminal construction, which<br />

understands modernization <strong>of</strong> transhipment technology and internal<br />

communication, the lorry traffic will be shifted to the direct connection<br />

with the primary state road network through the Adriatic Primary Road.<br />

As a result, the city streets will be free from the heavy lorry traffic, both<br />

internal and primary one. By this, negative impact <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> capacities<br />

on the site environment will be reduced.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:61<br />

A.3.5.4 . NOISE<br />

The residential and business zone <strong>of</strong> the part <strong>of</strong> city under possible influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> noise from the <strong>port</strong>, as well as other susceptible zones, are predominantly<br />

loaded by traffic noise from the town streets, as well as by noise produced by<br />

railway traffic from the railway node.<br />

The highest allowable noise levels are defined by the Rule Book from the year<br />

1990 with the following values:<br />

Highest allowed 15-minutes<br />

levels Leq in dBA<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

By day By night<br />

Hospital zones, health resorts, zones<br />

<strong>of</strong> rest and recreation, cultural-<br />

-historical localities and large parks 50 40<br />

Residential city areas, other<br />

settlements, tourist zones,<br />

camps and zones <strong>of</strong> educational<br />

institutions, scientific-research institutions 55 45<br />

Office-and-residential zone with public<br />

purpose structures out <strong>of</strong> city<br />

centre, children's playgrounds 60 50<br />

Office-and-residential zone with public<br />

purpose structures within the city centre,<br />

zones along highways and main<br />

city roads 65 50<br />

Industrial, storage and service areas Noise at the limit <strong>of</strong> this<br />

and trans<strong>port</strong> terminal areas, zone shall not exceed<br />

without apartments the allowed levels in the<br />

neighbouring zone<br />

A.3.5.4 .1. NOISE MEASUREMENT ON THE LOCATION<br />

Noise leven measurement within the area <strong>of</strong> the “LUKA PLOCE” and outside<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> took place based on the request <strong>of</strong> the Client. The object<br />

<strong>of</strong> the measurement is to determine noise on the characteristic and previously<br />

defined measuring points within the area <strong>of</strong> the “LUKA PLOCE” (points B2<br />

and B3) and on the external area at the point B1 closed to the <strong>port</strong> under daily<br />

and night-time operating conditions, to compare measured values with<br />

allowed values specified in the Rules on Maximum-allowed Noise Levels in<br />

Environment where People Work and Stay Official Gazette No. 145/04).<br />

Noise sources at the “LUKA PLOCE” :<br />

• Cranes, unloading and reloading devices and conveyors<br />

• Means <strong>of</strong> internal trans<strong>port</strong>, external vehicles and means <strong>of</strong> trans<strong>port</strong> for<br />

loading/unloading <strong>of</strong> cargo, waggons and traction locomotives<br />

• Other auxilliary plants, machines and devices<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:61/ 1<br />

External noise levels measured on the previously defined measuring points<br />

marked in the layout plan – plan enclosed to this Record.<br />

Internal characteristic points lay within the <strong>port</strong> and are marked in the layout<br />

plan as points B2 and B3.<br />

External characteristic point lays outside the area <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce to the<br />

north <strong>of</strong> the bus terminal and is marked in the layout plan as the point B1.<br />

MEASURING RESULTS<br />

Weather conditions during the measurements:<br />

In the daytime - clear with westerly breeze (v= app. 1.2 – 1.5 m/s)<br />

In the nighttime - clear and windless<br />

NOISE MEASURING RESULTS DURNG THE DAY<br />

MEASURING POINT<br />

(Measuring points – positions marked in the<br />

layout plan enclosed to the Record)<br />

POSITION B1<br />

(outside the <strong>port</strong> area)<br />

POSITION B2<br />

(within the area <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce)<br />

POSITION B3<br />

(within the area <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

MEASURED EQUIVALENT NOISE LEVEL - LAeq<br />

u dB(A)<br />

DAY<br />

NOISE MEASURING RESULTS DURNG THE NIGHT<br />

MEASURING POINT<br />

(Measuring points – positions marked in the layout<br />

plan enclosed to the Record)<br />

POSITION B1 (outside the <strong>port</strong> area)<br />

58<br />

52<br />

57<br />

POSITION B2 (within the area <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce)<br />

POSITION B3 (within the area <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce)<br />

Note<br />

Noise <strong>of</strong> traffic and business activity<br />

and additional impact <strong>of</strong> construction<br />

site closed to the point B1 (app. 30 m<br />

distant north-east from the point B1)<br />

Noise coming from activities in the Port<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

Noise coming from activities in the Port<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ploce and additional impact – cries<br />

<strong>of</strong> flocks on the plateau<br />

MEASURED EQUIVALENT NOISE<br />

LEVEL - LAeq u dB(A)<br />

NIGHT<br />

39<br />

34<br />

33<br />

Note<br />

Additional impact <strong>of</strong> activities<br />

at the adjacent bus terminal


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:61/ 2<br />

MAXIMUM-ALLOWED VALUES AND NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> external space within which the “Luka Ploce” is situated<br />

As the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Ploce has not performed any acoustic zoning <strong>of</strong> this<br />

area, the ING ATEST (the company for noise measurement and prediction in<br />

environment where people work and stay) is <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the said area<br />

belongs to noise zone 4.<br />

Noise zone 4: Zone <strong>of</strong> mixed, predominantly business purpose with housing<br />

sector.<br />

Pursuant to the Article 5 respectively Table No. 1 <strong>of</strong> the Rules on Maximumallowed<br />

Noise Levels in Environment where People Work and Stay (Official<br />

Gazette No. 145/04) the allowed noise levels in the external area next to the<br />

Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce and in external space at the closest residential haouses amount<br />

65 dB(A) in the daytime and 50 dB(A) in the nighttime.<br />

• The maximum-allowed assessed noise immission level on the open area<br />

shall be determined consistently with the Article 6 - Table 1 <strong>of</strong> the Rules<br />

on Maximum-allowed Noise Levels in Environment where People Work<br />

and Stay (Official Gazette No. 145/04). For areas where the existing<br />

residual noise level is equal or higher than the level in the Table 1 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rules, the noise immission that would arise from new-designed,<br />

constructed or reconstructed respectively rehabilitated structures with<br />

appertaining noise sources may not exceed the allowed levels as from the<br />

Table 1 <strong>of</strong> the Rules reduced by 5 dB(A). For areas where the existing<br />

residual noise level is lower than the level in the Table 1 <strong>of</strong> the Rules, the<br />

noise immission that would arise from new-designed, constructed or<br />

reconstructed respectively rehabilitated structures with appertaining noise<br />

sources may not increase the existing noise levels by more than 1dB(A).<br />

• According to the Rules the noise may, on the line <strong>of</strong> the industrial district in<br />

this case <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> (zone 5), not exceed the levels allowed in the<br />

bordering zone and the zone 4 (Zone <strong>of</strong> mixed, predominantly business<br />

purpos and housing sector) with maximum-allowed assessed noise level<br />

for the daytime 65 dB(A) and for the nighttime 50 dB(A) has been<br />

determined as borderzone.<br />

C O M M E N T<br />

• The existing external noise level outside the “LUKA PLOCE” at the point<br />

B1 during business activity at the <strong>port</strong> in the daytime does not exceed the<br />

allowed value.<br />

• The existing external noise level outside the “LUKA PLOCE” at the point<br />

B1 without business activity at the <strong>port</strong> in the nighttime does not exceed<br />

the allowed value.<br />

• The measured noise levels within the “LUKA PLOCE” at the points B2<br />

and B3 do not exceed the allowed values.<br />

The new container terminal is situated in the middle <strong>of</strong> the Ploce <strong>port</strong><br />

area. Noise from this terminal, when constructed, shall have no impact<br />

on the residential city area in accordance with Croatian regulation. In<br />

fact, the relations <strong>of</strong> the new container terminal should result in less<br />

noise input in the city Ploce and be beneficial for the inhabitants.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:61/ 3<br />

Layout plan <strong>of</strong> the “LUKA PLOCE” with marked measuring points (points B1 , B2 and B3)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 62<br />

A.3.5.5. WASTE<br />

According to their origin and properties, the waste matter detected in the <strong>port</strong><br />

can be very different, but, in general, can be classified into two categories:<br />

a) Hazardous waste<br />

b) Other waste matter<br />

Hazardous waste may appear as a consequence <strong>of</strong> incidents in handling the<br />

hazardous matter. Sludge from oil separators (such as precipitation sewer<br />

separators) is also classified as hazardous waste.<br />

Other waste to be generated within the container terminal area is:<br />

• Waste from cleansing <strong>of</strong> operation shore (pieces <strong>of</strong> wood, plastic<br />

bags, cloths, cartons…)<br />

• Waste from process <strong>of</strong> internal sewage maintenance (solid waste<br />

appearing on drain covers)<br />

• Waste from vessels and waste occurred from workers' stay in the<br />

<strong>port</strong>, similar to municipal waste.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 63<br />

A.3.5.6. STRUCTURES AT THE SITE<br />

The transloading operations in the <strong>port</strong>, planned in the container terminal,<br />

require, first <strong>of</strong> all, open areas without structures.<br />

The technology applied in the container terminal envisages storages at the<br />

rear, where they partly exist today. Some storages are planned to be<br />

demolished and the new ones constructed, but always at the same site, so<br />

that, in fact, the construction degree remains always the same.<br />

By constructing the container terminal, amount <strong>of</strong> structures in the<br />

Ploce <strong>port</strong> area will not considerably increase.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


BULK CARGO TERMINAL<br />

LP DEVELOPMENT ZONE STAGE II<br />

Liquid cargo terminal<br />

Stage II<br />

CONTAINER TERMINAL<br />

Liquid cargo terminal - Stage I<br />

Vlaška channel - sea<br />

Quay 5<br />

SZ - Stage I <strong>of</strong> production programmes<br />

SZ-Stage II <strong>of</strong> production programmes<br />

Quay 3<br />

LIQUID CARGO TERMINAL LPG<br />

Quay 2<br />

Floating tank<br />

Quay 1<br />

Quay 0<br />

Parking<br />

PT centre<br />

Truck terminal<br />

Business and trade/<br />

/shopping centre<br />

SZ - Stage III<br />

SCZ - Stage II <strong>of</strong> production programmes<br />

SCZ - Stage II <strong>of</strong> production programmes<br />

A3. DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION<br />

SURROUNDINGS AND PROJECT IMPACT AREA<br />

SURROUNDINGS OF PLANNED PROJECT<br />

FEATURES OF PHYSICAL SURROUNDINGS<br />

OF PLANNED PROJECT<br />

A3. OPIS OKOLIŠA LOKACIJE I PODRUCJA<br />

UTJECAJA ZAHVATA<br />

ZNACAJKE PROSTORNOG OKRUŽENJA<br />

PLANIRANOG ZAHVATA<br />

KEY (LEGENDA)<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA )<br />

PORT AREA BOUNDARY (GRANICA LUCKOG PODRUCJA)<br />

ROAD ROUTES - STRATEGIC (CESTOVNI PRAVCI-STRATEŠKI)<br />

WATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FIRE ALARMS<br />

(VODA, TELEKOMUNIKACIJE, VATRODOJAVE)<br />

RAIL/WAY TRACK CORRIDORS (KOLOSIJECNI KORIDORI )<br />

SL. 50


m o r e<br />

m o r e<br />

QUAY (OBALA) 5<br />

m o r e<br />

−<br />

− − −<br />

_ _ − _ − _ − _ _ − _ _ − _ − _ −_<br />

_ _ _ _ _ _ _<br />

_ _ _ _ _<br />

−<br />

_<br />

−<br />

_<br />

−<br />

_<br />

−<br />

_<br />

− −<br />

_<br />

−<br />

_ _ _ _ _<br />

− − −<br />

−<br />

QUAY (OBALA) 6<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

2127<br />

(4559/111)<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

2129<br />

(4559/110)<br />

gps<br />

110 m<br />

2130<br />

2131<br />

(4559/109)<br />

vatrogasci<br />

z<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

2128<br />

(4559/108)<br />

garaza<br />

195.712 195 m<br />

z<br />

gps<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

ts<br />

2078/24<br />

(4559/90)<br />

2078/4<br />

( 4559/8 )<br />

2078/1<br />

(4559/1)<br />

2078/25<br />

( 4559/92 )<br />

2078/4<br />

( 4559/8 III )<br />

(4559/1)<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

32<br />

(4559/63)<br />

petrolkoks<br />

(4559/66)<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

(4559/1)<br />

z<br />

42<br />

" p l o b e s t "<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

(4559/67)<br />

z<br />

z<br />

(4559/70)<br />

z<br />

(4559/65)<br />

z<br />

44<br />

z<br />

(4559/71)<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

607<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

vaga<br />

57<br />

A3. DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION SURROUNDINGS<br />

AND PROJECT IMPACT AREA<br />

PRESENT SITUATION<br />

A3. OPIS OKOLIŠA LOKACIJE I PODRUCJA<br />

UTJECAJA ZAHVATA<br />

POSTOJECE STANJE<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

SL. 51


OBALA 4<br />

OBALA 3<br />

60 000 DWT<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7<br />

WATERFRONT 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

OBALA 2<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

OBALA 1<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

OBALA 0<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO Shunting group 3 - designed<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO Shunting group - completed<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO Shunting group 2 - completed<br />

A3. DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION<br />

SURROUNDINGS AND PROJECT IMPACT AREA<br />

A3. OPIS OKOLIŠA LOKACIJE I PODRUCJA<br />

UTJECAJA ZAHVATA<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:5000<br />

SL. 52


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

A.4. DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION<br />

A.4.1. FUNCTION OF PLANNED INTERVENTION<br />

A.4.2. SPATIAL NEEDS OF PLANNED INTERVENTION<br />

A.4.3. CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURE/FACILITY<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

A.4.1 FUNCTION OF PLANNED INTERVENTION<br />

With the construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal Ploce the following will be<br />

achieved:<br />

A.4.2 SPATIAL NEEDS<br />

- new wharf (dock) length 300 m to serve for access <strong>of</strong> ships <strong>of</strong> the<br />

highest maritime requirements up to maximum deadweight <strong>of</strong> 60.000<br />

DWT and deep draught without limit. On the planned wharf (dock) at<br />

the simultaneous berthing <strong>of</strong> either one ship <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned<br />

maximum deadweight or two ships <strong>of</strong> half <strong>of</strong> the maximum deadweight<br />

requirement.<br />

- new storage and handling surfaces <strong>of</strong> about 15.4 ha to be used for the<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> the container terminal, capacity about 100.000 TEU/year.<br />

The refurbished container terminal will be covering the total surface <strong>of</strong><br />

154.000 m² (15.4 ha) onshore and 53,000 m² (5.3 ha) sea water, i.e. gross<br />

surface 209,000 m² (21 ha).<br />

1. Statement <strong>of</strong> main surfaces<br />

- Port operations surfaces 86.000 m²<br />

- Waterfront with onshore surface 17.000 m²<br />

- Roads and infrastructure structures 24.000 m²<br />

- Warehouse space 12.000 m²<br />

- Auxiliary structures 15.000 m²<br />

- Total surface <strong>of</strong> pier 154.000 m²<br />

(<strong>of</strong> that roads and operative surfaces cover 127.000 m²)<br />

- Aquatic waters (sea) 53.000 m²<br />

2. Pier capacity<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

Grand total 209.000 m²<br />

- container terminal 100.000 TEU/year<br />

3. Number <strong>of</strong> employees (evaluation) 40<br />

The pier capacity and the number <strong>of</strong> employees (data elaborated in many<br />

studies) are subject to change and will depend on <strong>port</strong> modernization process<br />

and dynamics <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> modern technologies.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

A.4.2.1 DESIGNATION AND USE OF SURFACES AND FACILITIES<br />

According to its designation the container terminal represents part <strong>of</strong> those<br />

<strong>port</strong> surfaces designated for trans<strong>port</strong> and storage <strong>of</strong> goods. The new<br />

surfaces will be built on one part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> area, together with the new wharf<br />

for landing <strong>of</strong> ships for container trans<strong>port</strong>ation.<br />

On the surfaces for trans<strong>port</strong> and storage, open space will be organized for<br />

reloading, loading and unloading <strong>of</strong> containers from ships to the operative<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> the storage and reverse, and loading and unloading <strong>of</strong> container<br />

via: ship-wagon and reverse, ship-truck and reverse, wagon-truck and<br />

reverse, and storage-wagon-truck. Part <strong>of</strong> the surface will be designated for<br />

accompanying structures/facilities and traffic and public utilities infrastructure.<br />

The open storage spaces (unsheltered) <strong>of</strong> the operative shore, warehouses,<br />

control facilities at entrance and exit, auxiliary premises and other to be used<br />

by the investor-end user for the activities within the main line <strong>of</strong> business only<br />

and described in the following sections.<br />

The inland part <strong>of</strong> the terminal is refurbished as a functional unit in<br />

accordance with the technological requirements. Within this unit we<br />

distinguish five zones provided for specific kind <strong>of</strong> construction and surface<br />

refurbishing:<br />

I. Port-operative surfaces – it s planned to refurbish open (unsheltered)<br />

storage space for handling and storage <strong>of</strong> containers.<br />

II. Waterfront with onshore surface - for loading and unloading <strong>of</strong> containers<br />

with Ro –Ro ramps.<br />

III. Traffic communication lines and infrastructure facilities/structures –<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the new traffic communication lines is planned on the terminal,<br />

roads and railroads, as well as access roads and access railroad on terminal<br />

ground, throughout the <strong>port</strong> area.<br />

IV. Warehouse – in order to fill and empty containers a sheltered storagewarehouse<br />

will be built.<br />

V. Auxiliary structures – construction <strong>of</strong> a building is planned for control and<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the main gate, with adjacent parking lot for the freight and<br />

passenger vehicles, and workshop for repair <strong>of</strong> containers and terminal<br />

machinery.<br />

No construction <strong>of</strong> housing space is to be allowed, or construction <strong>of</strong> plants for<br />

re-working and processing <strong>of</strong> raw materials and organization <strong>of</strong> activities that<br />

may increase pressures on traffic communication lines, infrastructure,<br />

pollution <strong>of</strong> air, ground and sea, as well as those creating too much noise.<br />

The space designation is shown on the graphical attachment «Detailed<br />

designation <strong>of</strong> space».<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

A.4.3 WAY OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITY<br />

CONSTRUCTION OF PREFABRICATED PIER STRUCTURE<br />

Piles will be executed from the sea or partly before the excavation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shore aquatic waters. The pile have reinforced concrete pile caps (made in<br />

steel removable formwork) for placement <strong>of</strong> grid made <strong>of</strong> prestressed<br />

reinforced concrete, longitudinal and traverse prefabricated beams, which will<br />

be connected by wet nods in-situ.<br />

The heads on the location <strong>of</strong> bumpers will be concreted in removable<br />

reinforced concrete formwork. They will be used for installation <strong>of</strong> bumpers<br />

and polers.<br />

The power supply channel on the shoreline is made <strong>of</strong> prefabricated<br />

elements. The prefabricated prestressed sup<strong>port</strong>ing plates will be placed over<br />

a grid <strong>of</strong> main transversal sup<strong>port</strong>s and fixed by a reinforced concrete slab,<br />

concreted in-situ. The whole pier structure will be covered with a layer <strong>of</strong> micro<br />

reinforced concrete.<br />

On the joint with the onshore plateau the pier structure has a transition,<br />

reinforced concrete plate built-in the pavement structure <strong>of</strong> the plateau and<br />

sup<strong>port</strong>ed by pin joint, along the whole length, on the land longitudinal sup<strong>port</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the pier structure.<br />

The excavations underneath shore are in slope 1: 2.<br />

General stone fill and rock protection are in slope 1: 1.50.<br />

The slope underneath the pier structure is protected against erosion by a<br />

stone retaining lining.<br />

The ground directly behind the shore and under the pavement structure is<br />

improved by gravel piles <strong>of</strong> different depth and density. The gravel piles are <strong>of</strong><br />

100 mm ND. The improvement zone starts at the last pile <strong>of</strong> the pier structure<br />

and has two different piles density per width <strong>of</strong> the plateau zone.<br />

In the zone along the pier structure (width about 34.00 m) the piles have two<br />

lengths.<br />

CIVIL ENGINEERING SOLUTION OF THE PIER<br />

The wharf for container is a surface structure at elevation +3.00 m, 23.40 m<br />

wide and 300.90 m long berthing space.<br />

Shore water depth is 15.0 m, for ships up to 60.000 DWT and draught 13.5 m.<br />

The shore structure is divided per length into three dilatations. The first<br />

dilatation in the root <strong>of</strong> the pier is 109.50 m long, middle dilatation is 102.80 m<br />

long, and end 88.60 m long. The total length <strong>of</strong> the pier structure <strong>of</strong> the wharf<br />

(dock) no. 7 is 300.90 m.<br />

The pier structure is founded on drilled reinforced concrete piles (Benoto)<br />

1500 mm ND, and on driven, steel, battered piles, 812.8 mm ND .<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

The axial distance in the longitudinal orientation in each dilatation is 7, 10 m,<br />

and in transversal 10,00 m ( three rows <strong>of</strong> piles per pier length ).<br />

Ro-Ro ramp is a surface structure at elevation +3.00 m with ramp 20.0 m wide<br />

and 12.67 m long. The ramp begins at elevation + 1.50 m and has slopes <strong>of</strong><br />

25 % and 7.50 %.<br />

Ro-Ro ramp on the wharf (dock) 7 is located in the root <strong>of</strong> the pier, and<br />

located perpendicularly to ramp on wharf (dock) 6.<br />

The length <strong>of</strong> the wharf (dock) 6 with Ro-Ro ramp is 30.5 m and width 23.4 m.<br />

The water depth at location <strong>of</strong> Ro-Ro ramp is 15.0 m .<br />

All these interventions are in accordance with the spatial-planning<br />

premises in the current spatial-planning documentation.<br />

WARF EQUIPMENT<br />

For safe landing and berthing <strong>of</strong> ships the waterfront is equipped with rubber<br />

bumpers and polers. Bumpers are fixed to wharf structure by galvanized metal<br />

elements. Both access to sea water and landing will be secured by a sailor’s<br />

steel leather embedded into the prefabricated elements <strong>of</strong> the pier structure.<br />

The structural dilatations are protected with steel metal elements. On the<br />

wharf two container <strong>port</strong>al cranes will be installed for the terminal final phase<br />

<strong>of</strong> construction. For handling <strong>of</strong> containers during the construction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

terminal first phase mobile cranes are provided on shore.<br />

CONSTRUCTION PHASES<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> pier is foreseen in two phases, and in accordance with the<br />

<strong>port</strong> needs.<br />

I. phase<br />

The first phase includes complete wharf and storage space, capacity 40.000<br />

TEU/year together with all required public utilities infrastructure. Part <strong>of</strong> road<br />

communication lines would also be built, with the required structure at<br />

entrance to terminal, and railroad tracks along the shoreline.<br />

II .phase<br />

In the second phase the construction <strong>of</strong> the remaining part <strong>of</strong> storage space<br />

would be undertaken together with the complete public utilities infrastructure,<br />

as well as construction <strong>of</strong> the remaining structures/facilities: warehouse,<br />

workshop, and part <strong>of</strong> structures at entrance to terminal. By completion <strong>of</strong> this<br />

phase the terminal would reach the design capacity <strong>of</strong> 100.000 TEU/year.<br />

SITE MOBILIZATION AREA<br />

In accordance with the construction phases and works performance schedule<br />

<strong>of</strong> separate phases it is necessary to provide a surface <strong>of</strong> about 10.000 m² for<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

site mobilization and organization. Such surface is available within the <strong>port</strong><br />

area and can be used for site mobilization.<br />

These surfaces have complete infrastructure.<br />

A.4.3.1 TRAFFIC CONNECTION<br />

The container terminal Ploce will enable to reach yearly equivalent units<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> about 100.000 TEU/year.<br />

About 30 % <strong>of</strong> mentioned capacities will be trans<strong>port</strong>ed by railroad and 70%<br />

by trucks.<br />

For loading and unloading by railroad, new connection tracks are provided<br />

from the marshalling yard Ploce, adjacent to the <strong>port</strong> are <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

For truck traffic, the existing main gate to the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is provided and<br />

connected, by the new road within the area <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, directly to the<br />

terminal.<br />

Besides the main road gate to the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, there are functional auxiliary<br />

entrances to connect the <strong>port</strong> to railroad, and to the marshalling yard Ploce.<br />

Traffic on terminal:<br />

o The solution <strong>of</strong> the internal traffic provides for a main collecting multi-lane<br />

road located at the edge between the unsheltered and sheltered storage<br />

surfaces to which connect the transversal inside process roads, which are<br />

located in such way to meet the technological requirements <strong>of</strong> the loadingreloading<br />

operations.<br />

o Parking <strong>of</strong> the employees and client vehicles is solved at the main gate to<br />

terminal, within the <strong>port</strong> area.<br />

The foreseen surfaces provide parking space for 10 – 20 trucks and<br />

regular parking <strong>of</strong> about 60 passenger vehicles, <strong>of</strong> which 30 for employees<br />

and 30 for clients <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> services.<br />

o Pedestrian traffic on terminal:<br />

• at arrival to work through the main and secondary gates<br />

• within the <strong>port</strong> on road traffic lanes network.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

A.4.3.2. PUBLIC UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

A.4.3.2.1. WATER SUPPLY<br />

WATER SUPPLY – SANITARY WATER SYSTEM<br />

CONNECTION <strong>of</strong> the water supply system will be made from the existing<br />

pipeline diameter 200 mm, with hydraulic conditions – available pressure 5-6<br />

bar, available quantity 33 l/s.<br />

At the point <strong>of</strong> connection a manhole will be installed with branch to water<br />

meter manhole.<br />

WATER METER MANHOLE – within the water meter manhole, it is provided<br />

to install water meter for sanitary water consumption, as well as water meter<br />

for fire system.<br />

Before the water meter the impurities traps will be installed, and for easier<br />

installation and dismantling appropriate fittings and armature will be installed.<br />

PIPE MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT –it is planned to install ductile pipes<br />

(modular cast) for work pressure minimum NP 10 bar, connection tyton,<br />

bearing class K-10 (min k-9).<br />

Pipes are placed into trench on sand bedding 4-16 mm, and minimum<br />

10 cm thick. Backfilling will begin with sand up to 30 cm above the pipe<br />

tip and finished with excavation material. The minimum depth above the<br />

pipe tip is 1.00 m.<br />

MANHOLES- all water system elements (nods, air vents, mud oulets,<br />

hydrant manholes) will be installed into concrete manholes, which size<br />

will secure free installation and regular maintenace <strong>of</strong> the water supply<br />

network.<br />

Manholes will be <strong>of</strong> reinforced concrete, and minimum 1.90 m high.<br />

