An overview of vis-nir-swir field spectroscopy - Spectral International
An overview of vis-nir-swir field spectroscopy - Spectral International
An overview of vis-nir-swir field spectroscopy - Spectral International
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
________________________________________________________________<br />
Definition <strong>of</strong> deposit type<br />
HIGH SULFIDATION SYSTEMS<br />
High sulphidation Au + Cu ore systems develop from the reaction with host rocks<br />
<strong>of</strong> hot acidic magmatic fluids to produce characteristic zoned alteration and later<br />
sulphide and Au + Cu + Ag deposition. Ore systems display permeability controls<br />
governed by lithology, structure and breccias and changes in wall rock alteration<br />
and ore mineralogy with depth <strong>of</strong> formation. One <strong>of</strong> the challenges is to<br />
distinguish the mineralized systems from a group <strong>of</strong> generally non-economic<br />
acidic alteration styles including lithocaps or barren shoulders, steam heated,<br />
magmatic solfatara and acid sulphate alteration.<br />
Original definitions (Heald et al.,1987) suggest that epithermal deposits formed at<br />
temperatures < 300°C and therefore at shallow depths, typically < 1 km.<br />
The term epithermal is therefore used in <strong>field</strong> exploration studies to describe Au ±<br />
Ag ± Cu deposits formed in magmatic arc environments (including rifts) at<br />
shallow depths, most typically above the level <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> porphyry Cu-Au<br />
deposits (typically < 1 km), although in many instances associated with<br />
subvolcanic intrusions. Higher level epithermal deposits are commonly formed<br />
later in a deposit paragenesis, and may be telescoped upon deeper earlier<br />
formed deposits, including in some instances porphyry systems which are older,<br />
or part <strong>of</strong> the same overall magmatic event (e.g., Lihir, Corbett et al., 2001b). In<br />
strongly dilational structural environments porphyry-related systems may be<br />
telescoped outwards into the deeper “epithermal” environment (e.g., Cadia,<br />
Maricunga Belt).<br />
In brief, high sulphidation deposits develop in settings where volatile rich<br />
magmatic fluids rise to higher crustal levels without significant interaction<br />
with the host rocks or ground waters. Volatiles (SO2) evolved from the<br />
depressurising fluids oxidize to form a two stage hot acid fluid, the initial stage<br />
<strong>of</strong> which reacts with the host rocks to produce the characteristic zoned acidic<br />
alteration at epithermal crustal levels (Corbett and Leach, 1998). A later liquiddominated<br />
fluid phase deposits sulphides which are characterised by pyrite<br />
with enargite, or the latter’s low temperature polymorph luzonite.<br />
Magmatic rocks are interpreted to represent the ultimate source <strong>of</strong> ore fluids as<br />
demonstrated by the commonly association <strong>of</strong> HS deposits with felsic domes<br />
and phreatomagmatic breccias within flow-dome complexes. Many HS deposits<br />
display associations with porphyry Cu-Au systems <strong>of</strong> similar ages (Nena), or are<br />
collapsed upon and form part <strong>of</strong> the porphyry ores. Fluids responsible for the<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> HS deposits rarely evolve to Au- rich lower sulphidation style ores.<br />
23