09.04.2013 Views

Substitution of PFOS for use in nondecorative hard chrome plating

Substitution of PFOS for use in nondecorative hard chrome plating

Substitution of PFOS for use in nondecorative hard chrome plating

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10<br />

The laboratory experiments were carried out by IPU and the large scale<br />

test<strong>in</strong>g was carried out at a.h. nichro Haardchrom A/S. FORCE Technology<br />

was responsible <strong>for</strong> the chromium emission measurement dur<strong>in</strong>g the large<br />

scale test<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> conclusions<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> conclusions <strong>of</strong> the project are:<br />

A non-<strong>PFOS</strong> mist suppressant chemical alternative was found (at<br />

large scale test<strong>in</strong>g) to be <strong>use</strong>ful as an alternative to <strong>PFOS</strong>. The<br />

effectiveness, the durability, and the price level were similar to that <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>PFOS</strong>. The non-<strong>PFOS</strong> alternative is an environmental improvement<br />

as it is less persistent, less bioaccumulative, and less toxic than <strong>PFOS</strong>.<br />

A non-fluor<strong>in</strong>ated mist suppressant chemical alternative was found<br />

and might be a promis<strong>in</strong>g substitute <strong>for</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong>. However, as<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously addition <strong>of</strong> the mist suppressant is needed, the <strong>use</strong>fulness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the alternative seems to be limited <strong>for</strong> automated <strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong><br />

processes and must be assessed <strong>in</strong> each case.<br />

A physical alternative – <strong>in</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> PTFE coated balls – does not<br />

seem to lower the chromium emissions from the <strong>chrome</strong> bath. Quite<br />

the contrary, the chromium emissions seem to <strong>in</strong>crease compared to<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g no mist suppressant at all.<br />

A physical alternative – <strong>in</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> a mesh or blanket solution –<br />

could be suitable <strong>for</strong> large scale series plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> uni<strong>for</strong>m products.<br />

However, this k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> alternative was not <strong>in</strong>vestigated further <strong>in</strong> this<br />

project.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, the laboratory results <strong>of</strong> this project showed that the Cr 6+<br />

emission can be reduced radically by avoid<strong>in</strong>g air convection. This<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that large scale tests <strong>of</strong> a physical method that prevents air<br />

convection could turn out to be an alternative to <strong>PFOS</strong>. Such method<br />

would be a suitable alternative to <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> mass production systems.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>for</strong> frequently vary<strong>in</strong>g productions, it will<br />

be more difficult to establish a closed system beca<strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> the flexibility<br />

required to such systems. However, this alternative solution was not<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated further <strong>in</strong> this project, but would be a very <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

solution to <strong>in</strong>vestigate further.<br />

Project results<br />

Survey <strong>of</strong> the Danish and global <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

A survey <strong>of</strong> the Danish <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry showed<br />

that the annually <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Danish <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is<br />

between 10 to 28 kg (calculated as pure <strong>PFOS</strong>). This number was found by<br />

contact to the Danish <strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong> platers and suppliers <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> as mist<br />

suppressants to the Danish market.<br />

The global <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry was estimated to be<br />

around 32 to 40.7 tons <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> (calculated as pure <strong>PFOS</strong>). This number<br />

was derived by contact to various global suppliers <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> as well as an<br />

Internet search after various sources to this k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation. Most<br />

literature does not dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> non-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!