06.05.2013 Views

screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

aga<strong>in</strong>st S. litura on <strong>groundnut</strong> <strong>and</strong> also found more persistent on <strong>groundnut</strong> foliage dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

kharif which was up to ten days.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Hegde (2001) the mycopathogen @ 2×10 8 conidia per litre sprayed<br />

thrice aga<strong>in</strong>st S. litura <strong>in</strong> potato at 15 days <strong>in</strong>terval from 50 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g proved as<br />

effective as SlNPV <strong>and</strong> Bt <strong>and</strong> reduced the <strong>defoliators</strong> up to 32 per cent.<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> host plants on the response <strong>of</strong> S. litura to N. rileyi <strong>in</strong>dicated that larvae<br />

fed on <strong>groundnut</strong> were more susceptible by record<strong>in</strong>g the lowest LC50 value <strong>of</strong> 5.79 × 10 6<br />

conidia per litre followed by soybean 5.98 × 10 6 conidia per litre, potato 6.96 × 10 6 conidia per<br />

litre <strong>and</strong> highest when feed on cotton 7.84 × 10 6 (Kulkarni <strong>and</strong> L<strong>in</strong>gappa, 2001).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Navi (2002) spray<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> N. rileyi @ 1×10 11 conidia per hectare was most<br />

effective <strong>in</strong> soybean <strong>and</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong> <strong>in</strong> large scale demonstration <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g larval population<br />

to the extent <strong>of</strong> 28 <strong>and</strong> 62 per cent <strong>in</strong> soybean, 33 <strong>and</strong> 77 per cent <strong>in</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong> after first <strong>and</strong><br />

second spray respectively.<br />

Manjula et al. (2004) record the occurrence <strong>of</strong> N. rileyi on S. litura <strong>and</strong> H. armigera <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>groundnut</strong> fields <strong>in</strong> Anantapur (Andhra Pradesh, India) <strong>and</strong> adjacent areas. The numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

cadavers <strong>and</strong> live larvae were recorded at fortnightly <strong>in</strong>tervals from September 2001 until the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the cropp<strong>in</strong>g season. N. rileyi was <strong>in</strong>itially observed dur<strong>in</strong>g the first fortnight <strong>of</strong><br />

September, <strong>and</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection gradually <strong>in</strong>creased to 5-10, 25-50 <strong>and</strong> 50-100% dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the second fortnight <strong>of</strong> September, first fortnight <strong>of</strong> October <strong>and</strong> second fortnight <strong>of</strong> October,<br />

respectively. These periods were characterized by a mean maximum temperature <strong>of</strong> 31-32 ° C,<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum temperature <strong>of</strong> 22-23 ° C, morn<strong>in</strong>g relative humidity (RH) <strong>of</strong> 79-84%, <strong>and</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g RH<br />

<strong>of</strong> 29-42%.<br />

Nagaraja, (2005) reported that <strong>in</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong> crop ecosystem, different formulations <strong>of</strong><br />

N. rileyi <strong>and</strong> spray equ<strong>ipm</strong>ents were evaluated, the results <strong>in</strong>dicated that oil based formulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> N. rileyi with knapsack sprayer recorded significantly higher mycosis (47.43%), followed by<br />

wettable powder <strong>and</strong> crude formulation.<br />

A field experiment was conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2001 kharif <strong>in</strong> medium black soils <strong>in</strong><br />

India to study the effect <strong>of</strong> resistant (Dh-53, GPBD-4, Dh-74, Dh-86, Dh-22 (red), ICGV<br />

86590, Dh-995, <strong>and</strong> Dh-22 (tan)) <strong>and</strong> susceptible <strong>genotypes</strong> (ICGV-92242 <strong>and</strong> Jl-24) <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>groundnut</strong> on the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> S. litura. The reduction <strong>of</strong> the larval population due to the spray<br />

<strong>of</strong> N. rileyi was compared with Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE), <strong>in</strong>secticide (qu<strong>in</strong>alphos<br />

0.05%) spray. Insecticidal spray recorded significantly lower larval population (3.18, 2.53 <strong>and</strong><br />

0.82 larvae/m row at 40, 55 <strong>and</strong> 70 DAS, respectively) <strong>and</strong> leaflet damage <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

<strong>genotypes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong>. Significantly higher yield (16.89 q/ha) <strong>and</strong> lowest leaflet damage was<br />

recorded <strong>in</strong> qu<strong>in</strong>alphos spray, whereas, N. rileyi <strong>and</strong> NSKE were next best <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> yield<br />

(14.04 <strong>and</strong> 13.83 q/ha) with lesser leaflet damage (Navi et al., 2006).<br />

Rachappa <strong>and</strong> L<strong>in</strong>gappa (2007) conducted experiments dur<strong>in</strong>g 2000-01 <strong>and</strong> 2001-02<br />

at Bailhongal <strong>and</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g 2000-01 <strong>and</strong> 2002-03 at Dharwad, Karnataka, India, to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the seasonal occurrence <strong>of</strong> N. rileyi <strong>in</strong> relation to time <strong>and</strong> crop ecosystem. Fungal <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

was more abundant on pests <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g soyabean <strong>and</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong> ecosystems at both<br />

locations, e.g. Spodoptera litura, T. orichalcea <strong>and</strong> H. armigera. These crops, aside from<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g suitable for host <strong>in</strong>sect build-up <strong>and</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g congenial microclimate with their host,<br />

predisposed the <strong>in</strong>sect larvae to higher <strong>and</strong> quicker <strong>in</strong>fection.<br />

2.2.5 Integrated pest management for Spodoptera litura (F.)<br />

Mahesh (1996) reported that <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g tolerant varieties, rais<strong>in</strong>g trap crops<br />

like castor <strong>and</strong> sunflower around the fields <strong>and</strong> with<strong>in</strong> the field respectively. These trap crops<br />

will act as perches for predatory birds <strong>and</strong> lay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> eggs on the broader leaves as per the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the pest. Installation <strong>of</strong> pheromone traps to predict oviposition, application <strong>of</strong><br />

neem seed kernel extract dur<strong>in</strong>g early stages <strong>of</strong> the crop <strong>and</strong> spray<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> NPV @ 250 LE per<br />

hectare will be a good management strategy for S. litura <strong>in</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!