25.04.2013 Views

Fluensulfone ... - IR-4 Project

Fluensulfone ... - IR-4 Project

Fluensulfone ... - IR-4 Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PTRL West <strong>Project</strong> No. 1977W<br />

Report 2 Page 25<br />

96% with a standard deviation of 7%. The confirmation ions for MCW-2, M-3625 and<br />

M-3627 yielded acceptable recoveries at both fortification levels and the overall average<br />

recoveries were acceptable. Representative chromatograms of control and fortified<br />

tomato samples are presented in Figures 29 through 31.<br />

Method validation for MCW-2, M-3625 and M-3627 in pepper followed the same<br />

method as was used in the tomato method validation. The pepper validation included<br />

with two controls, five (5) replicates at 0.01 ppm and 5 replicates at 0.10 ppm. The<br />

average percent recovery for MCW-2 was 103% at 0.01 ppm and 106% at 0.10 ppm. The<br />

overall average percent recovery of MCW-2 in peppers was 105% with a standard<br />

deviation of 9%. The average percent recovery of M-3625 was 100% at 0.01 ppm and<br />

94% at 0.10 ppm. The overall average percent recovery of M-3625 in peppers was 97%<br />

with a standard deviation of 7%. The average percent recovery of M-3627 was 84% at<br />

0.01 ppm and 95% at 0.10 ppm. The overall average percent recovery of M-3627 in<br />

peppers was 90% with a standard deviation of 7%. The confirmation ions for MCW-2,<br />

M-3625 and M-3627 yielded acceptable recoveries at both fortification levels and the<br />

overall average recoveries were acceptable in peppers. Representative control and<br />

fortified pepper chromatograms are presented in Figures 32 through 34.<br />

Method validation was similarly carried out in cucumbers. The cucumber validation<br />

included two controls, five (5) replicates at 0.01 ppm and 5 replicates at 0.10 ppm. The<br />

average percent recovery for MCW-2 was 103% at 0.01 ppm and 89% at 0.10 ppm. The<br />

overall average percent recovery of MCW-2 in cucumber was 96% with a standard<br />

deviation of 8%. The average percent recovery of M-3625 was 103% at 0.01 ppm and<br />

97% at 0.10 ppm. The overall average percent recovery of M-3625 in cucumber was<br />

100% with a standard deviation of 6%. The average percent recovery of M-3627 was<br />

86% at 0.01 ppm and 97% at 0.10 ppm. The overall average percent recovery of M-3627<br />

in cucumber was 92% with a standard deviation of 7%. The confirmation ions for MCW-<br />

2, M-3625 and M-3627 yielded acceptable recoveries at both fortification levels and the<br />

overall average recoveries were acceptable in cucumber. Representative control and<br />

fortified cucumber chromatograms are presented in Figures 35 through 37.<br />

Method validation for MCW-2, M-3625 and M-3627 in melon included with two<br />

controls, five (5) replicates at 0.01 ppm and 5 replicates at 0.10 ppm. The average percent<br />

recovery for MCW-2 was 101% at 0.01 ppm and 96% at 0.10 ppm. The overall average<br />

percent recovery of MCW-2 in melon was 98% with a standard deviation of 5%. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!