28.04.2013 Views

use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ...

use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ...

use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 Use <strong>of</strong> Tumor Markers <strong>in</strong> Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, <strong>and</strong> Ovarian Cancers<br />

lymph node-negative <strong>breast</strong> cancer patients identified by urok<strong>in</strong>ase-type<br />

plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator <strong>and</strong> plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibitor type 1. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:913–920.<br />

363. Duffy MJ. Urok<strong>in</strong>ase plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator <strong>and</strong> its <strong>in</strong>hibitor,<br />

PAI-1, as prognostic <strong>markers</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer: from pilot to level<br />

1 evidence studies. Cl<strong>in</strong> Chem 2002;48:1194–1197.<br />

364. Harbeck N, Kates RE, Schmitt M. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical relevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

factors urok<strong>in</strong>ase-type plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator <strong>and</strong> plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen<br />

activator <strong>in</strong>hibitor type 1 for <strong>in</strong>dividualized therapy decisions <strong>in</strong><br />

primary <strong>breast</strong> cancer is greatest when <strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

J Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 2002;20:1000–1007.<br />

365. Harbeck N, Kates RE, Look MP, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Klijn<br />

JG, Kruger A, et al. Enhanced benefit from adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy <strong>in</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer patients classified high-risk<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to urok<strong>in</strong>ase-type plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator (uPA) <strong>and</strong><br />

plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator <strong>in</strong>hibitor type 1 (n = 3424). Cancer Res<br />

2002;62:4617–4622.<br />

366. Benraad TJ, Geurts-Moespot J, Grondahl-Hansen J, Schmitt M,<br />

Heuvel JJ, de Witte JH, et al. Immunoassays (ELISA) <strong>of</strong> urok<strong>in</strong>ase-type<br />

plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator (uPA): report <strong>of</strong> an EORTC/<br />

BIOMED-1 workshop. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1371–1381.<br />

367. Sweep CG, Geurts-Moespot J, Grebenschikov N, de Witte JH,<br />

Heuvel JJ, Schmitt M, et al. External quality assessment <strong>of</strong> trans-<br />

European multicentre antigen determ<strong>in</strong>ations (enzyme-l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

immunosorbent assay) <strong>of</strong> urok<strong>in</strong>ase-type plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator<br />

(uPA) <strong>and</strong> its type 1 <strong>in</strong>hibitor (PAI-1) <strong>in</strong> human <strong>breast</strong> cancer<br />

tissue extracts. Br J Cancer 1998;78:1434–1441.<br />

368. Janicke F, Pache L, Schmitt M, Ulm K, Thomssen C, Prechtl<br />

A, Graeff H. Both the cytosols <strong>and</strong> detergent extracts <strong>of</strong> <strong>breast</strong><br />

cancer tissues are suited to evaluate the prognostic impact <strong>of</strong><br />

the urok<strong>in</strong>ase-type plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator <strong>and</strong> its <strong>in</strong>hibitor,<br />

plasm<strong>in</strong>ogen activator <strong>in</strong>hibitor type 1. Cancer Res 1994;<br />

54:2527–2530.<br />

369. Abraha RS, Thomssen C, Harbeck N, Mueller V, Baack K,<br />

Schmitt M, et al. Micromethod for determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> uPA <strong>and</strong><br />

PAI-1 from preoperative core-needle biopsies <strong>in</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer.<br />

Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;82:S144.<br />

370. Schmitt M, Lienert S, Prechtel D, Sedlaczek E, Welk ARU, et<br />

al., et al. The urok<strong>in</strong>ase protease system as a target for <strong>breast</strong><br />

cancer prognosis <strong>and</strong> therapy: technical considerations.<br />

Procedure for the quantitative determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> urok<strong>in</strong>ase (uPA)<br />

<strong>and</strong> its <strong>in</strong>hibitor PAI-1 <strong>in</strong> human <strong>breast</strong> cancer tissue extracts by<br />

ELISA, Vol.: Breast Cancer Protocols, 2005.<br />

371. Mol<strong>in</strong>a R, Barak V, van DA, Duffy MJ, E<strong>in</strong>arsson R, Gion M,<br />

et al. Tumor <strong>markers</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer - European Group on Tumor<br />

Markers recommendations. Tumour Biol 2005;26:281–293.<br />

372. Pestalozzi BC, Luporsi-Gely E, Jost LM, Bergh J. ESMO<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant<br />

treatment <strong>and</strong> follow-up <strong>of</strong> primary <strong>breast</strong> cancer. Ann Oncol<br />

2005;16 Suppl 1:i7–i9.<br />

373. Kataja VV, Colleoni M, Bergh J. ESMO M<strong>in</strong>imum Cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment <strong>and</strong> follow-up <strong>of</strong><br />

locally recurrent or metastatic <strong>breast</strong> cancer (MBC). Ann Oncol<br />

