09.04.2013 Views

Substitution of PFOS for use in nondecorative hard chrome plating

Substitution of PFOS for use in nondecorative hard chrome plating

Substitution of PFOS for use in nondecorative hard chrome plating

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Most literature does not dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong><br />

non-decorative <strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g (chromium-(VI)) and <strong>for</strong> other purposes<br />

with<strong>in</strong> metal plat<strong>in</strong>g. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>in</strong> most cases, the amounts <strong>in</strong> the table below<br />

cover the entire metal plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry and not only non-decorative <strong>hard</strong><br />

<strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g. Furthermore, most literature data is more than five years old<br />

and there<strong>for</strong>e it does not account <strong>for</strong> the fact that <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> the EU was<br />

banned <strong>for</strong> other purposes than non-decorative <strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> these sources is the OECD report published <strong>in</strong> 2005. OECD<br />

conducted a survey about the production and <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong>, PFAS, and<br />

PFOA, related substances and products/mixtures conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these substances.<br />

In this report, the total <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> related substances <strong>for</strong> metal plat<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

estimated by <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation from 10 different OECD countries. The data<br />

provided represented the year 2003 (OECD, 2005).<br />

However, there is one new source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation from the European<br />

Commission (2010). They have gathered <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the restriction <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> electroplat<strong>in</strong>g applications. In<br />

this paper, the European countries have reported the amounts <strong>use</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong><br />

as mist suppressant – sometimes explicitly stated as mist suppressant <strong>for</strong> <strong>hard</strong><br />

<strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g. Most figures are new – from 2008 or 2009. Figures from<br />

2008 may be higher than figures from 2009, as the restriction on <strong>PFOS</strong> with<strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry entered <strong>in</strong>to <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> the middle <strong>of</strong> 2008. For<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the European countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Denmark, it is stated that <strong>PFOS</strong> is<br />

not <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> non-decorative <strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g. However, this may not be<br />

entirely true, as <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> Denmark, the Danish EPA has reported that<br />

there is no <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>in</strong> the non-decorative <strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong><br />

Denmark, as no <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> can be found with<strong>in</strong> the Danish Product<br />

Register. However, as the mist suppressants <strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>dustry is not<br />

classified as dangerous, no report<strong>in</strong>g to the Danish Product Register is<br />

required.<br />

Beca<strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> this recent <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>for</strong> non-decorative <strong>hard</strong><br />

<strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the EU, the <strong>PFOS</strong> <strong>use</strong> data <strong>for</strong> the EU only represents the<br />

<strong>use</strong> <strong>for</strong> non-decorative <strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g, as this is one <strong>of</strong> few exemptions<br />

from the restriction <strong>of</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong>. However, data from other parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world may <strong>in</strong>clude the entire metal plat<strong>in</strong>g sector and not only non-decorative<br />

<strong>hard</strong> <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Another new report prepared <strong>for</strong> UNIDO (United Nations Industrial<br />

Development Organization) Regional Office <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a from December 2009<br />

has also collected all publicly available <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on the <strong>use</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong><br />

(Carloni, 2009). Data on <strong>use</strong> has been reported between the year 2000 and<br />

2008. This data is presented <strong>in</strong> the text below if other sources have not been<br />

found.<br />

Table 2-1 Total annual reported <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>PFOS</strong> based mist suppressants <strong>for</strong> (non-decorative <strong>hard</strong>)<br />

chromium-(VI) plat<strong>in</strong>g. More detailed descriptions/explanations can be found below.<br />

Country<br />

<strong>PFOS</strong> (kg)*<br />

annually<br />

Industry covered References/comments<br />

Non-decorative <strong>hard</strong> Cr-(VI) plat<strong>in</strong>g Info from Danish <strong>in</strong>dustry (2009) and<br />

Denmark 10 – 28 kg (and perhaps partly other metal suppliers to Danish <strong>in</strong>dustry (2008).<br />

plat<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>for</strong> the year 2008). Calculated.<br />

Norway 0 kg Chrome plat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

SC UNEP/POPS/POPRC.5/INF/14,<br />

2009.<br />

Sweden<br />

26 – 71 kg<br />

(250 kg)<br />

Hard <strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g and decorative<br />

<strong>chrome</strong> plat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

KEMI, 2004, states a <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> 26 kg.<br />

Swedish Product Register (2008)<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!