Manholes will be watertight. Cover on manholes will have bearing<br />

power 400 kN (on raods and handling surfaces) and 250 kN (on other<br />

surfaces).<br />

Manholes will be equipped with step irons.<br />

FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLY SISTEM<br />

FIRE PROTECTION - for fire protection needs it is provided to install<br />

hydrants at minimum distance <strong>of</strong> 80 m.<br />

The required fire water quantities are secured from several sources:<br />

• CITY WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM – about 30 l/s is secured by hydrant<br />

network connected to the city water supply system.<br />

• MOBILE FIRE PUMPS – additional quantity is secured by mobile fire<br />

pumps (self suction pump with diesel motor on car trailer) individual<br />

capacity 20 l/s, which is connected to fixed inlet on the waterfront <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 8<br />

A.4.3.2.2 DISCHARGE<br />

new pier. Two fixed inlets are provided (marked as SU on layout), each<br />

with its own distribution system. Considering that there are two<br />

independent systems, parallel use <strong>of</strong> two mobile fire pumps is possible.<br />

• ADDITIONAL SIYSTEMS – there is also an additional possibility for fire<br />

fighting with <strong>port</strong> tug boats (about 50 l/s).<br />

The mentioned sources satisfy the total quantities <strong>of</strong> about 50 l/s and<br />

additional 20 l/s by parallel work <strong>of</strong> two pumps. Additional possible source are<br />

tug boats also.<br />

In any case, the required water quantities will be defined in accordance with<br />

the fire hazard assessment re<strong>port</strong> to be prepared for the whole <strong>port</strong> complex,<br />

in order to get an overall solution.<br />

With the fire hazard assessment re<strong>port</strong> it is necessary to define the end water<br />

quantities from the city water supply system, possible additional sources,<br />

firemen unit equipment level, and all in accordance with the assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

possible fire hazard covering the whole complex, and taking into account<br />

different kind <strong>of</strong> goods, possibility <strong>of</strong> more then one fire taking place at the<br />

same time and other relevant factors.<br />

DISCHARGE OF SANITARY (FOUL) WASTE WATER<br />

Discharge <strong>of</strong> sanitary (foul) waste water will be solved by installation <strong>of</strong> main<br />

conduit to be connected to foreseen septic tank.<br />

Main conduit will be <strong>of</strong> polyester pipes, diameter 250 – 300 mm, with<br />

manholes 80/80 cm on each horizontal and vertical change <strong>of</strong> grade, as well<br />

as on connection to particular structures.<br />

Septic tank is located within green surface, and in the latter phases, when it<br />

will be possible to connect to the planned discharge system <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Ploce, the septic tank will be put out <strong>of</strong> function.<br />

In this phase, connection to the planned city system is provided with a<br />

gravitational main conduit up to the connection to the city main sewer. If the<br />

change in heights does not allow connection by gravity, the septic tank will be<br />

reconstructed into local pump station, which will be used for forced pumping to<br />

city main sewer.<br />

Possible alternative is installation <strong>of</strong> compact biological plant (like type Biodisc),<br />

what depends on investor’s assessment and is related to the investment<br />

cost-efficiency, as well as maintenance costs. In this case compact plant will<br />

dispose <strong>of</strong> treated waters through suction structure.<br />

DRAINAGE OF STORM WATERS<br />

Within the container terminal it is foreseen to build a closed drainage system,<br />

with treatment <strong>of</strong> storm waters before their outlet into the costal sea water.<br />

Main principles for the storm waters drainage system are as follows:<br />

• Polluted storm waters form open surfaces and traffic communication lines<br />

are collected by closed drainage system and are treated through<br />

separators before their outlet into sea,<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 9<br />

• Clean storm waters (ro<strong>of</strong>), which quantity is relatively small, are also<br />

collected by the mentioned system, construction <strong>of</strong> separate system would<br />

not be cost -efficient,<br />

• Polluted waters form closed areas (workshops), before connection to the<br />

external storm waters drainage system, are treated through appropriate<br />

grease traps within the plants,<br />

• Reference intensity for sizing <strong>of</strong> drainage system is taken as 170 l/s/ha<br />

(return period 1.25 year, concentration time 10 min.)<br />

• Treatment <strong>of</strong> storm waters before outlet into costal sea water is provided<br />

through separators, type B (according to Swiss standards), with overflow<br />

channel within the separator.<br />

Collection and disposal <strong>of</strong> storm waters from open surfaces <strong>of</strong> the wharf-<br />

operative and handling surfaces and traffic communication lines is provided in<br />

the following way:<br />

• LONGITUDINAL OPEN CHANNELS – drainage from the surfaces <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wharf will be by longitudinal open channels (OK) laid parallel with the<br />

waterfront edge. Channels are 40 cm wide, about 125 m long (from wharf<br />

axis to connection to main conduit), and covered with continuous, castiron,<br />

drainage grilles for heavy traffic. Longitudinal channel slope is 3 per<br />

thousand (3 0 /00) so that its height ranges from 20 cm at the beginning up<br />

to 60 cm at the point <strong>of</strong> connection to the main conduit. Besides the<br />

channel on the part <strong>of</strong> the container warehouse, channels are also<br />

foreseen on the part by the storages and by the administration building.<br />

On this part the drainage surfaces are smaller; therefore the provided<br />

water storm channels will be <strong>of</strong> smaller width (30 cm).<br />

• STORM WATERS MAIN CONDUIT – the whole network <strong>of</strong> the storm<br />

water drainage system is divided into two drainage basins collecting water<br />

to separator.<br />

Separator S1 collects drainage basin from F1 to F5, with main conduit<br />

(from manhole 1 to S1) placed along the edge <strong>of</strong> the traffic communication<br />

line.<br />

Separator S2 collect drainage surfaces from F6 to F16, by help <strong>of</strong> main<br />

conduit along the edge <strong>of</strong> the traffic communication line (manhole 7 up to<br />

S2) and second main conduit placed along the terminal fence (manhole<br />

13 up to S2).<br />

For collecting and drainage <strong>of</strong> storm waters main conduits will be placed<br />

with installation <strong>of</strong> sewerage pipes, diameter according to hydraulic data,<br />

ranging from 400-800 mm. Main conduit installation is provided <strong>of</strong><br />

polyester pipes, nominal bearing capacity to meet heavy duty traffic<br />

conditions.<br />

• PIPES are placed on send bedding, grain size from 4 to 16 mm, to be<br />

used for primary backfilling up to 30 cm above tip. Secondary backfilling<br />

will be with filling material grain size up to 5 cm, and to elevation at bottom<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pavement structure.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 10<br />

On sections where damage <strong>of</strong> main conduit is possible or washing out <strong>of</strong><br />

bedding (shallow sections, grade below elevation 1.00) the main conduit<br />

will be placed into protection concrete block or on concrete bedding.<br />

In the hydraulic analysis dimensioning will be made based on the<br />

maximum flow speed up to 4.0 m/s, and filling <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles to maximum 90-<br />

95 %.<br />

• SEWERAGE MANHOLES – manholes on the rout are foreseen <strong>of</strong><br />

concrete, layout over-all size 1.00/1.00 (at smaller diameters – up to 500<br />

mm), i.e. 1.20/1.20 (at bigger diameters). Walls will be <strong>of</strong> compacted<br />

concrete with additives to obtain watertight quality. At the bottom a halfround<br />

gutter will be made. Distance <strong>of</strong> manholes will depend on<br />

connection points, horizontal change <strong>of</strong> grade and change <strong>of</strong> diameter.<br />

Maximum installation distance will be 50 m. Covers will be <strong>of</strong> cast iron,<br />

600/600 mm, bearing power to meet heavy duty traffic. Access to manhole<br />

is provided by installation <strong>of</strong> standard step irons.<br />

• GULLIES – direct gathering <strong>of</strong> storm waters (at places where channels<br />

are not foreseen) will be through gullies Φ 50 cm, with cast iron grilles<br />

400/400 mm, bearing power for heavy duty traffic. Gullies will be installed<br />

in such way to collect waters from gathering surface <strong>of</strong> about 400 – 600<br />

m2.<br />

Catch pit height is 100 cm, and gully connection to main conduit or<br />

manhole is foreseen with pipes diameter 200 mm, with connection pipe<br />

gradient 1-2 %. It is recommended that connection to manhole is above<br />

the tip <strong>of</strong> the discharge pipe.<br />

• SEPARATORS – foreseen gravity separators are used for separation and<br />

keeping on surface oily substances lighter then water, while mineral<br />

substances heavier then water polluted by oil products are disposed on<br />

bottom. It is foreseen to build reinforced concrete separators according to<br />

Swiss regulations (types B).<br />

Internal space <strong>of</strong> separators is divided in three parts: intake for waste<br />

water, middle and largest part for separation <strong>of</strong> water from floating (oily)<br />

substances and sediment contents, and outlet-overflow part where treated<br />

water is discharged into the drainage cannel. The middle part can be<br />

divided per height to the top part foreseen for retention <strong>of</strong> pollutants and<br />

substances lighter then water, middle part for flow <strong>of</strong> purified water<br />

towards discharge-overflow part and bottom part for sedimentation <strong>of</strong><br />

substances heavier then water. Along the whole length <strong>of</strong> the top slab,<br />

covers are foreseen for purpose <strong>of</strong> maintenance, revision and cleaning.<br />

Separators will be built on appropriate location enabling access to vehicle<br />

for maintenance and emptying.<br />

After purification, storm waters are discharged into costal sea waters by<br />

outlet located at the waterfront edge.<br />

There are planned totally 2 separators with relevant catchment area <strong>of</strong><br />

app. 6 and 8 ha.<br />

A relevant precipitation with intensity <strong>of</strong> 170 l/s/ha has been adopted<br />

corresponding to 1.25 annual return period and duration time (time <strong>of</strong><br />

concentration) <strong>of</strong> 10 minutes.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 10/1<br />

It follows that the separator with catchment <strong>of</strong> app. 6 ha receives in totally<br />

app. 880 l/s and the separator with catchment area receives in totally app.<br />

1250 l/s.<br />

The separators are foreseen as gravity separators with sedimentation and<br />

oil collection space with volume <strong>of</strong> 15 m3.<br />

Such solution conforms to water right conditions set forth by the institution<br />

«Hrvatske vode», item No. 6 <strong>of</strong> the said conditions. It is also practice in<br />

Croatia to use such separators within big traffic routes and handling areas.<br />

The flow velocity in the separator is limited to 0.3 m/s and oil retention is<br />

possible with submerged partition walls.<br />

It is im<strong>port</strong>ant to note that the relevant intensity <strong>of</strong> 25 l/s/ha shall be let<br />

through such separators whereas bigger flows (with stronger intensities)<br />

shall be let through by-pass placed along the separator. Both waters shall<br />

be accepted on the separator outlet and they run through common pipe<br />

towards the recipient.<br />

The mentioned intensity <strong>of</strong> 25 l/s/ha is named, according to our<br />

regulations, as critical intensity in which process major contamination from<br />

the drained surface is collected together with water. Consequently, this<br />

intensity has to be let through the separator and the excessive amount<br />

through the overflow.<br />

The stated results from the fact that the precipitation hydrograph has<br />

usually a form <strong>of</strong> Gaussian curve, consequently every rain starts with the<br />

intensity «0» and intensifies to the maximum with subsequent trend to<br />

decline. Therefore, major contamination flushing from the surface<br />

develops when precipitation starts and this part <strong>of</strong> precipitation (up to 25<br />

l/s/ha) flows through the separator.<br />

It is im<strong>port</strong>ant to note that such separator must be maintained regularly,<br />

implying their monthly control and, if necessary, their emptying from oil<br />

and deposited material after performed control, at least twice a year. The<br />

separator has to be cleaned also after a possible incident – pouring out <strong>of</strong><br />

bigger amount <strong>of</strong> waste or hazardous substance reaching the separator<br />

through the drainage system.<br />

Such drainage solution does not provide for retention space than floating<br />

substances (fats and oils) and deposited substances (sand, particles<br />

heavier than water) shall be collected in the separator within the operating<br />

chamber.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 10/2<br />

Oil separator with overflow / by pass<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 11<br />

A.4.3.2.2 POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM<br />

HIGH VOLTAGE CONNECTION OF NEW AND EXISTING TRANSFORMER<br />

SUBSTATIONS<br />

For feeding <strong>of</strong> the new facilities <strong>of</strong> the container terminal - wharf (dock) no. 7<br />

in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce with electric energy it is planned to build one new<br />

transformer substation, which will be connected to the power supply system <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

Planned increase <strong>of</strong> the peak load at point <strong>of</strong> measurement would be 1.408<br />

kW.<br />

High voltage feeding and connection <strong>of</strong> the new TS 10(20)/0,4 kV is foreseen<br />

form switching yard RS.<br />

In the same trench together with the high voltage cable it is foreseen to place<br />

optical cable with 24 fibers, for connection <strong>of</strong> power supply plants within the<br />

<strong>port</strong>.<br />

TRANSFORMER STATIONS<br />

During the first phase <strong>of</strong> the terminal construction one mobile low voltage<br />

crane, power 740 kW is foreseen only. For the second phase, instead <strong>of</strong><br />

mobile low voltage crane, it is foreseen to have two high voltage <strong>port</strong>al cranes,<br />

power 836 kW each. For these needs one transformer substation TS 15<br />

1x630 + 1x1000 kVA will be built so that in the second phase the transformer<br />

1000 kVA would be used as reserve.<br />

Transformer substation will be designed <strong>of</strong> prefabricated elements and<br />

located on green surface near the entrance-control area to the terminal. It<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> transformer chambers for installation <strong>of</strong> power transformers and<br />

space for installation <strong>of</strong> HV (20 kV) and NN (0,4 kV) board. Air inlets are<br />

foreseen for natural ventilation and cooling <strong>of</strong> transformers. An oil pit is<br />

foreseen under transformer, and at the upper edge <strong>of</strong> the pit a net with layer<br />

<strong>of</strong> washed gravel will be placed.<br />

OUTDOOR LIGHTING<br />

The whole outdoor lighting <strong>of</strong> the container terminal wharf (dock) no. 7 and<br />

surfaces adjacent to accompanying facilities (administrative zone, frigo<br />

containers, service zone and storages) is foreseen (according to applied<br />

technology) on masts height h = 30 m and traffic communication lines along<br />

terminal on typical masts height h = 19 m, which are already installed on<br />

similar areas within the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce. The space between structures<br />

(entrance-control terminal, storages and service workshops) is illuminated with<br />

lamps mounted on the façade walls <strong>of</strong> these facilities.<br />

Distance between masts on the container terminal is about 70-80 m. One<br />

mast is foreseen for installation <strong>of</strong> maximum 4 pcs asymmetrical reflector<br />

lights in order to satisfy illumination rate up to 50 lx.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 12<br />

For lighting <strong>of</strong> traffic communication line it is foreseen to install typical masts<br />

with asymmetrical reflector lights, and the distance between masts is about 50<br />

m.<br />

Both automatic and hand control are foreseen on the outdoor lighting control<br />

system <strong>of</strong> the whole container terminal.<br />

CONNECTION SYSTEM FOR SHIPS AND CRANES<br />

CONNECTIONS FOR SHIPS, CRANES AND STRUCTURES /FACILITIES<br />

Power cables will be installed from the new transformer station TS-15 to end<br />

switchboards for connection. Cables W15 and W16 10 kV will be used for<br />

connection <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong>al cranes, while low voltage cables W 1 and W2 will be used<br />

for connection <strong>of</strong> cabinets used for connection <strong>of</strong> ships.<br />

Connection <strong>of</strong> ships will be from switchboards R1-R4 located along the shore<br />

line approximately every 80 m. Each feeder supplies electric energy to two<br />

switchboards.<br />

Cabinets for connection <strong>of</strong> ships R1-R4 are made <strong>of</strong> stainless steel class A4.<br />

During the first phase one mobile low voltage crane is foreseen for which<br />

feeding special cables W17, W18, W19 and W20 cross-section 4x(4x150<br />

mm2) which satisfy current load and voltage drop up to 300 m length are<br />

used. Feeding will be from LV board <strong>of</strong> the transformer T2 (1000 kVA).<br />

In the second phase the mobile low voltage crane is removed and the high<br />

voltage <strong>port</strong>al cranes are connected to feeder bays.<br />

Connection <strong>of</strong> the crane will be on switchboards RD1 and RD2 located along<br />

every crane way, each 100-110 m. crane feeding will be with special cables<br />

XHP48 4x70 mm2, 10 kV for each switchboard RD1 and RD2 (W15 and<br />

W16).<br />

Building <strong>of</strong> administrative zone, warehouses, service zone and frigo container<br />

zone will be connected to the transformer substations TS-15 by cables.<br />

Connection <strong>of</strong> frigo containers is foreseen with several cabinets, through three<br />

phase industrial sockets 63A installed on connection cabinets frigo containers.<br />

The electrical design for accompanying structures/facilities provided for the<br />

following power supply distribution networks:<br />

• power supply connection to TS15<br />

• main distribution, power and sockets wiring system<br />

• general wiring (indoor and outdoor) and safety (emergency) lighting<br />

metal masses potential equalization wiring<br />

• telephone and „LAN“ network systems<br />

• public-address system<br />

• hand and automatic fire alarm system<br />

• lightning system<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 13<br />

TELEPHONE SYSTEM<br />

Telephone system will be performed with telephone cables from TO on<br />

structures to end cabinets T on masts <strong>of</strong> outdoor lighting <strong>of</strong> containers. The<br />

telephone cabinets T are installed every 80 m.<br />

All telecommunication cables (horizontal cabling) is foreseen in outlet<br />

telephone cabinet ITO, on façade wall at entrance <strong>of</strong> structures.<br />

The existing telephone station, type: MD 110 (ASB 501) manufactured by<br />

ERICSSON Nikola Tesla d.d. Zagreb is located at the fire alarm center and<br />

has enough capacity for connection <strong>of</strong> new facilities <strong>of</strong> the container terminal<br />

wharves (docks) no.7 and 8 7 i 8.<br />

Telephone network from the telephone cabinets to end telephone outlets will<br />

be performed with cables, type: TK59, and telephone outlets are foreseen on<br />

every second outdoor lighting mast, while along the waterfront they are<br />

provided every 100 m for possibility <strong>of</strong> telephone connection for ship. Outlets<br />

will be installed in telephone cabinets TO.<br />

Together with the telephone cables it is foreseen to place optical cables for<br />

connection <strong>of</strong> transformer stations as well as LAN network cabinet inside the<br />

accompanying structures/facilities.<br />

FIRE ALARM<br />

For fire alarm system cables will be placed from DP on the administration<br />

building in the administrative zone to concentrations on other structures and<br />

hand sensors installed on outdoor lighting masts.<br />

Fire alarm system will be with analogue-addressable sensors for outdoor<br />

installation. They will be placed on outdoor lighting masts on every 80 m,<br />

while in structures/buildings an automatic and hand fire alarm system will be<br />

installed and also with analogue-addressable sensors for indoor installation.<br />

The existing fire alarm station, type: NEXUS manufactured by CONTROL<br />

EQUIPMENT LIMITED is located in the fire centre and has enough capacity<br />

for connection <strong>of</strong> new facilities <strong>of</strong> the container terminal wharves (docks) 7<br />

and 8.<br />

For fire alarm system cables, type: JB-Y(ST)Y will be used.<br />

Cables are placed along the outdoor lighting cable rout. Hand sensors are<br />

placed at height 1.5 m from ground level.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 14<br />

PUBLIC-ADDRESS SYSTEM<br />

Public-address system network will be carried out with cables placed from<br />

concentrations RO on the administration building in the administrative zone to<br />

loudspeakers on outdoor lighting masts at 5-6 m high.<br />

Public-address system (loudspeakers) will be carried out with loudspeakers<br />

for outdoor installation, which will be placed on outdoor lighting masts every<br />

80 m, while in structures it will have loudspeakers and attenuators equipment<br />

for indoor installation.<br />

For public-address system cables, type: PP00-Y will be used.<br />

Cables are placed along outdoor lighting cable route.<br />

VIDEO CONTROL SYSTEM<br />

For video control system cable will be placed form central control system <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>port</strong> in the fire alarm centre up to the video cameras on the outdoor<br />

lighting masts installed 20-25 m high. Cameras will be placed on outdoor<br />

lighting masts every 80 m.<br />

For the video control system coaxial cables, type: KOAX RG 59 will be used.<br />

Cables are placed along the outdoor lighting cable route.<br />

LIGHTNING SYSTEM<br />

For protection <strong>of</strong> the container terminal against direct thunder strikes it is<br />

foreseen to used the PREVECTRON 2 – INDELEC system, which functions<br />

on principle <strong>of</strong> pre-thunder riser. For lightning protection a special type <strong>of</strong><br />

clamp will be installed to conduct electric field energy which is created during<br />

storm approach. Protection <strong>of</strong> structures against direct thunder strikes<br />

(administration, services, storages and other) is foreseen with standard<br />

lightning system placed into the structures foundation, but with copper ropes<br />

as clamps and conductors.<br />

All metal masses on ro<strong>of</strong> (like antennas, gutters, ventilation and other) will be<br />

interconnected and at the nearest point connected together with clamp to<br />

grounding.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


60 000 DWT<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7 QUAY 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

m o r e<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

TS-15<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

gps<br />

vatrogasci<br />

z<br />

z<br />

garaza<br />

ts<br />

z<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

ts<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO Shunting group 3 - designed<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO Shunting group 2 - completed<br />

A4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT<br />

PORT OF PLOCE LAYOUT PLAN<br />

FUNCTIONAL ASSEMBLY<br />

A4. OPIS ZAHVATA<br />

SITUACIJSKI PLAN LUKE PLOCE<br />

FUNKCIONALNI SKLOP<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2000<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA )<br />

LINE OF EXISTING WATERFRONT (LINIJA POSTOJECE OBALE)<br />

LINE OF NEW WATERFRONT (LINIJA NOVE OBALE)<br />

EXISTING RAILWAYS (POSTOJECE ŽELJEZNICE)<br />

DESIGNED RAILWAYS (PROJEKTIRANE ŽELJEZNICE )<br />

EXISTING ROADS (POSTOJECE CESTE)<br />

CESTE DESIGNED ROADS (PROJEKTIRANE)<br />

FENCE (OGRADA)<br />

EXISTING STRUCTURES (POSTOJECI OBJEKTI)<br />

SEA (MORE )<br />

STORAGE AREAS (POVRŠINE ZA SKLADIŠTA)<br />

AREAS FOR CONTAINER DISPOSAL<br />

(POVRŠINE ZA ODLAGANJE KONTEJNERA)<br />

GREEN AREAS (ZELENE POVRŠINE )<br />

GROUND (TEREN)<br />

STRUCTURES (OBJEKTI)<br />

ENTRANCE TO THE PORT - VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN<br />

(ULAZ U LUKU-KOLNI I PJEŠACKI )<br />

SL. 1


60 000 DWT<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

m o r e<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

OBALA 6<br />

TS-15<br />

GRAÐEVNA LINIJA<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

gps<br />

vatrogasci<br />

I=+2,10<br />

z<br />

z<br />

garaza<br />

ts<br />

z<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

ts<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

A4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

PURPOSE OF AREAUSE AND<br />

TERMS OF CONSTRUCTION<br />

A4. OPIS ZAHVATA<br />

NAMJENA POVRŠINA I UVJETI IZGRADNJE<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA )<br />

SHIP'S BERTH (BRODSKI PRIVEZ)<br />

CONSTRUCTION LINE (GRAÐEVNA LINIJA )<br />

RAILWAY CONNECTION (ŽELJEZNICKI PRIKLJUCAK)<br />

PRIMARY VEHICLE ENTRANCE AND EXIT (PRIMARNI KOLNI ULAZ I IZLAZ)<br />

DRAINAGE, WATER SUPPLY, ELECTRIC SUPPLY, TT CONNECTION<br />

(ODVODNJA, VODOOPSKRBA, ELEKTROOPSKRBA, TT PRIKLJUCAK)<br />

PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE AND EXIT (PJEŠACKI ULAZ I IZLAZ )<br />

I PORT OPERATIONAL AREAS (I LUCKO OPERATIVNE POVRŠINE)<br />

II WATERFRONT WITH hinterland back-up area<br />

(II OBALA SA ZAOBALNOM POVRŠINOM)<br />

III LINES OF COMMUNICATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES<br />

(III PROMETNICE I OBJEKTI INFRASTRUKTURE)<br />

IV COVERED STORAGE WAREHOUSE (IV ZATVORENO SKLADIŠTE)<br />

V AUXILIARY STRUCTURES (V POMOCNI OBJEKTI)<br />

SL. 2


60 000 DWT<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

m o r e<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

TS-15<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

gps<br />

vatrogasci<br />

z<br />

z<br />

garaza<br />

ts<br />

z<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

ts<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO Shunting group 3 - designed<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO Shunting group 2 - completed<br />

A4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

TRAFFIC INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

A4. OPIS ZAHVATA<br />

PROMETNA INFRASTRUKTURA<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA )<br />

DESIGNED RAILWAYS (PROJEKTIRANE ŽELJEZNICE)<br />

EXISTING ROADS (POSTOJECE CESTE )<br />

CESTE DESIGNED (PROJEKTIRANE )<br />

SL. 3


60 000 DWT<br />

VODA<br />

ISPUST OBORINSKIH<br />

SEPARATOR br. 1<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

5<br />

6<br />

OBALA 7<br />

PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

OK<br />

OBALA 5<br />

m o r e<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

PH2 PH2<br />

PH2 PH2<br />

4 OK OK<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

SU<br />

PH2 PH2<br />

OK OK<br />

OK<br />

OK<br />

F =1.23 ha<br />

F =1.13 ha<br />

F =1.13 ha<br />

F =1.06 ha<br />

PH2 PH2<br />

PH2<br />

PH2<br />

PH2 PH2 PH2 PH2<br />

PH2<br />

PH2<br />

OK<br />

OK<br />

F =1.04 ha<br />

F =0.95 ha<br />

F =0.95 ha<br />

F =0.88 ha<br />

OK<br />

ISPUST OBORINSKIH<br />

PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

VO+PH2<br />

12<br />

11<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

10 15 14<br />

F =1.22 ha F =1.02 ha F =0.23 ha<br />

SU<br />

VODA<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

OBRADA<br />

OTPADNIH VODA<br />

F =0.24 ha<br />

F =1.10 ha<br />

SEPARATOR br. 2<br />

OK<br />

F =0.62 ha<br />

NH<br />

NH<br />

S 3<br />

16<br />

S 4<br />

F =0.35 ha<br />

OK<br />

NH<br />

F =0.84 ha<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

OK<br />

OV<br />

13<br />

NH<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

NH<br />

gps<br />

z<br />

vatrogasci<br />

PRIKLJUCAK NA<br />

OKNO<br />

POSTOJECI VODOVOD<br />

VODOMJERA (post. vod ljež. želj. Ø 200)<br />

TRASA EVENTUALNE<br />

REKONSTRUKCIJE<br />

z<br />

z<br />

garaza<br />

ts<br />

z<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

ts<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

A4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT<br />

A4. OPIS ZAHVATA<br />

SITUACIJA VODOOPSKRBA I ODVODNJA<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

