Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 13: Freshwater fish survey site habitat descriptions – MLA areas surveys Site Photo Description Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Habitat: Isolated pool in a seasonally flowing creek Substrate: Earthen with small pebbles Bank Erosion: Active erosion on outer bend Disturbances: Nil Average Width: 7m Maximum Depth: 0.5m Velocity: Nil Colour: Pale grey Clarity:
4.7 Bare-rumped Sheathtail Bat Surveys The Bare-rumped Sheathtail Bat was not captured, observed or its call recorded during the targeted survey for this species. Calls of Saccolaimus species were conspicuously abundant (but not quantified) in the survey area, but it is anticipated that many, if not all, of these derive from the Yellow-rumped Sheathtail Bat (Saccolaimus flaviventris). The presence, therefore, of Saccolaimus saccolaimus was not confirmed in any of the project areas. This suggests that either it was not present, or that ability to detect and distinguish this species was limited. Kyle Armstrong, who undertook the survey, concluded that its presence is still a possibility given the observation of several large vertical hollows in tree trunks in the Eucalyptus tetrodonta – Eucalyptus miniata Mid Open Woodland. The detailed bat report is provided in Appendix D-5. 4.8 Sensitive Habitats None of the vegetation communities are listed under any legislation (TPWC or EPBC Acts) but some types are locally noteworthy from the perspective of conserving habitat which is in good condition, features more of the atypical species, or contributes to the hydrology and connectivity within this mid part of the Towns catchment. The communities considered locally notable, and the justifications for this, are outlined below. Tall Eucalyptus tetrodonta and Erythrophleum chlorostachys Woodland (Vegetation type 15) and Callitris Woodland occurring within a distinct patch near the existing exploration camp. Both of these vegetation communities are not uncommon within the survey area. However, these particular patches have obviously been sheltered from the impacts of fire over several years and are in particularly good condition. From a fauna perspective the dense patch of Vegetation type 15 is notable due to the diversity of woodland bird species. It was also the only site at which a Sugar Glider (Petaurus breviceps) and the Chestnut Mouse (Pseudomys nanus) were observed (however Sugar Glider scats were recorded near site 13). The Sugar Glider utilised the area despite the continuous noise of a nearby generator. The nearby patch of Callitris was also notable for the diversity of woodland bird species. The Melaleuca Woodlands which are often inundated are notable as they contribute to the local hydrology and more often feature the more uncommon ephemeral plant species. Vegetation type 18, which falls within this category, is particularly noteworthy as is probably the wettest form of the Melaleuca viridiflora vegetation types; indicated by the presence of Asteromyrtus. This vegetation type features the most notable plant species including the two data deficient species, Nymphoides exiliflora & Fimbristylis dolera, and one near threatened species, Ophioglossum gramineum. It also features the only record of the Utricularia species, which probably has a limited range or likely to be endemic to at least the Gulf Falls Upland Bioregion (pers comm. Ian Cowie NRETAS). There is only one record for this Utricularia species within the surveyed area and this is intended to be cleared and altered for the construction of a storage area. From a fauna perspective this habitat type also features the higher diversity of amphibians. The Eucalyptus camaldulensis Woodlands (Vegetation type 14) occurring along stream channels is the only vegetation type where Eucalyptus camaldulensis (River Red Gum) occurs within the project area. Stream channels in the surrounds also feature River Red Gums in similar small quantities. A very small area (90m 2 ) is proposed to be affected by potential mining. However, the seasonal flows within this vegetation type support connectivity within this mid part of the Towns Catchment. From a fauna perspective this habitat type also features the higher diversity of amphibians. However, none of these are only found within this habitat type. The Towns River flowing through the mining MLA is targeted for major disturbance and realignment. Client: Western Desert Resources Ltd Page 78 of 150 Doc No. DW120004-C0302-EIA-R-0036 Doc Title: Appendix D – Terrestrial Biodiversity Technical Report
Page 1 and 2:
EcOz Environmental Services Draft E
Page 3 and 4:
Document Control Record Prepared by
Page 5 and 6:
