Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7.1.3 Notable Fauna Records As is to be expected the field surveys of the MLA / Haul Road and of the port facility yielded less species than the cumulative historic records of the desktop surveys. It is interesting to note, however, that both MLA areas and haul road corridor field surveys found fauna species which have not been previously recorded within the data search area (Table 26). Included are common birds such as Australasian Pipit (Anthus novaeseelandiae) and White-throated Needletail (Hirundapus caudacutus), highlighting how under-surveyed the Gulf bioregions are. More significantly, the Carpenter Frog (Limnodynastes lignarius) record represents a ~400km range extension. The observation of Long-footed Frog (Litoria longipes) at two sites places this species in the middle of this previously record-deficient region. Table 26: Species recorded in field surveys that have not been not previously recorded MAMMAL Scientific Name Common Name Where found Demansia simplex Grey Whip Snake MINE Isoodon macrourus Brown Bandicoot PORT BIRD Anthus novaeseelandiae Australasian Pipit HAUL Calidris alba Sanderling PORT Chalcites osculans Black-eared Cuckoo MINE Esacus magnirostris Beach Stone-curlew PORT Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon PORT Gerygone levigaster Mangrove Gerygone PORT Hirundapus caudacutus White-throated Needletail MINE Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern PORT Megalurus timoriensis Tawny Grassbird PORT Numenius madagascariensis Eastern Curlew PORT Pachycephala simplex Grey Whistler MINE Pluvialis squatarola Grey Plover PORT AMPHIBIAN Limnodynastes convexiusculus Marbled Frog HAUL Limnodynastes lignarius Carpenter Frog HAUL REPTILE Brachyurophis semifasciatus Half-girdled Snake HAUL Chelodina canni Cann's Long-necked Turtle PORT Diplodactylus conspicillatus Fat-tailed Gecko MINE Liasis fuscus Water Python PORT Varanus gouldii Sand Monitor MINE, HAUL Client: Western Desert Resources Ltd Page 139 of 150 Doc No. DW120004-C0302-EIA-R-0036 Doc Title: Appendix D – Terrestrial Biodiversity Technical Report
7.1.4 Proposed Status Changes In 2010, the Northern Territory Government initiated a review of the conservation status of all species in the Northern Territory. There have been two rounds of public consultation on the Threatened Species list. Although the final findings are yet to be released, a list of proposed changes following the first round of public consultation have been published. On that list are six species known or likely to occur within the proposed development site (see Table 27). Table 27: Recorded species with proposed increase in threatened status Scientific Name Common Name Current Status Proposed Status Records Varanus mitchelli Mitchell’s Water Monitor DD VU Haul road / MLA (desktop) Pseudechis australis King Brown Snake LC NT MLA (desktop), Haul road (field) Hipposideros stenotis Northern Leaf-nosed Bat LC VU MLA (analysis) Rattus tunneyi Pale Field Rat NT VU MLA (desktop) Isoodon macrourus Northern Brown Bandicoot LC NT Port (field) Conilurus penicillatus Brush-tailed Rabbit-rat VU EN Haul road, MLA, port (EPBC) 7.1.5 Comparison with 1996 Field Surveys In 1996 a wildlife field survey was undertaken in the area of the then-proposed Limmen Gate National Park by the NTPWC (Griffiths et al. 1997). Forty-five quadrats were surveyed in seven major habitats between April and June – Table 28 summarises the results. The MLA areas and haul road are located within and adjacent to the habitat surveyed in 1996. A comparison of that survey with the combined MLA / haul road field surveys for this report is largely congruent, with only total reptile species varying significantly. The 1996 survey identified 28% more reptile species than the field surveys in this report, possibly reflecting seasonal differences in activity. Table 28: Comparison of 1996 and 2011-2 survey totals Field Limmen Gate Amphibian 17 13 Reptile 42 54 Bird 120 118 Mammal 23 24 TOTAL 202 209 The 1996 survey report made a number of general observations: • Reptile species richness did not correspond with any one particular vegetation type, but a distinct reptile fauna was associated with sandstone habitats. As the field surveys undertaken for this report found far fewer reptile species no patterns of habitat association could be discerned; • Avian richness was highest in riparian forests and lowest in Eucalyptus foelscheana low open woodland. This correlates with proximity to water and floristic diversity. For the MLA areas and haul road a similar correlation between proximity to water and avian richness was identified – the most bird species recorded within the MLA areas, by far, was at riparian site. Similarly for the haul road both a riparian site and a ridge site adjacent to a creek had the highest avian richness; Client: Western Desert Resources Ltd Page 140 of 150 Doc No. DW120004-C0302-EIA-R-0036 Doc Title: Appendix D – Terrestrial Biodiversity Technical Report
Page 1 and 2:
EcOz Environmental Services Draft E
Page 3 and 4:
Document Control Record Prepared by
Page 5 and 6:
5.5 Sensitive Habitats ............
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 25: Notable habitat identifi
Page 9 and 10:
Appendices FAUNA APPENDICES Appendi
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 1: Locations for three propo
Page 13 and 14:
Table 1: A summary of key informati
Page 15 and 16:
• Fine scale vegetation mapping (
Page 17 and 18:
Coastal Port Facilities The coastal
Page 19 and 20:
“Vegetation mapping is not an exa
Page 21 and 22:
• Water bodies - The waterbodies
Page 23 and 24:
2.3 Groundwater Dependant Ecosystem
Page 25 and 26:
Haul Road Transport Corridor Five s
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 2: Map of all fauna survey l
Page 29 and 30:
Bat Survey Bat species present were
Page 31 and 32:
The Freshwater fish surveys were ca
Page 33 and 34:
2.6 Targeted Surveys 2.6.1 Bare-rum
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 3: The IUCN Red List categor
Page 37 and 38:
D-3. Desktop Review 3.1 Climate The
Page 39 and 40:
3.3 Sites of Conservation Significa
Page 41 and 42:
3.4 Topography and Geomorphology Th
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 6: Five-year fire scar map o
Page 45 and 46:
3.6 Weeds Weed data was collected f
Page 47 and 48:
3.7.2 Flora Records Flora surveys w
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 10: Map of existing flora re
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 11: Proposed site layout pla
Page 53 and 54:
Table 9: Five main vegetation and l
Page 55 and 56:
Veg. Type Table 10: Vegetation Type
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 13: Five main vegetation typ
Page 59 and 60:
4.3.2 Vegetation Condition The fire
Page 61 and 62:
(note that conceptual site layout h
Page 63 and 64:
It is unknown whether an increase o
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Site Photo Description F5 F6 F7 F8a
Page 71 and 72:
Site Photo Description F12 F13 F14
Page 73 and 74:
4.5.2 Fauna Survey Results The Wet
Page 75 and 76:
• The remaining species are all l
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 24: Locations of freshwater
Page 79 and 80:
4.7 Bare-rumped Sheathtail Bat Surv
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 25: Notable habitat identifi
Page 83 and 84:
Sections of the McArthur land syste
Page 85 and 86:
Table 14: Land system and vegetatio
Page 87 and 88:
Land System Landform Soils Vegetati
Page 89 and 90: 5.3 Vegetation Surveys National Veg
Page 91 and 92: NVIS Level 3 Veg ID Description (ad
Page 93 and 94: Figure 27: Haul road (and surrounds
Page 95 and 96: 5.3.1 Notable flora records Surveys
Page 97 and 98: Towns Survey - Lower Reaches Site 4
Page 99 and 100: Towns Survey - Upper Site 3 Site 4
Page 101 and 102: Table 18: Fauna site habitat descri
Page 107 and 108: diversity. The riparian zone and ad
Page 109 and 110: Figure 34: Map 1 of 4 - Haul road s
Page 111 and 112: Figure 36: Map 3 of 4 - Haul road s
Page 113 and 114: 5.5.2 Rocky Sandstone Ridges Rocky
Page 115 and 116: feature the three species of freshw
Page 117 and 118: Figure 39: Land system map of the c
Page 119 and 120: Table 22: Vegetation type summaries
Page 121 and 122: 6.3.2 Vegetation Condition The vege
Page 123 and 124: 6.3.4 Introduced Plant Species Envi
Page 125 and 126: Site Photo Description Site 4 Site
Page 127 and 128: 6.4.2 Fauna Survey Results The surv
Page 129 and 130: 6.5 Sensitive Habitats None of the
