THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Q. 76. ART. ! THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA " 26 intellect could be attributed to the whole. This is, however, absurd for many reasons. First, because the intellect does not move the body except through the appetite, the movement of which presupposes the operation of the intellect. The reason therefore why Socrates understands is not because he is moved by his intellect, but rather, contrariwise, he is moved by his intellect because he understands. Secondly, because, since Socrates is an individual in a nature of one essence composed of matter and form, if the intellect be not the form, it follows that it must be outside the essence, and then the intellect is to the whole Socrates as a motor to the thing moved. Whereas the act of intellect remains in the agent, and does not pass into something else, as does the action of heating. Therefore the action of understanding cannot be attributed to Socrates for the reason that he is moved by his intellect. Thirdly, because the action of a motor is never attributed to the thing moved, except as to an instrument; as the action of a carpenter to a saw. Therefore if understanding is attributed to Socrates, as the action of what moves him, it follows that it is attributed to him as to an instrument. This is contrary to the teaching of the Philosopher, who holds that understanding is not possible through a corporeal instrument (De Anima iii. 4). Fourthly, bex:ause, although the action of a part be attributed to the whole, as the action of the eye is attributed to a man ; yet it is never attributed to another part, except perhaps indirectly; for we do not say that the hand sees because the eye sees. Therefore if the intellect and Socrates are united in the above manner, the action of the intellect cannot be attributed to Socrates. If, however, Socrates be a whole composed of a union of the intellect with whatever else belongs to Socrates, and still the intellect be united to those other things only as a motor, it follows that Socrates is not one absolutely, and consequently neither a being absolutely, for a thing is a being according as it is one. There remains, therefore, no other explanation than that given by Aristotle---namely, that this particular man understands, because the intellectual principle is his form. Thus
_7 UNION OF BODY AND SOUL Q. 76. ART., from the very operation of the intellect it is made clear that the intellectual principle is united to the body as its form. The same can be clearly shown from the nature of the human species. For the nature of each thing is shown by its operation. Now the proper operation of man as man is to understand; because he thereby surpasses all other animals. Whence Aristotle concludes (Ethic. x. 7) that the ultimate happiness of man must consist in this operation as properly belonging to him. Man must therefore derive his species from that which is the principle of this operation. But the species of anything is derived from its form. It follows therefore that the intellectual principle is the proper form of man. But we must observe that the nobler a form is, the more it rises above corporeal matter, the less it is merged in matter, and the more it excels matter by its power and its operation ; hence we find that the form of a mixed body has another operation not caused by its elemental qualities. And the higher we advance in the nobility of forms, the more we find that the power of the form excels the elementary matter; as the vegetative soul excels the form of the metal, and the sensitive soul excels the vegetative soul. Now the human soul is the highest and noblest of forms. Wherefore it excels corporeal matter in its power by the fact that it has an operation and a power in which corporeal matter has no share whatever. This power is called the intellect. It is well to remark that if anyone holds that the soul is composed of matter and form, it would follow that in no way could the soul be the form of the body. For since the form is an act, and matter is only in potentiality, that which is composed of matter and form cannot be the form of another by virtue of itself as a whole. But if it is a form by virtue of some part of itself, then that part which is the form we call the soul, and that of which it is the form we call the primary animate, as was said above (Q. LXXV., A. 5). Reply Obj. I. As the Philosopher says (Phys. ii. 2), the ultimate natural form to which the consideration of the natural philosopher is directed is indeed separate; yet it
Page 1 and 2: THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 3 and 4: THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA" OF ST. THOMA
Page 5 and 6: 1749 .T5 1920 v.4 LETTER FROM THE C
Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS TREATISE ON MAN QUESTION P
Page 9: TREATISE ON MAN x. 4 J
Page 12 and 13: Q. 75. Am'. t THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 14 and 15: Q. 75. ARt. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 16 and 17: 9. 75. ART.2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 18 and 19: Q. 75. AR_. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 20 and 21: Q. 75. ART.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 24 and 25: Q.75. Arr. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 28 and 29: Q. 75. ART. 7 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 30 and 31: QUESTION LXXVI. OF THE UNION OF BOD