SU<br />

OK<br />

S<br />

VO+PH2<br />

OV<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

PH2<br />

OKNO SA DVOSTRUKIM PODZEMNIM HIDRANTOM<br />

SL. 4


60 000 DWT<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

m o r e<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

TS-15<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

gps<br />

vatrogasci<br />

z<br />

z<br />

garaza<br />

ts<br />

z<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

ts<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

A4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION LAYOUT -<br />

- HV AND LV DISTRIBUTION<br />

A4. OPIS ZAHVATA<br />

SITUACIJA ELEKTROINSTALACIJE VN I NN RAZVOD<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

SL. 5


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

A.5. EVALUATION OF COSTS FOR REALIZATION OF PLANNED<br />

INTERVENTION<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

COST ESTIMATE<br />

1. WARF STRUCTURE 14.204.931,00 EUR<br />

2. GEOTECHNICAL AND INVESTIGATION COSTS 210.000,00 EUR<br />

3. STORAGE AREAS AND ROADS 22.719.261,00 EUR<br />

4. RAILWAY TRACKS ON TERMINAL 782.000,00 EUR<br />

5. WATER SUPPLY AND DISCHARGE 1.444.737,00 EUR<br />

6. POWER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS 2.445.000,00 EUR<br />

7. ARHITECTURE AND CIVIL WORKS DESIGN<br />

-STRUCTURES ON TERMINAL 6.889.584,00 EUR<br />

8. RAILWAY TRACKS<br />

CONNECTION TO TERMINAL 1.580.000,00 EUR<br />

9. CONNECTION ROADS TO TERMINAL 430.346,00 EUR<br />

10. CONNECTION INFRASTRUCTURE: WATER,<br />

DISCHARGE,POWER SUPPLY,TELEPHONE<br />

AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 440.000,00 EUR<br />

11. TRAFFIC 75.000,00 EUR<br />

12. GRAND TOTAL: 51.220.859,00 EUR<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

A.6. RELATION OF INTERVENTION CARRIER<br />

WITH GENERAL PUBLIC<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

The general public has been informed about the planned intervention already<br />

during elaboration <strong>of</strong> the conceptual plan for the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce. Through the<br />

verification process the intervention has become an integral part <strong>of</strong> the passed<br />

development plans <strong>of</strong> the state, county, city, and finally the maritime industry<br />

development plan for the period <strong>of</strong> ten years in Croatia and the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

All strategies and development plans are verified and incorporated into all<br />

current spatial plans <strong>of</strong> all ranks.<br />

It is possible to conclude that the general public has been fully informed about<br />

the plans through public hearings held prior to passing plans at the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state, Dubrovacko-neretvanska County and City <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

The mass media, newspapers and television continuously inform the general<br />

public about the planned development interventions in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

B. OPERATION ACCEPTABILITY EVALUATION<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

B.1. IDENTIFICATION AND OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE OPERATION DURING ITS<br />

PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND UTILIZATION PHASE,<br />

INCLUDING ECOLOGICAL EMERGENCY AND RISK OF ITS<br />

OCCURRENCE<br />

B.1.1. OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS<br />

DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

B.1.1. OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING<br />

THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE<br />

B.1.1.1. ON LAND<br />

The selected construction method, the suction dredging <strong>of</strong> the sea bottom<br />

between Quay 5 (existing) and Quay 7 (new), has partially reduced the<br />

environmental impact during the construction phase. Heavy traffic <strong>of</strong> trucks<br />

trans<strong>port</strong>ing the embanking material has fallen <strong>of</strong>f, which has eliminated its<br />

harmful impact upon the immediate and remote environment.<br />

The phased and long-lasting realization, in accordance with the selected<br />

construction conception and technology, does not generate additional<br />

environmental impacts.<br />

B.1.1.2 ON THE SEA<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> the sea dynamic the present site has already been affected by<br />

activities on the neighboring Quay 5, where the same type <strong>of</strong> ships berth.<br />

Tugboats are used to operate the entering/departing, eliminating thus<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> crash incidents or bottom disturbances caused by the propellers.<br />

Shallow and undeveloped shore at the site <strong>of</strong> the future Quay 7 causes<br />

uncontrolled inflow <strong>of</strong> swimming and floating pollutants that usually are not<br />

cleaned. The waves impact is insignificant and does not affect the capacity.<br />

Sea currents develop from the rise and fall <strong>of</strong> tide, that is, under the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tides in the channel, so that the water exchange in the immediate<br />

aquatorium is practically affected only by the sea tides.<br />

The half-confined aquatorium between Quay 5 and Quay 7 is also a discharge<br />

point for the sewage system, which worsens the sea condition (current quality<br />

measurement values are enclosed).<br />

The sea tides are the key natural factor <strong>of</strong> quality conservation. Therefore, at<br />

present the site capacity is already as usual for confined harbours.<br />

The bottom inspection results revealed strong terrigenous material inflows via<br />

river stream, which sediments increasingly under conditions <strong>of</strong> diminished<br />

dynamic. Consequently, conditions for the establishment <strong>of</strong> the close-tobottom<br />

populations are worsened and this partially explains the low diversity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the registered species.<br />

Furthermore, according to some information, the <strong>port</strong> basin in the study area<br />

has been deepened. This may be substantiated by the steep bottom sections<br />

with sudden depth increases that have been registered at the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

both inspected transects. By dredging the sediment the surface stratum that<br />

may have been more densely populated was removed. In this case, the<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the silt sediments is expected to be recovering, which is slowed<br />

down by the aforementioned sedimentation.<br />

The enclaves <strong>of</strong> the solid bottom <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic origin on both transects are<br />

populated with numerous sciafile filtration organisms. Their presence in<br />

shallow waters confirms the constant inflow <strong>of</strong> suspended substance that<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

considerably diminishes the light penetration, while the rich organic<br />

component suspension benefits the population density.<br />

The construction activities will muddle the water, in particular during the phase<br />

<strong>of</strong> deepening the aquatorium for the purpose <strong>of</strong> reaching the necessary basin<br />

depth. The increased quantities <strong>of</strong> suspended substances in the water column<br />

will be reflected on the reduced amount <strong>of</strong> the light that algae need for<br />

assimilation. Since all this occurs on the already degraded sea bottom, new<br />

activities do not degrade the existing condition.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

B.2. OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS<br />

DURING THE UTILIZATION PHASE<br />

B.2.1. POTENTIAL MICRO-CLIMATIC CONDITIONS CHANGE<br />

B.2.2. POTENTIAL IMPACTS UPON THE NATURAL<br />

TERRESTRIAL AND SEA ECOSYSTEMS<br />

B.2.3. POTENTIAL CHANGES WITH REGARDS TO<br />

UTILIZATION<br />

B.2.4. POTENTIAL CHANGES OF AIR OR SEA WATER<br />

QUALITY, CHANGES CAUSED BY NOISE, IN NORMAL<br />

CONDITIONS AND IN CASE OF ECOLOGICAL<br />

EMERGENCY<br />

B.2.5. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE<br />

OPERATION IN CASE OF ECOLOGICAL EMERGENCY<br />

WITH OCCURRENCE RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

B.2.1. POTENTIAL MICRO-CLIMATIC CONDITONS CHANGE<br />

Considering the size and the type <strong>of</strong> the site, neither changes <strong>of</strong> nor impacts<br />

on the microclimate are expected.<br />

B.2.2. POTENTIAL IMPACTS UPON THE NATURAL TERRESTRIAL AND<br />

SEA ECOSYSTEMS<br />

B.2.2.1. LAND<br />

PROTECTED VALUES OF THE AREA<br />

Since for some time now the protection <strong>of</strong> the environment has been receiving<br />

particular attention, the planning <strong>of</strong> new constructions or reconstructions <strong>of</strong><br />

existing technological facilities takes into consideration the best possible<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> those elements <strong>of</strong> both natural and anthropogenic<br />

environment that are protected by laws (land, water, air, flora and fauna,<br />

cultural, ethnographic, sacral, tourist and other sites and monuments).<br />

Industrial developments, communication means and settlements contribute a<br />

lot to reducing the natural habitats <strong>of</strong> animals. Regretfully, the tendency <strong>of</strong> this<br />

process is unstoppable.<br />

Pursuant to the Nature Protection Law, the protected parts <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

are the estuary on the right Neretva bank with the lake Parile, while the<br />

Bacina Lakes with the peninsula Višnjica enjoy the status <strong>of</strong> a special<br />

preserve, and Rogotin with the Lake Vlaška the status <strong>of</strong> an im<strong>port</strong>ant<br />

landscape.<br />

Special preserves are defined as areas where one or more natural elements<br />

are especially im<strong>port</strong>ant, and the complex <strong>of</strong> the Neretva Estuary with the lake<br />

Parile is very im<strong>port</strong>ant for the birds migration and breeding while the<br />

aquatorium is rich with diverse fish that spawn there. Within the areas <strong>of</strong><br />

special preserves no activities are permitted that may impact the<br />

characteristics for which this special status has been awarded to them (e.g.<br />

plants-picking, disturbing, hunting or killing animals, im<strong>port</strong>ing non-indigenous<br />

species, irrigation, utilization <strong>of</strong> any kind, etc.).<br />

The original characteristics <strong>of</strong> this preserve have been altered by<br />

anthropogenic activities, but all further interventions ought to be prevented, for<br />

example by consequent implementation <strong>of</strong> the Law on Hunting, conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pine and cypress woods, etc.<br />

Im<strong>port</strong>ant landscape is a natural or engineered area <strong>of</strong> a higher esthetic value<br />

(picturesque landscape characteristic for a region, landscape with a cultural,<br />

historical or ethnographical monument, etc.). Bacina lakes, the flooded karst<br />

crypto-depressions with maximum depth <strong>of</strong> 32 meters (28 m bellow the sea<br />

level) are the most interesting phenomenon in the karst hydrography. The<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the tunnel from the lake Podgora towards the polje Vrgorac is<br />

an example <strong>of</strong> how the protected areas can be impacted, because large water<br />

quantities were drained and the oscillation fell from 8,5 m to 2 m, affecting<br />

also the gray mullet’s acclimatization.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

B.2.2.2. SEA<br />

Rogozin, another im<strong>port</strong>ant landscape, is an extraordinary combination <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

and water bodies typical for the Neretva. This zone has been disturbed by<br />

construction works but some landscape and ambiance features should be<br />

preserved.<br />

Several monuments can be found in the immediate surroundings. On the<br />

Kozjak and Sladinac there are antique locations, in Rogotin are three<br />

protected complexes and a church not distant from the Bacina Lakes, St.<br />

Luca’s church and medieval localities are near Pucevo.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, located in the<br />

center <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>, does not increase the impacts upon its environment.<br />

The borders <strong>of</strong> the dock area <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, which is located next<br />

to an im<strong>port</strong>ant landscape, are strictly defined in order to best conserve<br />

the protected parts <strong>of</strong> the environment.<br />

The dock construction will lie on concrete columns – pilots. During the<br />

utilization phase, impacts from urban wastewater and industrial waters, oil and<br />

its derivates as well as water turbidity and pollution with solid waste in case <strong>of</strong><br />

emergency are most likely.<br />

Increased amounts <strong>of</strong> phosphorus and nitrogen (urban wastewaters) cause<br />

the growth <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton and combined with silt this increases the<br />

seawater turbidity. Oil contamination generated by the marine trans<strong>port</strong> is<br />

limited to the supralitoral and mediolitoral zone. Sediments <strong>of</strong> masut, oil and<br />

silt prevent a normal communication between the concrete organisms and the<br />

environment, which leads to the extinction <strong>of</strong> many species.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the surface size and the distance from the natural shore, the<br />

section under the quay will be left in complete darkness. Wearing out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organisms whose life conditions will be changed as well as the suspended<br />

organic particles load in the water column will cause increased oxygen<br />

consumption and most probably anoxia.<br />

Weaker currents along the quay would impede the oxygen renewal, in<br />

particular over the summer months when also the vertical water exchange is<br />

insignificant (thermocline). Solid pollutants should have no impact on the sea<br />

environment, except for the esthetical one.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal will entail an increase <strong>of</strong> the basin<br />

depth, because the sediments would be excavated to a certain depth. The<br />

removal would not include only the surface layer but all the existing organisms<br />

as well. What would be left is the pure azoic silt, at least in macrobenthic<br />

terms.<br />

Considering the planned operation, it is estimated with high level <strong>of</strong> certainty<br />

that it will have no additional negative impacts upon the environment. The<br />

construction would not imply any new activity in the aquatorium between Quay<br />

5 and Quay 7 in addition to the depth and the navigation path maintenance<br />

done so far.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

It can be concluded that the physical development <strong>of</strong> the existing shore<br />

with a range <strong>of</strong> tufa towers would improve the condition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment, since it would prevent sedimentation <strong>of</strong> both inorganic and<br />

organic material on the shore. The navigation path improvement and the<br />

increase in the depth will have positive impact on the water exchange in<br />

and around the aquatorium.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

B.2.3. POTENTIAL CHANGES WITH REGARDS TO UTILIZATION<br />

B.2.3.1. CHANGES WITH REGARDS TO UTILIZATION<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal and the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

operation and stacking zones will neither have negative impact on other<br />

facilities <strong>of</strong> the area nor affect their operating, as the major part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposed operation would be realized within the existing dock area and also<br />

the extension <strong>of</strong> the operation zone will be brought about by the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the existing dock area.<br />

All the proposed operations are compliant to the existing physical plans.<br />

B.2.3.2 AESTHETIC QUALITY AND VISUAL CHARACTER<br />

All Plans consider the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce as the second most im<strong>port</strong>ant national<br />

<strong>port</strong>. The construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal in the <strong>port</strong> is just one stage <strong>of</strong><br />

the development and modernization plan, which will not impact the present<br />

aesthetic value <strong>of</strong> this area, since the past activities have already degraded<br />

the beauty <strong>of</strong> the natural and pristine environment in the Neretva Estuary.<br />

In fact, the construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal and the extension <strong>of</strong> the<br />

operation/stacking areas will improve the present, rather ugly sight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ploce Port basin. More severe laws and requirements will introduce order in<br />

the utilization <strong>of</strong> the operation and the open storage area. New dock facilities,<br />

and careful development <strong>of</strong> the dock area would turn the <strong>port</strong> into a modern<br />

and best-equipped site.<br />

Careful new construction activities that would put a special emphasis on<br />

the color selection would considerably improve the visual character <strong>of</strong><br />

this part <strong>of</strong> the Ploce Port.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

B.2.4. POTENTIAL CHANGES OF AIR OR SEA WATER QUALITY,<br />

CHANGES CAUSED BY NOISE, IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN<br />

CASE OF ECOLOGICAL EMERGENCY<br />

B.2.4.1. AIR<br />

B.2.4.2 SEA<br />

On the container terminal container reloading activities will be carried out.<br />

These activities are not accompanied by additional air pollution, as it is the<br />

case with bulk or loose freight. Potential sources <strong>of</strong> the air pollution are:<br />

• Berthed ships<br />

• Heavy road cargo vehicles (trucks)<br />

Ship’s main engines usually do not operate when ship is moored, and<br />

emissions generated by auxiliary engines are insignificant.<br />

The trucks reloading cargo in the reloading area may be a source <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

air pollution, depending on the gasoline used and on how old the engines are<br />

and how well they are maintained.<br />

Nevertheless, due to the distance, the impact upon the settlements <strong>of</strong> Ploce is<br />

insignificant.<br />

In order to reduce the negative impact <strong>of</strong> the trans<strong>port</strong> means on air quality,<br />

the cargo vehicles on the terminal have to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

EURO II and EURO III standards.<br />

In general, the changes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> morphology generate changes in seawater<br />

quality.<br />

The planned construction may primarily affect the sea currents, the water<br />

body dynamic and time for the water exchange in the entire <strong>port</strong>. A potential<br />

key problem may be a decreased water flow and the water exchange with the<br />

surrounding aquatorium. Weak flows and retarded exchange <strong>of</strong> the water<br />

loaded with organic matter and nutrient salts may increase the concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> these substances and the growth <strong>of</strong> the algae and consequently cause a<br />

decrease in the oxygen concentration and further turbidity. This may result in<br />

complete lack <strong>of</strong> oxygen and development <strong>of</strong> anaerobic organic matter<br />

decomposition, which produces unpleasant odor and is toxic for many sea<br />

organisms. One may say that such is the present situation in the basin<br />

between Quay 5 and Quay 7.<br />

Proposed is also an extension <strong>of</strong> the basin between Quay 5 and the future<br />

Quay 7, which would in fact be a correction and extension <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

basin that is currently too narrow for the estimated number <strong>of</strong> container ships.<br />

The operation will have a positive impact on the water exchange both in the<br />

<strong>port</strong> aquatorium and its surrounding.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

Additional impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction works on the seawater quality will<br />

depend on the freight that would be handled. The threat <strong>of</strong> ballast and bilge<br />

waters being pumped out will remain.<br />

The following activities would be carried out on the new quay within the<br />

terminal area:<br />

• Ships berthing<br />

• Freight <strong>of</strong>f-loading from ships into the open storage areas/ warehouses<br />

and other trans<strong>port</strong> means ships – rail wagons – trucks<br />

• Freight storing in open storage areas and in warehouses for the<br />

container and RO-RO terminal<br />

• Freight storing, goods processing and packing in warehouses<br />

• Mending and maintaining the terminal machinery will be performed in<br />

the <strong>port</strong>’s existing facilities for such purposes<br />

Unpredictable incidents associated with cargo handling or berthed ships may<br />

cause pollution <strong>of</strong> the sea.<br />

In addition to that, dock machinery, transformer stations, storm run<strong>of</strong>f from<br />

open storage and handling areas, sewage discharge and pollutants may all<br />

cause pollution <strong>of</strong> the sea.<br />

On the construction site, the sea may be polluted by untreated wastewaters <strong>of</strong><br />

the Town <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

B.2.4.2.1 OIL SPILLS AND OTHER POLLUTION FROM SHIPS<br />

Oil spills from ships are the most frequent type <strong>of</strong> pollution occurring in <strong>port</strong>s<br />

and they will create a constant hazard also in this <strong>port</strong>. The waste and oily<br />

waters pumping out into the sea (bilge and ballast water), pollution with<br />

carbon black or engine oil leakages are all possible.<br />

B.2.4.2.2 HAZARDOUS CARGO HANDLING<br />

Loading, unloading and reloading <strong>of</strong> the packed hazardous freight will take<br />

place on the container terminal. Hazardous cargo will not be stored on the<br />

new section <strong>of</strong> the ferryboat terminal but in the already existing specialized<br />

warehouses in the dock area. Although hazardous cargo would make only a<br />

small fraction <strong>of</strong> the total cargo and pollution caused by it is not so frequent as<br />

pollution caused by oil spills, this issue deserves our special attention for the<br />

following reasons:<br />

• Range <strong>of</strong> potentially hazardous cargo is wide<br />

• Many incidents include two sorts <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances –<br />

flammable liquids and corrosive substances<br />

• Leakages happen on various ship types<br />

• Incidents with dangerous substances occur both with bulk and packed<br />

cargo<br />

Although prevention and intervention measures in case <strong>of</strong> contamination by<br />

hazardous substances are similar to those in case <strong>of</strong> oil spills, there are<br />

differences in terms <strong>of</strong> protection technology and security measures as well as<br />

with respect to the equipment used. They are:<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 8<br />

• Oil is present on the water surface in the viscosity layer. This is the<br />

case with a limited number <strong>of</strong> dangerous goods; oil spills are easily<br />

noticeable. Leakage <strong>of</strong> dangerous substance is <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to spot.<br />

• Intervention technology for the case <strong>of</strong> oil spills is well developed. This<br />

is not so with dangerous substances.<br />

• Removing oil from water surface can be very successful. When it<br />

comes to dangerous substances, this is <strong>of</strong>ten not the case.<br />

Various ships with hazardous cargo would be arriving in the <strong>port</strong>:<br />

• Container ship with cargo packed in containers, and usually it is dry<br />

cargo. Some container ships can carry solid (powder) or liquid<br />

chemicals in mobile tanks.<br />

• RO-RO ships equipped with fast unloading/loading machinery<br />

On the container terminal the packed dangerous goods will be handled.<br />

Probability <strong>of</strong> an emergency that would cause pollution with dangerous<br />

substances is very small. Still, consequences <strong>of</strong> such an incident may be very<br />

serious. Emergency situations may occur as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Crashes caused by bad maneuvering<br />

• Crashes against other berthed ships or the quay<br />

• Fire/explosion: local fire is the initial step in a chain leading to incidents<br />

with dangerous substances<br />

• Container falling into the water or onto the quay. Dangerous<br />

substances may leak from the damaged container or may get into the<br />

sea after flushing the dock polluted with dangerous substances<br />

• Disintegration <strong>of</strong> containers due to their bad quality<br />

• So called domino effect: emergency on one ship spreads onto the next<br />

ship or fixed installation on the quay<br />

Consequences <strong>of</strong> a leakage are contingent on the type <strong>of</strong> hazardous<br />

substance as well as on the leakage size and duration.<br />

B.2.4.2.3 DOCK MACHINERY AND TRANFORMATION STATIONS<br />

The <strong>port</strong> machinery (cranes, car cranes, forklifts, tractors, trailers, loaders,<br />

tugs, trucks, container trans<strong>port</strong>ers) is also a potential source <strong>of</strong> pollution <strong>of</strong><br />

the operation zone with hydraulic oil, lubricants or gasoline. Rain flushes the<br />

operation zone and the run<strong>of</strong>f ends in the sea.<br />

Incidents with damaged machinery also may cause leakages. It gets more<br />

serious when oils on basis <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances are used (let us recall an<br />

incident from 1994 when a crane with 1,400 kg <strong>of</strong> hydraulic oil, containing<br />

polychlorine biphenyls collapsed in the Port <strong>of</strong> Bakar).<br />

Transformation stations pose a risk <strong>of</strong> polluting the sea if they contain the<br />

transformation oils, which are special oils made <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances<br />

(polychlorine biphenyls). Though such oils are kept in sealed compartments,<br />

there is always a risk <strong>of</strong> leakage, in unexpected circumstances.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 9<br />

B.2.4.2.4 WASTEWATERS<br />

Storm run<strong>of</strong>f from the quay trans<strong>port</strong>ation and handling areas may carry<br />

suspended particles and mineral oils. The most intense pollution happens<br />

when it rains after longer dry periods.<br />

With the new container terminal the problem <strong>of</strong> oily, untreated wastewaters<br />

from vehicle maintenance areas and <strong>of</strong> water used to wash trucks and rail<br />

wagons will grow.<br />

Constructing the new container terminal entails employing more people.<br />

Sewage effluent discharge would be another source <strong>of</strong> pollution, unless it is<br />

treated after passing through impervious sewage pipe and subsequently<br />

discharged into soil or the sea.<br />

B.2.4.2.5 DISCHARGE OF UNTERATED WASTEWATERS FROM THE MAIN<br />

SEWAGE COLLECTOR OF THE TOWN OF PLOCE<br />

B.2.4.2.6 WASTE<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> origin and characteristics the waste generated in the <strong>port</strong> can be<br />

classified in numerous categories, but the two principle are:<br />

a) Hazardous waste<br />

b) Other waste<br />

c)<br />

Hazardous waste can be generated in emergency situations that occur when<br />

handling dangerous substances. Pursuant to the Waste Regulations (Official<br />

Gazette, Narodne novine, No. 27/96), hazardous waste generated in <strong>port</strong>s<br />

under usual conditions is:<br />

1. Waste engine and hydraulic oil generated by the oil<br />

exchange in the production means (key number from the<br />

Waste Catalogue 13 02 02)<br />

2. Waste engine oil containers (key number from the Waste<br />

Catalogue 13 02 04)<br />

3. Waste transformer oils (key number from the Waste<br />

Catalogue 13 03 06)<br />

4. Storage batteries ((key number from the Waste Catalogue<br />

16 06 05)<br />

5. Silt from oil separators in the wastewater treatment plants<br />

((key number from the Waste Catalogue 13 05 02)<br />

Other waste that would be generated in the container terminal area is:<br />

- Waste generated by cleaning the handling area (wood particles, plastic<br />

bags, linen, cardboard, etc.)<br />

- Waste generated by maintaining the internal sewage system (solid<br />

residual on the sink grids)<br />

- Waste from ships and waste generated by dock workers that is similar to<br />

municipal waste<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 10<br />

B.2.4.2.7. CONCLUSION<br />

Finally, it ought to be pointed out that in view <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> polluting the sea,<br />

the mass liquid and bulk freight, which is considered to be the most<br />

problematic cargo, would be neither trans<strong>port</strong>ed, unloaded, loaded, reloaded<br />

nor stored in this section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

The <strong>port</strong> activities relating to the planned operation are a potential source <strong>of</strong><br />

pollution in case <strong>of</strong> an emergency. Possible are also other types <strong>of</strong> pollution <strong>of</strong><br />

limited scale.<br />

Taking into account that the proposed operation will be carried out in<br />

the industrial <strong>port</strong> area, which has already been considerably degraded,<br />

that the quay activities would not include the most problematic cargo<br />

and imply risks <strong>of</strong> pollution that are linked to them, and ensuring<br />

appropriate protection measures, this operation is acceptable from the<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> protecting the sea from potential pollution.<br />

B.2.4.3 . PRESENT SITUATION WITH REGARD TO THE SEA PROTECTION<br />

Pursuant to international regulations and conventions ratified by the Republic<br />

<strong>of</strong> Croatia (Barcelona Convention and the Protocol concerning cooperation in<br />

combating pollution <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea by oil and other harmful<br />

substances in cases <strong>of</strong> emergency 1976, 1996 - MARPOL, London 73/78) all<br />

