27.04.2013 Views

the_taliban_shuffle_-_kim_barker

the_taliban_shuffle_-_kim_barker

the_taliban_shuffle_-_kim_barker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

paying my salary.<br />

Many diplomats rarely poked <strong>the</strong>ir heads outside embassy walls.<br />

Many consultants traded places every six months and <strong>the</strong>n promptly<br />

repeated all <strong>the</strong> mistakes of <strong>the</strong>ir predecessors. How out of touch were<br />

<strong>the</strong>y? Employees of <strong>the</strong> Department for International Development<br />

(DFID), <strong>the</strong> British equivalent of USAID, decided it would be a good<br />

idea to throw a going-away party just before <strong>the</strong> election, with <strong>the</strong> dress<br />

code specied as “INVADERS—Alexander <strong>the</strong> Great, Hippies, Brits,<br />

Mughals, Russians, and general gratuitous fancy dress. Gorillas<br />

welcome.” It was unclear if <strong>the</strong> misspelling of “guerrillas” was<br />

intentional. Pictures of <strong>the</strong> festivities were posted on Facebook,<br />

showing one partygoer with her left breast almost hanging out of her<br />

white Grecian dress, three pirates, two aliens drinking beer, two men in<br />

turbans, a Mughal, a cowboy, a jihadi. Any member of <strong>the</strong> Afghanistan<br />

Network on Facebook—and plenty of Afghans belonged—could see <strong>the</strong><br />

photos. Well, at least it wasn’t <strong>the</strong> Tarts and Talibs <strong>the</strong>me party, thrown<br />

<strong>the</strong> year before. Graveyard of Empires, indeed.<br />

Meanwhile <strong>the</strong> invaders continued <strong>the</strong>ir invasion. By August, <strong>the</strong><br />

month of <strong>the</strong> presidential election, a record 101,000 international<br />

troops had arrived in Afghanistan, including a record 62,000 Americans,<br />

each of whom cost up to $1 million a year. In July, not coincidentally,<br />

a record number of international troops had been killed, largely by<br />

roadside bombs, <strong>the</strong> weapon of choice of weaker insurgents determined<br />

to wait out <strong>the</strong>ir enemies. Military spending in Afghanistan was set to<br />

exceed Iraq for <strong>the</strong> rst time. The United States was also now spending<br />

$200 million a month on civilian governance and development<br />

programs—double that under Bush, an amount equal to <strong>the</strong> nonmilitary<br />

spending in Iraq during its heyday. Too bad it was having such a hard<br />

time attracting USAID employees to ll those jobs—one USAID ocial<br />

conded that <strong>the</strong> agency would be lucky to get <strong>the</strong> C-team of<br />

applicants. Almost eight years into this war, mustering new enthusiasm<br />

was difficult.<br />

Regardless, signicant results needed to be shown in <strong>the</strong> next year, in<br />

time for <strong>the</strong> 2012 U.S. presidential election. The United States kept<br />

reviewing its strategy and redening success; <strong>the</strong> goal posts kept<br />

shifting. Our partners seemed equally tired—Canada had just reiterated<br />

it would pull its 2,830 troops by 2011, and <strong>the</strong> 84 soldiers promised by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!