03.04.2013 Views

State v. Proctor - Kansas Judicial Branch

State v. Proctor - Kansas Judicial Branch

State v. Proctor - Kansas Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not entail a punishment requiring a return to prison for life without parole based on a later<br />

felony conviction. Even murderers are not treated so harshly. A person committing<br />

successive second-degree murders could be released and then commit a low-level felony<br />

without spending the rest of his or her life in prison.<br />

On the whole, the comparison between <strong>Proctor</strong>'s circumstances if he were on<br />

lifetime supervised release for a severity level 5 offense and those of persons committing<br />

crimes with higher offense levels supports the gross disparity between offense and<br />

punishment indicative of an Eighth Amendment violation. Whether we treat the result as<br />

a means of confirming that disparity, in keeping with Justice Kennedy's methodology, or<br />

as an integrated part of an overall analysis of the sentence's constitutionality, as the Solem<br />

majority and the <strong>Kansas</strong> Supreme Court have done, we arrive at the same point. This<br />

factor weighs against the <strong>State</strong>.<br />

The <strong>State</strong> argues that the <strong>Kansas</strong> Supreme Court has upheld lengthy sentences and<br />

60-month periods of postrelease supervision against constitutional challenges. The<br />

authority, however, is unpersuasive.<br />

The <strong>State</strong> cites <strong>State</strong> v. McCloud, 257 Kan. 1, 891 P.2d 324, cert. denied 516 U.S.<br />

837 (1995), and <strong>State</strong> v. Tyler, 251 Kan. 616, 644-46, 840 P.2d 413 (1992), as<br />

demonstrating the court has rejected constitutional challenges to prison sentences with<br />

minimum terms approaching or in excess of 100 years. Those sentences effectively<br />

amounted to life in prison for the respective defendants. But the lengthy duration resulted<br />

from sentences on multiple criminal acts imposed consecutively. For example, in<br />

McCloud, the defendant committed 12 separate aggravated robberies during a 4-month<br />

crime spree. He received a statutorily proper sentence of 8 years to life on each and was<br />

ordered to serve them consecutively, resulting in a minimum sentence of 96 years. The<br />

aggregate incarceration of 111 to 330 years imposed in Tyler resulted from consecutive<br />

sentences on multiple convictions, including second-degree murder of a police officer<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!