2005;16 Suppl 1:i10–i12.<br />

374. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann<br />

B, Senn HJ. Progress <strong>and</strong> promise: highlights <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

expert consensus on the primary therapy <strong>of</strong> early <strong>breast</strong><br />

cancer 2007. Ann Oncol 2007;18:1133–1144.<br />

375. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravd<strong>in</strong> P, Taube S,<br />

et al. American Society <strong>of</strong> Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Oncology 2007 Update <strong>of</strong><br />

Recommendations for the Use <strong>of</strong> Tumor Markers <strong>in</strong> Breast<br />

Cancer. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 2007:In press. [e-pub ahead <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t].<br />

376. Jager W. The early detection <strong>of</strong> dissem<strong>in</strong>ated (metastasized)<br />

<strong>breast</strong> cancer by serial tumour marker measurements. Eur J<br />

Cancer Prev 1993;2 Suppl 3:133–139.<br />

377. Nicol<strong>in</strong>i A, Anselmi L, Michelassi C, Carpi A. Prolonged survival<br />

by ‘early’ salvage treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer patients: a<br />

retrospective 6-year study. Br J Cancer 1997;76:1106–1111.<br />

378. Kovner F, Merimsky O, Hareuveni M, Wigler N, Chaitchik S.<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> disease-negative but muc<strong>in</strong>-like carc<strong>in</strong>oma-associated<br />

antigen-positive <strong>breast</strong> cancer patients with tamoxifen: prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

results <strong>of</strong> a prospective controlled r<strong>and</strong>omized trial.<br />

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994;35:80–83.<br />

379. Hayes DF, Kiang DT, Korzum AH, Tond<strong>in</strong>i C, Wood WC, Kufe<br />

DW. CA15-3 <strong>and</strong> CEA spikes dur<strong>in</strong>g chemotherapy for metastatic<br />

<strong>breast</strong> cancer. Proc Am Soc Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 1998;7:38.<br />

380. Yasasever V, D<strong>in</strong>cer M, Camlica H, Karaloglu D, Dalay N.<br />

Utility <strong>of</strong> CA 15-3 <strong>and</strong> CEA <strong>in</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>breast</strong> cancer patients<br />

with bone metastases: special emphasis on “spik<strong>in</strong>g” phenomena.<br />

Cl<strong>in</strong> Biochem 1997;30:53–56.<br />

381. Duffy MJ. Serum <strong>tumor</strong> <strong>markers</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer: are they <strong>of</strong><br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical value? Cl<strong>in</strong> Chem 2006;52:345–351.<br />

382. Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, Botk<strong>in</strong> J, Kahn MJ, Lynch P, et al.<br />

Recommendations for follow-up care <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with an <strong>in</strong>herited<br />

predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 <strong>and</strong> BRCA2. Cancer<br />

Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA 1997;277:997–1003.<br />

383. Nelson HD, Huffman LH, Fu R, Harris EL. Genetic risk assessment<br />

<strong>and</strong> BRCA mutation test<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>breast</strong> <strong>and</strong> ovarian cancer<br />

susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the U.S.<br />

Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:<br />

362–379.<br />

384. US Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment <strong>and</strong><br />

BRCA mutation test<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>breast</strong> <strong>and</strong> ovarian cancer susceptibility:<br />

Recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2005;<br />

143:355–361.<br />

385. Sotiriou C, Piccart MJ. Tak<strong>in</strong>g gene-expression pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ic: when will molecular signatures become relevant to patient<br />

care? Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:545–553.<br />

386. Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L, Weigelt B, Nuyten DS, Nobel AB,<br />

et al. Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for<br />

<strong>breast</strong> cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:560–569.<br />

387. van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van dV, M.J., He YD, Hart AA, Mao M,<br />

et al. Gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g predicts cl<strong>in</strong>ical outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>breast</strong> cancer. Nature 2002;415:530–536.<br />

388. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil<br />

DW, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor <strong>of</strong> survival<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1999–2009.<br />

389. Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Glas AM,<br />

et al. Validation <strong>and</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical utility <strong>of</strong> a 70-gene prognostic signature<br />

for women with node-negative <strong>breast</strong> cancer. J Natl<br />

Cancer Inst 2006;98:1183–1192.<br />

390. Cardoso F, Van’t Veer L, Rutgers E, Loi S, Mook S, Piccart-<br />

Gebhart MJ. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical application <strong>of</strong> the 70-gene pr<strong>of</strong>ile: the<br />

MINDACT trial. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 2008;26:729–735.<br />

391. Paik S. Development <strong>and</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical utility <strong>of</strong> a 21-gene recurrence<br />

score prognostic assay <strong>in</strong> patients with early <strong>breast</strong> cancer<br />

treated with tamoxifen. Oncologist 2007;12:631–635.<br />

392. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cron<strong>in</strong> M, et al. A multigene<br />

assay to predict recurrence <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen-treated node-negative<br />

<strong>breast</strong> cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;347:2817–2826.<br />

393. Habel LA, Shak S, Jacobs MK, Capra A, Alex<strong>and</strong>er C, Pho M,<br />

et al. A population-based study <strong>of</strong> <strong>tumor</strong> gene expression <strong>and</strong><br />

risk <strong>of</strong> <strong>breast</strong> cancer death among lymph node-negative patients.<br />

Breast Cancer Res 2006;8:R25.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!