Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association
Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association
Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
evised as the Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing Program <strong>for</strong> Reading, Spelling and<br />
Speech (Lindamood & Lindamood, 1998).<br />
2.5.5 Lovett et al. (1994)<br />
Lovett, Borden, Lacerenza, Benson and Brackstone (1994) provided 35 hours of<br />
instruction to children who were very severely disabled in reading (mean word<br />
identification score on the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test of 64). <strong>The</strong> average age at<br />
the start of the study was 9 years 7 months, and they were taught in pairs using a<br />
modification of the Reading Mastery programme, which provides direct instruction in<br />
phonemic decoding, with an emphasis on achieving mastery and fluency.<br />
2.5.6 Wise, Ring and Olson (1999)<br />
<strong>The</strong> study by Wise, Ring and Olson (1999) gave 40 hours of both 1:1 and 1:4 instruction<br />
to children who had an average age of 8 years 9 months. A combination of teacherdelivered<br />
instruction using the Lindamood method, and computer-administered<br />
instruction that provided extensive practice in reading text, was provided.<br />
2.5.7 Lovett et al. (2000)<br />
Lovett, Lacerenza, Borden, Frijters, Steinbach and DePalma (2000) also reported<br />
outcomes from two equally successful instructional techniques with children who had<br />
severe reading disabilities (mean age 9 years 8 months). <strong>The</strong> instruction in both<br />
approaches was given in groups of 3 pupils, who were taught in 60-minute sessions <strong>for</strong><br />
a total of 70 hours of instruction. <strong>The</strong> two techniques differed primarily in the order in<br />
which the components of the teaching programme were delivered. Students in Group A<br />
received 35 hours of explicit phonics instruction first, followed by 35 hours of instruction<br />
in four different word reading strategies (i.e. looking <strong>for</strong> familiar embedded words, using<br />
analogies to known words, identifying affixes, and vowel flexibility). Students in Group B<br />
received just the opposite sequence of instruction.<br />
2.5.8 O’Connor and Wilson (1995)<br />
O’Connor and Wilson (1995) reported the effects of about 60 hours of instruction<br />
provided 1:1 to pupils in 3rd to 8th grades. <strong>The</strong> instruction was provided 1:1 by teachers<br />
trained in the use of the Wilson Reading System (Wilson, 1988), which is a multisensory<br />
structured and sequential language programme that directly teaches phoneme<br />
segmentation, decoding, sight words, fluency, vocabulary, spelling and comprehension.<br />
2.5.9 Torgesen et al. (2003)<br />
Torgesen, Rashotte, Alexander, Alexander & MacPhee (2003) used the Lindamood<br />
programme and the Spell Read Phonological Auditory Training programme with students<br />
aged 12 years. <strong>The</strong> students were taught in groups of four, and a total of either 50<br />
hours or 100 hours of instruction was given.<br />
<strong>Intervention</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dyslexia</strong> 45