24.04.2013 Views

Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association

Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association

Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2 or<br />

above<br />

2b or<br />

above<br />

W 1 2c 2b 2a 3<br />

accelerated progress<br />

all completed programmes<br />

Figure 7. Per<strong>for</strong>mance profiles of accelerated progress children and all children who completed<br />

Reading Recovery programmes in KS1 reading National Curriculum assessments in 2004-05<br />

<strong>The</strong> figures reveal similar patterns of per<strong>for</strong>mance across the two cohorts (and the same<br />

patterns are found also in the 2005-06 and 2006-07 data, which are considered later in<br />

relation to all-England Key Stage 1 National Curriculum assessment results in 2006 and<br />

2007). In each cohort, over 80% of ‘accelerated progress’ children achieved Level 2 or<br />

above – but this fell to 72% of all children who completed programmes (i.e. both<br />

‘accelerated progress’ and ‘progress-referred’ groups).<br />

Accepting that children enrolled into Reading Recovery were the lowest per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

children in their classes, these results appear commendable, with 7 out of 10 children<br />

enrolled in and having completed the programme achieving Level 2 or above. However,<br />

when we look at percentages achieving Level 2b or above, the picture is less rosy, with<br />

just over 50% of ‘accelerated progress’ children and 42% of all children who completed<br />

programmes achieving Level 2b or above. That is, only 4 out of 10 children enrolled in<br />

and having completed the programme achieved Level 2b or above; 30%-33% of<br />

‘accelerated progress’ children and 24%-30% of all children completing the programme<br />

achieved Level 2c. In addition, a further 17% (2003-04) or 15% (2004-05) of<br />

‘accelerated progress’ children and 31% (2003-04) or 28% (2004-05) of all children<br />

completing the programme achieved Level 1, or working towards Level 1.<br />

In order to address the question of whether Reading Recovery puts children ‘on track’<br />

<strong>for</strong> becoming independent readers, it is necessary to examine the characteristics of Level<br />

1 and Level 2c readers, and, in particular, to consider how well developed are the word<br />

recognition skills of children at these stages, given that these are the skills that will<br />

mostly determine the likelihood of them becoming independent readers. <strong>The</strong> descriptors<br />

<strong>for</strong> National Curriculum assessment reading levels are shown in Table 12.<br />

<strong>Intervention</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dyslexia</strong> 113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!