5.5 Sensitive Habitats ............
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 25: Notable habitat identifi
Page 9 and 10:
Appendices FAUNA APPENDICES Appendi
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 1: Locations for three propo
Page 13 and 14:
Table 1: A summary of key informati
Page 15 and 16:
• Fine scale vegetation mapping (
Page 17 and 18:
Coastal Port Facilities The coastal
Page 19 and 20:
“Vegetation mapping is not an exa
Page 21 and 22:
• Water bodies - The waterbodies
Page 23 and 24:
2.3 Groundwater Dependant Ecosystem
Page 25 and 26:
Haul Road Transport Corridor Five s
Page 27 and 28: Figure 2: Map of all fauna survey l
Page 29 and 30: Bat Survey Bat species present were
Page 31 and 32: The Freshwater fish surveys were ca
Page 33 and 34: 2.6 Targeted Surveys 2.6.1 Bare-rum
Page 35 and 36: Figure 3: The IUCN Red List categor
Page 37 and 38: D-3. Desktop Review 3.1 Climate The
Page 39 and 40: 3.3 Sites of Conservation Significa
Page 41 and 42: 3.4 Topography and Geomorphology Th
Page 43 and 44: Figure 6: Five-year fire scar map o
Page 45 and 46: 3.6 Weeds Weed data was collected f
Page 47 and 48: 3.7.2 Flora Records Flora surveys w
Page 49 and 50: Figure 10: Map of existing flora re
Page 51 and 52: Figure 11: Proposed site layout pla
Page 53 and 54: Table 9: Five main vegetation and l
Page 55 and 56: Veg. Type Table 10: Vegetation Type
Page 57 and 58: Figure 13: Five main vegetation typ
Page 59 and 60: 4.3.2 Vegetation Condition The fire
Page 61 and 62: (note that conceptual site layout h
Page 63 and 64: It is unknown whether an increase o
Page 69 and 70: Site Photo Description F5 F6 F7 F8a
Page 71 and 72: Site Photo Description F12 F13 F14
Page 73 and 74: 4.5.2 Fauna Survey Results The Wet
Page 75 and 76: • The remaining species are all l
Page 77: Figure 24: Locations of freshwater
Page 81 and 82: Figure 25: Notable habitat identifi
Page 83 and 84: Sections of the McArthur land syste
Page 85 and 86: Table 14: Land system and vegetatio
Page 87 and 88: Land System Landform Soils Vegetati
Page 89 and 90: 5.3 Vegetation Surveys National Veg
Page 91 and 92: NVIS Level 3 Veg ID Description (ad
Page 93 and 94: Figure 27: Haul road (and surrounds
Page 95 and 96: 5.3.1 Notable flora records Surveys
Page 97 and 98: Towns Survey - Lower Reaches Site 4
Page 99 and 100: Towns Survey - Upper Site 3 Site 4
Page 101 and 102: Table 18: Fauna site habitat descri
Page 107 and 108: diversity. The riparian zone and ad
Page 109 and 110: Figure 34: Map 1 of 4 - Haul road s
Page 111 and 112: Figure 36: Map 3 of 4 - Haul road s
Page 113 and 114: 5.5.2 Rocky Sandstone Ridges Rocky
Page 115 and 116: feature the three species of freshw
Page 117 and 118: Figure 39: Land system map of the c
Page 119 and 120: Table 22: Vegetation type summaries
Page 121 and 122: 6.3.2 Vegetation Condition The vege
Page 123 and 124: 6.3.4 Introduced Plant Species Envi
Page 125 and 126: Site Photo Description Site 4 Site
Page 127 and 128: 6.4.2 Fauna Survey Results The surv
Page 129 and 130:
6.5 Sensitive Habitats None of the
Page 131 and 132:
6.5.4 Melaleuca Swamp This is a rel
Page 133 and 134:
Figure 46: Map of threatened and no
Page 135 and 136:
SCIENTIFIC NAME Falcunculus frontat
Page 137 and 138:
7.1.2 Migratory Shorebirds The Gulf
Page 139 and 140:
Figure 48: Location of MLA and haul
Page 141 and 142:
7.1.4 Proposed Status Changes In 20
Page 143 and 144:
Table 29: Notable flora species wit
Page 145 and 146:
SCIENTIFIC NAME LENTIBULARIACEAE Ut
Page 147 and 148:
7.3 Sensitive Habitat 7.3.1 MLA Are
Page 149 and 150:
D-9. References Aldrick, JM & Wilso
Page 151 and 152:
NRETAS 2006, Threatened Species of
Page 153 and 154:
Client: Western Desert Resources Lt
Page 155 and 156:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Client:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME VARANID
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATU S
Page 175 and 176:
Table 2-3: Mammals found from MLA f
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Table 2-5: Freshwater vertebrates f
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Delma b
Page 187 and 188:
Table 3-3: Mammals found from Haul
Page 189 and 190:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME BURHINI
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Table 4-2: Amphibians found from Po
Page 199 and 200:
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Geopeli
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
SZ247: Bat survey from the Western
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Ground: Alloteropsis semialata (fq
Page 269 and 270:
Ground: Portulaca bicolor (fq 75%),
Page 271 and 272:
Upper: Low open woodland dominated
Page 273 and 274:
mitrasacmoides (fq 50%), Panicum ef
Page 275 and 276:
Ground: Murdannia graminea (fq 100%
Page 277 and 278:
25%), Jacksonia odontoclada (fq 25%
Page 279 and 280:
Ground: Crotalaria montana (fq 33%)
Page 281 and 282:
Carissa lanceolata (fq 25%), Dolich
Page 283 and 284:
33%), Dimeria ornithopoda (fq 33%),
Page 285 and 286:
Landform: simple slope General Cond
Page 287 and 288:
Ground: Polygala longifolia (fq 67%
Page 289 and 290:
Ground: Ammannia multiflora (fq 100
Page 291 and 292:
Ground: Alloteropsis semialata (fq
Page 293 and 294:
cunninghamii (fq 67%), Grevillea pa
Page 295 and 296:
Ground: Bulbostylis barbata (fq 67%
Page 297 and 298:
Desmodium brownii (fq 20%), Desmodi
Page 299 and 300:
graminea (fq 33%), Nesaea muelleri
Page 301 and 302:
trifolia (fq 33%), Cyperus holoscho
Page 303 and 304:
microcephala (fq 67%), Melochia cor
Page 305 and 306:
General Condition: This single site
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Site ID Map Easting Northing Descri
Page 311 and 312:
Table 10-3: Vegetation Assessment o
Page 313 and 314:
Table 10-5: Vegetation Assessment o
Page 315 and 316:
Site ID Map Easting Northing W54 2
Page 317 and 318:
Site ID Map Easting Northing Client
Page 319 and 320:
Table 10-8: Riparian Vegetation Ass
Page 321 and 322:
Table 10-10: Riparian Vegetation As
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Table 11-2: Port Area. Vegetation U
Page 331 and 332:
Table 11-4: Port Area. Vegetation U
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337:
Voucher No. Strata labels Biodivers
show all

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?