Page 131 and 132: 6.5.4 Melaleuca Swamp This is a rel
Page 133 and 134: Figure 46: Map of threatened and no
Page 135 and 136: SCIENTIFIC NAME Falcunculus frontat
Page 137 and 138: 7.1.2 Migratory Shorebirds The Gulf
Page 139: Figure 48: Location of MLA and haul
Page 143 and 144: Table 29: Notable flora species wit
Page 145 and 146: SCIENTIFIC NAME LENTIBULARIACEAE Ut
Page 147 and 148: 7.3 Sensitive Habitat 7.3.1 MLA Are
Page 149 and 150: D-9. References Aldrick, JM & Wilso
Page 151 and 152: NRETAS 2006, Threatened Species of
Page 153 and 154: Client: Western Desert Resources Lt
Page 155 and 156: SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Client:
Page 167 and 168: SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME VARANID
Page 173 and 174: SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATU S
Page 175 and 176: Table 2-3: Mammals found from MLA f
Page 181 and 182: Table 2-5: Freshwater vertebrates f
Page 185 and 186: SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Delma b
Page 187 and 188: Table 3-3: Mammals found from Haul
Page 189 and 190: SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME BURHINI
Page 191 and 192:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Client:
Page 193 and 194:
Client: Western Desert Resources Lt
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Table 4-2: Amphibians found from Po
Page 199 and 200:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Geopeli
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
SZ247: Bat survey from the Western
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Ground: Alloteropsis semialata (fq
Page 269 and 270:
Ground: Portulaca bicolor (fq 75%),
Page 271 and 272:
Upper: Low open woodland dominated
Page 273 and 274:
mitrasacmoides (fq 50%), Panicum ef
Page 275 and 276:
Ground: Murdannia graminea (fq 100%
Page 277 and 278:
25%), Jacksonia odontoclada (fq 25%
Page 279 and 280:
Ground: Crotalaria montana (fq 33%)
Page 281 and 282:
Carissa lanceolata (fq 25%), Dolich
Page 283 and 284:
33%), Dimeria ornithopoda (fq 33%),
Page 285 and 286:
Landform: simple slope General Cond
Page 287 and 288:
Ground: Polygala longifolia (fq 67%
Page 289 and 290:
Ground: Ammannia multiflora (fq 100
Page 291 and 292:
Ground: Alloteropsis semialata (fq
Page 293 and 294:
cunninghamii (fq 67%), Grevillea pa
Page 295 and 296:
Ground: Bulbostylis barbata (fq 67%
Page 297 and 298:
Desmodium brownii (fq 20%), Desmodi
Page 299 and 300:
graminea (fq 33%), Nesaea muelleri
Page 301 and 302:
trifolia (fq 33%), Cyperus holoscho
Page 303 and 304:
microcephala (fq 67%), Melochia cor
Page 305 and 306:
General Condition: This single site
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Site ID Map Easting Northing Descri
Page 311 and 312:
Table 10-3: Vegetation Assessment o
Page 313 and 314:
Table 10-5: Vegetation Assessment o
Page 315 and 316:
Site ID Map Easting Northing W54 2
Page 317 and 318:
Site ID Map Easting Northing Client
Page 319 and 320:
Table 10-8: Riparian Vegetation Ass
Page 321 and 322:
Table 10-10: Riparian Vegetation As
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Table 11-2: Port Area. Vegetation U
Page 331 and 332:
Table 11-4: Port Area. Vegetation U
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337:
Voucher No. Strata labels Biodivers
show all

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?