03.04.2013 Views

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

Appendix D Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity - Environment ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SZ247: Bat survey from the Western Desert Resources Towns River project area, NT<br />

4.0 RESULTS<br />

4.1 Expected species<br />

A maximum total of 22 species was expected from the Roper River – Limmen – Borroloola<br />

area based on the distribution records compiled in Milne <strong>and</strong> Pavey (2011), of which three<br />

species are listed in an elevated or data deficient conservation category (S. saccolaimus;<br />

Macroderma gigas; Rhinonicteris aurantia; Table 1). Within any one locality, the species<br />

assemblage is likely to be smaller than this regional total, on the basis of the habitats present.<br />

In addition to these, there are two species that might also occur in this area, but are currently<br />

only known from records adjacent to the region (Northern leaf-nosed bat Hipposideros<br />

stenotis; Pallid long-eared bat Nyctophilus daedalus). Both of these species are known from<br />

relatively few records <strong>and</strong> might be distributed sparsely across their range (Milne <strong>and</strong> Pavey<br />

2011).<br />

4.2 Acoustic detection<br />

A total of 12 AnaBat sessions <strong>and</strong> 10 D500x sessions were made in the MLA – Towns River<br />

project area (Table 2; Figures 1 – 4), in addition to a further 33 recording nights over several<br />

surveys in other parts of the project area (Table 3). All represent a full night of passive<br />

stationary recording.<br />

At least six species of echolocating bat were identified from the acoustic recordings made in<br />

the MLA – Towns River project area, with the possibility of several others than cannot be<br />

distinguished reliably from their echolocation call characteristics. In addition, at least one<br />

species of flying-fox Pteropus sp. was observed at three sites, however identification to<br />

species could not be made. At least nine species were identified as being present in the<br />

other parts of the project area, with the possibility of others that could not be distinguished<br />

based on echolocation call characteristics (Table 3).<br />

Details supporting the identifications are provided, as recommended by the Australasian Bat<br />

Society (ABS 2006). A summary of pulse parameters is provided in Table 4, <strong>and</strong><br />

representative call sequences are illustrated in Figure 4. Further data is available should<br />

verification be required.<br />

4.3 Trapping<br />

A total of 20 individuals from five species was captured at four trapping sites, most being from<br />

mist nets spread over water bodies (Table 5). The majority of captures came from a broad<br />

river habitat in the south-east of the MLA – Towns River project area. Long-eared bats<br />

(Nyctophilus geoffroyi) were captured in mist nets (M01, M02) <strong>and</strong> a harp trap (H1) in riparian<br />

vegetation away from the main river channel. The understorey vegetation at site H1 was<br />

relatively dense. One individual of Saccolaimus was captured as it flew low over a long pool<br />

in the Towns River. It was identified to species (S. flaviventris) on the basis of a relatively<br />

broad inter-canine width (6.05), according to the scheme in Milne et al. (2009), plus the<br />

absence of a palpable lambdoidal crest (KN Armstrong unpubl). The specimen has been<br />

lodged in the South Australian Museum (temporary accession number BS5949 temporary<br />

accession number 12.052).<br />

Page 13 of 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!