Volume 10 - Issue 1, February 15, 2008 - Lake Chapala Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Page 62 Lake Chapala Review February 2008 Pen Knife by Tom B. Stephenson Scrivener and Grandfather My grandfather had a pen knife. Not an ordinary one, but a magical knife. He used it for extra-ordinary feats. H carried it in his pocket, so I suppose you might have called it a pocket knife, but he also had a sharpener. That couldn’t have been carried in his pocket, for it was about two inches wide, eighteen inches around, and was made of sand stone. It sat on a wooden tripod, with iron fittings, and a foot pedal, and was kept in the back yard ready for instant use. Of course, there have been many kinds of knives through the ages. When a lad I had a jack knife that fit in a pocket of my lace-up boots. But grandfather had a pen knife. What use could he have had for a pen knife? For one thing, he used it to get a sharper blade than most knives had. His were of tempered carbon steel, not stainless. He claimed that stainless steel blades would not hone to the sharpness he needed, so he spent many an hour on the grind stone, honing the blades to the keenness he desired. He checked his work by shaving the hairs off of a portion of his fore-arm. When the hairs came off without the least little tugging, the blade was ready to use. Not before! Barbers used razor strops to fine-tune straight razors back when barbers shaved faces, but for Grandfather the grindstone sufficed. Since he was a Methodist Missionary preacher, he took his impatience out on the grindstone instead of cussing. A pen knife is a small folding instrument, originally used for cutting quills to make a pen nibs. To make a quill pen, the wing feather of a goose or crow is first hardened by drying. The quill is then cut to a broad edge with a special pen knife. A scrivener was a person who could read and write, normally secretarial and administrative staff who kept business, judicial, and historical records for church and government. St. Augustine, the Bishop of Hippo, used teams of such scribes, often six at a time, dictating to each in turn. They had to recut their quill pens frequently to maintain their edge. By the 18th century the width of the edge had diminished and the length of the slit had increased, creating a flexible point that produced thick and thin strokes by pressure on the point rather than by the angle at which the broad edge was held. Grandfather may have used his pen knife to whittle a goose feather, but I doubt it. He used it for whittling! Of the many things he made, with his whittling I remember mostly his whistles. Whittling whistles was usually a latespring occupation. He would select a sturdy twig from a branch, about three-quarters of an inch in diameter. He rolled it between his palms until he could slide the bark from the wood. a lengthy process. Cutting off a section about four-inches long, he cut a plug from the long end of the twig, then cut a short piece at the whistle end, He then cut a v-shaped notch in the bark and cut that off at an angle to form the business end of the whistle. Reassembling the lot, he went “TOOT - TOOT”, which could be heard clear across the wood lot. And in saying that, I realize that even without preaching, Grandfather taught!
February 2008 Lake Chapala Review Page 63 Verso by Larry Reeves The Library “F” Word Recently the New York Times carried an article about the non payment of library fines, and for some library patrons, the consequences when fines are consistently ignored. The old dime a day fines are a thing of the past. A quarter a day is the going rate in most libraries. (Note: The Lake Chapala Society library recently raised their fines to two pesos per day.) The investment a library makes in a book does not end with the purchase price. There is a considerable amount of time and some money spent by personnel to process the book before it can become part of the library collection. With book prices being what they are, and inflation, it is no wonder fine rates have increased. The library, above all, wants to get their book returned to their collection. Some libraries have in frustration turned to collection agencies or local law enforcement agencies for assistance. The fine is meant to prod the patron to return what was borrowed. For some unknown reason returning borrowed books has its own complicated psychology. I have loaned books to people who would never for a moment think about cheating me out of $25 but have no qualms about not returning my borrowed book and in at least one case denying they even borrowed it. So imagine the plight of the library with thousands of books to track and thousands of borrowers who may or may not be book honest. For some large metropolitan public libraries, the outstanding fines are in the millions of dollars so I was not surprised to read about the drastic measures taken by them to try again to get their books returned. This last resort of the libraries is drastic, at least drastic enough to catch the attention of the New York Times. When your name is given to a collection agency, it is reported to the credit reporting services and you may become a credit risk which causes your bank and credit card companies to make demands to which you are not accustomed. And all because of a couple of books you forgot to return to your library. This all may be a case of unforeseen consequences except that you have also ignored all those pleading notices. I don’t believe librarians are happy about some of their patrons losing their good credit scores but I doubt if they care much either. Many years ago a friend of mine, then the director of libraries of a large New Jersey suburb asked the local sheriff for some assistance in retrieving seriously overdue books. Since the books were government property the sheriff deputies were dispatched to retrieve them and demand payment of outstanding fines. Those patrons unable to immediately satisfy the deputy’s demands were charged with theft and locked up. From the sheriffs viewpoint the program was a success. The local newspaper however, characterized the sheriff ’s actions as raids and accused the librarian of acting unconscionably. My friend’s defense was that of unforeseen consequences. He did not want his patrons jailed. He just wanted the books back. The New York Times considered the story news that was fit to print. The Library Journal and Publisher’s Weekly also reported on the situation. My friend, a member in good standing of the American Library Association (ALA) became famous almost overnight, was soon elected to the ALA council and saw his professional career move forward. He weathered the “overdue book” storm in his community. Unfortunately he died of a heart attack while attending an ALA meeting Philadelphia a few years later. It is generally believed that his death was not due to the stress of collecting fines. Not being a public library, I no longer lend books and am prepared to forgive all those who return my books after reading this column.
Page 3 and 4:
February 2008 Lake Chapala Review P
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14: February 2008 Lake Chapala Review P
Page 37 and 38: s judged and curated by the rator f
Page 63: February 2008 Lake Chapala Review P
show all

Volume 10 - Issue 1, February 15, 2008 - Lake Chapala Review

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?