Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association
Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association
Intervention for Dyslexia - The British Dyslexia Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Against the many advantages of computer-based assessment must be set its limitations.<br />
Computer technology is not yet sufficiently advanced to permit the use of direct speech<br />
input into the computer <strong>for</strong> assessment purposes because current technology generates<br />
error frequencies that would undermine the reliability of the test. Phonological<br />
processing and word reading are fundamental areas of deficit in dyslexia, and<br />
assessment of either of these skills normally requires an oral response from the child.<br />
This technological limitation is there<strong>for</strong>e a serious one <strong>for</strong> computer-based tests. It is<br />
anticipated that within a few years voice input technology will be adequate <strong>for</strong> this task,<br />
but in the meantime designers of computer tests attempt to circumvent this problem by<br />
using multiple-choice items (which changes a word reading or phonological task from<br />
production to the somewhat easier task of recognition) or, in the case of reading, using<br />
sentence completion or Cloze tasks, which involve comprehension and which<br />
consequently are not pure measures of reading accuracy. In view of these problems,<br />
some teachers and psychologists may feel that when assessing phonological and word<br />
reading skills the conventional approach is still to be preferred; others may feel that the<br />
advantages and greater practicality of computer-based screening make the acceptance<br />
of these limitations <strong>for</strong> the time being a price worth paying.<br />
<strong>The</strong> two computer-based screening tests <strong>for</strong> dyslexia are the <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Screener (Turner<br />
& Smith, 2004) and Lucid Rapid <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Screening (Singleton, Horne, Leedale &<br />
Thomas, 2003). Both these tests provide automatic scoring in standardised score <strong>for</strong>m<br />
and automatic interpretation of results.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Screener is designed <strong>for</strong> children aged 5–16 years and comprises the<br />
following subtests, which in total take about 30 minutes <strong>for</strong> the average child to<br />
complete:<br />
Non-verbal reasoning<br />
Phonics<br />
Spelling<br />
Visual search<br />
Reading<br />
Verbal reasoning.<br />
<strong>The</strong> decision process used by the <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Screener is largely based on discrepancy<br />
between intelligence (verbal and non-verbal reasoning subtests) and per<strong>for</strong>mance on<br />
the literacy tests (reading, spelling, phonics) (see Section 4.1.1 <strong>for</strong> a discussion of the<br />
discrepancy criterion in the identification of dyslexia). It incorporates a version of<br />
Turner’s <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Index (see Section 4.3.2), but whereas Turner (1997) advocates using<br />
a total of at least 13 tests to calculate the <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Index (six ability tests, four<br />
diagnostic tests, and three achievement tests), the <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Screener comprises only six.<br />
Expected reading and spelling scores are estimated by the program using the combined<br />
ability score (derived from verbal and nonverbal reasoning), and based on correlation<br />
coefficients typically reported in the psychological literature <strong>for</strong> the relationships<br />
between literacy and general ability. And whereas Turner (1997) includes several<br />
memory tests in his analysis, it is notable that, unlike all the other dyslexia screening<br />
and profiling tests considered in this Chapter, the <strong>Dyslexia</strong> Screener does not contain<br />
any tests of memory or of phonological processing. Arguably, this deficiency weakens its<br />
capability to identify children with dyslexia, particularly if they are of below average<br />
intelligence and a discrepancy is not apparent.<br />
<strong>Intervention</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dyslexia</strong> 89