Page 32 and 33: Q. 76. ART.X THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 36 and 37: Q. 76. ART.X THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 38 and 39: Q. 76. ART. _ THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 42 and 43: Q. 76. ART.3 THE " SUMMA .THEOLOGIC
Page 44 and 45: Q. 76. Aar.3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 48 and 49: Q. _. ART.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 62 and 63: 9. 76. A_r. 8 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 64 and 65: Q. 77. ARt. x THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 66 and 67: Q. 77. ART.i THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 70 and 71: Q. 77.ART.3 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 72 and 73: Q.77. Art. 4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 74 and 75: Q. 77. An. 5 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 76 and 77: Q. 77. Agr. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 78 and 79: Q. 77. A_. 7 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 80 and 81: Q. 77. ARt. 8 THE " SUMMA THEOLOG1C
Page 82 and 83: Q. 77. _urr.8 "ITHE '° SUMMA THEOL
Page 84 and 85:
Q. 78. ARt. i THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 86 and 87:
9. 78. A_. x THE "SUMMA THEOLOGIGA"
Page 88 and 89:
Q. 78. A_. 2 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 90 and 91:
Q. 78. ART.3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 92 and 93:
Q.78. Art. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 94 and 95:
Q. 78. A,_T.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 96 and 97:
Q.78. A_r. 4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 98 and 99:
Q. 78. A_T. 4 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 100 and 101:
Q. 79. ART. I THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 102 and 103:
Q. 79. ART._' THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 104 and 105:
Q. 79. An. 3 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 106 and 107:
Q.79.Awr.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA "
Page 108 and 109:
Q. 79- ART.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 110 and 111:
Q. 79, Aar. 5 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 112 and 113:
Q. 79. Am'. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 114 and 115:
Q. 7_ ART.6 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Q. 79. An'r.8 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 120 and 121:
Q. 79. Asa'.9 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 122 and 123:
Q. 7_Alrr. xo THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 124 and 125:
Q. 7_ A_r. tt THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 126 and 127:
Q. 79' ART.12 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 128 and 129:
Q. 79. Am..x3 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 130 and 131:
QUESTION LXXX. OF THE APPETITIVE PO
Page 132 and 133:
Q. 80. A_r. 2 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 134 and 135:
Q. 8o. ART.Z THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 136 and 137:
Q. 8L A_. z THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 138 and 139:
Q. 8i. Amr. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 140 and 141:
Q. St. AsT. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 142 and 143:
O. 81. ART.3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 144 and 145:
Q. 8_. Am". _ THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 146 and 147:
Q. 82. a_r. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 148 and 149:
Q. 82. ART. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 150 and 151:
Q. 82. Amr. 4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 152 and 153:
Q. 82. A_rr.5 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Q. 83. ART. ! THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Q. 83. Am-. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
QUESTION LXXXIV. HOW THE SOUL WHILE
Page 166 and 167:
Q.84.A_. t THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA "
Page 168 and 169:
Q. 84. A_. a THE '° SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Q. 84- A_T.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 176 and 177:
Q. 84.ART.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 178 and 179:
Q. 84.Am-.5 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA "
Page 180 and 181:
Q. 84. ARr. 5 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 182 and 183:
Q"_4' ART. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 184 and 185:
Q. 84. Am-. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Q. 84. h_. 8 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 190 and 191:
QUESTION LXXXV. OF THE MODE AND ORD
Page 192 and 193:
Q. 85. Am'. x THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 194 and 195:
Q. 85. Am'. x THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 196 and 197:
Q. 85. AR'r. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Q. 85. Aa-r. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 202 and 203:
Q. 85.ART.3 THE '° SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 204 and 205:
Q.85. Ajar.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 206 and 207:
Q. 85.ARt. 5 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 208 and 209:
Q. aS. AzT. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 210 and 211:
Q. 85. Am'. 7 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 212 and 213:
Q. 85. An. 8 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 214 and 215:
Q. 8S. A_. 8_ THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 216 and 217:
Q. 86. ART. I THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 218 and 219:
0.86. A_. • THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 220 and 221:
Q- 86. Arc. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 222 and 223:
0. 86. AaT. 4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 224 and 225:
QUESTION LXXXVII. HOW THE INTELLECT
Page 226 and 227:
Q. 87. A,T._ THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
QUESTION LXXXVIII. HOW THE HUMAN SO
Page 236 and 237:
Q 88. ART.t THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 238 and 239:
0. 88. ART. x THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 240 and 241:
O. 8a. ART.2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 242 and 243:
O. s8. _,rr. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 244 and 245:
QUESTION LXXXIX. OF THE KNOWLEDGE O
Page 246 and 247:
Q. 89. AItT.t THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 248 and 249:
Q. 89. ART.a THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Q. 89. XttT.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 254 and 255:
Q. 89. Aar. S THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 256 and 257:
_. 89. Arr. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 258 and 259:
Q. 89. A_r. 7 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 260 and 261:
Q. _._z. 8 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 262 and 263:
QUESTION XC. OF THE F1RST PRODUCTIO
Page 264 and 265:
_. 90_ ART. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 266 and 267:
Q. 9o. A_,. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 268 and 269:
Q. 9o. ART.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 270 and 271:
QUESTION XCI. THE PRODUCTION OF THE
Page 272 and 273:
Q. 91. Air. i THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 274 and 275:
Q. 9t. ^,r. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 276 and 277:
Q. 9 z. ART. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 278 and 279:
{2-9t. AaT. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 280 and 281:
{_.9t. ARx. 4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 282 and 283:
QUESTION XCII. THE PRODUCTION OF TH
Page 284 and 285:
_. 92. ART.2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
0. 9a. _r. 4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 290 and 291:
QUESTION XCIII. THE END OR TERM OF
Page 292 and 293:
Q. 93- AR_. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
0- 93- ART.6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 302 and 303:
_. 93. ART. 6 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 304 and 305:
O. 93-ART.7 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA"
Page 306 and 307:
_. 93. ART.7 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
1_. 93. A2a'.9 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Q. 94._,RT._ THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
9.94. ART.2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 320 and 321:
Q. 94./mr. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 322 and 323:
Q. 94- ART.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 324 and 325:
QUESTION XCV. OF THINGS PERTAINING
Page 326 and 327:
Q. 95- ARt. I THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 328 and 329:
Q. 9S- A2T. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 330 and 331:
Q- 95. ART.3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 332 and 333:
_, 95. AHT.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 334 and 335:
QUESTION XCVI. OF THE MASTERSHIP BE
Page 336 and 337:
Q. 96. ARt. z THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
O. 96. ^ur.4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 342 and 343:
Q. 96. Awr. 4 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 344 and 345:
Q. 97. ART.I THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Q. 97. ARt. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
QUESTION XCVIII. OF THE PRESERVATIO
Page 354 and 355:
0- 98. ART.2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
QUESTION XCIX. OF THE CONDITION OF
Page 360 and 361:
Q" 99. ART. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 362 and 363:
_) 99. ART.2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 364 and 365:
Q. too. ARt. x THE "SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 366 and 367:
Q. _o0. ARt. 2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 368 and 369:
QUESTION CI. OF THE CONDITION OF TH
Page 370 and 371:
Q.iol. ART.2 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 372 and 373:
QUESTION CII. OF MAN'S ABODE, WHICH
Page 374 and 375:
Q. io2. A_T. t THE " SUMMA THEOLOGI
Page 376 and 377:
Q. io2.^Rr. 2 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
Page 378 and 379:
Q. _o_.ART. 3 THE " SUMMA THEOLOGIC
Page 380 and 381:
Q. zo,.Aaz. 4 THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA
show all

THE "SUMMA THEOLOGICA"

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?