<strong>port</strong>s that are open to international trans<strong>port</strong> must be equipped with facilities<br />

for the reception <strong>of</strong> waste and oily waters from ships. It means that the <strong>port</strong><br />

must have:<br />

• Organized service (or contractor) or department for cleaning the sea<br />

and collecting the waste from the ships<br />

• Boats that remove pollution from the sea surface (solid waste, oil,<br />

hazardous and harmful substances, algae, etc.)<br />

• Harbor boats for passengers and equipment<br />

• Barriers for encircling the pollution site<br />

• Skimmer boats for removing oil from the sea surface<br />

• Land devices for receiving and processing the pollutants from the sea<br />

• Specialized boats for participating in the clean up and pollutants<br />

collection<br />

• Various pumps<br />

• Dispersants and equipment for their employment<br />

• Information transmission system<br />

B.2.4.3.1 WASTE AND OILY WATERS RECEPTION FACILITIES IN THE PORT OF<br />

PLOCE<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the liquid, bulk and other types <strong>of</strong> cargo and intensive ship<br />

trans<strong>port</strong>, the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is an especially threatened area <strong>of</strong> the Neretva<br />

channel. Small water body and weaker water exchange and the pristine<br />

beauty <strong>of</strong> this part <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic Coast make this area in particular vulnerable<br />

to any kind <strong>of</strong> pollution. Thus, a coordinated approach to the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

protecting the sea from pollution would be <strong>of</strong> highest im<strong>port</strong>ance.<br />

Pomorski servis – luka Ploce (Marine Service – Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce) is a company<br />

specialized for interventions in case <strong>of</strong> sea/land pollution. Main activities <strong>of</strong><br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 11<br />

this company include docking <strong>of</strong> ships, taking over the waste from ships,<br />

supplying ships with oil and collecting oily waters from ships as well as<br />

preventing oil spills during reloading activities. Also, this company carries out<br />

disinfections, disinsection and deratization in the dock area and onboard<br />

ships.<br />

The company uses following equipment for collecting oily waters, waste oil<br />

and solid waste from ships: ECO boat (13 m long, 1 tons <strong>of</strong> carrying capacity,<br />

5m 3 <strong>of</strong> tank capacity), two tanks with a capacity <strong>of</strong> 120 m 3 tons, truck–tank <strong>of</strong><br />

14 tons, several working pumps, two smaller oil separators with a capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

5 tons, some 300 m <strong>of</strong> floating barriers, dispersants with employment devices,<br />

certain quantity <strong>of</strong> adsorbents and communication equipment.<br />

Agreement on Funding the ECO Boat Operations has been signed between<br />

the company and the Government <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia. The boat is 24<br />

hours a day ready for employment as unexpected pollutions cannot be<br />

predicted.<br />

Oily wastewaters and waste oil from ships are stored in mobile tanks.<br />

Processing the oily waters is carried out in improvised separators – tanks with<br />

a capacity <strong>of</strong> 120 m 3 . Sometimes, facilities <strong>of</strong> Energopetrol, i.e. the liquid<br />

cargo terminal (oil separator with a capacity <strong>of</strong> 300 m 3 ) are used. Utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

the Energopetrol facility is not regulated by law, which means that it is not<br />

possible to guarantee systematic, controlled receiving and processing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

oily waters on land.<br />

Pomorski servis – luka Ploce and Dalmacija cement have signed an<br />

Agreement on Taking-over Waste Oils. In practice, this solution does not work<br />

well. Before accepting the oil, Dalmacija cement insists on a laboratory<br />

certificate, attesting that it is harmless. Since, at present, only a laboratory in<br />

Rijeka does this kind <strong>of</strong> analysis, it is difficult to meet the requirement.<br />

For daily collection <strong>of</strong> solid waste similar to municipal waste the ECO boat is<br />

employed, and the waste is treated like the municipal waste in the town area.<br />

The Harbor Authority Ploce controls the sea pollution in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

B.2.4.3.2 REGULATIONS ON HANDLING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND ON<br />

KEEPING ORDER IN THE PORT<br />

At its meeting on March 5, 2002 the Management Board <strong>of</strong> the Port Ploce<br />

adopted the Guidelines on Types and Quantities <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Substances<br />

that can be handled in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce and that can enter the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce,<br />

which also determines sites in the Port where such substances can be<br />

handled. Pursuant to Art 12 <strong>of</strong> the Guidelines on Handling Hazardous<br />

Substances, Conditions and Ways <strong>of</strong> Loading and Unloading Hazardous<br />

Substances, Bulky and Other Cargo in Ports and on Preventing Oil Spills in<br />

Ports (Narodne novine,No. 10/95), the Guidelines have been approved by the<br />

Ministry for Marine Affairs, Trans<strong>port</strong> and Communications.<br />

Guidelines on Order and Working Conditions in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce,<br />

(adopted by the Port Management 2001) define the pollution prevention<br />

measures for the Port. They refer to the issue <strong>of</strong> receiving liquid and solid<br />

substances from ships (through licensees), degasification and deratization <strong>of</strong><br />

ships that is to be done at specific sites within the <strong>port</strong>, and to the protective<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 12<br />

B.2.4.4 NOISE<br />

measures applied during the reloading <strong>of</strong> mineral oils (floating barriers). These<br />

Guidelines have not been agreed upon with the Harbour Authority.<br />

B.2.4.4.1 SOURCES OF NOISE DURING THE STRUCTURE UTILIZATION<br />

The new container terminal will enable the annual reloading efficiency <strong>of</strong> ca.<br />

100000 TEU.<br />

Containers will be delivered into and dispatched from the <strong>port</strong> on ships <strong>of</strong><br />

60000 DWT. One ship <strong>of</strong> this size can berth quayside.<br />

An estimated 60% <strong>of</strong> the total cargo will be trans<strong>port</strong>ed by rail and the<br />

remaining 40% by trucks.<br />

The existing accesses to the classification station Ploce and further into the<br />

inland will be used for the loading and trans<strong>port</strong>ation activities.<br />

Trucks will be using the existing access road from the Adriatic main road<br />

(Jadranska magistrala). Within the <strong>port</strong>, existing roads will be used.<br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> noise spreading within the construction site and impact area are:<br />

A) TRANSPORTATION MEANS<br />

- Loading/unloading ships<br />

- Entering/departing trucks<br />

- Entering/departing trains<br />

B) DOCK MACHINERY<br />

- Cranes and container bridges<br />

- Transtainers<br />

- Tractors with trailers<br />

- Container trans<strong>port</strong>ers<br />

- Other equipment, devices and installations<br />

B.2.4.4.2 TRANSPORTATION MEANS<br />

A) LOADING/UNLOADING SHIPS<br />

It has been mentioned that containers will be delivered into and dispatched<br />

from the <strong>port</strong> on ships <strong>of</strong> max. 60000 DWT and that one ship <strong>of</strong> this size can<br />

berth quayside.<br />

According to the present regulations in the developed countries (Germany,<br />

Sweden, Canada), ships must meet strict criteria with respect to the noise<br />

during the entering/departing maneuvers and the operations during the stay in<br />

the <strong>port</strong> (loading/unloading).<br />

Therefore, ships mooring into the container terminal area must meet following<br />

conditions:<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 13<br />

- WHEN A SHIP NAVIGATES AT FULL ENGINE CAPACITY, THE NOISE<br />

AT THE DISTANCE OF 25 M FROM THE SHIP PLATING MUST NOT<br />

EXCEED 75 dBA (LpA


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 14<br />

B.2.4.4.3 PORT MACHINERY<br />

A) CRANES, CONTAINER BRIDGES AND TRANSTAINERS<br />

The noise limit for these machines is 103 dBA (LwA = 103dBA)<br />

(for those more modern LwA < 100dBA)<br />

The designer <strong>of</strong> the project must consider these values while specifying the<br />

equipment characteristics in the cost estimate, and the investor must insist on<br />

them.<br />

B) TRACTORS WITH TRAILERS AND CONTAINER TRANSPORTERS<br />

For such trans<strong>port</strong>ation means <strong>of</strong> 50 to 110 kW the highest noise values must<br />

not exceed 106 – 116 dBA (LwA = 106 – 116 dBA).<br />

C) OTHER EQUIPMENT, DEVICES AND INSTALLATIONS<br />

Other equipment, devices and installations include:<br />

- COMPRESSOR UNITS<br />

- TRANSFORMATOR UNITS<br />

- VENTILATION SYSTEMS<br />

- FILTRATION SYSTEMS<br />

- OTHER<br />

They all must be placed in closed spaces (buildings, soundpro<strong>of</strong>ed<br />

containers…) so their noise would not impact the environment more than<br />

permitted by regulations.<br />

B.2.4.4.4 NOISE IMPACTS DURING THE STRUCTURE UTILIZATION<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> the noise impact during the structure utilization can be summarized<br />

as follows:<br />

• NOISE GENERATED BY SHIPS ENTERING/LEAVING THE PORT<br />

AND LYING AT BERTH<br />

• NOISE GENERATED BY THE LOADING SYSTEMS<br />

• NOISE GENERATED BY CARGO ROAD OR RAILWAY TRAFFIC<br />

Noise generated during the use <strong>of</strong> the container terminal will not impact<br />

the environment considerably since the terminal will be located in the<br />

center <strong>of</strong> the dock area, at the outward side facing the sea. Ploce is more<br />

than 1500 m distant.<br />

B.2.4.5. TRAFFIC IMPACTS<br />

B.2.4.5.1 ON LAND<br />

Trucks would be entering/leaving the container terminal directly from the main<br />

<strong>port</strong> gate, using the <strong>port</strong> roads.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 15<br />

Such a new technological organization considerably reduces the internal<br />

traffic in the old part <strong>of</strong> the Ploce Port.<br />

This new organization would not increase the environmental impacts but<br />

rather reduce them. Such a conclusion is based on the fact that the cargo will<br />

be more rationally handled and trans<strong>port</strong>ed, which is precisely the main goal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new construction.<br />

B.2.4.5.2 ON THE SEA<br />

General characteristics <strong>of</strong> the access navigation path and ships berthing and<br />

lying at berth are:<br />

• Berths are protected from sea currents, wind and waves<br />

• Water around the berths is deep enough for ships to maneuver freely,<br />

so that UKC is not problematic<br />

• Navigation marks along the navigation path and in the berthing area<br />

are all right<br />

• Free area in front <strong>of</strong> the future container terminal is big enough for the<br />

ships <strong>of</strong> the anticipated size to do the necessary maneuver operations<br />

Since the docking in or docking out the basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7 is<br />

considered to be a maneuver, and not free navigation, it can be concluded<br />

that ships lying at anchor at Quay 7 <strong>of</strong> the container terminal will not hinder a<br />

safe passage <strong>of</strong> the ships docking in or out the basin Rijeka.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> safe navigation, docking in and out the Quay 7 <strong>of</strong> the container<br />

terminal will at certain times disturb the arrival to/departure from the basin<br />

between Quay 5 and Quay 7. Since tugboats must be used because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ships’ size, simultaneous maneuvering <strong>of</strong> two ships in this basin will be<br />

forbidden. Exceptions will be allowed in case that real dimensions <strong>of</strong> two<br />

smaller ships intending to do the docking in/out maneuvers are<br />

acknowledged, depending also on hydrological and meteorological conditions.<br />

It can be concluded that the new Quay 7 <strong>of</strong> the container terminal would<br />

affect safe docking in/out the basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7. It will<br />

be necessary to regulate additional proceeding for safe docking in the<br />

basin <strong>of</strong> the Ploce Port.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 16<br />

B.2.5. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE OPERATION IN<br />

CASE OF ECOLOGICAL EMERGENCY WITH OCCURRENCE RISK<br />

ASSESSMENT<br />

B.2.5.1 OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE<br />

OPERATION IN CASE OF ECOLOGICAL EMERGENCY<br />

Since the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce is <strong>of</strong> local significance at present, but envisaged as a<br />

county <strong>port</strong> and intended mainly for the passenger trans<strong>port</strong>, no bigger<br />

incidents that may cause large scale ecologic catastrophes are expected to<br />

occur. However, since it is a public <strong>port</strong> that also cargo ships may enter, there<br />

may be accidents that could cause ecological catastrophes and have negative<br />

environmental impacts. The location <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce in the center <strong>of</strong> the<br />

town increases the number <strong>of</strong> potential environmental impacts since not only<br />

the natural but also the cultural environment may be affected.<br />

Pollution <strong>of</strong> the shore, which is usual in case <strong>of</strong> accidents, causes public<br />

distress and affects recreational activities such as swimming, sailing, diving. It<br />

also has effect on the hotel and catering business and the whole tourism<br />

sector. Rates <strong>of</strong> the oil pollution removal are contingent, among other factors,<br />

on the quantity and type <strong>of</strong> oil.<br />

The whole Ploce shore line is a recreational zone used by both locals and<br />

tourists. Activities exercised at present and anticipated with the plans include<br />

swimming, sailing, diving and other s<strong>port</strong> and underwater activities. Oil spills<br />

may spread due to sea currents and/or unfavorable wind and contaminate the<br />

whole harbor and beaches, including those outside <strong>of</strong> the harbor and not<br />

distant from the harbor and the town center.<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> individual oil spills on the aforementioned activities are rather<br />

short-term but any tourism impact is more an issue <strong>of</strong> winning back the<br />

confidence, once the clean up has been performed.<br />

Ecological emergency may occur during operations with oil and oil derivates:<br />

- In case that fuel tanks are damaged and oil leaks into the sea<br />

- In case <strong>of</strong> fire and/or explosions on ships<br />

- In case <strong>of</strong> emergency during ship maneuvers (crash, capsize, etc…)<br />

Oil spills would eventually pollute the harbor aquatorium and the vessels in it,<br />

but also the surrounding beaches in the bay and in the town. Such pollution<br />

would have negative impacts on the plankton, sea birds and other sea<br />

organisms. In case <strong>of</strong> unfavorable meteorological conditions (strong winds<br />

and storms), the pollution might spread to several beaches situated to the<br />

north and to the south <strong>of</strong> the harbor. This would temporarily make the use <strong>of</strong><br />

the shoreline zone for swimming and large-scale recreation impossible. In<br />

addition, oil spills and sea pollution would produce an unpleasant aesthetic<br />

impression.<br />

Fire on ships, in addition to the initial air pollution, would create also a hazard<br />

<strong>of</strong> the explosion <strong>of</strong> the fuel tank or the gas bottles on the surrounding vessels.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 17<br />

B.2.5.2 OCCURRENCE RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

Managing a public <strong>port</strong> situated next to a town and protected shore is always<br />

associated with certain environmental hazards and in order to assess<br />

potential risks, it is necessary to assess:<br />

• Probability <strong>of</strong> an un<strong>welcome</strong> incident<br />

• Consequences <strong>of</strong> such an incident<br />

• Duration <strong>of</strong> the exposure to the consequences<br />

Un<strong>welcome</strong> incidents may occur in case <strong>of</strong><br />

• Force majeur<br />

• Accidental emergency<br />

Force majeur would be an earthquake stronger than expected, hurricanes,<br />

war or other deliberate damages <strong>of</strong> movables (vessels, vehicles) and<br />

immovables (buildings, facilities). “Accidental emergency” occurs in general<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the human factor, i.e. because <strong>of</strong> negligence or recklessness <strong>of</strong><br />

either the ship or the <strong>port</strong> personnel, though sometimes also prepensely.<br />

Occurrence probability for an un<strong>welcome</strong> incident is difficult to predict due to<br />

the nature <strong>of</strong> its source. Probability <strong>of</strong> a force majeur incident in peaceful<br />

condition in our <strong>port</strong>s is relatively low. Much higher is a probability <strong>of</strong> an<br />

“accidental emergency”. “Accidental emergency” may be a small-scale<br />

incident with spatially limited environmental impacts, when “the first level<br />

threat” occurs. In case <strong>of</strong> large-scale incidents bigger area is affected and “the<br />

second level threat” occurs, which is <strong>of</strong> equal relevance as a natural disaster.<br />

Exposure to the consequences <strong>of</strong> the first level threat is considerably shorter<br />

than in case <strong>of</strong> the second level threat or in case <strong>of</strong> force majeur incidents.<br />

The records <strong>of</strong> how the smaller Adriatic <strong>port</strong>s have been functioning so far<br />

sup<strong>port</strong> an assessment <strong>of</strong> a much lower occurrence probability for incidents<br />

causing the second level threat.<br />

When it comes to the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce, the risk, i.e. the probability <strong>of</strong> an<br />

ecological emergency, is assessed as follows:<br />

• Relatively low risk produced by a force majeur emergency in peaceful<br />

circumstances<br />

• Much higher risk produced by an “accidental emergency”<br />

• Relatively low risk <strong>of</strong> ecological emergency with “the second level<br />

threat”<br />

• Much higher risk <strong>of</strong> ecological emergency with “the first level threat”<br />

It can be concluded that occasional, not frequent incidents <strong>of</strong> short<br />

lasting impacts and medium intensity may occur. Thus, the overall risk<br />

assessment would be “acceptable level <strong>of</strong> risk”.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

B.3. THE MOST SUITABLE OPTION –<br />

PROPOSAL AND CLARIFICATION<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

The container terminal will be located on a plot <strong>of</strong> 250 000 m 2 surface area. The<br />

eastern side <strong>of</strong> the plot is where the container terminal and the RO-RO terminal with<br />

an annual capacity <strong>of</strong> 100,000 TEU will be constructed. The rest <strong>of</strong> the plot is<br />

reserved for the expansion to 200 000 TEU annually, pursuant to the long-term<br />

development plan.<br />

The reception zone for container ships with up to 60 000 DWT (Quay 7) will be north<br />

<strong>of</strong> the terminal platform, and two railway tracks, 340 m away from and parallel to the<br />

new quay will be on its southern side.<br />

There will be a bridge for unloading containers from ships to either railway wagons or<br />

trucks on Quay 7. According to the technological feasibility study, the areas for<br />

arranging containers and for stacking the refrigeration or empty containers will take<br />

the space from the shore toward the southern side <strong>of</strong> the platform. Next to the last<br />

stacking section at the southern side <strong>of</strong> the plateau there would be two rail tracks for<br />

the shipping by railway.<br />

The existing road that runs along the platform edge on the runway area will enclose<br />

the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the plateau. The southeastern side <strong>of</strong> the plateau will have an<br />

entry gate for cargo and other vehicles, with five passages between the traffic islands.<br />

Next to the entry gate, on its southern side, car parking and a reception building will<br />

be positioned.<br />

A service entry gate to/from the <strong>port</strong> road is planned to be on the southeastern side <strong>of</strong><br />

the plateau. It would be opened to enable the mobile equipment to leave, if and when<br />

necessary.<br />

Between the existing road along the eastern edge o the planned plateau and the<br />

existing road leading from the border inspection point to the Quay 7, a road to the<br />

container terminal plateau, serving as the main access to the plateau, will be built. It<br />

would be an east-west road, continuing the axis <strong>of</strong> the road housing the border<br />

checkpoint, i.e. the main entrance into the dock area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>. It will be a four-track<br />

road and the two outward tracks would be longitudinal parking lots for those cargo<br />

vehicles, which are waiting to enter the container terminal or to be cleared by the<br />

customs. The access road to the container terminal would run parallel to the planned<br />

switching group <strong>of</strong> the rail tracks.<br />

The plateau is divided into five working units – areas for stacking containers. On the<br />

first three the containers will be deposited in two groups, each with seven rows and<br />

four columns. The fourth unit will be for empty and refrigerator containers and in the<br />

fifth unit the containers will be stacked in four rows, next to the two railway tracks that<br />

can be accessed by a transtainer. Roads leveling with them encircle these five<br />

working areas.<br />

To the east <strong>of</strong> the four-track road are designed areas for warehouses, workshops and<br />

parking lots for cars at the entry/exit gate.<br />

The new Quay 7 will be built at the altitude <strong>of</strong> +3.0 m above sea level, so that also the<br />

terminal platform is at the same elevation. The quay for containers is a surface<br />

structure divided longitudinally in three dilated parts. The structure will lie on<br />

perforated vertical pilots <strong>of</strong> reinforced concrete (Benoto) and on the riveted steel<br />

diagonal pilots.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

The pilots will be constructed from the tidal area or partially prior to the aquatorium<br />

excavation <strong>of</strong>f shore. A grid <strong>of</strong> pre-tightened horizontal and vertical prefabricated<br />

beams <strong>of</strong> reinforced concrete, connected by wet knots, will be placed onto the pilots.<br />

The tops on bumping points are covered with concrete in the prefabricated paving <strong>of</strong><br />

reinforced concrete.<br />

The energetic channel on the edge <strong>of</strong> the quay is prefabricated, with sup<strong>port</strong> above<br />

the pilot. A layer <strong>of</strong> reinforced concrete covers both the prefabricated and pretightened<br />

slab-like props placed on the main vertical sup<strong>port</strong>ing grid and the whole<br />

quay surface.<br />

The structure is connected to the plateau with a plate <strong>of</strong> reinforced concrete, which is<br />

placed in the roadbed <strong>of</strong> the plateau structure. A hydro-insulating layer on which a<br />

tarmac road is built protects the surface <strong>of</strong> the structure. The slope under the quay is<br />

protected from erosion by a stone plaster.<br />

Deviation between the altitude points <strong>of</strong> the plateau and the basic height will be + 3<br />

m.n.m., which is necessary to achieve the bevel and enable the drain. On the plateau<br />

between the working surfaces planned are six roads parallel to the line <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

Quay 7 and two side roads, the western <strong>of</strong> which is two-track, while the one to the<br />

east is a four-track road. All roads on the plateau are with 3.5 m wide tracks. The<br />

transtrainer should be moving within the limits <strong>of</strong> the stacking areas. Traffic on all the<br />

roads will be two-way and all the roads will be accordingly marked (continuous and<br />

broken white lines). The STOP traffic signs and the stop lines will mark the<br />

connection points between the roads in the stacking areas and the main road. Curbed<br />

traffic islands and green islands will be located on the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the plateau<br />

between the eastern four-track road and the outer road at the platform-side (road “2”),<br />

in accordance with the plan to construct necessary warehouses and workshops.<br />

The surface <strong>of</strong> the container terminal plateau will be covered with 25 cm thick plates<br />

<strong>of</strong> micro-reinforced concrete on the 25 cm thick base <strong>of</strong> compacted crushed stone.<br />

Such a final treatment can be performed once the soil consolidation has been<br />

performed, ensuring that there is no sinking that might damage the working area <strong>of</strong><br />

the plateau.<br />

Considering the geo-mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the base soil, the geo-technical<br />

study suggests that the consolidation be done using the dredged material, for the<br />

basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7. In order to this, it is necessary to level the<br />

existing area to the altitude <strong>of</strong> +1 m.n.m. and to apply the geotextile and geonet that<br />

will be strewed with a 50 cm thick layer <strong>of</strong> stone material and covered with another<br />

geonet and a layer <strong>of</strong> 100 cm thick stone material. This is then covered with a 3 m<br />

thick layer <strong>of</strong> the dredged arisings, serving as the pre-load, which is supposed to be<br />

removed after 8-9 months and applied in new potential areas within the dock area, for<br />

the further <strong>port</strong> development.<br />

After the removal <strong>of</strong> the pre-load, begins the final treatment <strong>of</strong> the terminal surfaces.<br />

The geo-technical project study will detail the material use and quality criteria and the<br />

special construction parameters (Section A 1, Figure 2).<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

C. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND<br />

MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

C.1. PROPOSAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE<br />

MEASURES DURING THE PHASE OF<br />

PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND<br />

EXPLOITATION<br />

C.1.1. PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE<br />

MEASURES DURING THE PHASE OF PREPARATION<br />

C.1.2. PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE<br />

MEASURES DURING THE PHASE OF<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

C.1.3. PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE<br />

MEASURES DURING THE PHASE OF EXPLOITATION<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

During the phase <strong>of</strong> preparation, construction and utilization <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>, it is<br />

necessary to reduce all possible undesirable environmantal impacts to an<br />

acceptable level by implementation <strong>of</strong> appropriate measures.<br />

C.1.1. PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES DURING<br />

THE PHASE OF PREPARATION<br />

Before issuing preliminary building permit it is necessary to implement the<br />

following:<br />

C.1.1.1 . AIR POLLUTION PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

Terms <strong>of</strong> prevention and reducing air pollution by ships should be included in<br />

the Regulation on Port Operation and Requirements for Port Utilization in the<br />

Port Area <strong>of</strong> the Ploce Port, provided they were accepted on both national and<br />

international level.<br />

C.1.1.2. MEASURES RELATING TO REDUCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

DAMAGES RESULTING FROM SUDDEN SEA POLLUTION<br />

C.1.1.2.1. Project design for land installations for disposal <strong>of</strong> oily water from ships<br />

in the Ploce Port<br />

In order to be discharged into the sea, waste water coming from the system<br />

treatment device, must meet the following requirements: suspended<br />

substances = 35 mg/L, KPK Cr- = 125 mg O2/L, BPK5 = 25 mgO2/L, total oil<br />

and grease 25 mg/L and mineral oil = 5 mg/L.<br />

C.1.1.2.2. Furnishing <strong>of</strong> a specialized company for waste oil takeover <strong>of</strong>f ships.<br />

A specialized company for pollution control and elimination, performing within<br />

its business activities, waste oil collection from ships as well, must be supplied<br />

with appropriate equipment for waste oil sampling and must stipulate<br />

contracts on testing with the authorized testing laboratory. It is also necessary<br />

to define terms and liabilities <strong>of</strong> this business with the company receiving<br />

waste oil, by means <strong>of</strong> a contract.<br />

C.1.1.2.3. Plan elaboration for the further development <strong>of</strong> system <strong>of</strong> measures<br />

related to environmental damage reduction resulting from sudden<br />

pollutions in the Ploce Port.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> the system must be performed in such a way as to<br />

enable efficient pollution protection by other hazardous substances as well.<br />

Setting up <strong>of</strong> this system should not be connected with the container terminal<br />

construction. Plans for the further development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> should also include<br />

this component.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The set out requirements cannot be connected to the container terminal<br />

construction exclusively. However, in construction <strong>of</strong> this structure, all<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

major problems related to the threat <strong>of</strong> sea pollution in the Ploce Port<br />

should be solved in the phase <strong>of</strong> preparation.<br />

C.1.1.3. PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR WASTE WATER HANDLING<br />

