24.04.2013 Views

Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association

Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association

Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

evised as the Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing Program <strong>for</strong> Reading, Spelling and<br />

Speech (Lindamood & Lindamood, 1998).<br />

2.5.5 Lovett et al. (1994)<br />

Lovett, Borden, Lacerenza, Benson and Brackstone (1994) provided 35 hours of<br />

instruction to children who were very severely disabled in reading (mean word<br />

identification score on the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test of 64). <strong>The</strong> average age at<br />

the start of the study was 9 years 7 months, and they were taught in pairs using a<br />

modification of the Reading Mastery programme, which provides direct instruction in<br />

phonemic decoding, with an emphasis on achieving mastery and fluency.<br />

2.5.6 Wise, Ring and Olson (1999)<br />

<strong>The</strong> study by Wise, Ring and Olson (1999) gave 40 hours of both 1:1 and 1:4 instruction<br />

to children who had an average age of 8 years 9 months. A combination of teacherdelivered<br />

instruction using the Lindamood method, and computer-administered<br />

instruction that provided extensive practice in reading text, was provided.<br />

2.5.7 Lovett et al. (2000)<br />

Lovett, Lacerenza, Borden, Frijters, Steinbach and DePalma (2000) also reported<br />

outcomes from two equally successful instructional techniques with children who had<br />

severe reading disabilities (mean age 9 years 8 months). <strong>The</strong> instruction in both<br />

approaches was given in groups of 3 pupils, who were taught in 60-minute sessions <strong>for</strong><br />

a total of 70 hours of instruction. <strong>The</strong> two techniques differed primarily in the order in<br />

which the components of the teaching programme were delivered. Students in Group A<br />

received 35 hours of explicit phonics instruction first, followed by 35 hours of instruction<br />

in four different word reading strategies (i.e. looking <strong>for</strong> familiar embedded words, using<br />

analogies to known words, identifying affixes, and vowel flexibility). Students in Group B<br />

received just the opposite sequence of instruction.<br />

2.5.8 O’Connor and Wilson (1995)<br />

O’Connor and Wilson (1995) reported the effects of about 60 hours of instruction<br />

provided 1:1 to pupils in 3rd to 8th grades. <strong>The</strong> instruction was provided 1:1 by teachers<br />

trained in the use of the Wilson Reading System (Wilson, 1988), which is a multisensory<br />

structured and sequential language programme that directly teaches phoneme<br />

segmentation, decoding, sight words, fluency, vocabulary, spelling and comprehension.<br />

2.5.9 Torgesen et al. (2003)<br />

Torgesen, Rashotte, Alexander, Alexander & MacPhee (2003) used the Lindamood<br />

programme and the Spell Read Phonological Auditory Training programme with students<br />

aged 12 years. <strong>The</strong> students were taught in groups of four, and a total of either 50<br />

hours or 100 hours of instruction was given.<br />

<strong>Intervention</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dyslexia</strong> 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!