03.04.2013 Views

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

abundance or large rocks <strong>and</strong> rock outcrop. Although differences are apparent between the two substrates<br />

these sites haven been grouped together based on broadly similar species compositions. Sampling over a<br />

larger area may distinguish the two communities more readily.<br />

Small patches of Callitris intratropica dominated Woodl<strong>and</strong>s were found scattered through the surveyed<br />

area, however, these are not mapped nor described as a separated vegetation unit due to their small size.<br />

This vegetation type is scattered within a few different vegetation types.<br />

2.2.4 Port<br />

Sampling Regime <strong>and</strong> Site Selection<br />

Vegetation types of the port area were mapped <strong>and</strong> described through a preliminary interpretation of aerial<br />

photography, delimiting obvious vegetation types <strong>and</strong> boundaries at 1:30,000. This preliminary map provided<br />

the basis for selecting sites for fauna survey <strong>and</strong> vegetation survey for the more common vegetation types.<br />

Preliminary mapping <strong>and</strong> vegetation descriptions were refined through one field survey carried out in<br />

February 2012 – associated with fauna surveys. Flora sites were selected for each vegetation types,<br />

however no sites were established in mangroves or salt flats.<br />

Sampling Intensity<br />

A total of seven full characterisation <strong>and</strong> five check sites (conferring with the levels of data collection<br />

recommend by Brocklehurst et al. 2007) were selected <strong>and</strong> surveyed (refer to Figure 40). This sampling<br />

density is below the minimum of four sites per km 2 as recommended by Brocklehurst et al. (2007) for<br />

mapping at 1:25,000, but was regarded as suitable for the purpose of this preliminary vegetation mapping<br />

exercise. Vegetation in the vicinity if the actual proposed iron ore stockyard, conveyor belt <strong>and</strong> barge loading<br />

facility was surveyed at greater detail (i.e. vine thickets, Melaleuca woodl<strong>and</strong>s, beefwood woodl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

Cypress Pine woodl<strong>and</strong>s) than surrounding vegetation units (salt flats, mangroves, beach dunes, <strong>and</strong><br />

paperbark swamps).<br />

Limitations<br />

Detailed ground-truthing of vegetation types was not possible due to project time frames, which resulted in<br />

the survey area not having survey effort applicable to vegetation mapping to a scale of 1:25,000. Therefore<br />

vegetation types proposed for disturbance were targeted during on-grounds works to an adequate level of<br />

survey.<br />

Although vegetation classification attempts to place vegetation into “types” <strong>and</strong> place boundaries around<br />

these types, in reality vegetation is a continuum (apart from mangrove communities). Vegetation<br />

communities feature a reasonable amount of variation within a classified type due to soils, rainfall, surface<br />

drainage, fire history <strong>and</strong> other factors. The boundaries between vegetation types may not always be clear<br />

due to a gradual transition.<br />

Client: Western Desert Resources Ltd Page 21 of 150<br />

Doc No. DW120004-C0302-EIA-R-0036<br />

Doc Title: <strong>Appendix</strong> D – <strong>Terrestrial</strong> <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Technical Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!