Among major present problems concerning the Ploce Port sea pollution are<br />

waste waters. The largest problem is the waste water discharge from the main<br />

collector <strong>of</strong> the Ploce sewage system into the planned intervention<br />

acquatorium, and the unsolved waste water problem from the mechanical<br />

equipment repairshop, as well as wagon and truck cleansing.<br />

Therefore, the following general sea protection measures are being proposed:<br />

C.1.1.3.1. Construction <strong>of</strong> the first phase <strong>of</strong> the Ploce sewage system,<br />

Which according to the Conceptual design <strong>of</strong> the waste water disposal on the<br />

territory under GUP (Master Plan) Ploce (the Public company for water<br />

management «Hrvatska vodoprivreda» - National Water Company Zagreb OJ<br />

(Organisational Unit) Split TD 48/91) includes the following:<br />

- Construction <strong>of</strong> water purification system for lower quality rate waste<br />

waters and submarine outlet on the Višnjica Peninsula,<br />

- Construction <strong>of</strong> supply channel, final pump station (PS 19) and<br />

penstock, and<br />

- Connecting to the user pumps station <strong>of</strong> the Ploce town, i.e. to the<br />

main collector.<br />

Set out protective measures cannot be connected to the container terminal<br />

construction exclusively, but should be pointed out as an initiative for integral<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> the sea protection in the Ploce Port.<br />

It is necessary to determine the deadline for the construction <strong>of</strong> this project.<br />

C.1.1.3.2. Provide by the design for washing and cleansing <strong>of</strong> wagons and trucks<br />

on place where a system for controlled drainage <strong>of</strong> waste waters and<br />

their further treatment, e.i. purifying shall be established for the Ploce<br />

Port area.<br />

Before being discharged in the sea, waste water must meet the following<br />

requirements: suspended substances = 35 mg/L, KPK Cr- = 125 mg O2/L,<br />

BPK5 = 25 mgO2/L, total oil and grease 25 mg/L, mineral oils 5 mg/L, anionic<br />

detergents = 2 mg/L, non-ionic detergents = 2 mg/L.<br />

C.1.1.3.3 Provide by the design for purification <strong>of</strong> oily waste waters coming from<br />

the <strong>port</strong> equipment and vehicles repairshop on the oil trapsedimentation<br />

basin.<br />

Trap outlet waste water must meet the following requirements: suspended<br />

substances 35 mg/L, total oil and grease content 25 mg/L, mineral oil 5 mg/L.<br />

C.1.1.3.4. Project should be constructed as a distribution sewage system for<br />

sanitary-sewage waste waters, waste precipitation coming from traffic<br />

and operative <strong>port</strong> areas and «pure» rain water-ro<strong>of</strong> water.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

Until the problem <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Ploce waste water discharge in the <strong>port</strong><br />

acquatorium is solved, i.e. until the 1st phase <strong>of</strong> the city sewage system<br />

reached, the sanitary-sewage water coming from new structures must be<br />

purified in the septic tank and discharged into the ground.<br />

Waste waters resulting from traffic and operative <strong>port</strong> area washing out should<br />

be purified in the oil traps-sedimentation basins.<br />

Waste water at trap outlet must meet the following requirements: suspended<br />

substances 35 mg/L, total oil and grease content 25 mg/L, mineral oil 5 mg/L.<br />

Oil traps are also used for receiving hazardous liquids in the event <strong>of</strong> traffic<br />

and operative area incidents (i.e. spillage <strong>of</strong> fuel).<br />

C.1.1.4. TRAFFIC IMPACT PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

C.1.1.4.1. ON LAND<br />

C.1.1.4.2. AT SEA<br />

Prior to the container terminal start-up, the junction road leading from<br />

the Adriatic Highway to <strong>port</strong> industrial zone where the Container<br />

terminal is situated up to the intersection, must be in service. The same<br />

applies to the first phase <strong>of</strong> terminal construction, i.e. the first phase can<br />

be in use only after the junction road was put in service.<br />

The junction road has been approved by the Strategy and space development<br />

program <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia, it has been included in the county and city<br />

physical plans and in the construction plan <strong>of</strong> the Hrvatkse Ceste (Croatian<br />

Roads) for the upcoming planning period <strong>of</strong> four years, namely until the year<br />

2004.<br />

Maritime traffic within the Container terminal zone should be regulated<br />

according to the existing maritime traffic laws and regulations and according<br />

to the Maritime Study for Entering and Leaving the Port which elaboration is<br />

mandatory for the new situation in the basin.<br />

C.1.1.5. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

Environmental protection with regard to noise pollution can be implemented<br />

through the following:<br />

C.1.1.5.1. ORGANIZATIONAL MEASURES<br />

Noise protection organizational measures implementation starts with<br />

preliminary technological and architectural and structural designs, continues<br />

with extensive solutions within working designs, then by site organization<br />

projects, by proscribing requirements to be met by the contractors, by designs<br />

<strong>of</strong> certain construction phases and connection with authorized inspection<br />

services, and after the completion <strong>of</strong> construction, by the organization <strong>of</strong> work<br />

technology procedures within the INTERVENTION. If performed in a quality<br />

manner, those works actually represent the least expensive and most<br />

effective environmental noise protection measures.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

Planned technological solutions <strong>of</strong> all activities, already in the phase <strong>of</strong><br />

preliminary design creation, have to provide for and adopt as final solutions,<br />

actions and procedures, machines and devices which in normal conditions<br />

emit minimum levels <strong>of</strong> sound energy. During the design, optimization <strong>of</strong><br />

working conditions in all aspects, including the noise created and the part <strong>of</strong><br />

the day when they take place, should be implemented.<br />

C.1.1.5.2 ARCHITECTONIC AND ORAGANIZATIONAL NOISE PROTECTION<br />

MEASURES<br />

Architectonic noise protection measures in the organizational sense are to be<br />

achieved by the disposition <strong>of</strong> structures so that by their dimensions, they<br />

present an appropriately located barrier for the strongest sources noise<br />

expansion (in this case, road and railway traffic noise), and at the same time<br />

they favour the technological process progress.<br />

C.1.1.6. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MEASURES<br />

In order for the Container terminal management within the Ploce Port (during<br />

construction and utilization) to be efficient, it is necessary to compile already<br />

during the phase <strong>of</strong> designing, and before obtaining building permit, the<br />

following studies:<br />

«Environmental Management Policy» – study which includes and regulates<br />

the method <strong>of</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> expert team for managing the project, running<br />

the terminal and monitoring proscribed environmental protective measures<br />

implementation.<br />

«Environmental Condition Review» – study which would serve as a starting<br />

point for the compilation <strong>of</strong> the “Environmental Management Programme”.<br />

«Environmental Management Programme» – study which would contain a<br />

complete environmental management plan, and which would coordinate the<br />

Ploce <strong>port</strong> requirements and needs with the appropriate environmental<br />

preservation requirements and needs.<br />

C.1.1.7. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE AESTHETIC IMPACTS<br />

It is necessary to incorporate plan and technincal measures for improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> visual appearance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> and city urban structures under the following<br />

conditions:<br />

• During designing, special attention should be paid to the <strong>port</strong> aesthetic<br />

appearance in relation to the city urban structure in the background,<br />

especially from the sea line <strong>of</strong> sight. The selection <strong>of</strong> building material,<br />

colours and shades for all <strong>port</strong> elements should be well considered.<br />

• Design should regulate superficial treatment <strong>of</strong> the structure, coast and<br />

coastline.<br />

• Master plan should examine and establish the best location for excess<br />

building material, and excavated material disposal.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

• It is necessary to elaborate the “Site organization and Mechanical<br />

Equipment Maintenance Design”, as a separate design within the<br />

designs necessary for obtaining building permit.<br />

It is necessary to elaborate the above mentioned designs and<br />

documetns from C.1.1.1. to C.1.1.7. before the issuing <strong>of</strong> the building<br />

perimt, in order to meet the construction requirements for the<br />

construction permit.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 8<br />

C.1.2. PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES DURING<br />

THE PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION<br />

C.1.2.1. EXCESSIVE NOISE PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN THE EVENT OF<br />

SITE OPENING AND CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THE NOISE<br />

PROTECTION ACT (OG No. 17/1990.)<br />

This act regulates noise protection requirements for the INTERVETNION<br />

IMPACT AREA in the event <strong>of</strong> site opening, construction and<br />

exploitation <strong>of</strong> the PROJECT.<br />

The above mentioned act governs the contractor liability on the<br />

CONSTRUCTION SITE to PROVIDE FOR AND IMPLEMENT noise<br />

expansion protective measures, exceeding the permissible levels, and to<br />

monitor the implementation <strong>of</strong> the measures within the framework <strong>of</strong> site<br />

development plan.<br />

In accordance with this act, construction works shall be executed on everyday<br />

basis, in the period from 6 to 23 o’clock.<br />

For construction works, which have to be executed incessantly by day and<br />

night (as well as on holidays) due to the nature <strong>of</strong> their technological<br />

procedure, the opinion and approval by the competent inspection service shall<br />

be filed for.<br />

Contractor must comply with the general noise protective measures for the<br />

intervention location <strong>of</strong>f the site. The general environmental noise protective<br />

measures <strong>of</strong>f the site imply the following:<br />

• ESTABLISHING CRITERIA TO BE MET BY THE CONTRACTOR<br />

DURING CONSTRUCTION (limits for emitted sound force allowed for the<br />

constructor’s equipment).<br />

• CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY TO COMPILE THE SITE DEVELOPMENT<br />

PLAN, AS WELL AS THE WORK PLAN INCLUDING A PRECISE COST<br />

ESTIMATE AND WORK, MATERIAL, PROCEDURES AND<br />

RESTRICTIONS SPECIFICATIONS, WHICH SHALL ENSURE IN A<br />

CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE MANNER THE CONSTRUCTOR’S<br />

MAKING OF A UNAMBIGUOUS AND CLEAR OFFER WITH ACCEPTED<br />

LIABILITIES.<br />

• SUPERVISION DURING WORK EXECUTION (not only technical<br />

supervision, but also occasional or constant monitoring by inspection<br />

services or companies authorized for noise measurement).<br />

C.1.2.2. AIR POLLUTION PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

Due to the assessment that the vehicles trans<strong>port</strong>ing the dredged material<br />

shall produce a considerable quantity <strong>of</strong> dust during dry period, which shall<br />

cause air pollution (during dry period and strong winds in particular), trans<strong>port</strong><br />

vehicles should be under constant supervision. In case <strong>of</strong> trans<strong>port</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> an<br />

extremely dry, powdery material, the material shall be sprinkled with water<br />

before trans<strong>port</strong>ation.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 9<br />

Due to the possible environmental pollution by increased quantity <strong>of</strong> exhaust<br />

gases, machines and trans<strong>port</strong> vehicles shall also be constantly monitored in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> exhaust gases, in conformity with<br />

allowed values.<br />

C.1.2.3. SEA POLLUTION PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

C.1.2.3.1. SUBMARINE EXCAVATION<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sea<br />

sediment on the area <strong>of</strong> planned construction is low. Pollution by<br />

polychlorinated biphenyls has not been proved. Regardless <strong>of</strong> this quite<br />

favourable re<strong>port</strong>, place and method <strong>of</strong> disposal <strong>of</strong> the excavated material has<br />

to be elaborated. The excavated material obtained by deepening <strong>port</strong> basin<br />

shall be used for the construction <strong>of</strong> a new embankment required for the<br />

container terminal and possible surplus <strong>of</strong> dredged material shall be deposited<br />

on the <strong>port</strong> area for new areas development for further <strong>port</strong> development. In<br />

any case, disposal <strong>of</strong> dredged material has to be avoided on sensitive areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> the coastal sea and on sea areas which are not degraded (Fig.1).<br />

Deepening <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> basin is accompanied with a number <strong>of</strong> problems and<br />

dangers for direct environment. Sediment resuspension increases turbidity <strong>of</strong><br />

water within the <strong>port</strong> area and suspend and colloidal particles can reach the<br />

external sea too. Water turbidity reduces penetration <strong>of</strong> light needed for<br />

photosynthesis and resettling <strong>of</strong> suspended particles on sea bottom can<br />

damage benton bioceonoses. Removal <strong>of</strong> sediment includes, although<br />

temporarily, removal <strong>of</strong> habitats <strong>of</strong> bottom-dwelling sea organisms. It may be<br />

proposed to implement following measures in order to reduce all these<br />

negative effects <strong>of</strong> dredging to sea ecosystem:<br />

- Dredging has to be carried out in the most possible short time, in the<br />

period when damages to sea ecosystem shall be the least observable..<br />

This is a period with no fish spawning and migration <strong>of</strong> fish and winter<br />

period when development <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton is limited by ecological<br />

factors.<br />

- Dredging works have to be executed out <strong>of</strong> bathing season in order to<br />

avoid possible disruption <strong>of</strong> esthetic sea appearance.<br />

- Less loading the water from waters leaching from dredged material<br />

being deposited on land with suspended substances and this water<br />

shall be again discharged into the sea.<br />

Taking into consideration input data on submarine excavation required for<br />

embankment formation<br />

o Total required embankment 500.000 m3<br />

o Possible excavation per hour 2.000 m3<br />

o Daily excavation within 16 hours 32.000 m3<br />

o Embankment/water pro<strong>port</strong>ion 40/60<br />

o Actual daily excavation 32.000 x 0.4 = ca 13.000 m3<br />

o Total required days 500/13 = 38<br />

and condition that no excavated waste material (being deposited on inshore<br />

part for years) is permitted to be disposed back in sea, the following<br />

technology for carrying out works has been proposed.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:9/ 1<br />

Meanwhile tests for sedimentation time <strong>of</strong> particles in sample <strong>of</strong> submarine<br />

excavated material has been carried out and it has been founded out that<br />

mostly particles are falling on the bottom within 2 hours. Precipitation could be<br />

also quicker if coagulants would be used.<br />

With respect to ground conditions there is possible to for at least 3 (or more)<br />

basins in which excavated material would be deposited.<br />

Basins shall be formed on places requiring carrying out embankment so that<br />

at first around the planned basin edges embankments up to plateau final<br />

height level with sluice placed on one <strong>of</strong> the side shall be formed. Bottom<br />

and sides <strong>of</strong> the basin shall be lined with filter cloth <strong>of</strong> such permeability to<br />

retain particles that may not be returned in the sea.<br />

When depositing <strong>of</strong> excavated material a <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> water shall be leached<br />

through filter cloth back into the sea and a <strong>port</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> water together with<br />

excavated material remains in the basin.<br />

Working technology for basins is as follows:<br />

1 st day – the basin No. 1 shall be filled with material<br />

in the basin No. 2 water is motionless<br />

in the basin No. 3 water shall be discharged<br />

2 nd day – the basin No. 3 shall be filled with material<br />

in the basin No. 1 water is motionless<br />

in the basin No. 2 water shall be discharged<br />

3 rd day – the basin No. 2 se shall be filled with material<br />

in the basin No. 3 water is motionless<br />

in the basin No. 1 water shall be discharged<br />

On such way sedimentation time in individual basin shall be obtained that is<br />

much longer than mentioned 2 hours.<br />

Draining <strong>of</strong> water from basin shall take place by regulating sluice directed<br />

towards the sea enabling slowly discharged <strong>of</strong> clarified water.<br />

The process shall be repeated until all basins shall be filled.<br />

FILLING<br />

MOTIONLESS<br />

WATER<br />

DISCHRGING<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.<br />

SLUICE<br />

See picture C1-pic 2 :Submarine excavation and dispozal area-supplement<br />

and picture C1-pic 3: Cross sections.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:9/ 2<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:9/ 3<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:9/ 4<br />

C.1.2.3.2 WASTE ON CONSTRUCTION LOCATION<br />

When removing the waste from the construction site, it shall be necessary to<br />

determine the type <strong>of</strong> waste and make a re<strong>port</strong>. If hazardous waste is in<br />

question, then it shall be managed in a way prescribed by the Ordinance on<br />

Requirements for Handling Hazardous Waste (Official Gazette, 32/98).<br />

Disposal <strong>of</strong> any type <strong>of</strong> waste in the sea is not allowed.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 10<br />

C.1.3. PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES DURING<br />

EXPLOITATION<br />

C.1.3.1. MEASURES RESULTING FROM REGULATIONS, PROVISIONS AND<br />

STANDARDS APPLIED<br />

C.1.3.1.1. AIR<br />

C:1.3.1.2. SEA<br />

Measures <strong>of</strong> Prevention <strong>of</strong> Pollution by Ships are an issue <strong>of</strong> international<br />

environment protection policy. The Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia ratified the IMO<br />

conventions, namely MARPOL Convention <strong>of</strong> - the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Pollution by<br />

Ships 73/78, modified by 1998 Protocol.<br />

In 1997 IMO adopted the text <strong>of</strong> a new Annex VI to the MARPOL 73/78<br />

Convention. However, the Annex VI dealing with prevention <strong>of</strong> pollution by<br />

ships has not yet entered in force.<br />

The existing air protection legal provisions <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia do not<br />

include trans<strong>port</strong>ation means (road vehicles, <strong>of</strong>f-road vehicles, locomotives,<br />

ships, airplanes).<br />

Pursuant to the Air Protection Act (OG 48/95.) the Regulation on<br />

Recommended and Limit Air Quality Values was issued, but the Regulation<br />

covered only stationary sources. (OG 140/97.).<br />

According to the UN Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea Convention (Montego Bay, 10th<br />

December 1982, Official Gazette – International Treaties no. 11/95.), the<br />

Adriatic is being classified among the seas with the following characteristics:<br />

• complexity <strong>of</strong> navigation in the narrow area <strong>of</strong> semi-closed sea;<br />

• accesses to <strong>port</strong>s lead through long insular area and dangerous<br />

passes;<br />

• complexity <strong>of</strong> weather conditions due to fast, sudden changes and<br />

reaching extreme values;<br />

• great danger <strong>of</strong> all sorts <strong>of</strong> pollution due to small water masses and<br />

their weak and very slow change, and<br />

• needs to pay special attention to the use and preservation <strong>of</strong> living<br />

resources, purity and natural attractions.<br />

Regulations in force in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia follow international sea<br />

protection regulations and conventions:<br />

• International Convention for the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Pollution by Ships<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1973./1978. (MARPOL 73./78.) including 6 technical Annexes.<br />

Annex I. and II. deal with oil and mass hazardous liquid loads.<br />

Annex III., IV., V. and VI. deal with harmful substances in<br />

packaged form, sewage, garbage and air pollution.<br />

• International Convention for the Safety <strong>of</strong> Life at Sea (SOLAS) –<br />

chapter 7 – Hazardous Goods Trans<strong>port</strong>, 1974.<br />

• International Maritime Organization Code <strong>of</strong> Hazardous and<br />

Dangerous Loads (IMCO).<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 11<br />

• Barcelona Convention on Protection <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean Sea<br />

Environment and Coastal Region and Protocol for Cooperation in<br />

Combating Pollution <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean by Oil and Other Toxic<br />

and Hazardous Substances in Case <strong>of</strong> Accidents –1976., 1996.<br />

The regulations in force in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia governing sea protection<br />

against pollution by maritime traffic and <strong>port</strong> activities are the following:<br />

- Maritime Code (Official Gazette, 17/94., 74/94 and 43/96.)<br />

proscribes that the ship is seaworthy if it meets corresponding<br />

requirements proscribed by the law and technical conditions indicated<br />

in the Croatian Register <strong>of</strong> Shipping with respect to, among other<br />

things, environmental protection against ship pollution. The state <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ship and its equipment should be maintained so that the ship could<br />

remain seaworthy in every respect without danger to the ship, crew,<br />

load and environment.<br />

- Sea Port Act (Official Gazette, 108/95.), proscribes, among other<br />

things, that the Port Authority, i.e. the company which has obtained the<br />

concession for economic exploitation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>, is obliged to equip the<br />

<strong>port</strong> with equipment for protection against sea pollution and is also<br />

responsible for sea pollution in the <strong>port</strong>.<br />

- Methods <strong>of</strong> Maintaining Order in Ports and other Parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Internal Sea Waters and Territorial Sea <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia,<br />

and Limits <strong>of</strong> Navigation for Ships and Boats outside Ports<br />

(Official Gazette, 91/94, 162/98.) regulates that order in the <strong>port</strong> shall<br />

be carried out by the body who manages the <strong>port</strong> and that body is<br />

obliged to proscribe a special act for that purpose which should be<br />

approved by the harbourmaster’s <strong>of</strong>fice. The rulebook prohibits, among<br />

other things, the performance <strong>of</strong> operations on board ships in the <strong>port</strong>,<br />

which might endanger human lives, cause fire or pollute the sea.<br />

Cleaning <strong>of</strong> ships and boats, intended for economic purposes, <strong>of</strong><br />

hazardous gases (degasation) and rodents (cargo rodent control and<br />

fumigation) can be carried out, pursuant the decisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong><br />

managing body and against previous agreement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

harbourmaster’s <strong>of</strong>fice, only on the specific places, in a specific way<br />

and in a determined time. The <strong>port</strong> managing body has to assure<br />

reception <strong>of</strong> waste resulting from ship cleaning and regular use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ship. The body that operates the ship at cargo loading, unloading and<br />

transloading has to take adequate measures to prevent sea pollution.<br />

When handling general cargo between the ship and the coast,<br />

adequate protective net has to be installed. After cargo loading,<br />

unloading or transloading has been completed, the responsible body is<br />

obliged to clean up the used part <strong>of</strong> the coastal area.<br />

Act on Trans<strong>port</strong> and Handling <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Substances in<br />

Inland Navigations (OG, 79/96.) regulates for the movement <strong>of</strong><br />

hazardous substances by seagoing ships, the appropriate application<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Act on the Requirements and Manner <strong>of</strong> Loading and Unloading<br />

Hazardous Substances, Bulk and other Freight in Ports, and<br />

Manner <strong>of</strong> Preventing the Spreading <strong>of</strong> Oil Leaks in Ports.<br />

- According to the Act on Trans<strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Substances (OG,<br />

97/93.), hazardous substances can be divided in 9 classes:<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 12<br />

Class 1.: Explosive substances and objects filled with explosive<br />

substances<br />

Class 2.: Gases under pressure, liquefied or dissolved under<br />

pressure<br />

Class 3.: Inflammable liquids<br />

Class 4.1.: Inflammable solids<br />

Class 4.2.: Substances potential for self-ignition<br />

Class 4.3.: Substances which in contact with water develop<br />

inflammable gases<br />

Class 5.1.: Oxidizing substances<br />

Class 5.2.: Organic peroxides<br />

Class 6.1.: Toxic substances<br />

Class 5.2.: Polluting and infectious substances<br />

Class 7.: Radioactive substances<br />

Class 8.: Corrosive substances<br />

Class 9.: Other dangerous substances and objects, i.e. the<br />

substances, which on the basis <strong>of</strong> certain properties,<br />

according to scientific tests, cannot be classified in<br />

classes 1-8 (asbestos, dry ice, magnetic materials, etc.).<br />

Requirements and Manner <strong>of</strong> Loading and Unloading Hazardous<br />

Substances, Bulk and other Freight in Ports, and Manner <strong>of</strong><br />

Preventing Spreading <strong>of</strong> Oil Leaks in Ports (Official Gazette,<br />

10/95.) proscribes that a <strong>port</strong> user is obliged to prepare a special Act<br />

(rulebook) in which are set out protective and other measures on<br />

handling hazardous substances in the <strong>port</strong> or on certain area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>port</strong>. The Rulebook has to be approved by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Interior,<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Maritime Affairs, Trans<strong>port</strong> and Communication, the<br />

Harbourmaster’s <strong>of</strong>fice and the Directorate for the Environment.<br />

According to the Rulebook, handling hazardous substances is not<br />

allowed if the <strong>port</strong>, i.e. a part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> is not organized for handling<br />

those substances. The Rulebook provides common safety measures<br />

for handling hazardous substances in packed form, special safety<br />

measures for handling hazardous substances, handling explosive<br />

substances, handling polluting or infectious substances, corrosive and<br />

toxic substances.<br />

Intervention Plan in Case <strong>of</strong> Sudden Adriatic Sea Pollution in the<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia (OG, 8/97.) determines the measures for<br />

minimizing environmental damages resulting from sudden wide-range<br />

sea pollution, the subjects to be in charge <strong>of</strong> implementation and<br />

authorization <strong>of</strong> measures, as well as the manner <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

measures. In case <strong>of</strong> pollution <strong>of</strong> smaller range and intensity, the Plan<br />

foresees the issuing <strong>of</strong> County intervention plans.<br />

Intervention Plan in Case <strong>of</strong> Sudden Sea Pollution in the<br />

Dubrovacko-neretvanska County (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Dubrovacko-neretvanska County, 1/98) is to be applied in case the<br />

pollution threatens or presents a threat to the environment, health or<br />

economic exploitation <strong>of</strong> the sea within the territory <strong>of</strong> the Dubrovackoneretvanska<br />

County, or in case the pollution does not surpass the<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> the Dubrovacko – neretvanska County Headquarter.<br />

- Environmental Protection Act (Official Gazette, 82/84. and 128/99.)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 13<br />

- The Water Act (Official Gazette, 107/95.). Terms <strong>of</strong> the Act refer to<br />

the seawaters in regard to the land-based sources <strong>of</strong> pollution.<br />

- Water Classification Regulation (Official Gazette, 77/98) sets out<br />

types <strong>of</strong> water that meet quality requirements in respect <strong>of</strong> their<br />

general ecological function and their use for certain purposes. This<br />

applies also to the sea in respect <strong>of</strong> its pollution prevention from land.<br />

Pursuant this Regulation, water classification indicators are also<br />

applied to sea quality assessment immediately at outlets <strong>of</strong> all waste<br />

waters to be discharged in the sea, in order to abate sea water<br />

pollution from land-based sources.<br />

- Regulation on Hazardous Substances to Waters (Official Gazette,<br />

78/ 98) sets out the highest permissible concentration <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

hazardous substances in the sea.<br />

- National Water Protection Plan (Official Gazette, 8/99) the<br />

classification conveyed distinguished two types <strong>of</strong> sea:<br />

- second type - sea in the impact zone <strong>of</strong> waste water discharge from<br />

land-based sources;<br />

- first type - sea in specially protected and very sensitive areas.<br />

It can be concluded from the stated above that the sea at the Port <strong>of</strong><br />

Ploce area is classified in the second group.<br />

Regulation on Limit Values <strong>of</strong> Indices, Hazardous and Other<br />

Substances in Waste Water (Official Gazette, 40/99. and 6/2001.)<br />

sets out limit values <strong>of</strong> indices and permissible concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

hazardous and other substances in waste waters discharged into the<br />

sea.<br />

- According to Port Authorities Act (Official Gazette 124/97.) the<br />

harbourmaster’s <strong>of</strong>fice supervises the implementation <strong>of</strong> the law and<br />

other regulations which regulate the maintenance <strong>of</strong> order in the<br />

maritime domain which includes the sea pollution control from ships.<br />

According to Law on waters (Official Gazette, 197/05), the control <strong>of</strong><br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> pollution from land-based sources into the sea is within<br />

the competence <strong>of</strong> water management inspection <strong>of</strong> State Water<br />

Directorate.<br />

During utilisation <strong>of</strong> the container terminal, it shall be applied all measures<br />

originating from other laws, regulations, normative acts and standards in force<br />

in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia and that <strong>of</strong> international im<strong>port</strong>ance, prticularly the<br />

measures originating from th following laws, regulations and international<br />

agreements:<br />

• Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia (OG 41/02-consolidated text)<br />

• Declaration on Environmental Protection <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia<br />

(OG 34/92)<br />

• Physical Planning Act (OG 30/94, 68/98, 61/00, 32/02)<br />

• Nature Conservation Act (OG 30/94, 72/94, 73/97)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 14<br />

• Law on Protection and Preservation <strong>of</strong> Cultural Assets (OG 69/99,<br />

151/03 and 157/03)<br />

• Air Quality Protection Act (OG 48/95)<br />

• Natural Disaster Protection Act (OG 73/97)<br />

• Maritime Domain and Sea<strong>port</strong>s Act (OG 158/03)<br />

• Construction Act (OG 52/99, 75/99, 117/01 and 47/03)<br />

• Fire Protection Act (OG 58/93)<br />

• Waste Act (OG 34/95, 57/99, 75/99)<br />

• Public Utilities Act (OG 3/95, 70/97)<br />

• Act on Inflammable Liquids and Gases (OG 108/95)<br />

• Ordinance on Seawater Quality Standards on Beaches (OG 33/96)<br />

• Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (OG 34/97 i 37/97).<br />

• Ordinance on Protection <strong>of</strong> Buildings <strong>of</strong> Special Im<strong>port</strong>ance for the<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia (OG 6/00)<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Handling Hazardous Waste (OG<br />

53/96)<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Ports (OG 22/95)<br />

• Resolution on Classification <strong>of</strong> Special Purpose Ports (OG 38/96)<br />

• Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation (OG 59/00)<br />

• Regulation on Highest Permissible Noise Levels in Manned Working<br />

Environment (OG 37/90)<br />

• Waste Classification Ordinance (OG 27/96)<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Handling Waste (OG 123/97)<br />

• Ordinance on Packaging Waste Handling (OG 53/96)<br />

• List <strong>of</strong> expert institutions<br />

• List <strong>of</strong> specialized institutions authorized to issuing testing re<strong>port</strong>s on<br />

waste physical and chemical properties (OG 32/98)<br />

• Regulation on Maintaining Order in Ports (OG 91/94, 161/98)<br />

• Regulation on Inflammable Liquids (NN 54/99)<br />

• List <strong>of</strong> specialized institutions authorized to issuing testing re<strong>port</strong>s on<br />

waste physical and chemical properties (NN 32/98)<br />

• Protocol on Prevention and Elimination <strong>of</strong> Pollution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Mediterranean Sea by Dumping from Ships and Aircrafts or by<br />

Incineration in the Sea (OG-IT 17/98)<br />

• Protocol Concerning Cooperation in Combating Suppressing Pollution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean by Oil and Other Hazardous Substances in<br />

Cases <strong>of</strong> Emergency (OG, IT 12/93)<br />

• Protocol on Specially Protected Areas <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea (OG,<br />

IT 12/93)<br />

• UN Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea Convention (OG, IT 11/95)<br />

• Convention on Protection <strong>of</strong> Marine Environment and Coastal Area <strong>of</strong><br />

the Mediterranean (OG-IT 17/98)<br />

• International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and<br />

Cooperation <strong>of</strong> 1990 (OG-IT 2/97)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 15<br />

C.1.3.1.3. TRAFFIC IMPACT<br />

• International Convention on Intervention on High Seas in the Event <strong>of</strong><br />

Accidents or Threatened Accidents Resulting from Oil Pollution (OG-IT<br />

1/92)<br />

• International Convention on Establishment <strong>of</strong> International Oil Pollution<br />

Compensation Fund (OG-IT 1/92)<br />

• International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage<br />

(OG-IT 1/92)<br />

• International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals, publisher:<br />

International Chamber <strong>of</strong> Shipping, London 1996.<br />

• Convention on Prevention <strong>of</strong> Marine Pollution by Dumping (OG-IT<br />

3/95)<br />

ON LAND<br />

All vehicles that enter and leave the zone <strong>of</strong> the reconstructed landing place<br />

have to be equipped in conformity with the valid law.<br />

AT SEA<br />

C.1.3.1.4. NOISE<br />

All vessels arriving in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce have to respect the valid legal<br />

provisions.<br />

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY ACT (OG No. 59/96.)<br />

This Act regulates the requirements for the protection <strong>of</strong> workers employed in<br />

the technological process during INTERVENTION.<br />

By the detailed technological design, it shall be defined the means <strong>of</strong> work<br />

and procedures which, among other things, shall limit and emit the level <strong>of</strong><br />

noise and vibrations lower than allowed by applying basic rules <strong>of</strong> protection<br />

at work as well as special rules <strong>of</strong> protection at work.<br />

The work process shall be so planned, prepared and carried out that effective<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> employees as well as <strong>of</strong> the environment shall be achieved.<br />

DIRECTIVE ON PROTECTION OF WORKERS FROM THE RISKS<br />

RELATED TO EXPOSTURE TO NOISE (86/188/EEC)<br />

In the workplaces in which the daily cumulative dose <strong>of</strong> noise exceeds 85<br />

dBA, i.e. momentary (impulse) level <strong>of</strong> noise exceeds 140 dB, it shall be<br />

undertaken technical, technological, educational and organizational measures<br />

with the purpose <strong>of</strong> eliminating the risks for health or reduce them to<br />

minimum.<br />

REGULATION ON HIGHEST PERMISSIBLE NOISE LEVELS IN MANNED<br />

WORKING ENVIRONMENT (OG no. 37/90.)<br />

In conformity with this regulation, the highest allowed levels <strong>of</strong> noise are<br />

defined in:<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 16<br />

• external areas <strong>of</strong> the project location as well as within the area <strong>of</strong> project<br />

impact<br />

• closed working areas <strong>of</strong> INTERVENTION.<br />

A) External areas on the project location<br />

The stated location can be viewed as ZONE 4 with the following description:<br />

“OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL ZONE CONTAINING PUBLIC PURPOSE<br />

FACILITIES WITHIN THE CENTRAL URBAN AREA, ALONG THE HIGHWAY<br />

ZONE AND PRIMARY URBAN ROADS» with the highest allowed level <strong>of</strong><br />

noise:<br />

65 dBA . . . for day<br />

50 dBA . . . for night<br />

The above mentioned values should not be exceeded at limits <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project location.<br />

Since it is not known whether or not the actual state found in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

project impact satisfies the values <strong>of</strong> Zone 4 as stated in Table 3 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mentioned Rulebook (competent services have to carry out reliable systematic<br />

measurements), it shall be determined by implementation measures whether<br />

the “CONTAINER TERMINAL IN THE PORT OF PLOCE» PROJECT should<br />

meet the values in Table 3 or it shall be necessary to provide for and satisfy<br />

the found state by the detailed design by applying technical and technological<br />

measures.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> noise (sound pressure), which has to be adopted as a criterion<br />

during the elaboration <strong>of</strong> detailed designs <strong>of</strong> the PROJECT and which should<br />

not be exceeded, means the sound that emits fixed, incorporated equipment<br />

or trans<strong>port</strong>ation means in arrival and departure for no matter how long, is the<br />

environmental noise level L90 found or defined in Table 3, Zone 4, exceeded<br />

by 2 (two) dBA.<br />

By meeting the above stated requirements, the project environmental<br />

impact shall be solved with regard to the environmental noise pollution.<br />

B) Closed PROJECT working areas<br />

C.1.3.1.5 WASTE<br />

In the detailed design, physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> buildings with closed working<br />

areas shall be defined so that the penetration <strong>of</strong> noise originating from the<br />

technological process can be prevented meeting so the requirements stated in<br />

this Regulation.<br />

The following dispositions that regulate the waste management in both the<br />

naval traffic and <strong>port</strong> activities are in force in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia:<br />

• Waste Act (Official Gazette, 34/95.)<br />

• Act on Ratification <strong>of</strong> Convention on Control <strong>of</strong> Transboundary<br />

Movement <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal (Official<br />

Gazette – International Treaties, 3/94.)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 17<br />

• Waste Classification Regulation (Official Gazette 27/96.)<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Handling Waste (Official Gazette,<br />

123/97.)<br />

• Ordinance on Packaging Waste Handling (Official Gazette, 53/96.)<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Handling Hazardous Waste<br />

(Official Gazette, 32/98.)<br />

• List <strong>of</strong> special institutions authorized to issue re<strong>port</strong>s on testing<br />

physical and chemical properties <strong>of</strong> waste (National Gazette No.<br />

51/96 and 93/96).<br />

C.1.3.2 PLANS AND TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

PROTECTION<br />

C.1.3.2.1. AIR<br />

When adopted on the stat, i.e. international level, the regulations on<br />

prevention and reduction <strong>of</strong> air pollution from ships should be included in the<br />

Regulations on maintaining order and methods <strong>of</strong> using <strong>port</strong> facilities in the<br />

Ploce <strong>port</strong> area, in Article 21.<br />

SEA<br />

C.1.3.2.2. MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM FOR MINIMIZING ADVERSE<br />

IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT RESULTING FROM SUDDEN SEA<br />

POLLUTIONS<br />

It was empathized in the previous chapter that the greatest problem in the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> planned intervention represents the sea pollution by oil hydrocarbons.<br />

For the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, there exist a system for implementation <strong>of</strong> measures for<br />

reducing damages caused by sea pollution which includes: the control <strong>of</strong><br />

pollution occurrence, pollution information system, organizational chart with<br />

competences set out and tasks defined, organized actions <strong>of</strong> special<br />

companies for control and elimination <strong>of</strong> pollution, equipment and means for<br />

combating against pollution (ships cleaning, protective floating walls,<br />

skimmers, tanks, pumps, dispersants, etc.). The system is in the first place<br />

intended for prevention <strong>of</strong> sea pollution by oils, potentially the most im<strong>port</strong>ant<br />

pollutant <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

The existing system has to be not only maintained in respect to equipment<br />

and training <strong>of</strong> the staff participating in individual phases <strong>of</strong> combat against<br />

pollution occurrence and elimination but also has to undergo further<br />

development. For that reason, one <strong>of</strong> the larger tasks to be solved is:<br />

• Construction <strong>of</strong> the disposal system for oily water originating from<br />

ships in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 18<br />

This requirement cannot exclusively be connected with the construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the container terminal. However, the planned intervention, being a<br />

very im<strong>port</strong>ant project for the further development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Ploce should give an impulse to further development <strong>of</strong> the system for<br />

prevention <strong>of</strong> the sea pollution in this <strong>port</strong>.<br />

C.1.3.2.3. PROTECTIVE MEASURES AT LOADING, UNLOADING AND<br />

TRANSLOADING OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES<br />

Loading, unloading and transloading <strong>of</strong> packaged hazardous substances shall<br />

be carried out on the newly constructed container terminal. Even though the<br />

pollution by hazardous substances is not as frequent as by oils, great<br />

attention should be paid to this problem.<br />

One part <strong>of</strong> the container terminal should be specially organized for<br />

hazardous substances handling. Such a place should be so organized that<br />

damages caused by spilling or leakage <strong>of</strong> hazardous substances, could be<br />

successfully prevented/minimized. That includes provision <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Protective clothing for personnel<br />

• Empty vessels (barrels, containers…)<br />

• Absorbing material– sand, granulated clay, sawdust<br />

• Detergent<br />

• Accessories for collecting scattered or spilled substances<br />

• Sundry material – metal funnels, tools, adhesive labels for marking<br />

vessels containing hazardous substances<br />

• First aid means<br />

• Information devices (telephone, fax machine, mobile telephone, radio<br />

connection…).<br />

The area on which hazardous substances are handled has to be clean and<br />

accessible to intervention vehicles and protective means in case <strong>of</strong> danger<br />

and equipped with fire fighting hoses with international fire flange. Appropriate<br />

lighting <strong>of</strong> the area has to be provided at night.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> providing safe, timely and effective intervention measures,<br />

adequate organization system has to be established and procedures in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> unexpected events related to hazardous substances handling<br />

defined.<br />

Key elements for the establishment <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> emergency<br />

measures related to hazardous substances incidents are:<br />

• organization <strong>of</strong> the system that shall clearly define roles, responsibilities<br />

and capabilities <strong>of</strong> individual participants;<br />

• manner <strong>of</strong> planning, i.e. preparation <strong>of</strong> detailed and special plans for<br />

emergency measures implementation;<br />

• monitoring and keeping informed so that all incidents could be recorded,<br />

evaluated and monitored;<br />

• defined operative procedures;<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 19<br />

C.1.3.2.4. PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR PORT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND<br />

SUB-STATIONS<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> hydraulic oils and oils that contain hazardous substances such as<br />

polychlorinated biphenyl is not allowed for lubrication <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> mechanical<br />

equipment.<br />

Also, polychlorinated biphenyl transformer oil shall not be used in substations.<br />

We propose the sub-stations <strong>of</strong> dry cooling type.<br />

C.1.3.2.5. PROTECTIVE MEASURES – WASTE WATER<br />

• Construct distributing sewage system for sanitary-sewage waste<br />

water, rain waste water from the traffic and operative <strong>port</strong> surfaces and<br />

“clean” rain-ro<strong>of</strong> water.<br />

• Waste water originating from washing out traffic (road) and operative<br />

<strong>port</strong> surfaces, have to be purified in the traps – sedimentation<br />

chambers. Waste water at the outlet <strong>of</strong> the trap has to satisfy the<br />

following criteria: total suspended matter 20 mg/L, total oils and grease<br />

25 mg/L, mineral oils 5 mg/L.<br />

• Sanitary-sewage waste water has to be conducted into public sewage<br />

system <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

C.1.3.2.6. NOISE PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

Environmental protection in view <strong>of</strong> noise pollution can be performed by<br />

applying two types <strong>of</strong> measures:<br />

• TECHNOLOGICAL MEASURES<br />

• TECHNICAL MEASURES<br />

C.1.3.2.6.1. TECHNOLOGICAL MEASURES<br />

Technological measures that shall be taken against noise in the technological<br />

process during construction include the following:<br />

- Among different procedures <strong>of</strong> process development, particularly<br />

concerning goods handling during unloading, transloading, storing,<br />

shifting, etc. it should be selected the one that emits noise <strong>of</strong> lesser<br />

intensity.<br />

- Among the necessary machines and devices (cranes, transtainers, bridge<br />

cranes, tractors, container trans<strong>port</strong>ers, forklifts, etc.), the technology<br />

should be adjusted to machines and devices for which the bidder can<br />

prove that develop the least level <strong>of</strong> noise.<br />

- From the range <strong>of</strong> tools by which individual operations can be successfully<br />

accomplished, it should be selected those tools which, with correct use,<br />

emit the least noise. This particularly refers to tools that cause peak noise.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 20<br />

C.1.3.2.6.2. TECHNICAL MEASURES<br />

Technical measures by which technical means enabling normal development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the technological process during INTERVENTION, are protected against<br />

noise as follows:<br />

- all mechanical and other equipment that are used in the process<br />

development technology has to be in working order. Therefore the<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> equipment has to be very well organized;<br />

- the cooperation with trans<strong>port</strong> companies that shall perform trans<strong>port</strong> in<br />

arrival and departure shall be conditioned by their utilization <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

up-to-date trans<strong>port</strong> means (road and railway). It is <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

im<strong>port</strong>ance that electric towing is used for trans<strong>port</strong>ation by a railroad;<br />

- railway has to be <strong>of</strong> the most recent design including the protection<br />

against spreading <strong>of</strong> vibrations (structure noise);<br />

- road overpasses have to be provided with the elements against spreading<br />

<strong>of</strong> structure noise and vibrations;<br />

- it has to be foreseen the construction <strong>of</strong> noise barriers on specially<br />

sensitive points where noise emission above allowed values cannot be<br />

avoided (on exit ramps – road vehicle overpass, road and railway route<br />

sections behind residential buildings).<br />

The mentioned TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL MEASURES shall be<br />

elaborated in details in detailed and working civil engineering, architectural,<br />

technological, technical and traffic designs.<br />

C.1.3.2.7. WASTE PROTECTIVE MEASURES<br />

All hazardous waste developed in the <strong>port</strong> area has to collected separately.<br />

Separate storing facility for hazardous waste has to be provided.<br />

Hazardous material storing facility has to meet the prescribed technical<br />

and technological requirements:<br />

• separate waste storing by types has to be made possible;<br />

• storing facility has to be provided with a base from which bulk and<br />

spilled waste can be collected and with a waste water collection<br />

system;<br />

• storing facility has to be equipped with devices, equipment and<br />

information means for extinguishing and prevention <strong>of</strong> fire<br />

spreading;<br />

• waste storing facility has to be so equipped to prevent scattering and<br />

spilling <strong>of</strong> waste;<br />

• vehicle that trans<strong>port</strong>s the waste to the storing facility has to be so<br />

equipped to prevent scattering and spilling <strong>of</strong> waste.<br />

Packaging waste shall be collected separately and specially marked.<br />

Municipal and other similar waste shall be collected separately in special<br />

recipients, which shall be regularly emptied.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


PLANIRANI<br />

PLANIRANA<br />

PLANIRANI<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 4<br />

OBALA 5<br />

OBALA 3<br />

OBALA 6<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

OBALA 2<br />

OBALA 1<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

OBALA 0<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

C1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES<br />

SUBMARINE EXCAVATION<br />

C.1. MJERE ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA<br />

PODMORSKI ISKOP<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA)<br />

PORT AREA BOUNDARY (GRANICA LUCKOG PODRUCJA )<br />

STRATEŠKI STRATEGIC ROAD ROUTES (CESTOVNI PRAVCI )<br />

WATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FIRE ALARMS<br />

(VODA, TELEKOMUNIKACIJE, VATRODOJAVE)<br />

RAILWAY TRACK CORRIDOR (KOLOSIJECNI KORIDOR)<br />

EXCAVATION ZONE (PODRUCJE ISKOPA )<br />

EXCAVATED MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREA<br />

(PODRUCJE ZAODLAGANJE ISKOPANOG MATERIJALA)<br />

SL. 1


A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

SLUICE<br />

(ZAPORNICA)<br />

SLUICE<br />

(ZAPORNICA)<br />

SLUICE<br />

(ZAPORNICA)<br />

OBALA 4<br />

-15,0<br />

60 000 DWT<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 3<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 5<br />

V=200 000 m3<br />

P=74 800 m2<br />

V=200 000 m3<br />

P=71 500 m2<br />

V=200 000 m3<br />

P=68 300 m2<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

OBALA 2<br />

-11,0<br />

V=500 000 - 600 000 m3<br />

P=137 500 m2<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

gps<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

TS-15<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

interspeds−stocarnik<br />

intersped−stocarnik<br />

gps<br />

z<br />

vatrogasci<br />

zzzz<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

2179/2<br />

(4559/80)<br />

z<br />

z<br />

garaza<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

ts<br />

z z<br />

I<br />

z<br />

z<br />

cesta<br />

z<br />

" P L O B E S T "<br />

z<br />

z<br />

ts<br />

poslovni prostor − terminal za drvo<br />

II<br />

TS<br />

z<br />

cesta<br />

z<br />

2<br />

z<br />

z<br />

cesta za " PLOBEST "<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

2078/8<br />

z<br />

zz<br />

z<br />

cesta prema zracnoj luci<br />

z<br />

z<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

IZVEDENO<br />

z<br />

ts<br />

zeljeznicka stanica<br />

z<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

III<br />

30<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

32<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

petrolkoks<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

42<br />

" p l o b e s t "<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

44<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

607<br />

z z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

vaga<br />

8<br />

z<br />

z<br />

57<br />

radenska<br />

z z<br />

z z z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

59<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

61<br />

brodokomerc<br />

z<br />

83<br />

Betonirana povrsina<br />

WC<br />

luka−gradnja<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

9<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

z<br />

kartonplast<br />

81<br />

z<br />

85<br />

79<br />

ts<br />

C1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES<br />

- SUPPLEMENT<br />

SUBMARINE EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL AREA<br />

C.1. MJERE ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA - DOPUNA<br />

PODMORSKI ISKOP I DEPONIJA MATERIJALA<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:5000<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA)<br />

LINE OF EXISTING WATERFRONT (LINIJA POSTOJECE OBALE)<br />

LINE OF NEW WATERFRONT (LINIJA NOVE OBALE)<br />

EXISTING RAILWAYS (POSTOJECE ŽELJEZNICE)<br />

DESIGNED RAILWAYS (PROJEKTIRANE ŽELJEZNICE)<br />

EXISTING ROADS (POSTOJECE CESTE)<br />

DESIGNED ROADS (PROJEKTIRANE CESTE)<br />

FENCE (OGRADA)<br />

EXISTING STRUCTURES (POSTOJECI OBJEKTI)<br />

STORAGE AREAS (POVRŠINE ZA SKLADIŠTA)<br />

CONTAINER DISPOSAL AREAS (POVRŠINE ZA ODLAGANJE KONTEJNERA)<br />

GREEN AREAS (ZELENE POVRŠINE)<br />

STRUCTURES (OBJEKTI)<br />

TRERMINAL EXPANSION AREAS (POVRŠINE ZA ŠIRENJE TERMINALA)<br />

SUBMARINE EXCAVATION (PODMORSKI ISKOP) V=600 000m3<br />

SUBMARINE EXCAVATED MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREA<br />

(PODRUCJE ZA ODLAGANJE ISKOPANOG MATERIJALA)<br />

SL. 2


MJ 1:1000<br />

A B C D<br />

MJ 1:200<br />

A B<br />

V= 22 000 m3<br />

V= 197 250 m3<br />

C1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES<br />

CROSS SECTIONS<br />

C.1. MJERE ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA<br />

PRESJECI<br />

V= 22 000 m3<br />

SL. 3


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

C.2. PROPOSAL OF MEASURES FOR PREVENTION AND<br />

MITIGATION OF POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF<br />

ECOLOGICAL DISASTERS<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

The “Unintentional accidents” which can be classified in the “first<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> endangerment” can be mostly prevented by planned<br />

environmental protection measures and adequate <strong>port</strong> management,<br />

i.e. ecologic disasters caused by these accidnets can be reduced to<br />

minimum.<br />

Prevention <strong>of</strong> consequences caused by the “Unintentional accident”<br />

is possible and consequeces can be mitigated in a relatively short<br />

period. The unintentional accidents which cause the “first stage <strong>of</strong><br />

endangerment” can be mitigated by urgent actions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> staff.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most im<strong>port</strong>ant measures for mitigation <strong>of</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

ecologic disasters is to notify immediately the county information /<br />

monitoring center or harbour master’s <strong>of</strong>fice or police station during<br />

each even the least release <strong>of</strong> petroleum product and/or oil into the<br />

sea, so that the procedure for damage reduction could be applied. It is<br />

also necessary to remove the petroleum products and/oil from the sea<br />

surface and the land as soon as possible.<br />

The <strong>port</strong> has to be equipped with a plastic sprayer for dispersant <strong>of</strong> so<br />

called “third generation”, i.e. it should be included in the “eco-set” for<br />

decompositon <strong>of</strong> smaller quantities <strong>of</strong> petrolemum products that might<br />

spill in the accident.<br />

The Port <strong>authority</strong> has also to provide an operation boat for placement<br />

<strong>of</strong> a floating wall and shall apply the fire fighting measures. The Port<br />

has to be equipped with a mobile foam and powder fire extinguishing<br />

devices in case <strong>of</strong> fire and/or explosion in the <strong>port</strong>. Plan <strong>of</strong> activities in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the fire or explosion has to be applied immediately.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> more serious accidents, i.e. the accidents that give rise to<br />

the “second stage <strong>of</strong> endangerment”, the mitigation <strong>of</strong><br />

consequences is in conformity with county plans <strong>of</strong> water protection,<br />

i.e. environmental protection.<br />

In principle, occurrence <strong>of</strong> accidents and ecologic disasters caused by<br />

“force majeure” cannot be prevented and it takes more time to<br />

mitigate the consequences.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong> 1<br />

C.3. ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PROGRAM<br />

C.3.1. SEA<br />

C.3.2. TRAFFIC IMPACT<br />

C.3.3. WASTE<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong> 2<br />

C.3.1. SEA<br />

During the construction and later the use <strong>of</strong> the terminal, it shall be necessary<br />

to monitor the state <strong>of</strong> the environment for timely discovering <strong>of</strong> possible<br />

unfavourable and undesirable impacts so that additional measures <strong>of</strong><br />

environment protection could be applied. The following environment<br />

monitoring program is proposed:<br />

C.3.1.1. After the construction <strong>of</strong> the facility, the state <strong>of</strong> life communities in the<br />

existing transects should be monitored in the years to come and the obtained<br />

results should be compared with those obtained before the construction.<br />

Regular controls should be carried out every four years for continuous<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> the macrobenthonic organisms colonization process and<br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> bottom-dwelling communities in the transect PL-01 I PL-02.<br />

C.3.1.2. Testing the waste water quality at the outlet <strong>of</strong> the treatment plant SZV 1<br />

for oily water coming from the machine maintenance plant shall be<br />

performed four times a year by the laboratory authorized for water quality<br />

testing (Rule on authorized laboratories, OG No. 78/97. The analysis shall<br />

include the determination <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />

• pH,<br />

• total suspended matter,<br />

• chemical oxygen consumption,<br />

• biochemical oxygen consumption,<br />

• overall and mineral oils,<br />

• anionized and unionized detergents.<br />

C.3.1.3 Testing <strong>of</strong> water quality at the outlet <strong>of</strong> the grease trap – sedimentation<br />

chamber SOK 1 and SOK 2, precipitation sewers, shall be performed four<br />

times a year. The analysis shall include the following:<br />

• pH,<br />

• total suspended matter,<br />

• chemical oxygen consumption,<br />

• biochemical oxygen consumption,<br />

• overall and mineral oils.<br />

C.3.1.4 Testing <strong>of</strong> sea water quality shall be carried out on two stations:<br />

• KV 1 within the basin between coast 5 and coast 7<br />

• KV 2 at the basin outlet between the coast 5 and coast 7<br />

two times during summer months in bottom-dwelling and surface sea<br />

layer.<br />

The following indexes <strong>of</strong> water quality should be determined:<br />

• clearness<br />

• temperature<br />

• salinity<br />

• dissolved oxygen<br />

• PH<br />

• mineral oils,<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong> 3<br />

• ammoniac,<br />

• bacteriological tests (indicators <strong>of</strong> fecal discharges contamination).<br />

Sea water quality should be checked:<br />

• Before beginning <strong>of</strong> construction (“zero state”)<br />

• Every year during exploitation.<br />

C.3.2.1.5. The state <strong>of</strong> sea bottom sediments should be monitored:<br />

- on the station PLS-01<br />

- on the station PLS-02<br />

It should be examined the content <strong>of</strong> heavy metals in the surface layer <strong>of</strong><br />

sediments (0-2cm) such as:<br />

• Lead<br />

• Copper<br />

• Zinc<br />

• Tin<br />

• Polycyclic aromaten Policiklièkih aromatena<br />

Samples should be taken and checked:<br />

C.3.2. TRAFFIC IMPACT<br />

C.3.2.1. ON LAND<br />

C.3.2.2 . ON SEA<br />

C.3.3 WASTE<br />

• Every two years during exploitation.<br />

Prepare and publish a re<strong>port</strong> on the state <strong>of</strong> traffic means<br />

equipment twice a year, particularly concerning the state <strong>of</strong> drive<br />

engines in respect <strong>of</strong> the quantity <strong>of</strong> waste oil and lubricants and<br />

exhaust gases.<br />

Prepare the regulatory measures program for the case <strong>of</strong> an emergency<br />

during arrival and departure <strong>of</strong> the ship from the berth as well as while the<br />

vessel is on the berth.<br />

Publish yearly re<strong>port</strong> on emergency cases on the landing place – the<br />

vessel on the berth, the vessel in arrival and in departure.<br />

Prepare and publish yearly re<strong>port</strong>s on measurements <strong>of</strong> wind wave<br />

climate on that location.<br />

Prepare and publish twice a year a re<strong>port</strong> on the management <strong>of</strong> all<br />

types <strong>of</strong> waste out <strong>of</strong> the technological process and mud out <strong>of</strong> waste water<br />

treatment process at the container terminal location.<br />

Provide the adequacy certificate once a year.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


KV 2 PLS-02<br />

KV 1<br />

PL-02<br />

SOK 1<br />

PLS-01<br />

PL-01<br />

SOK 2<br />

SZV 1<br />

C3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES<br />

POSITION OF CONTROL MEASURING POINTS<br />

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING<br />

C3. MJERE ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA<br />

POLOŽAJ KONTROLNIH MJERNIH TOCAKA<br />

ZA PRACENJE STANJA OKOLIŠA<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

TRANSECTIONS PL01 AND PL02 (TRANSEKTI PL01 I PL02 )<br />

CONTROL POINTS OF SEA BOTTOM SEDIMENT STATE PLS1 AND PLS2<br />

TOCKE KONTROLE STANJA SEDIMENATA MORSKOG DNA PLS1 I PLS2<br />

SEA QUALITY TEST POINTS KV1 AND KV2<br />

TOCKE ISPITIVANJA KAKVOCE MORA KV1 I KV2<br />

PRECIPITATION INTERCEPTORS SOK1 AND SOK2<br />

SEPARATORI OBORINSKIH VODA SOK1 I SOK2<br />

WORKSHOP WATER INTERCEPTORS SZV1<br />

SEPARATOR RADIONICKIH VODA SZV1<br />

SL. 2


IRANA<br />

PLANIRANI<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 4<br />

60 000 DWT<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

OBALA 5<br />

TS-15<br />

OBALA 3<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 2<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

OBALA 1<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

OBALA 0<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

C3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES<br />

POSITION OF CONTROL MEASURING POINTS<br />

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING<br />

C3. MJERE ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA<br />

POLOŽAJ KONTROLNIH MJERNIH TOCAKA<br />

ZA PRACENJE STANJA OKOLIŠA<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

NOISE MEASURING POINTS<br />

POINT COORDINATION TABLE<br />

POINT X Y<br />

B1 6454379.981 4767358.841<br />

B2 6454362.166 4766966.719<br />

B3 6453762.141 4766647.141<br />

SL. 2 a


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong> 1<br />

C.4. ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION POLICY OF THE<br />

INTERVENTION HOLDER<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong> 2<br />

The government <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia (O.G. 42/96) established the Ploce<br />

<strong>port</strong> <strong>authority</strong> on May 23, 1996 on the basis <strong>of</strong> the Decision on the Ploce <strong>port</strong><br />

<strong>authority</strong> establishment.<br />

During its term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice, the Port <strong>authority</strong> got prepared the documents which<br />

are in the phase <strong>of</strong> adoption. These documents regulate some relations<br />

between the corporation and environmental protection.<br />

• The Book on determination <strong>of</strong> the type and quantity <strong>of</strong> dangerous<br />

substances with which the manipulation at the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce is<br />

possible, i.e. with which the vessel can enter the <strong>port</strong> and places in the<br />

<strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce on which these substances shall be manipulated.<br />

• The Book on the measures which have to be undertaken by the Ploce<br />

Port <strong>authority</strong> and the users <strong>of</strong> the concessions in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

enabling them to manipulate with dangerous substances.<br />

The bellow mentioned studies, which in some parts deal with the problem <strong>of</strong><br />

environment protection, are made for the needs <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce. These<br />

materials shall naturally be used by both the public company Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

and the Ploce Port <strong>authority</strong>.<br />

• Ports <strong>of</strong> Rijeka and Ploce, Economic and technical study, financial<br />

audit and institutional assistance; S<strong>of</strong>remer, Apis, France, January<br />

1997.<br />

• Ploce-Sarajevo intermodal corridor-feasibility study, Manalyti cs<br />

International Inc., Gary greene engineers<br />

Presently it can be noticed positive efforts <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>authority</strong> in “turning a<br />

new page” in respect <strong>of</strong> its relation towards the environment by applying the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> environmental protection which are regulated by the existing<br />

jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia and at the same time by respecting the<br />

international conventions which the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia is the signatory. An<br />

im<strong>port</strong>ant element <strong>of</strong> such estimation is the contracting <strong>of</strong> the PUO study<br />

elaboration for the foreseen intervention within the <strong>port</strong> basin.<br />

The further obligation <strong>of</strong> the Port <strong>authority</strong> is the construction, management<br />

and usage <strong>of</strong> the future container terminal as well as <strong>of</strong> other specialized <strong>port</strong><br />

terminals, which also implies the environment management. To make the<br />

management successful, the following steps shall be undertaken determining:<br />

1. Environment management policy<br />

• readiness for upgrading the performances <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> terminals in<br />

relation to the environment;<br />

• establishment <strong>of</strong> a team for project management;<br />

• obligatory elaboration <strong>of</strong> the existing state basis with respect to the<br />

environment and management and application <strong>of</strong> adequate<br />

protective measures.<br />

2. Review <strong>of</strong> the environmental state– which makes an initial picture <strong>of</strong><br />

the existing container terminal and represents a basis for development<br />

<strong>of</strong> adequate environment management programs.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong> 3<br />

3. Environment management program– is a summary but also a<br />

complete management plan by which goals and purpose <strong>of</strong> operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the container terminal are coordinated with corresponding<br />

requirements and needs <strong>of</strong> environmental protection.<br />

4. Revision – For achieved results in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Program,<br />

it shall be requested the certificates <strong>of</strong> the authorized and supervisory<br />

institutions. The Environment Statement or Certificate for<br />

improvements achieved in the environment impact in all the parts and<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> the container terminal should primarily refer to:<br />

• nature conservation<br />

• water resource management<br />

• waste management<br />

• energy efficiency and purchasing policies<br />

• education and the working environment<br />

• communications and public awareness.<br />

The goals that are intended to be reached in the management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Ploce are coordinated with the targets that achieve the neighboring Adriatic<br />

<strong>port</strong>s.<br />

The principles <strong>of</strong> active public relations and respecting all standards that are<br />

prescribed by legal provisions in the area <strong>of</strong> environmental protection are still<br />

the themes which the management bodies <strong>of</strong> the Ploce Port <strong>authority</strong> should<br />

adopt.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

C.5. PRESENTATION OF THE PLANNED MODE OF COOPERATION<br />

OF INTERVENTION HOLDER WITH THE PUBLIC<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

The procedure <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact <strong>of</strong> the planned<br />

intervention is carried out during the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project and in the<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> obtaining the location permit on the basis <strong>of</strong> technical documents,<br />

i.e. this Sturdy. The public participates also in the Sturdy evaluation by making<br />

the Sturdy available to them and acquainting them with intended construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the container terminal as well as with all im<strong>port</strong>ant data concerning<br />

environmental protection. By submitting written opinion, proposals and<br />

remarks, the public participates in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the intervention as well as<br />

in its implementation <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

By introducing the monitoring, an active public cooperation shall be<br />

established which should be strengthened by regular public presentation <strong>of</strong><br />

results obtained by measuring the environment quality.<br />

It is proposed that the intervention holder gives a press conference at least<br />

once a year presenting the implemented program to the public as well as its<br />

short and long term plans.<br />

After implementation <strong>of</strong> the intervention and during its exploitation, it would be<br />

appropriate to conduct regularly once a year a poll among the inhabitants,<br />

immediate neighbors inquiring their satisfaction with the achieved state, i.e.<br />

their proposals for its improvement.<br />

In conformity with the notes <strong>of</strong> this Study, we conducted informative talks with<br />

the intervention holder concerning the mode <strong>of</strong> cooperation with the public. In<br />

spite <strong>of</strong> our insistence, we did not succeed in finding out if, and which if<br />

affirmative, systematic steps had been taken for cooperation with the public.<br />

We would like to point out that the intervention holder should disclose its<br />

standpoint very soon and present the plan <strong>of</strong> cooperation and its<br />

implementation.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

D. STUDY CONCLUSION<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

D.1. EXPLANATION OF MOST SUITABLE PROJECT<br />

ALTERNATIVE<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

The main objective <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> container terminal in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

is renewal, modernization and extension <strong>of</strong> cargo handling capacities and their<br />

furnishing with modern equipment <strong>of</strong> high technical efficiency and<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> work organization which is the basis <strong>of</strong> the future <strong>port</strong><br />

development.<br />

This particularly refers to transit <strong>of</strong> goods from catchment areas and the return<br />

<strong>of</strong> general cargoes which are most cost-effective in terms <strong>of</strong> income, but<br />

because <strong>of</strong> bad technological equipment <strong>of</strong> our <strong>port</strong>s they are handled by<br />

better equipped and organized European <strong>port</strong>s.<br />

The project contractor Lucka Uprava Ploce (the Ploce Port Authority) proceeds<br />

with the construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal with capacity 100 000 TEU a<br />

year in the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce because the old <strong>port</strong> basin, intended for the line traffic<br />

with the use <strong>of</strong> the traditional technology, has gradually lost its classic traffic<br />

value and needs to be modernized.<br />

During the construction <strong>of</strong> the new container terminal with capacity 100 000<br />

TEU in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce the following will be constructed within the existing <strong>port</strong><br />

area:<br />

• A new Quay No. 7 with mooring structure 340 m in length which will be<br />

used for receiving ships with highest maritime requirements, with cargo<br />

capacity up to 60,000 DWT and deep draft without restrictions. On<br />

planned Quay No. 7 one ship with mentioned cargo capacity or two<br />

ships half the size can be berthed simultaneously;<br />

• Deepening <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> basin between the Quay 5 and the new Quay 7;<br />

• New storage and cargo-handling areas about 22 ha which will be used<br />

as open storages for the container terminal with capacity about 100,000<br />

TEU a year;<br />

• Ro-Ro ramps with part <strong>of</strong> the Quay No. 6 for receiving Ro-Ro ships;<br />

• Roads and railways at the terminal;<br />

• Infrastructure facilities at the terminal: water supply, sewerage, electric<br />

power supply and telecommunications;<br />

• Covered storage area at the terminal;<br />

• Auxiliary terminal structures, entrance with shelter, control tower,<br />

auxiliary workshops and the auxiliary entrance to the terminal.<br />

The most suitable alternative <strong>of</strong> this project shall be determined by the design<br />

solution which defines the most favourable system <strong>of</strong> construction at sea for<br />

obtaining the new <strong>port</strong> areas and the most favourable system and method <strong>of</strong><br />

construction <strong>of</strong> new storages and cargo-handling areas for open container<br />

storages.<br />

Planned project includes also the proposal for the connection <strong>of</strong> container<br />

terminal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce to the primary state roads and railways, new<br />

organization <strong>of</strong> the traffic in the <strong>port</strong> basin.<br />

The details <strong>of</strong> this task, such as the choice <strong>of</strong> equipment and its technical and<br />

technological characteristics, are determined by the designs.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

The project can be realized in stages depending on the investment plans and<br />

the potentials <strong>of</strong> the project contractor and also by respecting all technical and<br />

technological conditions <strong>of</strong> a stage.<br />

The proposed project alternative is suitable for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons, the<br />

following ones being also the most im<strong>port</strong>ant:<br />

• The planning documentation which proclaims the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

to be <strong>of</strong> im<strong>port</strong>ance on the state, county and town level is<br />

unquestionable.<br />

• It is indisputable that newly built capacities are not a new burden<br />

on the location, but that this is a realization <strong>of</strong> capacities in the<br />

<strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce foreseen by plan and for these capacities the <strong>port</strong><br />

area has been formed and reserved by the plan.<br />

By analyzing the possible environmental impacts it can be concluded that the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the new Container terminal in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce in the existing<br />

and planned <strong>port</strong>, trans<strong>port</strong> and industrial zone will at the same time mean an<br />

improvement on the existing situation in the central and wider surroundings <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>port</strong> area:<br />

• the <strong>port</strong> basin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce will develop more significantly in its<br />

central part which will enable a part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> to qualify for receiving <strong>of</strong> big<br />

ships up to 60,000 DWT which essentially improves the competitive ability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong><br />

• simultaneous construction <strong>of</strong> the line <strong>of</strong> communication from the entrance<br />

to the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce and connection to the Adriatic Highway, which will be<br />

grade-separated in relation to the railway will enable fast and uninterrupted<br />

trans<strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> cargo from the town by the shortest way<br />

• notable development <strong>of</strong> modern and technically better equipped and<br />

developed <strong>port</strong> basin between the Quay 5 and Quay 7, as well as the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> Quay 7 in the central part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce will greatly<br />

improve the entire ecological situation and visual outlook <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong><br />

The existing ecological situation in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce is improved by<br />

the construction <strong>of</strong> the container terminal as proposed in this<br />

Study.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

D.2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

IMPACT DURING PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND<br />

USE OF PROJECT, INCLUDING ALSO ECOLOGICAL<br />

INCIDENT AND RISK OF ITS OCCURRENCE<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

D.2.1. OVERVIEW OF POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

D.2.1.1 ON LAND<br />

D.2.1.2 ON SEA<br />

With selected method <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> coastal areas, by dredging the sea<br />

bottom between the Quay 5 (existing) and Quay 7 (new) the environmental impact<br />

during construction is partially reduced. The work in stages and the lengthiness <strong>of</strong><br />

construction according to the chosen concept and the technology <strong>of</strong> building,<br />

does not bring about the additional environmental impacts.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> construction work mud silting <strong>of</strong> the sea shall occur, especially during<br />

deepening <strong>of</strong> the local waters for achieving the necessary depth <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> basin.<br />

Increased quantity <strong>of</strong> suspended matter in the water column shall be reflected in<br />

reduced quantity <strong>of</strong> light needed by algae for assimilation. Since all this is taking<br />

place on already degraded sea bottom, new activities shall not (further) degrade<br />

the current state.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

D.2.2. OVERVIEW OF POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING<br />

PROJECT USE<br />

D.2.2.1 POSSIBLE CHANGE OF MICROCLIMATIC CONDITIONS<br />

With regard to the type and size <strong>of</strong> the project <strong>of</strong> the container terminal<br />

construction, no changes or effect on the microclimate are expected.<br />

D.2.2.2 POSSIBLE IMPACT ON NATURAL SEA AND LAND ECOSYSTEM<br />

D.2.2.2.1 LAND<br />

D.2.2.2.2 SEA<br />

IMPACT ON PROTECTED VALUES OF THE AREA<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the Container terminal in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, which is located in<br />

the middle <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, does not increase the impact on<br />

the <strong>port</strong> surroundings.<br />

The <strong>port</strong> area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, which is located next to the im<strong>port</strong>ant<br />

landscape, today too has strictly defined boundaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> area so that the<br />

protected parts <strong>of</strong> the environment can be preserved to a maximum degree.<br />

Within the scope <strong>of</strong> planned construction <strong>of</strong> the Container terminal facility,<br />

deepening <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> basin shall be executed by excavation <strong>of</strong> the sediment to a<br />

specific depth. The new construction shall represent nothing new in the local<br />

waters <strong>of</strong> the basin between the Quay 5 and Quay 7, i.e. something that was not<br />

already done within the regular maintenance <strong>of</strong> the depth <strong>of</strong> the basin and the<br />

waterway.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> Quays 7 and 6 will improve the existing picture <strong>of</strong> untended<br />

shallow shores with a number <strong>of</strong> above water and underwater tufa, since<br />

inorganic and organic material shall no longer be collected on the shore.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> the waterway and depth increase shall favourably affect the sea<br />

changes within and around the local waters.<br />

D.2.2.3 POSSIBLE CHANGES IN ASSIGNMENT OF LAND USE<br />

CHANGES IN PURPOSE OF AREA USE<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the Container terminal and development <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

for handling and storage <strong>of</strong> containers shall not have a negative impact on<br />

other structures and their amenities in this area, no will they affect their<br />

functioning since the biggest part <strong>of</strong> the project is planned within the<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> the present <strong>port</strong> area, while the extension <strong>of</strong> cargo-handling<br />

area shall be obtained by developing already existing <strong>port</strong> area. All these<br />

interventions are in accordance with the applicable physical plans.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

AESTHETIC OUTLOOK AND VISUAL IMPACT ON THE PORT OUTLOOK<br />

In all plans the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce is the second major state <strong>port</strong>. The construction <strong>of</strong><br />

the Container terminal in the <strong>port</strong> is only one stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>port</strong> development and<br />

modernization which will not affect the present outlook <strong>of</strong> this area since the<br />

aesthetic atmosphere <strong>of</strong> the natural and untouched area in the Neretva delta on<br />

the sea shores has been permanently lost long time ago.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the new Container terminal with extension <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> handling<br />

area for container storage will actually improve the existing, in the aesthetic terms<br />

quite ugly, picture <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> basin the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, and with careful new<br />

construction, with the emphasis on the choice <strong>of</strong> colours, the visual outlook <strong>of</strong> this<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce should also be substantially improved.<br />

D.2.2.4 POSSIBLE CHANGES IN QUALITY OF AIR, SEA, CHANGES CAUSED BY<br />

NOISE IMPACT, IN NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN CASE OF<br />

ECOLOGICAL INCIDENTS<br />

D.2.2.4.1. AIR<br />

D.2.2.4.2. SEA<br />

D.2.2.4.3. WASTE<br />

D.2.2.4.4 NOISE<br />

Transshipment <strong>of</strong> containers shall take place at the Container terminal. In<br />

handling this type <strong>of</strong> cargo there is no additional air pollution, such as with dry bulk<br />

and bulk cargo.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the distance, the impact on housing settlements <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

is negligible.<br />

Starting from the fact that planned project is foreseen in a rather degraded<br />

industrial and <strong>port</strong> area, that foreseen <strong>port</strong> activities do not include cargoes with<br />

are most problematic or big danger <strong>of</strong> sea pollution connected with them, by<br />

taking specific measures <strong>of</strong> protection, this project is acceptable from the aspect<br />

<strong>of</strong> sea protection against pollution.<br />

According to their origin and properties, the waste materials which occur in the<br />

<strong>port</strong> can be very different, but can generally be classified in two categories: a)<br />

hazardous waste and b) other waste substances. Handling <strong>of</strong> waste substances<br />

which occur in the <strong>port</strong> today is carried out on the basis and in compliance with<br />

legal provisions and <strong>port</strong> rules.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> waste and waste handling remain the same.<br />

Noise occurring during the use <strong>of</strong> the Container terminal shall not have any<br />

substantial impact on the environment since the terminal location is situated in the<br />

middle <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> area on the outside towards the sea. Distances from the town<br />

are well over 1500 m.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

D.2.2.4.5 TRAFFIC IMPACT<br />

ON LAND<br />

The new traffic organization is not expected to increase the environmental impact,<br />

but rather the reduction <strong>of</strong> such impact. We make this conclusion on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

the fact that cargo will be handled and trans<strong>port</strong>ed much more rationally which is<br />

also the basic objective <strong>of</strong> this newly built structure.<br />

ON SEA<br />

Newly built Quay 7 <strong>of</strong> the Container terminal shall affect the safety <strong>of</strong> putting in<br />

and out <strong>of</strong> the basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce. Additional<br />

procedures for safety <strong>of</strong> navigation upon entering this basin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

shall have to be prescribed.<br />

D.2.2.5. POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IN CASE OF ECOLOGICAL<br />

INCIDENTS WITH ASSESSMENT OF RISK OCCURRENCE<br />

Occasional incidents can be expected, but very rarely and with brief time<br />

exposure to adverse effect <strong>of</strong> moderate strength, and generally an extent <strong>of</strong><br />

such a risk can be graded as an “acceptable extent <strong>of</strong> risk”.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

D.3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES, DURING<br />

PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF<br />

PROJECT, INCLUDING ALSO ECOLOGICAL INCIDENT<br />

AND RISK OF ITS OCCURRENCE<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

During the construction and use <strong>of</strong> the Container terminal it is necessary to<br />

avoid and reduce to the tolerable degree all adverse environmental effects.<br />

D.3.1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES DURING<br />

CONSTRUCTION PLANNING<br />

In the preliminary stage <strong>of</strong> realization <strong>of</strong> the container terminal construction,<br />

and before obtaining the building permit, a number <strong>of</strong> studies and designs have<br />

to be organized and made.<br />

• The provisions <strong>of</strong> regulations <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia have to be<br />

applied and implemented throughout the projects in all stages as well<br />

as the provisions <strong>of</strong> international regulations and conventions which<br />

refer to air and sea pollution, waste management, noise impact and<br />

safety <strong>of</strong> traffic on land and sea.<br />

D.3.1.1. REDUCTION OF NEGATIVE IMPACT ON SAFETY OF MARITIME<br />

TRAFFIC<br />

The Maritime study has to be made prior to issuing <strong>of</strong> the building permit:<br />

Procedure and safety <strong>of</strong> putting the 60,000 DWT ship from the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce<br />

in the basin between the Quay 5 and Quay 7.<br />

D.3.1.2. REDUCTION OF NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON SEA QUALITY<br />

Before issuing the preliminary approval or the building permit:<br />

D.3.1.2.1 Making <strong>of</strong> the design for installations on land for disposal <strong>of</strong> oily water from the<br />

ships in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

D.3.1.2.2. The existing specialized company must be made completely qualified for<br />

receiving waste oils from the ships.<br />

D.3.1.2.3. Making and adoption <strong>of</strong> the detailed plan <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the system for<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> measures towards the reduction <strong>of</strong> environmental damage<br />

caused by sudden pollutions in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

D.3.1.2.4. Making <strong>of</strong> the design for the system for emptying and cleaning wagons and<br />

trucks with controlled removal <strong>of</strong> waste and oily waters and their treatment for<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

D.3.1.2.5. Making <strong>of</strong> the design <strong>of</strong> oily water sewerage <strong>of</strong> the plant for maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>port</strong> mechanical equipment and trans<strong>port</strong> means so that all oily water is<br />

treated on the separator-settling tank before disposal into the sea.<br />

D.3.1.2.6. Making <strong>of</strong> the design for the sewage system <strong>of</strong> the container terminal as a<br />

separate sewage system for sanitary-foul waste water, precipitation waste<br />

water from traffic and operational <strong>port</strong> surfaces and “clean” precipitation - ro<strong>of</strong><br />

water.<br />

D.3.1.2.7. Elaboration <strong>of</strong> the design which will define the organization and procedures in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> unforeseen developments which relate to handling hazardous<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

substances. The design should define: the system organization, preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

plans for implementation <strong>of</strong> emergency measures, monitoring and re<strong>port</strong>ing,<br />

place for keeping hazardous substances, operational procedures and training<br />

and instructing <strong>of</strong> personnel.<br />

D.3.1.2.8. Construction <strong>of</strong> the first stage <strong>of</strong> the sewage system <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Ploce.<br />

D.3.1.2.9. The following studies have to be made in the designing stage.<br />

• Environmental management policy<br />

• Overview <strong>of</strong> the environmental situation<br />

• Environmental management programme<br />

D.3.1.2.10. Transformer stations have to be designed for dry cooling.<br />

D.3.1.2.11. The main designs for obtaining the building permit should provide the<br />

technological solutions for mechanical and other equipment so that under<br />

normal circumstances the minimum sound power levels are emitted.<br />

D.3.1.2.12. Measures for the protection <strong>of</strong> visual identity have to be implemented through<br />

main designs, such as:<br />

• during designing special attention should be paid to the aesthetic<br />

outlook <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong>, particularly <strong>of</strong> the view from the sea <strong>of</strong> the urban<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the town in the background, with special emphasis on the<br />

physical structure <strong>of</strong> the cargo <strong>port</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> the design and the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> colours and shades for all <strong>port</strong> elements (quay and cargohandling<br />

area, all buildings and all cargo-handling facilities), whereby<br />

grey colour and colours and shades to it should be excluded<br />

• making <strong>of</strong> the “Landscaping design”<br />

• the design should determine the method <strong>of</strong> surface finish <strong>of</strong> structures,<br />

quays and quay aprons<br />

• the main design should explore and determine the most favourable<br />

location for disposal <strong>of</strong> surplus construction material<br />

• the “Site organization and constructional plant maintenance design”<br />

should be made as a separate design within the scope <strong>of</strong> the design<br />

needed for obtaining the building permit<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

D.3.2. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES DURING<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

D.3.2.1. REDUCTION OF NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF NOISE<br />

Implement measures for protection against effects <strong>of</strong> increased noise level:<br />

• Obtaining <strong>of</strong> opinion and approval from the competent inspection<br />

authorities for all construction works which by nature <strong>of</strong> their<br />

technological procedure and process have to be carried out continually<br />

during the day and night (and holiday).<br />

• Restriction <strong>of</strong> daily execution <strong>of</strong> works, primarily from 6 to 23 hours.<br />

• In the construction stage, the contractor has to meet the general<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> project location protection against spreading <strong>of</strong> site noise<br />

(restriction <strong>of</strong> emitted sound power which the contractor’s equipment is<br />

allowed to have).<br />

• The contractor is under obligation to prepare the site organization<br />

schedule with clear and articulate bill <strong>of</strong> quantities and specifications for<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> environmental protection measures according to<br />

established criteria which will have to be met during construction, all in<br />

accordance with regulations, conventions and other provisions.<br />

• Supervision during execution <strong>of</strong> works, not only the technical<br />

supervision, but also periodical or permanent supervision by inspection<br />

authorities during noise measurements performed by authorized<br />

companies.<br />

• Cooperation with trans<strong>port</strong> companies which will perform trans<strong>port</strong><br />

both on arrival and departure, should be conditioned to include the most<br />

modern trans<strong>port</strong> means (both road and railway ones).<br />

D.3.2.2. REDUCTION OF NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF WASTE<br />

Implement measures for protection against effects <strong>of</strong> waste during<br />

construction:<br />

• Packaging waste should be collected separately and distinctly marked.<br />

• Municipal and other similar waste should be collected in specialpurpose<br />

containers and regularly trans<strong>port</strong>ed.<br />

D.3.2.3. REDUCTION OF NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF SEA EXCAVATION<br />

Material obtained by submarine excavation for deepening <strong>of</strong> the <strong>port</strong> basin<br />

between Quay 5 and Quay 7 should be disposed <strong>of</strong> in <strong>port</strong> area, on the<br />

location <strong>of</strong> the container terminal and on areas designed for further <strong>port</strong><br />

development.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

D.3.3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES DURING USE<br />

The user <strong>of</strong> quays and <strong>of</strong> the terminal is under obligation to prepare the<br />

technological plan <strong>of</strong> development and organization <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> quay apron and<br />

quays with clear and articulate bill <strong>of</strong> quantities and specifications for<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> environmental protection measures according to<br />

established criteria which will have to be met during construction, all in<br />

accordance with regulations, conventions and other provisions:<br />

D.3.3.1. IMPLEMENT MEASURES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST EFFECTS OF<br />

INCREASED NOISE LEVEL<br />

• Implementation <strong>of</strong> architectural measures for noise protection by<br />

technological arrangement <strong>of</strong> cargo (containers) and cargo-handling<br />

equipment so that they with their dimensions represent suitably located<br />

barrier against spreading <strong>of</strong> noise from strongest sources (here, it is the<br />

noise coming from road and railway trans<strong>port</strong>).<br />

• The technology should be adjusted to machines and devices for which the<br />

bidder can prove to develop the lowest levels <strong>of</strong> noise emission.<br />

• Cooperation with trans<strong>port</strong> companies which will perform trans<strong>port</strong> both on<br />

arrival and departure, should be conditioned to include the most modern<br />

trans<strong>port</strong> means (both road and railway ones).<br />

• All mechanical and other equipment which is used in the technological<br />

process must be in working order.<br />

D.3.3.2. IMPLEMENT MEASURES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST EFFECTS OF<br />

WASTE<br />

• All hazardous waste emerging in the <strong>port</strong> area has to be collected<br />

separately and separate storage which has to meet the prescribed<br />

technical and technological conditions must be provided for it.<br />

• Packaging waste should be collected separately and distinctly marked.<br />

• Municipal and other similar waste should be collected in special-purpose<br />

containers and regularly trans<strong>port</strong>ed.<br />

D.3.3.3. IMPLEMENT MEASURES FOR PREVENTION AND ALLEVIATION OF<br />

CONSEQUENCES OF POSSIBLE ECOLOGICAL INCIDENTS:<br />

• During the use <strong>of</strong> designed project, apart from already mentioned<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> possible environmental load, the potential ecological incidents<br />

could occur only in case <strong>of</strong> natural disasters in the form <strong>of</strong> earthquakes<br />

and fires <strong>of</strong> bigger pro<strong>port</strong>ions.<br />

• The possibility <strong>of</strong> earthquakes is shown by seismic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area. In case <strong>of</strong> fire, with measures and procedures <strong>of</strong> fire protection the<br />

disaster can be localized to burden the immediate surrounding - urban<br />

area for a short time only.<br />

D.3.3.4. IMPLEMENT MEASURES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST EFFECTS OF<br />

TRAFFIC ON LAND AND SEA DURING USE<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

• All vehicles entering and leaving the zone <strong>of</strong> the new container terminal<br />

have to be equipped according to applicable laws.<br />

• All ships putting in at the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce for the container terminal must<br />

comply with the provisions <strong>of</strong> applicable laws.<br />

• Before putting into use <strong>of</strong> the stage II <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the Container<br />

terminal in the <strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ploce, the connection road leading from the <strong>port</strong><br />

entrance to the Adriatic highway has to be operational. The same applies to<br />

the stage I <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the wharf when the capacity <strong>of</strong> 40,000<br />

TEU/year has been reached, i.e. the first stage can be utilized to the full<br />

capacity only when the connection road is fully operational.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 7<br />

D.3.4. PREVENTION AND ALLEVIATION OF CONSEQUENCES OF POSSIBLE<br />

ECOLOGICAL INCIDENTS<br />

Stage <strong>of</strong> project construction<br />

During the construction <strong>of</strong> the new structure no elements which might cause<br />

an ecological incident are envisaged, therefore, no risks outside the usual<br />

construction practice are foreseen.<br />

Stage <strong>of</strong> project use<br />

During the use <strong>of</strong> designed project, apart from already mentioned elements <strong>of</strong><br />

possible environmental load, the potential ecological incidents could occur only<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> natural disasters in the form <strong>of</strong> earthquakes and fires <strong>of</strong> bigger<br />

pro<strong>port</strong>ions.<br />

The possibility <strong>of</strong> earthquakes is shown by seismic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> fire, with measures and procedures <strong>of</strong> fire protection the disaster<br />

can be localized to burden the immediate surrounding - urban area for a short<br />

time only.<br />

Stage <strong>of</strong> project end <strong>of</strong> use<br />

In a situation in which the use <strong>of</strong> the project comes to an end, no<br />

environmental consequences are envisaged, except for a short-term<br />

environmental impact because <strong>of</strong> possible demolition <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


PLANIRANI<br />

PLANIRANA<br />

PLANIRANI<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 4<br />

OBALA 5<br />

OBALA 3<br />

OBALA 6<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

OBALA 2<br />

OBALA 1<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

OBALA 0<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

D3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES<br />

SUBMARINE ASSEMBLY<br />

D.3. MJERE ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA<br />

PODMORSKI ISKOP<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

PROJECT BOUNDARY (GRANICA ZAHVATA )<br />

PORT AREA BOUNDARY (GRANICA LUCKOG PODRUCJA)<br />

ROAD ROUTES - STRATEGIC (CESTOVNI PRAVCI-STRATEŠKI)<br />

WATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FIRE ALARMS<br />

(VODA, TELEKOMUNIKACIJE, VATRODOJAVE)<br />

RAIL/WAY TRACK CORRIDORS (KOLOSIJECNI KORIDORI )<br />

EXCAVATION ZONE (PODRUCJE ISKOPA)<br />

EXCAVATED MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREA<br />

PODRUCJE ZA ODLAGANJE ISKOPANOG MATERIJALA<br />

SL. 1


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

D.4. PROGRAMME OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

D.4.1 CONTROL OF THE PROCESS OF SETTLEMENT OF<br />

MACROBENTHIC ORGANISMS AND RECOVERY OF BOTTOM-<br />

DWELLING COMMUNITIES<br />

1. The processes should be monitored at two transections:<br />

• Transection PL-01<br />

• Transection PL-02<br />

2. Regular inspections should be made once a year, every four years.<br />

D.4.2. TESTING OF WASTE WATER QUALITY<br />

3. The place <strong>of</strong> testing:<br />

• at the exit from the device for treatment <strong>of</strong> waste water from oily<br />

water SZV 1<br />

• at the exit from the grease separator - precipitation sewerage<br />

settling tank SOK 1 and SOK 2<br />

4. The following indicators are to be covered:<br />

• pH,<br />

• total suspended matter,<br />

• chemical oxygen demand,<br />

• biochemical oxygen demand,<br />

• total and mineral oils,<br />

• anion and non-ion detergents.<br />

5. Regular inspections shall be made four times a year, every year.<br />

D.4.3 TESTING OF SEA QUALITY<br />

1. The place <strong>of</strong> testing:<br />

• Station KV 1 inside the basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7<br />

• Station KV 2 at the exit from the basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7<br />

2. The following indicators <strong>of</strong> sea water quality to be determined:<br />

• prozirnost transparency<br />

• temperature<br />

• salinity<br />

• liquefied oxygen<br />

• pH<br />

• mineral oils,<br />

• ammonia,<br />

• bacteriological tests ( indicators <strong>of</strong> faecal pollution)<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

3. Sea water quality should be controlled:<br />

• Prior to construction commencement - “zero state”<br />

• During the use every year, twice in summer months from the<br />

bottom and surface layer <strong>of</strong> the sea.<br />

D.4.4. STATE OF SEA BOTTOM SEDIMENTS<br />

1. The place <strong>of</strong> testing:<br />

• at transection PL-01 station PLS-01<br />

• na transection PL-02 station PLS-02<br />

2. Test content <strong>of</strong> heavy metals in the sediment surface layer (0-2 cm):<br />

• Lead<br />

• Copper<br />

• Zinc<br />

• Tin<br />

3. Samples should be taken and controlled:<br />

• During the use once a year, every two years.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


KV 2 PLS-02<br />

KV 1<br />

PL-02<br />

SOK 1<br />

PLS-01<br />

PL-01<br />

SOK 2<br />

SZV 1<br />

D4. ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING<br />

PROGRAMME<br />

POSITION OF CONTROL MEASURING POINTS<br />

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING<br />

D4. PROGRAM PRACENJA STANJA OKOLIŠA<br />

POLOŽAJ KONTROLNIH MJERNIH TOCAKA<br />

ZA PRACENJE STANJA OKOLIŠA<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

TRANSECTIONS PL01 AND PL02 (TRANSEKTI PL01 I PL02 )<br />

CONTROL POINTS OF SEA BOTTOM SEDIMENT STATE PLS1 AND PLS2<br />

TOCKE KONTROLE STANJA SEDIMENATA MORSKOG DNA PLS1 I PLS2<br />

SEA QUALITY TEST POINTS KV1 AND KV2<br />

TOCKE ISPITIVANJA KAKVOCE MORA KV1 I KV2<br />

PRECIPITATION INTERCEPTORS SOK1 AND SOK2<br />

SEPARATORI OBORINSKIH VODA SOK1 I SOK2<br />

WORKSHOP WATER INTERCEPTORS SZV1<br />

SEPARATOR RADIONICKIH VODA SZV1<br />

SL. 1


IRANA<br />

PLANIRANI<br />

50 000 DWT<br />

l=290,0m<br />

b=32,40m<br />

d=13,0m<br />

OBALA 7<br />

OBALA 4<br />

60 000 DWT<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

l=228,0m<br />

b=31,0m<br />

d=11,30m<br />

OBALA 5<br />

TS-15<br />

OBALA 3<br />

30 000 DWT<br />

14 000 DWT<br />

l=145,0m<br />

b=20,0m<br />

d=8,5m<br />

OBALA 6<br />

11 000 DWT<br />

l=135,0m<br />

b=18,0m<br />

d=8,0m<br />

OBALA 2<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 3-PROJEKTIRANO<br />

OBALA 1<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 2-IZVEDENO<br />

OBALA 0<br />

RANŽIRNA GRUPA 1-IZVEDENO<br />

D4. ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING<br />

PROGRAMME<br />

POSITION OF CONTROL MEASURING POINTS<br />

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE MONITORING<br />

D4. PROGRAM PRACENJA STANJA OKOLIŠA<br />

POLOŽAJ KONTROLNIH MJERNIH TOCAKA<br />

ZA PRACENJE STANJA OKOLIŠA<br />

SCALE (MJ) 1:2500<br />

KEY (LEGENDA):<br />

NOISE MEASURING POINTS<br />

POINT COORDINATION TABLE<br />

POINT X Y<br />

B1 6454379.981 4767358.841<br />

B2 6454362.166 4766966.719<br />

B3 6453762.141 4766647.141<br />

SL. 1 a


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 1<br />

F. INFORMATION SOURCES<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 2<br />

1. Legislation <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia<br />

In establishing the standards which the proposed intervention in space must comply with, the<br />

series <strong>of</strong> adopted legal solutions were used, and which are to be found in the following:<br />

• Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia OG 8/98<br />

• Declaration on Environmental Protection OG 34/92<br />

• <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia<br />

• Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance OG 59/00<br />

• Physical Planning Act OG 30/94, 68/98, 61/00<br />

• Intervention Plan in Case <strong>of</strong> Sudden Sea Pollution<br />

• In the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia OG 8/97<br />

• Ordinance on Protection <strong>of</strong> Buildings <strong>of</strong> Special Im<strong>port</strong>ance<br />

• For the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia OG 90/95<br />

• Nature Conservation Act OG 30/94, 72/94, 73/97<br />

• Natural Disaster Protection Act OG 73/97<br />

• Environmental Protection Act (ZoZO) OG 82/94<br />

• Act on Amendments <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection Act OG 128/99<br />

• Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation OG 34/97 and 37/97<br />

• Air Quality Protection Act (ZoZO) OG 48/95<br />

• Regulation on Recommended and Limit Air Quality Values OG 101/96<br />

• Regulation on Environmental Emission Inventory OG 36/96<br />

• Maritime Code OG 17/94,<br />

• 74/94 and 43/96<br />

• Sea<strong>port</strong> Act OG 108/95<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Ports OG 22/95<br />

• Regulation on Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Order in Ports OG 91/94, 161/98<br />

• Resolution on Classification <strong>of</strong> Special Purposes Ports OG 38/96<br />

• Methods <strong>of</strong> Maintaining Order in Ports and other Parts <strong>of</strong><br />

• The Internal Sea Waters and Territorial Sea <strong>of</strong> the<br />

• Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia, and Limits <strong>of</strong> Navigation for Ships<br />

• And Boats outside Ports OG 91/94,<br />

• 162/<br />

• Harbour Authorities Act OG 124/97<br />

• Act on Trans<strong>port</strong> and Handling <strong>of</strong> Dangerous<br />

• Substances in Inland Navigations OG 79/96<br />

• Regulations on Trans<strong>port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Substances OG 97/93<br />

• Regulations on Handling Hazardous Substances<br />

• Requirements and Manner <strong>of</strong> Loading and Unloading Hazardous<br />

• Substances, Bulk and other Freight in Ports, and<br />

• Manner <strong>of</strong> Preventing Spreading <strong>of</strong> Oil Leaks in Ports OG 108/95<br />

• Intervention Plan in Case <strong>of</strong> Sudden Sea Pollution<br />

• In the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia OG 8/97<br />

• Intervention Plan in Case <strong>of</strong> Sudden Sea Pollution<br />

in the Primorsko-goranska County OG 16/99<br />

• Harbour Authorities’ Act OG 124/97<br />

• Waste Act OG 34/95<br />

• Waste Classification Ordinance OG 27/96<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Handling Waste OG 123/97<br />

• Act on Ratification <strong>of</strong> Convention on Control <strong>of</strong><br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 3<br />

• Transboundary Movement <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Wastes<br />

• And their Disposal OG – IT, 3/94<br />

• Ordinance on Packaging Waste Handling OG 53/96<br />

• Ordinance on Requirements for Handling Hazardous Waste OG 32/98<br />

• Law on the Construction OG 52/99<br />

• Fire Protection Act OG 58/93<br />

• Act on Inflammable Liquids and Gases OG 108/95<br />

• Regulation on Inflammable Liquids OG 54/99<br />

• Noise Protection Act OG 17/90<br />

• Regulation on Highest Permissible Noise Levels<br />

• In Manned Working Environment OG 37/90<br />

• Occupational Safety Act OG 59/96<br />

Directive on Protection <strong>of</strong> Workers from the Risks<br />

Related to Exposure to noise at Work 86/188/EEC<br />

• Act on Waters OG 27/95<br />

• National Water Protection Plan OG 8/99<br />

• Water Classification Regulation OG 77/98<br />

• Regulation on Hazardous Substances to Waters OG 78/98<br />

• Regulation on Limit Values <strong>of</strong> Indices, Hazardous<br />

• And Other Substances in Waste Water OG 40/99<br />

2. Physical Planning Documents<br />

2.1. STRATEGY AND PROGRAM OF PHYSICAL PLANNING OF THE REPUBLIC OF<br />

CROATIA<br />

(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Physical Planning, Construction and Residence, Physical Planning<br />

Institute,<br />

2.2. PHYSICAL PLAN OF THE DUBROVACKO-NERETVANSKA COUNTY (PPDNŽ)<br />

(County Institute for Physical Planning, Dubrovnik)<br />

2.3. AMENDMENTS TO THE PHYSICAL PLAN OF THE KARDELJEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

UP TO 2000.<br />

(Urban Planning Institute <strong>of</strong> Dalmatia, Split, 1987.)<br />

2.4. AMENDMENTS TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN OF<br />

KARDELJEVO<br />

(Urban Planning Institute <strong>of</strong> Dalmatia, Split, 1987.)<br />

3. Conventions ratified and signed by the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia<br />

3.1. Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, OG International treaties,<br />

12/93<br />

3.2. Protocol for Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution <strong>of</strong> 1979., OG<br />

International treaties 12/93<br />

3.3. Protocol for Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution <strong>of</strong> 1979., OG<br />

International treaties 16/98<br />

3.4. Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution, OG<br />

International treaties 12/93, 16/98<br />

3.5. Protocol for the Protection <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution from Land-<br />

Based Sources, OG International treaties 12/93<br />

3.6. Convention on Assessment <strong>of</strong> Transboundary Impact on Environment, OG<br />

International treaties 1/6/96<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 4<br />

3.7. International Convention for the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Pollution by Ships <strong>of</strong> 1973./1978.<br />

(MARPOL 73./78.) including 6 technical Annexes. Annex I. and II. deal with oil and<br />

mass hazardous liquid loads. Annex III., IV., V. and VI. deal with harmful substances<br />

in packaged form, sewage, garbage and air pollution.<br />

3.8. International Convention for the Safety <strong>of</strong> Life at Sea (SOLAS) – chapter 7 –<br />

Hazardous Goods Trans<strong>port</strong>, 1974.<br />

3.9. International Maritime Organization Code <strong>of</strong> Hazardous and Dangerous Loads<br />

(IMCO).<br />

3.10. Barcelona Convention on Protection <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean Sea Environment and Coastal<br />

Region and Protocol for Cooperation in Combating Pollution <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean by<br />

Oil and Other Toxic and Hazardous Substances in Case <strong>of</strong> Accidents –1976., 1996.<br />

3.11. UN Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea Convention (OG, IT 11/95)<br />

3.12. Convention on Protection <strong>of</strong> Marine Environment and Coastal Area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Mediterranean (OG IT 17/98)<br />

3.13. Protocol for the Prevention and Elimination <strong>of</strong> Pollution <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea by<br />

Dumping from Ships and Aircrafts (OG IT 17/98)<br />

3.14. Protocol Concerning Cooperation in Combating Suppressing Pollution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Mediterranean by Oil and Other Hazardous Substances in Cases <strong>of</strong> Emergency (OG,<br />

IT 12/93)<br />

3.15. Protocol on Specially Protected Areas <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea (OG, IT 12/93)<br />

3.16. International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1990 (OG, IT 2/97)<br />

3.17. International Convention on Intervention on High Seas in the Event <strong>of</strong> Accidents or<br />

Threatened Accidents Resulting from Oil Pollution (OG, IT 1/92)<br />

3.18. International Convention on Establishment <strong>of</strong> International Oil Pollution<br />

Compensation Fund (OG, IT 1/92)<br />

3.19. International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (OG, IT 1/92)<br />

3.20. International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals, Publisher: The International<br />

Chamber <strong>of</strong> Shipping, London 1996.<br />

3.21. Convention on Prevention <strong>of</strong> Marine Pollution by Dumping (OG, IT 3/95)<br />

4. Conventions not ratified and signed by the Republic <strong>of</strong> Croatia<br />

4.11. Protocol for Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution <strong>of</strong> 1979,<br />

Geneva, 1991.<br />

4.12. Protocol for Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution <strong>of</strong> 1979, S<strong>of</strong>ia,<br />

1998.<br />

4.13. Protocol for Convention on on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution <strong>of</strong> 1979.,<br />

Aarhus 1988.<br />

4.14. Protocol for Convention on on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution <strong>of</strong> 1979,<br />

Goeteborg 1999.<br />

4.15. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and<br />

Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Aarhus 1998.<br />

5. European Legislative Regulations<br />

5.11. European Commission; Kathryn Jones: Study on Environmental Re<strong>port</strong>ing by<br />

Companies, Centre for Environmental Informatics, University <strong>of</strong> Sunderland, 1999.<br />

5.1. European Commission, DGXI, Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection; A<br />

Handbook on Environmental Assessment <strong>of</strong> Regional Development Plans and EU<br />

Structural Funds Programmes, August 1998.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 5<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY:<br />

SEA-POLLUTION<br />

1. Control <strong>of</strong> Coastal Sea Quality, Project Vir – Konavle 2002. Institute for<br />

Oceanography and Fishing Split. Split, March 2003.<br />

2. Regulation on Standards <strong>of</strong> Sea Quality on Sea Beaches (OG, no. 33/1996)<br />

3. Public Health Institute <strong>of</strong> the Dubrovacko-neretvanska County: Re<strong>port</strong>s on<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> sea-water quality in the Ploca area for the period <strong>of</strong> 1999. - 2002.<br />

4. Public Health Institute <strong>of</strong> the Splitsko – dalmatinska County: Re<strong>port</strong>s on<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> waste water from the main collector discharge in the Ploce<br />

harbour and waste water from the Ploce Energopetrol in 2002.<br />

5. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 99: 243-244, 1997.<br />

SEA-DYNAMICS<br />

1. Wind regime on the Adriatic Territory, National Hydrometeorological Institute,<br />

Zagreb, 1978.<br />

2. Drecun. D., Eastern Adriatic Climatologic Characteristics 1949.-1976. H’,1978.<br />

3. Studies <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact <strong>of</strong> the Liquified Petroleum Gas in the Ploce<br />

Harbour, B.B. & B.M.; d.o.o. Zagreb, 1997.<br />

4. Vibrilic, I., Re<strong>port</strong> on Measurements on the Polce Mareographic Station in the<br />

Period from 3/2002 to 3/2003., Croatian Hydrographic Institute 2003.<br />

5. Pršic M., Post-graduate Thesis: Long-term estimation <strong>of</strong> Maritime level in the<br />

Adriatic, 1983.<br />

6. Agerschou H & all: Planing and Design <strong>of</strong> Ports and Marine Terminals, John<br />

Wiley & Sons, 1983.<br />

7. British Standards : British Standard Code for Maritime Structures, London 1984.<br />

8. Androcec V; Markovic A.: Maritime Study with Hydraulic Analyses <strong>of</strong> the New<br />

Container Lashing Characteristics, 1989.<br />

SEA-FLORA AND FAUNA<br />

1. Bellan-Santini, D., Lacaze, J.C., Poizat, C. (1994): Les biocénoses marines et<br />

littorales de Méditerranée: synthcse, menaces et perspectives. Muséum National<br />

d' Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 246 pp.<br />

2. Gamulin-Brida, H. (1967): The benthic fauna <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic Sea. Oceanogr. Mar.<br />

biol. Ann. Rev., 5: 537-568.<br />

3. Jaklin A., Travizi A. 1999. Methods <strong>of</strong> benthos examination in the Northern<br />

Adriatic. Biodiverziteta in varstvo slovenskega morja na pragu 21. stoletja. Zbornik<br />

referatov: 51-53.<br />

4. Pércs, J.M., Picard, J. (1964): Nouveau manuel de bionomie bentique de la Mer<br />

Méditerranée. Rel. Trav. Stn. Mar. Endoume, 47: 5-137.<br />

5. Pércs, J.M., Gamulin-Brida, H. (1973): Biological Oceanography. Benthos.<br />

Benthos bionomics <strong>of</strong> the Adriatic Sea. Školska knjiga, Zagreb, 493 pp.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>: 6<br />

GEOLOGY<br />

A) PUBLISHED INFORMATION<br />

1. MARINCIC, S., MAGAŠ, N. & BENCEK, Ð. (1977): General Geological Map 1:<br />

100.000, page Ploce. Federal Geological Institute, Beograd.<br />

2. MAGAŠ, N., MARINCIC, S. & BENCEK, Ð. (1979): General Geological Map<br />

1:100.000, Legend for the page Ploce. Federal Geological Institute, Beograd.<br />

3. HORVAT, K., PRELOGOVIC, E., KUK, V., VULIC, Ž., DUJMIC, D., LOVRENCIC,<br />

D., MLINAR, Ž. & SLADOVIC, B. (1986): Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Ground Seismic Stability<br />

in the rivers Cetina and Neretva Deltas. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Fourth Convention <strong>of</strong><br />

the Association <strong>of</strong> Organizations for Seismic Construction Engineering <strong>of</strong><br />

Yugoslavia, 73-80, Cavtat.<br />

B) EXPERT DOCUMENTS<br />

1. Re<strong>port</strong> on geomechanical o geomehanickim stražnim radovima na Loose Cargo<br />

Terminal Location in the Ploce-Kardeljevo Hrbour. Geoexpert, Zagreb, 1985.<br />

2. Analysis <strong>of</strong> liquefaction on the Terminal Kardeljevo Location. Geoexpert, Zagreb,<br />

1985.<br />

C) RESOLUTIONS AND REGULATIONS<br />

1. Physical Plan <strong>of</strong> the Dubrovacko-neretvanska County. County Institute for<br />

Physical Planning, Dubrovnik.<br />

2. Temporary Seismological Map <strong>of</strong> the SFRJ. OG 49/82, OG 55/91.<br />

3. Seismological map <strong>of</strong> return periods in 50, 100, 200, 500, 1.000 and 10.000<br />

years. OG 30/87, OG 55/91.<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!